A Review on Advances in Mead Production: Fermentation Optimization, Stabilization and Sensory Quality Control

Abstract

Mead, the fermented beverage produced from honey, has experienced a notable resurgence in the craft beverage sector, driven by its historical heritage and unique sensory characteristics. This review synthesizes recent advances in mead production from 2015 to 2025, focusing on three critical aspects: fermentation optimization, post-fermentation stabilization, and sensory quality control. The physicochemical dynamics of fermentation, including the influence of honey type, yeast strain, and nutrient supplementation, are explored in detail, with particular attention to strategies for preventing stuck fermentations and development of off-flavor. Advances in stabilization techniques—such as bentonite fining, cold stabilization, centrifugation, and membrane filtration—are reviewed for their effectiveness in ensuring product clarity and shelf-life. The integration of modern analytical methods, including GC-MS and HPLC, for volatile compound and tannin profiling is discussed, alongside the application of standardized sensory evaluation protocols. Additionally, this review highlights the impact of digital technologies and sustainability practices on the commercial scalability of mead, as well as the ongoing challenges and opportunities in global regulatory harmonization. By consolidating current knowledge and research findings, this review aims to provide a comprehensive resource for researchers, producers, and stakeholders seeking to advance the quality, stability, and marketability of mead.

Introduction

Historical Context and Cultural Significance:
Mead, considered the world’s oldest alcoholic beverage, is traditionally made from honey and water, sometimes flavored with fruits, spices, or herbs. Archaeological evidence shows its consumption dating back to 7000 BCE. Mead held symbolic importance in ancient cultures, often linked to rituals, hospitality, and royalty. Although its popularity declined with the rise of beer and wine, mead persisted in some traditions and has seen a recent global revival driven by the craft beverage movement.

Resurgence in the Craft Beverage Era:
Modern mead production has expanded significantly, with meaderies worldwide offering diverse styles including traditional dry and sweet meads, fruit-infused melomels, spiced metheglins, and hybrid braggots. Producers experiment with local ingredients and fermentation methods, blending tradition with innovation.

Challenges in Modern Mead Production:
Mead fermentation is often hindered by stuck or sluggish fermentations due to honey’s nutrient deficiencies (low nitrogen, vitamins, minerals), leading to incomplete sugar conversion and off-flavors. Mead also faces challenges in product clarity and stability, requiring post-fermentation treatments like fining, cold stabilization, and filtration. Sensory consistency is difficult to maintain due to variations in honey types, yeast strains, and fermentation conditions. Honey authenticity is crucial, as adulteration with syrups impairs fermentation and flavor.

Objective and Scope:
The review focuses on advances from 2015–2025 in fermentation optimization, post-fermentation stabilization, and sensory quality control, integrating fermentation science, process engineering, and sensory evaluation to guide best practices and future developments in mead production.

Fermentation Process: Physicochemical Dynamics:
Key parameters influencing fermentation include pH, temperature, and nutrient management. Optimal pH (around 3.2–3.8) supports yeast activity and suppresses unwanted microbes. Temperature control (16–18°C) enhances desirable aromas while minimizing off-flavors. Nutrient supplementation, especially phased nitrogen additions and micronutrients like zinc and magnesium, improves yeast health and fermentation completion. Variations in honey type, yeast strain, and fermentation conditions create complexity in the final product, requiring careful process control for quality and consistency.

Conclusion

The past decade has witnessed significant progress in understanding and optimizing the complex processes underlying mead production, driven by advances in fermentation science, analytical chemistry, and sensory evaluation. Key findings from this review underscore the critical role of nutrient management in fermentation kinetics and product quality. Notably, the adoption of staggered nutrient addition protocols—where nitrogen and micronutrients are supplied in phases rather than as a single dose—has been shown to support continuous yeast activity, reduce the risk of stuck fermentations, and enhance the production of desirable aroma compounds such as fruity esters and glycerol. This approach not only improves fermentation efficiency but also contributes to the sensory richness and stability of the final product. Advances in post-fermentation stabilization, including the use of bentonite fining, cold stabilization, and centrifugation, have enabled producers to achieve greater clarity and shelf stability while preserving the unique sensory attributes of mead. The integration of modern analytical techniques, such as GC-MS for volatile compound profiling and HPLC for tannin quantification, has provided new insights into the chemical basis of mead quality and enabled more precise process control. Furthermore, the adoption of standardized sensory evaluation protocols, aligned with international standards such as ISO 13299:2016, has improved the objectivity and reproducibility of quality assessment, supporting product development and consumer acceptance. Looking ahead, the mead industry stands to benefit from the continued integration of digital technologies, such as IoT-based fermentation monitoring and AI-driven predictive analytics, which promise to further enhance process efficiency and product consistency. Sustainability initiatives, including the use of upcycled nutrients and low-water production methods, will be essential for reducing environmental impact and aligning with global sustainability goals. Addressing regulatory gaps through the development of globally recognized quality standards and digital traceability systems will be critical for ensuring product integrity, facilitating market access, and strengthening the reputation of mead as a premium fermented beverage. In summary, this review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to mead production, emphasizing the interplay between fermentation optimization, stabilization, and sensory quality control. By embracing innovation, sustainability, and regulatory harmonization, the mead industry can continue to evolve and thrive in the global beverage market.

References

[1] Aguiar, L. A., Melo, L., & de Lacerda de Oliveira, L. (2019). Validation of rapid descriptive sensory methods against conventional descriptive analyses: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59(16), 2535–2552. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1456401 [2] Alim, A., Sahab, A., & Schmidtke, L. M. (2018). Flavour-active compounds in thermally treated yeast extracts. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98(10), 3774–3783. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8905 [3] Ban, Y., Wang, X., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2025). Metabolic dynamics and sensory impacts of aging on peony mead: Insights into nonenzymatic reactions. Foods, 14(6), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14061234 [4] ?eslová, L., Hol?apek, M., & Fidler, M. (2022). Rapid HPLC/MS/MS analysis of phenolic content and profile for mead quality assessment. Food Control, 134, 108737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108737 [5] Chen, C.-H., Liu, T.-Y., & Chang, Y.-H. (2013). Physicochemical property changes during the fermentation of longan (Dimocarpus longan) mead and its aroma composition using multiple yeast inoculations. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 119(4), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.85 [6] Colangelo, D., Torchio, F., & Rolle, L. (2018). The use of chitosan as alternative to bentonite for wine fining: Effects on heat-stability, proteins, organic acids, colour, and volatile compounds in an aromatic white wine. Food Chemistry, 264, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.005 [7] Dunkel, A., Steinhaus, M., & Hofmann, T. (2014). Nature\'s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 53(28), 7124–7143. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201309508 [8] El Rayess, Y., Mietton-Peuchot, M., & Devatine, A. (2011). Cross-flow microfiltration applied to oenology: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 382(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.025 [9] Fu, Y., Zhang, L., & Li, H. (2023). Fermentation of mead using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus paracasei: Strain growth, aroma components and antioxidant capacity. Food Bioscience, 52, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102402 [10] Galvan, D., Coman, V., & Magdas, D. A. (2022). E-sensing and nanoscale-sensing devices associated with data processing algorithms applied to food quality control: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 62(24), 6605–6645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1903383 [11] Gomes, S., Dias, L. G., & Moreira, A. C. (2010). Physicochemical, microbiological and antimicrobial properties of commercial honeys from Portugal. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48(2), 544–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.029 [12] Harder, M. N. C., Paredes, A. M., & Silva, D. B. (2021). Mead of natural fermentation. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 11(1), e3628. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.3628 [13] Hornsey, I. S. (2003). A history of beer and brewing. Royal Society of Chemistry. [14] Ilc, T., Werck-Reichhart, D., & Navrot, N. (2016). Meta-analysis of the core aroma components of grape and wine aroma. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01472 [15] Inwongwan, S., Thanonkeo, P., & Yamada, M. (2025). Comparative analysis of physicochemical and biological activities of meads from five Mekong region honeys pre- and post-fermentation. Fermentation, 11(4), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11040190 [16] Jankowska, E., Chwia?kowska, J., & Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. (2017). Volatile fatty acids production during mixed culture fermentation – The impact of substrate complexity and pH. Chemical Engineering Journal, 326, 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.045 [17] Jose-Salazar, J. A., Rodriguez, A., & Lappe-Oliveras, P. (2024). Kinetic evaluation of the production of mead from a non-Saccharomyces strain. Foods, 13(12), 1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121892 [18] Kelly, J., Varela, C., & Schmidt, S. A. (2018). Characterization of Saccharomyces bayanus CN1 for fermenting partially dehydrated grapes grown in cool climate winemaking regions. Beverages, 4(3), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4030077 [19] López-Salas, L., Borrás-Linares, I., & Segura-Carretero, A. (2024). Design of experiments for green and GRAS solvent extraction of phenolic compounds from food industry by-products – A systematic review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 171, 117536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117536 [20] Ma, T. Z., Li, J. M., & Lan, Y. B. (2020). Effect of different clarification treatments on the volatile composition and aromatic attributes of \'Italian Riesling\' icewine. Molecules, 25(11), 2657. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112657 [21] Madariaga, V. I., Tanaka, H., & Ernberg, M. (2020). Psychophysical characterisation of burning mouth syndrome—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 47(12), 1590–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13087 [22] Marangon, M., Vincenzi, S., & Curioni, A. (2019). Wine fining with plant proteins. Molecules, 24(11), 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112186 [23] Maspolim, Y., Zhou, Y., & Ng, W. J. (2015). The effect of pH on solubilization of organic matter and microbial community structures in sludge fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 190, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.087 [24] McGovern, P. E., Zhang, J., & Tang, J. (2004). Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(51), 17593–17598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407921102 [25] Mendes-Ferreira, A., Cosme, F., & Barbosa, C. (2010). Optimization of honey-must preparation and alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for mead production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 144(1), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.016 [26] Mi?ek, M., D?ugan, M., & Tomczyk, M. (2023). The comparison of honey enriched with laboratory fermented pollen vs. natural bee bread in terms of nutritional and antioxidant properties, protein in vitro bioaccessibility, and its genoprotective effect in yeast cells. Molecules, 28(15), 5766. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155766 [27] Mo, Y., Zhang, Q., & Wang, J. (2024). Olfactory and gustatory perception among plant-based vs. omnivorous dieters: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sustainability, 16(15), 6241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156241 [28] Orhan Dereli, B., Türky?lmaz, M., & Özkan, M. (2023). Clarification of pomegranate and strawberry juices: Effects of various clarification agents on turbidity, anthocyanins, colour, phenolics and antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry, 413, 135672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135672 [29] Pan, Y., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2023). Modification method of high-efficiency organic bentonite for drilling fluids: A review. Materials, 28(23), 7866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma28237866 [30] Patel, V. B., Chatterjee, S., & Dhoble, A. S. (2022). A review on pectinase properties, application in juice clarification, and membranes as immobilization support. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 87(8), 3338–3354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12976 [31] Pereira, A. P., Mendes-Ferreira, A., & Estevinho, L. M. (2014). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells immobilization on mead production. *LWT - Food Science and Technology, 56*(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.10.040 [32] Pereira, A. P., Mendes-Ferreira, A., & Estevinho, L. M. (2015). Mead production: Effect of nitrogen supplementation on growth, fermentation profile and aroma formation by yeasts in mead fermentation. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 121(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.185 [33] Pop, C.-E., Pârvu, M., & Vlase, L. (2024). Bisphenol A analysis and quantification inconsistencies via HPLC-UV: A systematic review with technical notes. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(4), 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-05793-6 [34] Rai, P., Majumdar, G. C., & Sharma, G. (2007). Effect of various pretreatment methods on permeate flux and quality during ultrafiltration of mosambi juice. Journal of Food Engineering, 78(2), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.042 [35] Romano, R., De Luca, L., & Aiello, A. (2021). Characterization of a new type of mead fermented with Cannabis sativa L. (hemp). Journal of Food Science, 86(3), 874–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15628 [36] Rosenthal, K., Aksenov, A. A., & da Silva, R. (2024). Current data processing methods and reporting standards for untargeted analysis of volatile organic compounds using direct mass spectrometry: A systematic review. Metabolomics, 20(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-024-02088-0 [37] Schwarz, L. V., Kechinski, C. P., & Marcon, A. R. (2020). Selection of low nitrogen demand yeast strains and their impact on the physicochemical and volatile composition of mead. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57(8), 2840–2851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04315-7 [38] Sooklim, C., Thanonkeo, S., & Yamada, M. (2022). Enhanced aroma and flavour profile of fermented Tetragonula pagdeni Schwarz honey by a novel yeast T. delbrueckii GT-ROSE1 with superior fermentability. Food Bioscience, 50, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102001 [39] Starowicz, M., & Granvogl, M. (2020). Trends in food science & technology an overview of mead production and the physicochemical, toxicological, and sensory characteristics of mead with a special emphasis on flavor. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 100, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.013 [40] Trius-Soler, M., Lamuela-Raventós, R. M., & Vallverdú-Queralt, A. (2020). Effect of physiological factors, pathologies, and acquired habits on the sweet taste threshold: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 19(6), 3755–3773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12643 [41] Tucker, R. M., Mattes, R. D., & Running, C. A. (2017). Comparisons of fatty acid taste detection thresholds in people who are lean vs. overweight or obese: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0169583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169583 [42] Van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2015). Drivers of and barriers to organic purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.003 [43] Vander Weide, J., van Nocker, S., & Gottschalk, C. (2022). Meta-analysis of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit and juice quality traits for potential use in hard cider production. Plants, People, Planet, 4(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10244 [44] Verhagen, J. V., & Engelen, L. (2006). The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: Sensory integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(5), 613–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.11.003 [45] Visalli, M., & Galmarini, M. V. (2024). Multi-attribute temporal descriptive methods in sensory analysis applied in food science: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Sensory Studies, 23(1), e13294. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.13294 [46] Wang, C., Mas, A., & Esteve-Zarzoso, B. (2016). The interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeasts during alcoholic fermentation is species and strain specific. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00502 [47] Webster, C. E., Smart, K. A., & Stewart, G. G. (2025). Mead production and quality: A review of chemical and sensory mead quality evaluation with a focus on analytical methods. Food Research International, 202, 115655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115655 [48] Zielke, S. A., Bertram, A. K., & Patey, G. N. (2015). A molecular mechanism of ice nucleation on model AgI surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 119(29), 9049–9055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03118

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Swagat V. Kakade, Dr. Saee H. Thakur, Shristi S. Biswas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.