Forensic odontology integrates dentistry and law to aid in human identification, age estimation, bite mark analysis, and disaster victim identification. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) imaging technologies, including Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Micro-CT, Multislice CT (MSCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 3D surface scanning, and 3D printing, has revolutionized the field by providing high-resolution, volumetric, and interactive visualization of dental and craniofacial structures. These modalities enable precise morphological analyses, accurate antemortem-postmortem comparisons, trauma assessment, and facial reconstruction, while enhancing reproducibility, courtroom admissibility, and non-invasive evidence preservation. Despite challenges such as cost, radiation exposure, and the need for standardized protocols, 3D imaging significantly improves the accuracy, reliability, and legal robustness of forensic investigations. Future directions include integration with artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality simulations, expanded use in Disaster Victim Identification (DVI), and the development of global forensic 3D databases, further advancing precision, efficiency, and applicability in complex forensic scenarios.
Introduction
Forensic odontology is the intersection of dentistry and law, focusing on dental evidence for identification, age estimation, bite mark analysis, trauma assessment, and disaster victim identification (DVI). Traditionally reliant on 2D radiographs (IOPA, OPG), forensic investigations faced limitations such as distortion and incomplete anatomical representation. The advent of 3D imaging technologies—including CBCT, micro-CT, MSCT, MRI, 3D surface scanning, stereophotogrammetry, and 3D printing—has transformed the field by enabling precise, volumetric, and interactive visualization of dental and craniofacial structures.
CBCT provides high-resolution, low-radiation 3D imaging for postmortem identification, age estimation, bite mark analysis, and trauma evaluation.
Micro-CT allows microstructural analysis of teeth for age estimation and individual identification, while MSCT offers whole-body volumetric imaging, aiding DVI and virtual autopsies.
MRI enhances soft tissue visualization, crucial for pulp vitality assessment, trauma detection, and forensic documentation.
3D surface scanning and stereophotogrammetry enable accurate facial reconstruction, bite mark analysis, and precise antemortem-postmortem comparisons.
3D printing converts digital datasets into tangible models for courtroom presentation, craniofacial reconstruction, and bite mark replication.
Applications include human identification, age and sex determination, bite mark evaluation, trauma analysis, DVI, and facial reconstruction. Advantages of 3D imaging include high precision, non-invasive evidence preservation, reproducibility, interactive visualization, and improved courtroom communication. Limitations involve high cost, limited accessibility, radiation concerns, lack of standardized protocols, and legal/ethical considerations.
Conclusion
The future of 3D imaging in forensic odontology is poised to be transformed by the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, which can automate analysis, improve pattern recognition, and enhance the speed and accuracy of identification, age estimation, and bite mark comparisons. Virtual and augmented reality technologies offer new avenues for immersive forensic case simulations, allowing investigators, students, and legal professionals to interact with digital reconstructions in a realistic, controlled environment. The broader application of 3D imaging in Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) protocols can streamline postmortem examinations, reduce handling of fragile remains, and accelerate the reconciliation of antemortem and postmortem data. Additionally, the development of global forensic 3D imaging databases would facilitate standardized data sharing, cross-institutional collaboration, and the creation of reference models to support research, training, and legal investigations. Together, these innovations promise to enhance precision, reproducibility, and the legal robustness of forensic odontology while expanding its applicability in complex and large-scale investigative scenarios.
References
[1] Kahana T, Hiss J. Forensic radiology. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:129–33. doi: 10.1259/bjr.72.854.10365061.
[2] Mohammed F, Fairozekhan AT, Bhat S, et al. Forensic Odontology. [Updated 2023 Aug 14]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/
[3] Prajapati G, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Shelke P, Awan KH, Patil S. Role of forensic odontology in the identification of victims of major mass disasters across the world: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199791.
[4] Johnson A. Forensic odontology: A paradigm shift in the Indian context. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(3):117–117.
[5] Ali HJ, Choudhari M, Hande A. Scope and relevance of forensic odontology in India – a review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2022;44(3):1–3.
[6] Manigandan T, Sumathy C, Elumalai M, Sathasivasubramanian S, Kannan A. Forensic radiology in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S260-4. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155944. PMID: 26015728; PMCID: PMC4439688.
[7] Viner MD, Robson J. Post-mortem forensic dental radiography – a review of current techniques and future developments. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2017;8:22-37.
[8] Role of 3D cone beam computed tomography imaging in forensic dentistry: a review of literature. Indian J Forensic Odontol. 2018;11(2):27-32. doi:10.21088/ijfo.0974.505X.11218.5.
[9] Vijayashree V, Manigandan T, Ramraghav R. Application of CBCT in forensic odontology. TPM. 2025;32(S5):675. Available from: https://www.tpmap.org/
[10] Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017 Dec 2;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.00289. PMID: 29354314; PMCID: PMC5750833.
[11] Sarment DP, Christensen AM. The use of cone beam computed tomography in forensic radiology. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014;2(4):173-81.
[12] Issrani R, Prabhu N, Sghaireen MG, Ganji KK, Alqahtani AMA, ALJamaan TS, Alanazi AM, Alanazi SH, Alam MK, Munisekhar MS. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A New Tool on the Horizon for Forensic Dentistry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;19(9):5352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095352. PMID: 35564747; PMCID: PMC9104190.
[13] Patel S, Gupta R, Pawar AM, Dhoble P, Kaur M, Raj V. Endodontics and forensic personal identification. Eur Endod J. 2020;3(4):271-6.
[14] Thurzo A, Jan?ovi?ová V, Hain M, Thurzo M, Novák B, Kosná?ová H, Lehotská V, Varga I, Ková? P, Moravanský N. Human Remains Identification Using Micro-CT, Chemometric and AI Methods in Forensic Experimental Reconstruction of Dental Patterns after Concentrated Sulphuric Acid Significant Impact. Molecules. 2022 Jun 23;27(13):4035. doi: 10.3390/molecules27134035. PMID: 35807281; PMCID: PMC9268125.
[15] Assari, A. , Al Bukairi, M. and Al Saif, R. (2024) Micro-Computed Tomography Applications in Dentistry. Open Journal of Stomatology, 14, 32-41. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2024.141003.
[16] Zainuddin MZ, Mohamad NS, Su Keng T, Mohd Yusof MYP. The applications of MicroCT in studying age-related tooth morphological change and dental age estimation: A scoping review. J Forensic Sci. 2023 Nov;68(6):2048-2056. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15352. Epub 2023 Aug 2. PMID: 37529884.
[17] Rai, S., Misra, D., Misra, A., Kalita, P., & Krishna, A. (2022). Forensic outlook of Maxillofacial Radiology – An inevitable tool revisited. UNIVERSITYJOURNALOF DENTALSCIENCES, 8(3). 104-108
[18] Zhang M. Forensic imaging: a powerful tool in modern forensic investigation. Forensic Sci Res. 2022 Mar 7;7(3):385-392. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.2008705. PMID: 36353311; PMCID: PMC9639533.
[19] Babshet M, R S. 3D-modeling: the third eye of forensic odontologists. Int J Sci Res. 2020;9(4). doi:10.36106/INTERNATIONALJOURNALOFSCIENTIFICRESEARCH.
[20] Jani, G., Lavin, W. S., Ludhwani, S., & Johnson, A. (2020). An Overview of Three Dimensional (3D) Technologies in Forensic Odontology. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 12(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/12/1/2020.4
[21] Navic P, Inthasan C, Chaimongkhol T, Mahakkanukrauh P. Facial reconstruction using 3-D computerized method: A scoping review of methods, current status, and future developments. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2023;62:102239.
[22] Chaudhary, R. K., Doggalli, N., Chandrakant, H., & Patil, K. (2018). Current and evolving applications of three-dimensional printing in forensic odontology: A review. 3(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJFO.IJFO_28_18
[23] Kurniawan A, Alias A, Yusof MYPM, Marya A. Optimization of forensic identification through 3-dimensional imaging analysis of labial tooth surface using open-source software. Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Mar;54(1):63-69. doi: 10.5624/isd.20230218. Epub 2024 Feb 22. PMID: 38571779; PMCID: PMC10985530.
[24] Perkins H, Chiam TL, Forrest A, Higgins D. 3D dental images in forensic odontology: A scoping review of superimposition approaches utilizing 3D imaging. Forensic Imaging. 2025;40:200622.
[25] Ishwarkumar-Govender S, Nalla S. 3D technologies in dental arcade forensic research – A scoping review. Transl Res Anat. 2024;36:100313
[26] Evans, Sam & Jones, Carl & Plassmann, Peter. (2010). 3D Imaging in Forensic Odontology. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine. 33. 63-8. 10.3109/17453054.2010.481780.
[27] Patil PS. 3-D Printing in Forensic Odontology. Int J Dent Med Sci Res. 2023;5(5):62–6
[28] Jani, G., Lavin, W. S., Ludhwani, S., & Johnson, A. (2021). An Overview of Three Dimensional (3D) Technologies in Forensic Odontology. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 12(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.18311/JFDS/12/1/2020.4
[29] Eliášová, H., & Dostálová, T. (2017). 3D Multislice and Cone-beam Computed Tomography Systems for Dental Identification. Prague Medical Report, 118(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2017.2
[30] Abduo, J., & Bennamoun, M. (2013). Three-dimensional image registration as a tool for forensic odontology: a preliminary investigation. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 34(3), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0B013E31829F6A29