Precision Agriculture: A Review of AI Vision and Machine Learning in Soil, Water, and Conservation Practice

Abstract

Precision Agriculture (PA) is a modern farming management system which can help access and get maximum return from advanced technology advantages. The present conceptual review concentrates on three main sectors such as soil health monitoring, water management, and conservation practices to highlight the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) vision and machine learning (ML). However, several achievements are pioneering AI agriculture today, including soil quality check using AI, irrigation forecasting, conservation modelling using ML, and many more. The review finds certain progress in key areas of sustainable global food systems and suggests a practical future through improvement in resource efficiency, but notes also challenges including data standardization, technology accessibility and interdisciplinary research. The paper finally presents future research directions to overcome the challenges and advance the acceptance of AI and ML in precision agriculture.

Introduction

Agriculture is up against the daunting spectre of an increasing global population and a worsening climate crisis, which will lead to increased demand for food at the same time that climate change will disrupt traditional farming with any number of factors, including erratic weather patterns, soil degradation, and water depletion[1]. One of the disruptive solutions that smart farming (a subset of precision agriculture (PA)) provides is the connection between different sophisticated technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), IoT, drones, and GPS systems, which helps increase production and sustainability[2]. Smart farming automates and optimises farming processes using real-time data and intelligent decision-making, allowing farmers to adjust to environmental changes and increase resource efficiency [3].

While ML, a subset of AI, enables systems to learn from data and make accurate predictions, such as forecasting weather, assessment of soil health, predicting soil conditions, optimizing resource allocation, and forecasting crop yield, AI replicates human intelligence to analyse vast amounts of data, find patterns, and provide actionable insights. IoT adds to these technologies by connecting devices such as soil sensors, drones, and smart machines for continuous monitoring and automation[4].The interaction between AI, ML, and IoT technology optimizes agricultural operations, which can be seen in Fig. 1. These allow data analysis in real time for decision-making in precision agriculture.

1. AI VISION AND ML IN SOIL HEALTH MONITORING

AI vision systems and machine learning (ML) models have revolutionized the monitoring and management of soil health, which is a critical component of agricultural productivity and sustainability. Traditional soil evaluation methods sometimes include manual sampling, which can be labour-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to errors. By enabling automated and predictive methods for evaluating soil health, machine learning and artificial intelligence address these problems and transform the way farmers and researchers use agricultural resources [7].

A significant contribution to soil health monitoring is provided by AI and ML based techniques, which offer a variety of capabilities tailored to a task's specific requirements. The main strategies, together with their attributes, advantages, and drawbacks, are compiled in Table 1 based on AI. As an example, CNN may perform exceptionally well in pattern identification in soil image scanning, whereas random forests can be used to achieve robust performance for heterogeneous data. The specifics of the applications are used to determine differences in merit.

1. Automated Soil Quality Analysis

Automated soil quality analysis, which replaces conventional methods for assessing soil health with AI and ML technologies, is one of the most significant advances towards precision agriculture. Agricultural practitioners and researchers may now determine the real-time properties of soil, such as texture, organic matter concentration, and nutrient level[16], [17], by combining AI vision systems with drones or satellite pictures. Highly resolution photographs of agricultural landscapes may be obtained thanks to these technologies; therefore, even the smallest changes in soil characteristics that the human eye could overlook will inevitably be picked up [18].

Convolutional neural networks, in particular, are machine learning techniques used in critical processing and analysis of these pictures. CNNs are better at spotting patterns that indicate soil color and texture changes that indicate fertility or deterioration [19].

CNNs, for example, can identify regions of erosion and compaction and predict the amount of organic material present based on the color of the soil. In addition to the expenses associated with sampling using traditional techniques and laboratory testing, the benefits at this level of research include speed and accuracy since insights are provided quickly. Combining soil sensors with AI-based photography creates an Internet of Things solution that opens the door to automated soil quality analysis. Such environmental data about the soil, such as temperature, pH, or moisture content, is immediately supplied via IoT and, when directly connected with visual data, will produce an in-depth view towards healthier soil [20].

They can be connected, for example, to identify the regions that need certain treatments, such as fertilisation, irrigation, or erosion control [21]. There are many advantages to the holistic approach. It ensures timely, data-driven resource allocation, reduces analytical costs, and eliminates the need for time-consuming manual sampling[22].It also makes it possible for farmers to use sustainable soil management practices, which reduces the dangers of soil degradation and nutrient leaching. Drone photography, AI-based analysis, and Internet of Things connectivity come together to create a powerful toolkit that aims to maintain soil health and increase agricultural productivity in the face of growing global challenges[23].

1. Predictive Soil Health Modeling

Predictive soil health modeling is a technical advancement in sustainable agriculture that uses machine learning (ML) algorithms to monitor and evaluate nutrient and fertility deficiencies in order to preserve soil health[24] . These models process large and varied datasets to generate insights that may be used to enhance soil management practices. Big data combines soil properties across time, crop production records, climatic data, and land management approaches to produce a woven tapestry that illustrates the overall picture of the various factors impacting soil health[25].

Many machine learning (ML) methods, each with its own set of goals, are frequently used for soil health monitoring[26]. For example, random forests provide strong insights for diverse information by building several decision trees based on characteristics such as soil texture, pH, and organic matter concentration[27]. Rapid detection of crucial zones is made possible by support vector machines (SVMs), which are especially useful in locating regions with low nutrient levels or recognising chemicals entering the soil in excessive amounts[28].

Gradient boosting machines (GBMs) are excellent at analysing complicated datasets with several variables since they iteratively improve poor predictive models[29].

Similarly, by comparing fresh samples with previously labelled data, k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) effectively classify soil health, guaranteeing precise and quick forecasts. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and other deep learning algorithms imitate the workings of the human brain to identify complex, non-linear correlations and linkages that more straightforward models could miss[30]. Together, these various machine learning techniques improve soil health assessments by increasing practical effectiveness and forecast accuracy[31].

1. AI and ML in Water Management

Sustainable agriculture relies heavily on water management, particularly in areas with limited water supplies and erratic rainfall patterns. The conventional method is wide-ranging and ineffective in terms of crop hydration or water consumption efficiency[32]. AI and ML are traditionally used to create excellent, data-based solutions that guarantee consistently healthy crops and effective water utilization[33], [34].

Data from sensors placed in fields, weather predictions, soil condition data, and satellite imagery are all available to AI and ML[35]. Precision irrigation systems and the range of water quality monitoring are two crucial components of water management that are enhanced by the use of such data in potent combinations. In neural networks, for example, information is anticipated with accurate water requirements based on sensor data on weather, soil moisture, and crop development[36]. This prevents waste and excessive watering, which causes significant nutrient loss, and ensures that the crops receive the proper quantities of water.

Furthermore, the dynamic scheduling irrigation algorithms include decision trees, regression analysis, and water supply periods that can be modified in real time to reflect the actual weather and soil conditions[37]. These are combined with Internet of Things-enabled smart irrigation controllers, where they begin to automatically govern water flows and enable precision agriculture that definitely guarantees water efficiency[38].

Apart from optimization in irrigation, solutions from AI are also critical in the monitoring of water quality and also enhances precision and sustainability in agricultural operations [39]. In some aspects, computer vision and even tools that process images, among them, could have determined a few water-related factors that include turbidity, temperature, and certain degrees of pollution. Other methods involved drones with cameras that evaluate water bodies based on the pollution process through silt or algae accumulation and warning signals. The classified levels of pollution provide algorithms that include remediation strategies.

Such innovations provide more sustainable ways of preserving water for greater yields among farmers. Innovations based on artificial intelligence and machine learning make the proactive shift from reactive and ensure sustainability in agriculture related to worldwide issues[40]. All such technologies together help to optimize water usage while having a very minimal impact on the environment, thereby boosting agricultural resilience[41].

1. Precision Irrigation Systems

Precision irrigation constitutes one of the AI and ML applications that is pertinent to water management as it enables data-driven, effective resource usage to satisfy livestock needs [42]. With the use of sensors that gather data in real time on crop-specific water requirements, weather patterns, and soil moisture, these systems are able to make informed judgments about the best irrigation techniques[43]. A newer innovation under precision irrigation is that of smart irrigation controllers, which base the distribution of water supply on real-time environmental information[44]. These machine learning algorithms reduce the chances of overwatering, avoid such increased evaporation loss, and give just the right amount of water to a plant at the right time. In other words, if it rains within a few days, this system can automatically postpone irrigation, thus saving water and preventing saturated soil[45].

This is sometimes referred to as IoT-enabled irrigation technologies, which are AI-enabled drip and sprinkler systems that improve the effectiveness of precision irrigation[46]. It delivers water straight to plant root zones with little loss through evaporation or surface discharge. Sectional delivery of water in large farms is thus achievable, thereby ensuring that only areas that require irrigation are delivered with water[47]. Also, there is a benefit in conserving the accuracy of the water resources preserved, especially in arid and semi-arid regions where water lacks[48].

The environmental and economic benefits of precision irrigation are massive. Agro producers reduce operational costs by curtailing water consumption while helping reduce the dangers associated with soil degradation and nutrient leaching as well[49]. In addition, this method maintains fertility levels in soils, thereby promoting better crop growth. Increased crop yields accompanied by greater resource use efficiency end up leaving precision irrigation as one of the basic tools behind modern agriculture[50].

AI and ML transform precision irrigation systems, based on real-time data as well as prediction algorithms. That allows efficient water management with a myriad of methods listed in Table 2 neural networks, decision trees, or controllers with IoT capabilities to be included for optimizing the schedule of irrigation and eliminating its waste.

For instance, real-time IoT-enabled smart controllers may automatically change water flow in response to variable conditions, or neural networks could predict crop-specific amounts of water required based on soil moisture content and relevant meteorological variables. Precisely speaking, the merits of all these are such that precision irrigation remains a necessary tool in water use management in sustainable agricultural practice.

Conclusion

AI vision and ML are revolutionizing precision agriculture through innovative solutions for soil health improvement, water-use, and environmentally sustainable conservation practices. These technologies offer real-time monitoring, predictive modeling, and targeted interventions, enabling farmers to make better-informed decisions about their productivity while also minimizing the environmental impact. For example, AI vision systems combined with drones and IoT devices allow for automated soil analysis, while the work of machine-learning algorithms is devoted to the optimization of irrigation schedules and prediction of soil fertility, all working toward optimal resource utilization.Likewise, artificial intelligence-assisted tools manage sustenance through responsible land management and biodiversity preservation, establishing a balance between agricultural demand and the ecological sustainability of the land. The growth of AI and ML in agriculture faces several shortcomings such as the predominance of heterogeneous datasets from sensor networks, satellite images, and environmental models, which calls for a sophisticated computational infrastructure. The other challenge is the cost, which may hinder access for smallholder farmers, particularly in developing regions, where resources are scarce. Other ethical issues, including data privacy concerns, ownership problems, or the question of equitable access to some AI-driven solutions, will also have to be properly addressed in order for these technologies to operate for the benefit of all stakeholders involved. Effective resolution of these issues requires cooperation of researchers, policymakers, and industry executives in development of scalable, cost-effective, and inclusive AI and ML systems. Furthermore, this has the potential of bringing about a sustainable, resilient, and productive agriculture sector that meets the growing food demand globally while addressing issues arising from climate change and resources depletion. With the evolution of time, as these technologies move forth, their integration into precision agriculture will give a blueprint to the farming of the future-with food security and sustainability of the environment for generations to come.

References

[1] M. Padhiary and R. Kumar, “Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Agriculture, Industrial Operations, and Mining on Agro-Ecosystems,” in Smart Internet of Things for Environment and Healthcare, M. Azrour, J. Mabrouki, A. Alabdulatif, A. Guezzaz, and F. Amounas, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 107–126. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-70102-3_8. [2] B. Sahu, “Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Smart Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Precision Farming, All-Terrain Vehicles, IoT Innovations, and Environmental Impact Mitigation,” Int. J. Sci. Res. IJSR, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 656–665, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.21275/SR241110184009. [3] D. Huo, A. W. Malik, S. D. Ravana, A. U. Rahman, and I. Ahmedy, “Mapping smart farming: Addressing agricultural challenges in data-driven era,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 189, p. 113858, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113858. [4] K. P. Sriram, P. Kola Sujatha, S. Athinarayanan, G. Kanimozhi, and M. R. Joel, “Transforming Agriculture: A Synergistic Approach Integrating Topology with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable and Data-Driven Practice,” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS), Coimbatore, India: IEEE, Jul. 2024, pp. 1350–1354. doi: 10.1109/ICSCSS60660.2024.10625446. [5] M. Padhiary, L. N. Sethi, and A. Kumar, “Enhancing Hill Farming Efficiency Using Unmanned Agricultural Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review,” Trans. Indian Natl. Acad. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 253–268, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41403-024-00458-7. [6] E. E. K. Senoo et al., “IoT Solutions with Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Precision Agriculture: Definitions, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 1894, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13101894. [7] M. Padhiary and R. Kumar, “Enhancing Agriculture Through AI Vision and Machine Learning: The Evolution of Smart Farming,” in Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, D. Thangam, Ed., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 295–324. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5380-6.ch012. [8] Y. Chen et al., “Plant image recognition with deep learning: A review,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 212, p. 108072, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108072. [9] T. Kattenborn, J. Leitloff, F. Schiefer, and S. Hinz, “Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 173, pp. 24–49, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.12.010. [10] S. S. Subbiah and J. Chinnappan, “Opportunities and Challenges of Feature Selection Methods for High Dimensional Data: A Review,” Ingénierie Systèmes Inf., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 67–77, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.18280/isi.260107. [11] P. G. Giannopoulos, T. K. Dasaklis, and N. Rachaniotis, “Development and evaluation of a novel framework to enhance k-NN algorithm’s accuracy in data sparsity contexts,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 25036, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76909-6. [12] T. Thenmozhi and R. Helen, “Feature Selection Using Extreme Gradient Boosting Bayesian Optimization to upgrade the Classification Performance of Motor Imagery signals for BCI,” J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 366, p. 109425, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109425. [13] A. Datar and P. Saha, “The Promise of Analog Deep Learning: Recent Advances, Challenges and Opportunities,” 2024, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2406.12911. [14] R. Krishnamurthi, A. Kumar, D. Gopinathan, A. Nayyar, and B. Qureshi, “An Overview of IoT Sensor Data Processing, Fusion, and Analysis Techniques,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 21, p. 6076, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20216076. [15] J. Mena, O. Pujol, and J. Vitrià, “A Survey on Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning Classification Systems from a Bayesian Perspective,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1–35, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3477140. [16] M. Padhiary, A. K. Kyndiah, R. Kumara, and D. Saha, “Exploration of electrode materials for in-situ soil fertilizer concentration measurement by electrochemical method,” Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 539–544, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i4g.1011. [17] A. Hoque and M. Padhiary, “Automation and AI in Precision Agriculture: Innovations for Enhanced Crop Management and Sustainability,” Asian J. Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 95–109, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i10512. [18] G. Mohyuddin, M. A. Khan, A. Haseeb, S. Mahpara, M. Waseem, and A. M. Saleh, “Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Farming in Smart Agriculture System: A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 60155–60184, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3390581. [19] R. Somkunwar, A. K. Gupta, A. Anand, G. Gawali, A. Hiralkar, and D. Shinde, “CNN-based Soil Image Analysis for Enhanced Crop Prediction in Smart Agriculture,” in 2024 MIT Art, Design and Technology School of Computing International Conference (MITADTSoCiCon), Pune, India: IEEE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/MITADTSoCiCon60330.2024.10575651. [20] M. Padhiary, “The Convergence of Deep Learning, IoT, Sensors, and Farm Machinery in Agriculture:,” in Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, S. G. Thandekkattu and N. R. Vajjhala, Eds., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 109–142. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5498-8.ch005. [21] X. Zhang, P. Yang, and B. Lu, “Artificial intelligence in soil management: The new frontier of smart agriculture,” Apr. 18, 2024, Resources Economics Research Board: 2. doi: 10.50908/arr.4.2_231. [22] K. Xu et al., “Advanced Data Collection and Analysis in Data-Driven Manufacturing Process,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 43, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s10033-020-00459-x. [23] K. S. Reddy, S. S. Ahmad, and A. K. Tyagi, “Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things-Enabled Smart Agriculture for the Modern Era:,” in Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, A. Naim, Ed., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 68–99. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5266-3.ch004. [24] K. Kumar et al., “Artificial intelligence and machine learning in soil analysis innovations for sustainable agriculture: A review,” Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 869–878, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i11k.2973. [25] Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore, India., M. J*, I. M, and Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore, India., “Role of Big Data in Agriculture,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3811–3821, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.A5346.129219. [26] M. Padhiary, “Status of Farm Automation, Advances, Trends, and Scope in India,” Int. J. Sci. Res. IJSR, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 737–745, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.21275/SR24713184513. [27] M. Wiesmeier, F. Barthold, B. Blank, and I. Kögel-Knabner, “Digital mapping of soil organic matter stocks using Random Forest modeling in a semi-arid steppe ecosystem,” Plant Soil, vol. 340, no. 1–2, pp. 7–24, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0425-z. [28] S. Jain, D. Sethia, and K. C. Tiwari, “A critical systematic review on spectral-based soil nutrient prediction using machine learning,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 196, no. 8, p. 699, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12817-6. [29] A. Natekin and A. Knoll, “Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial,” Front. Neurorobotics, vol. 7, 2013, doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021. [30] S. Schmidgall, R. Ziaei, J. Achterberg, L. Kirsch, S. P. Hajiseyedrazi, and J. Eshraghian, “Brain-inspired learning in artificial neural networks: A review,” APL Mach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 021501, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0186054. [31] K. Liakos, P. Busato, D. Moshou, S. Pearson, and D. Bochtis, “Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 2674, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18082674. [32] A. Shahzad et al., “Nexus on climate change: agriculture and possible solution to cope future climate change stresses,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 14211–14232, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12649-8. [33] P. Delfani, V. Thuraga, B. Banerjee, and A. Chawade, “Integrative approaches in modern agriculture: IoT, ML and AI for disease forecasting amidst climate change,” Precis. Agric., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 2589–2613, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11119-024-10164-7. [34] M. Padhiary, D. Saha, R. Kumar, L. N. Sethi, and A. Kumar, “Enhancing Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and AI Vision Applications in All-Terrain Vehicle for Farm Automation,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 8, p. 100483, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100483. [35] H. Han, Z. Liu, J. Li, and Z. Zeng, “Challenges in remote sensing based climate and crop monitoring: navigating the complexities using AI,” J. Cloud Comput., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 34, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13677-023-00583-8. [36] O. Adeyemi, I. Grove, S. Peets, Y. Domun, and T. Norton, “Dynamic Neural Network Modelling of Soil Moisture Content for Predictive Irrigation Scheduling,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 10, p. 3408, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18103408. [37] A.-F. Jimenez, P.-F. Cardenas, A. Canales, F. Jimenez, and A. Portacio, “A survey on intelligent agents and multi-agents for irrigation scheduling,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 176, p. 105474, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105474. [38] P. M., A. K. Tyagi, S. K. Arumugam, and A. Rawat, “Internet of Things for Building a Smart and Sustainable Environment: A Survey,” in Advances in Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, L. D., N. Nagpal, N. Kassarwani, V. Varthanan G., and P. Siano, Eds., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 16–37. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5247-2.ch002. [39] G. Rabha, K. Kumar, D. Kumar, and D. Kumar, “A Comprehensive Review of Integrating AI and IoT in Farm Machinery: Advancements, Applications, and Sustainability,” Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev., vol. 11, no. 4, 2024. [40] Olabimpe Banke Akintuyi, “Adaptive AI in precision agriculture: A review: Investigating the use of self-learning algorithms in optimizing farm operations based on real-time data,” Open Access Res. J. Multidiscip. Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 016–030, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0023. [41] B. B. Lin, “Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification: Adaptive Management for Environmental Change,” BioScience, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 183–193, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.4. [42] S. Violino et al., “A data-driven bibliometric review on precision irrigation,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 5, p. 100320, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2023.100320. [43] M. H. Seyar and T. Ahamed, “Optimization of Soil-Based Irrigation Scheduling Through the Integration of Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, and Soil Moisture Sensor Technology,” in IoT and AI in Agriculture, T. Ahamed, Ed., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 275–299. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-1263-2_18. [44] Yunseop Kim, R. G. Evans, and W. M. Iversen, “Remote Sensing and Control of an Irrigation System Using a Distributed Wireless Sensor Network,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1379–1387, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2008.917198. [45] E. A. Abioye et al., “Precision Irrigation Management Using Machine Learning and Digital Farming Solutions,” AgriEngineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 70–103, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/agriengineering4010006. [46] K. Pachiappan, K. Anitha, R. Pitchai, S. Sangeetha, T. V. V. Satyanarayana, and S. Boopathi, “Intelligent Machines, IoT, and AI in Revolutionizing Agriculture for Water Processing:,” in Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, B. B. Gupta and F. Colace, Eds., IGI Global, 2023, pp. 374–399. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9999-3.ch015. [47] A. Dinar and J. Mody, “Irrigation water management policies: Allocation and pricing principles and implementation experience,” Nat. Resour. Forum, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 112–122, May 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00078.x. [48] M. I. Hussain, A. Muscolo, M. Farooq, and W. Ahmad, “Sustainable use and management of non-conventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments,” Agric. Water Manag., vol. 221, pp. 462–476, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.014. [49] S. Sarvade, V. B. Upadhyay, M. Kumar, and M. Imran Khan, “Soil and Water Conservation Techniques for Sustainable Agriculture,” in Sustainable Agriculture, Forest and Environmental Management, M. K. Jhariya, A. Banerjee, R. S. Meena, and D. K. Yadav, Eds., Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 133–188. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6830-1_5. [50] R. G. Evans and E. J. Sadler, “Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 44, no. 7, p. 2007WR006200, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006200. [51] L. Yang, J. Driscol, S. Sarigai, Q. Wu, C. D. Lippitt, and M. Morgan, “Towards Synoptic Water Monitoring Systems: A Review of AI Methods for Automating Water Body Detection and Water Quality Monitoring Using Remote Sensing,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 2416, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22062416. [52] S. K. H. and K. T. Veeramanju, “Predictive Models for Optimal Irrigation Scheduling and Water Management: A Review of AI and ML Approaches,” Int. J. Manag. Technol. Soc. Sci., pp. 94–110, May 2024, doi: 10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0346. [53] L. Gong et al., “An IoT-based intelligent irrigation system with data fusion and a self-powered wide-area network,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 29, p. 100367, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2022.100367. [54] M. Padhiary, P. Roy, P. Dey, and B. Sahu, “Harnessing AI for Automated Decision-Making in Farm Machinery and Operations: Optimizing Agriculture,” in Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, S. Hai-Jew, Ed., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 249–282. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6230-3.ch008. [55] T. M. Alabi et al., “A review on the integrated optimization techniques and machine learning approaches for modeling, prediction, and decision making on integrated energy systems,” Renew. Energy, vol. 194, pp. 822–849, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.123. [56] G. Fu, Y. Jin, S. Sun, Z. Yuan, and D. Butler, “The role of deep learning in urban water management: A critical review,” Water Res., vol. 223, p. 118973, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118973. [57] V. Mishra et al., “Uncrewed Aerial Systems in Water Resource Management and Monitoring: A Review of Sensors, Applications, Software, and Issues,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2023, pp. 1–28, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/3544724. [58] H. Zia, N. R. Harris, G. V. Merrett, M. Rivers, and N. Coles, “The impact of agricultural activities on water quality: A case for collaborative catchment-scale management using integrated wireless sensor networks,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 96, pp. 126–138, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.05.001. [59] I. Satpathy, A. Nayak, V. Jain, and S. S. Padmadas, “Applying Data Into Action: AI-Powered Solutions for Mitigating Climate Change and Fostering Sustainable Future,” in Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability, B. A. Riswandi, B. Singh, C. Kaunert, and K. Vig, Eds., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 50–74. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6567-0.ch004. [60] M. Padhiary, “Membrane Technologies for Treating Wastewater in the Food Processing Industry: Practices and Challenges,” in Research Trends in Food Technology and Nutrition, vol. 27, AkiNik Publications, 2024, pp. 37–62. doi: 10.22271/ed.book.2817. [61] M. Lowe, R. Qin, and X. Mao, “A Review on Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and Smart Technology in Water Treatment and Monitoring,” Water, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1384, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/w14091384. [62] R. Benameur, A. Dahane, B. Kechar, and A. E. H. Benyamina, “An Innovative Smart and Sustainable Low-Cost Irrigation System for Anomaly Detection Using Deep Learning,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 1162, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24041162. [63] J.-S. Um, “Imaging Sensors,” in Drones as Cyber-Physical Systems, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 177–225. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3741-3_6. [64] M. Padhiary, R. Kumar, and L. N. Sethi, “Navigating the Future of Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Automatic All-Terrain Vehicles in Precision Farming,” J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A, vol. 105, pp. 767–782, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40030-024-00816-2. [65] S. Alexandris et al., “Integrating Drone Technology into an Innovative Agrometeorological Methodology for the Precise and Real-Time Estimation of Crop Water Requirements,” Hydrology, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 131, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/hydrology8030131. [66] M. Abdelhak, “Innovative Techniques for Soil and Water Conservation,” in Ecosystem Management, 1st ed., A. Banerjee, M. K. Jhariya, A. Raj, and T. Mechergui, Eds., Wiley, 2024, pp. 291–326. doi: 10.1002/9781394231249.ch9. [67] Uwaga Monica Adanma and Emmanuel Olurotimi Ogunbiyi, “Artificial intelligence in environmental conservation: evaluating cyber risks and opportunities for sustainable practices,” Comput. Sci. IT Res. J., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1178–1209, May 2024, doi: 10.51594/csitrj.v5i5.1156. [68] K. N. Shivaprakash et al., “Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 7154, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14127154. [69] K. L.-M. Ang, J. K. P. Seng, E. Ngharamike, and G. K. Ijemaru, “Emerging Technologies for Smart Cities’ Transportation: Geo-Information, Data Analytics and Machine Learning Approaches,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 85, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijgi11020085. [70] A. Srivastava and H. Sharma, “AI-Driven Environmental Monitoring Using Google Earth Engine,” in IoT Sensors, ML, AI and XAI: Empowering A Smarter World, vol. 50, B. Pradhan and S. Mukhopadhyay, Eds., in Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 50. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 375–385. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-68602-3_19. [71] M. Padhiary, “Harmony under the Sun: Integrating Aquaponics with Solar-Powered Fish Farming,” in Introduction to Renewable Energy Storage and Conversion for Sustainable Development, vol. 1, AkiNik Publications, 2024, pp. 31–58. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22271/ed.book.2882 [72] D. Roy, M. Padhiary, P. Roy, and J. A. Barbhuiya, “Artificial Intelligence-Driven Smart Aquaculture: Revolutionizing Sustainability through Automation and Machine Learning,” LatIA, vol. 2, p. 116, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.62486/latia2024116. [73] R. Nishant, M. Kennedy, and J. Corbett, “Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 53, p. 102104, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104. [74] D. Kumar, K. Kumar, P. Roy, and G. Rabha, “Renewable Energy in Agriculture: Enhancing Aquaculture and Post-Harvest Technologies with Solar and AI Integration,” Asian J. Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 201–219, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i12539. [75] M. Mohamed, “Agricultural Sustainability in the Age of Deep Learning: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Trajectories,” Sustain. Mach. Intell. J., vol. 4, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.61185/SMIJ.2023.44102. [76] L. Lécuyer et al., “Conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe: Looking to the future by learning from the past,” in Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 65, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 3–56. doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.005. [77] L. Yang, J. Driscol, S. Sarigai, Q. Wu, H. Chen, and C. D. Lippitt, “Google Earth Engine and Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Comprehensive Review,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 14, p. 3253, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14143253. [78] X. Wang, “Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security,” Land, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 484, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11040484. [79] S. Pandey, N. Kumari, and L. Mallick, “Review on Assessment of Land Degradation in Watershed Using Geospatial Technique Based on Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” in Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 1st ed., S. K. Gupta, M. Kumar, A. Nayyar, and S. Mahajan, Eds., Wiley, 2024, pp. 263–311. doi: 10.1002/9781394230648.ch7. [80] M. Padhiary and P. Roy, “Collaborative Marketing Strategies in Agriculture for Global Reach and Local Impact,” in Emerging Trends in Food and Agribusiness Marketing, IGI Global, 2025, pp. 219–252. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6715-5.ch008. [81] A. Willson, G. Jones, G. Paynter, G. Edser, D. Norris, and M. Kravcik, “Hydrology, carbon and contours - The Future of Farming,” SCIREA J. Agric., Jul. 2023, doi: 10.54647/agriculture210360. [82] K. H. Anantha et al., “Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia,” Agric. Syst., vol. 194, p. 103276, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103276. [83] R. Espinel, G. Herrera-Franco, J. L. Rivadeneira García, and P. Escandón-Panchana, “Artificial Intelligence in Agricultural Mapping: A Review,” Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 1071, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/agriculture14071071. [84] I. Gryshova et al., “Artificial intelligence in climate smart in agricultural: toward a sustainable farming future,” Access J. - Access Sci. Bus. Innov. Digit. Econ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 125–140, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.46656/access.2024.5.1(8). [85] L. Xu and S. Tang, “Sustainable development: Maximizing productivity in natural resource markets for a more ecologically friendly future,” Resour. Policy, vol. 89, p. 104580, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104580. [86] L. Epple, A. Kaiser, M. Schindewolf, A. Bienert, J. Lenz, and A. Eltner, “A Review on the Possibilities and Challenges of Today’s Soil and Soil Surface Assessment Techniques in the Context of Process-Based Soil Erosion Models,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 10, p. 2468, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14102468. [87] M. Roohi, H. R. Ghafouri, and S. M. Ashrafi, “Developing an Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for Enhancing Flood Damage Assessment,” Int. J. Environ. Res., vol. 18, no. 5, p. 90, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41742-024-00647-w. [88] H. Sahour, V. Gholami, M. Vazifedan, and S. Saeedi, “Machine learning applications for water-induced soil erosion modeling and mapping,” Soil Tillage Res., vol. 211, p. 105032, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105032. [89] M. Mokarram and H. R. Pourghasemi, “Prediction of soil erosion using machine learning,” in Advanced Tools for Studying Soil Erosion Processes, Elsevier, 2024, pp. 307–322. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-22262-7.00030-8. [90] A. Pijl, W. Wang, E. Straffelini, and P. Tarolli, “Soil and water conservation in terraced and non?terraced cultivations: an extensive comparison of 50 vineyards,” Land Degrad. Dev., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 596–610, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1002/ldr.4170. [91] E. R. Sujatha, “Sustainable Solutions to Combat Soil Erosion Using Biogenic Agents,” in Global Sustainability, S. Kulkarni and A. K. Haghi, Eds., in World Sustainability Series. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 37–60. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-57456-6_3. [92] M. S. Behrouz, M. N. Yazdi, and D. J. Sample, “Using Random Forest, a machine learning approach to predict nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment event mean concentrations in urban runoff,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 317, p. 115412, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115412. [93] J. Griffiths, K. E. Borne, A. Semadeni-Davies, and C. C. Tanner, “Selection, Planning, and Modelling of Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation,” Water, vol. 16, no. 19, p. 2802, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16192802. [94] M. K. Sharma, S. V. G. V. A. Prasad, G. Anusha, A. Das, and M. Sambathkumar, “Tech-Driven Solutions for Environmental Conservation by AI Collaboration Processes:,” in Advances in Chemical and Materials Engineering, J. Arun, N. Nirmala, and S. S. Dawn, Eds., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 1–29. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3625-0.ch001. [95] F. Ullah, S. Saqib, and Y.-C. Xiong, “Integrating artificial intelligence in biodiversity conservation: bridging classical and modern approaches,” Biodivers. Conserv., Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10531-024-02977-9. [96] O. K. Pal, M. S. H. Shovon, M. F. Mridha, and J. Shin, “In-depth review of AI-enabled unmanned aerial vehicles: trends, vision, and challenges,” Discov. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 97, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44163-024-00209-1. [97] “Artificial Intelligence in Invasive Species Management: Transforming Detection and Response,” Trends Anim. Plant Sci., vol. 4, pp. 82–96, 2024, doi: 10.62324/TAPS/2024.050. [98] A. Causevic, S. Causevic, M. Fielding, and J. Barrott, “Artificial intelligence for sustainability: opportunities and risks of utilizing Earth observation technologies to protect forests,” Discov. Conserv., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44353-024-00002-2. [99] Victoria Bukky Ayoola, Idoko Peter Idoko, Samson Ohikhuare Eromonsei, Olusegun Afolabi, Akinkunmi Rasheed Apampa, and Oluwatosin Seyi Oyebanji, “The role of big data and AI in enhancing biodiversity conservation and resource management in the USA,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1851–1873, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2350. [100] V. Š. Kremsa, “Sustainable management of agricultural resources (agricultural crops and animals),” in Sustainable Resource Management, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 99–145. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00010-9. [101] M. Padhiary and P. Roy, “Advancements in Precision Agriculture: Exploring the Role of 3D Printing in Designing All-Terrain Vehicles for Farming Applications,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 861–868, 2024, doi: 10.21275/SR24511105508. [102] M. Padhiary, J. A. Barbhuiya, D. Roy, and P. Roy, “3D Printing Applications in Smart Farming and Food Processing,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 9, p. 100553, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100553. [103] R. Rayhana, G. G. Xiao, and Z. Liu, “Printed sensor technologies for monitoring applications in smart farming: A review,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–19, 2021. [104] M. Padhiary, D. Roy, and P. Dey, “Mapping the Landscape of Biogenic Nanoparticles in Bioinformatics and Nanobiotechnology: AI-Driven Insights,” in Synthesizing and Characterizing Plant-Mediated Biocompatible Metal Nanoparticles, S. Das, S. M. Khade, D. B. Roy, and K. Trivedi, Eds., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 337–376. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6240-2.ch014. [105] M. Mohammed, K. Riad, and N. Alqahtani, “Efficient IoT-Based Control for a Smart Subsurface Irrigation System to Enhance Irrigation Management of Date Palm,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 12, p. 3942, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21123942. [106] M. Padhiary, “Bridging the gap: Sustainable automation and energy efficiency in food processing,” Agric. Eng. Today, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 47–50, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.52151/aet2023473.1678. [107] M. Padhiary, P. Roy, and D. Roy, “The Future of Urban Connectivity: AI and IoT in Smart Cities,” in Sustainable Smart Cities and the Future of Urban Development, S. N. S. Al-Humairi, A. I. Hajamydeen, and A. Mahfoudh, Eds., IGI Global, 2024, pp. 33–66. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6740-7.ch002. [108] Amina Catherine Ijiga et al., “Technological innovations in mitigating winter health challenges in New York City, USA,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 535–551, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0078.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Joytu Debnath , Kundan Kumar, Kanica Roy, Rohit Dutta Choudhury , Ajin Krishna P U . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.