Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become a cornerstone of modern orthodontics, offering aesthetic, comfortable, and efficient alternatives to conventional braces. Accurate staging of tooth movements is essential for treatment success, yet traditional manual workflows are prone to errors, inconsistencies, and prolonged treatment duration. The advent of 3D printing, coupled with AI-assisted digital workflows, has transformed aligner fabrication by enabling both indirect model-based and direct aligner printing with biocompatible photopolymer resins. These technologies improve precision, reproducibility, and patient-specific customization while reducing production time and material waste. Treatment planning software with machine learning optimizes force application and predicts tooth movements, enhancing clinical outcomes. Factors such as printer type, resin properties, layer thickness, and algorithm sophistication critically influence staging accuracy. Overall, the integration of 3D printing, advanced materials, and digital planning establishes a new paradigm in orthodontics, enabling faster, more accurate, and patient-centered aligner therapy with potential for teleorthodontic monitoring and same-day production.
Introduction
Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become a major advancement in orthodontics, driven by the need for accurate, controlled staging of tooth movements. Each aligner typically moves teeth 0.15–0.25 mm per stage, making precise digital modeling essential to ensure predictable biomechanics and treatment success. Traditional manual fabrication methods were slow, inconsistent, and unsuitable for complex cases. The introduction of 3D printing—especially SLA and DLP—has transformed aligner production by offering higher precision, improved reproducibility, faster workflows, and compatibility with AI-driven staging algorithms. Advances in materials, including durable and transparent light-cured resins, support the structural reliability and biocompatibility required for aligner therapy.
The literature shows that 3D-printed aligners achieve high dimensional accuracy, enhanced fit, and clinically acceptable tooth-movement precision, with reported accuracies of 64–72% for most tooth movements and near-perfect accuracy for transverse dimensions. New resin formulations with shape-memory properties also improve biomechanical control. However, challenges persist regarding long-term material behavior, surface quality, and the lack of standardized testing protocols, highlighting the need for more clinical trials.
Multiple 3D printing technologies serve orthodontic applications. SLA offers high precision and smooth surfaces; DLP provides rapid, accurate, high-volume production; FDM remains limited to non-clinical uses; and PolyJet printing enables multi-material, high-detail models at higher cost. Material selection is critical: biocompatible photopolymer resins are used for dental models, while thermoplastics such as PU, PETG, PC, and multilayer polymers are commonly used for traditional thermoformed aligners. Emerging directly printed aligners made from resins like Tera Harz TC-85 eliminate thermoforming distortion and support same-day fabrication.
The digital workflow integrates intraoral scanning, CBCT imaging, AI-assisted treatment planning, and 3D printing to improve diagnostic accuracy, streamline production, and enable remote monitoring. Staging accuracy depends on printer technology, resin properties, curing protocols, layer thickness, and planning software sophistication. Optimizing these factors enhances treatment efficiency, reduces refinements, and improves patient comfort and clinical outcomes.
Conclusion
3D printing has revolutionized aligner staging by enhancing precision, efficiency, and patient-specific customization. Direct printing of clear aligners eliminates the need for thermoforming, streamlining production and improving material consistency. ombined with biocompatible materials and teleorthodontic integration, these advancements support more effective, patient-centered orthodontic care.
References
[1] Konda P, Rafiq AM. 3D printing: Changing the landscape of orthodontics [Internet]. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res. 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 16];10(3):149-157. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2024.029
[2] AlMogbel A. Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article. J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:37. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_30_23. PMID: 37881665; PMCID: PMC10597356.
[3] Abreu LG, Drumond VZ, Mesquita RA, Bernabé E, Almeida de Arruda JA. Optimising clear aligner therapy: What current evidence says about materials, attachments, and protocols. Semin Orthod. [Internet]. 2025 Jul 29 [cited 2025 Oct 16]
[4] https://sprintray.com/learn-3d-printing-clear-aligner-workflow-cloud-design/
[5] Alkhamees A. The new additive era of orthodontics: 3D-printed aligners and shape memory polymers-the latest trend-and their environmental implications. J Orthod Sci. 2024 Nov 25;13:55. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_211_23. PMID: 39758107; PMCID: PMC11698253.
[6] Dubey, S., Dash, B. P., Mohanty, B., Jena, S., Sahoo, N., & Singh, S. (2025). 3D printing in orthodontics - Past, present and future: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bioinformation. https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300211766
[7] Shahana, S., Kumar, J., Mearish, P., & Manas, G. (2025). Direct printed aligners: a paradigm shift in digital orthodontics. International Journal of Scientific Research, 26–28. https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/9106920
[8] Retrouvey, J.-M. (2025). Assessment of active memory of photo-curable resins for LuxCreo DCA direct-printed 3D aligners. APOS Trends in Orthodontics, 0, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_61_2025
[9] Jungbauer, R., Sabbagh, H., Janji? Rankovi?, M., & Becker, K. (2024). 3D Printed Orthodontic Aligners—A Scoping Review. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10084. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210084
[10] Narongdej, P., Hassanpour, M., Alterman, N., Rawlins-Buchanan, F., & Barjasteh, E. (2024). Advancements in Clear Aligner Fabrication: A Comprehensive Review of Direct-3D Printing Technologies. Polymers, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16030371
[11] Camenisch, L., Polychronis, G., Panayi, N. C., Makou, O., Papageorgiou, S. N., Zinelis, S., & Eliades, T. (2024). Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00511-0
[12] Jun, M.-K., Kim, J. W., & Ku, H. (2025). 3D Printing in Dentistry: A Scoping Review of Clinical Applications, Advantages, and Current Limitations. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1346.v1
[13] Li, H. (2023). 3D printing in orthodontics: A narrative review. Journal of International Oral Health: JIOH, 15(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_83_22
[14] Avolese, S., Parrini, S., Lugas, A. T., Bignardi, C., Terzini, M., Guajardo Cantu, V., Castroflorio, T., Grifalconi, E., Scotti, N., & Sanna, F. (2025). A Comparison Between the Expansion Force Exerted by Thermo-Printed Aligners and 3D Printed Aligners: An In Vitro Study. Bioengineering, 12(9), 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090912
[15] Zinelis S, Panayi N, Polychronis G, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners produced by different contemporary 3D printers. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022 Aug;25(3):336-341. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12537. Epub 2021 Oct 4. PMID: 34569692; PMCID: PMC9544566.
[16] Kumar GS, Dharshini CP, Soman PS, Abraham A. 3D printing – A paradigm shift in orthodontic appliances and patient care [Internet]. J Dent Panacea. 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 16];6(4):171-180. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.2024.035
[17] Gökmen ?, Görgülü S, Topsakal KG, Duran GS. Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models. Turk J Orthod. 2024 Dec 31;37(4):257-264. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.8.
[18] Ergül T, Güleç A, Göymen M. The Use of 3D Printers in Orthodontics - A Narrative Review. Turk J Orthod. 2023 Jun 22;36(2):134-142. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0074. PMID: 37346463; PMCID: PMC10318848.
[19] Prakash J, Shenoy M, Alhasmi A, Al Saleh AA, C SG, Shivakumar S. Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Dental Resins: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Jan 5;16(1):e51721. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51721. PMID: 38318586; PMCID: PMC10839546.
[20] Guttridge C, Shannon A, O\'Sullivan A, O\'Sullivan KJ, O\'Sullivan LW. Biocompatible 3D printing resins for medical applications: A review of marketed intended use, biocompatibility certification, and post-processing guidance. Ann 3D Print Med. 2022 Mar;5:100044.
[21] Guerrero-Gironés J, López-García S, Pecci-Lloret MR, Pecci-Lloret MP, Rodríguez Lozano FJ, García-Bernal D. In vitro biocompatibility testing of 3D printing and conventional resins for occlusal devices. J Dent. 2022 Aug;123:104163.
[22] Francisco I, Paula AB, Ribeiro M, Marques F, Travassos R, Nunes C, Pereira F, Marto CM, Carrilho E, Vale F. The Biological Effects of 3D Resins Used in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jan 3;9(1):15. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9010015. PMID: 35049724; PMCID: PMC8773237.
[23] Meade MJ, Ng E, Weir T. Digital treatment planning and clear aligner therapy: A retrospective cohort study. J Orthod. 2023 Dec;50(4):361-366. doi: 10.1177/14653125231166015. Epub 2023 Apr 1. PMID: 37002790; PMCID: PMC10693725.
[24] Migliorati M, Drago S, Castroflorio T, Pesce P, Battista G, Campobasso A, Gastaldi G, Valvecchi FF, Mari A. Accuracy of orthodontic movements with 3D printed aligners: A prospective observational pilot study. Korean J Orthod. 2024 May 25;54(3):160-170. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.268. Epub 2024 Apr 8. PMID: 38800861; PMCID: PMC11129935.
[25] Torkomian T, de la Iglesia F, Puigdollers A. 3D-printed clear aligners: An emerging alternative to the conventional thermoformed aligners? – A systematic review. J Dent. 2025 Apr;155:105616.