Radar vs. Stealth: A Critical Analysis of Evasion and Detection Technologies in Contemporary Warfare

Abstract

The ongoing technological competition between stealth and radar systems represents one of the most innovative fields in modern military science. Stealth technology is designed to reduce an object\'s radar detectability and other surveillance systems, mostly by modifying radar cross-section (RCS) through architectural design, radar-absorbent materials (RAM), and electronic countermeasures. Radar systems, on the other hand, are continuously evolving, developing complex techniques to detect and track stealth platforms. These technologies include low-frequency radar, bistatic and multistatic radar configurations, passive detection systems, as well as revolutionary techniques such as quantum radar. This paper presents a two-sided analysis: first, the mechanisms and effectiveness of stealth technologies; and second, evaluating radar innovations developed to counteract such benefits. Through detailed technical descriptions, comparative studies, and practical case studies, we explore the dynamic relationship between evasion and detection

Introduction

Quantum Radar and Stealth vs. Radar Technologies Overview

Stealth and radar technologies have evolved as opposing forces in modern warfare. Radar detects objects by emitting electromagnetic waves and analyzing reflections, while stealth technologies aim to reduce an object’s radar detectability, primarily by manipulating shape, materials, and electronic countermeasures (ECM).

Radar Fundamentals:

• Radar works by sending pulses and detecting reflected signals to determine target distance, velocity, and direction.

• Radar Cross Section (RCS) measures an object's detectability, influenced by shape, material, frequency, and angle.

• Different radar types exist (monostatic, bistatic/multistatic, passive) and use various frequency bands.

Stealth Technology:

• Uses structural shaping to deflect radar waves (e.g., angular surfaces on the F-117, smooth curves on the B-2).

• Employs radar-absorbent materials (RAM) that absorb rather than reflect radar signals, usually targeting X-band frequencies.

• Designs internal features like hidden weapon bays and engine intakes to reduce radar and infrared signatures.

• Active ECM techniques (jamming, spoofing, decoys) further confuse enemy radars.

Radar Advances to Detect Stealth:

• Low-frequency radars (VHF/UHF) can detect stealth aircraft because stealth designs focus on higher frequencies.

• Bistatic and multistatic radars use spatially separated transmitters and receivers to observe stealth planes from multiple angles.

• Passive radar exploits existing civilian signals to detect stealth aircraft without emitting detectable signals.

• Quantum radar (experimental) uses quantum entanglement for improved detection in noisy environments and may counter stealth and ECM in the future.

Case Study – F-117 Shoot-Down (1999):

• An F-117 stealth fighter was downed by Yugoslav forces using older Soviet S-125 missiles aided by low-frequency radars and multiple radar sites.

• The incident highlighted weaknesses in stealth tactics, especially predictable flight paths and vulnerability to low-frequency detection.

• It underscored the importance of electronic warfare, multistatic/passive radars, and adaptive mission planning in countering stealth.

Conclusion

The continuous battle between stealth and radar detection is one of the most important characters of new concepts in defense innovation. Stealth technology seeks to minimize visibility by using shaping, radar-absorbent material, and electronic countermeasures across the electromagnetic spectrum. As radar developers, with some collaboration from the partner developers, develop more capable systems that use low frequency, multistatic configurations, passive configurations, and quantum. This paper presented the concepts and mechanisms each side of the equation apply to maintain their edge, revealing that the battlefield does not go one way. Valid patterns of incidents, for example, the shooting down of an F-117 in 1999 remind us of the changing nature of unfolding conflict, that can produce sudden disparity in stealth advantage in contested spaces. Looking forward, advancements in artificial intelligence, metamaterials, and integrated sensors will have a major impact on how the next generation of stealth platforms and detection architectures will be defined, but in the end both offensive and defensive considerations will be crucial in shaping the character of future air superiority and integrated air and missile defence systems.

References

[1] D. C. Jenn, Radar and Laser Cross Section Engineering, 2nd ed. Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Publishing, 2005. [2] E. F. Knott, J. F. Schaeffer, and M. T. Tulley, Radar Cross Section, 2nd ed. Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Publishing, 2004. [3] M. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2001. [4] J. C. Toomay and P. J. Hannen, Radar Principles for the Non-Specialist, 3rd ed. Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Publishing, 2004. [5] B. Bhuyan and D. Roy, “Radar absorbing materials and their effect on stealth technology,” Defence Science Journal, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 567–575, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.14429/dsj.63.5753. [6] R. J. Sullivan, Radar Foundations for Imaging and Advanced Concepts, Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Publishing, 2004. [7] J. Appleby and R. J. Owen, “The emerging role of quantum radar in detecting stealth technology,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 24–33, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MAES.2020.3006820. [8] S. M. Waltz, Radar and Electronic Warfare, Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, 2017. [9] P. Pace, Detecting and Classifying Low Observable Targets, Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Publishing, 2009. [10] L. D. Bacon and J. L. Powell, “Multistatic radar: Applications and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 1234–1247, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TAES.2010.5545201.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 M L Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Soumi Ghosh, Prajjwal Gupta, Abhay Anand Jha, Purusharth Pokhriyal, Arnav Bansal, Manasvi Gaur. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.