With the rapid expansion of computer networks and internet-based services, ensuring network security has become a critical challenge. Commonly adopted network security measures, such as firewalls and signature-oriented intrusion detection systems, play a key role in defending against known threats, making them ineffective against evolving and previously unseen attacks. This paper presents an AI-powered Network Intrusion Detection System designed to enhance real-time threat detection in modern network environments.
The proposed system integrates live packet monitoring using Scapy, detection of SYN flood attacks, and anomaly detection through the Kitsune ensemble autoencoder framework. The system is evaluated in a simulated environment using SYN flood and ICMP flood attacks. Experimental observations demonstrate improved detection accuracy, reduced false alerts, and efficient real-time performance. The results indicate that the proposed approach provides a practical and adaptive solution for securing contemporary networks.
Introduction
The text presents an AI-based Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) designed to address the growing complexity and security vulnerabilities of modern network infrastructures. Traditional security mechanisms such as firewalls and signature-based intrusion detection systems are limited in detecting hidden, novel, and zero-day attacks, while conventional anomaly-based systems often generate high false-positive rates. To overcome these issues, the proposed system integrates artificial intelligence and machine learning for adaptive and real-time threat detection.
The system captures live network traffic using the Scapy library and extracts traffic features through the Afterimage framework, which analyzes statistical patterns over multiple time windows. Known attacks such as SYN flood and ICMP flood are detected using threshold-based and behavioral analysis techniques. For unknown and anomalous threats, the Kitsune ensemble autoencoder framework is employed, enabling unsupervised anomaly detection by learning normal network behavior and identifying deviations through reconstruction errors.
Implemented in a Linux-based environment using Python, the system was evaluated under simulated attack scenarios. Experimental results show high detection accuracy for SYN flood and ICMP flood attacks while maintaining low false-positive rates and efficient real-time performance. Although enabling the NIDS introduces slight throughput overhead and increased delay during attacks, overall network performance remains within acceptable limits.
The results demonstrate that combining rule-based detection with ensemble autoencoder–based anomaly detection significantly improves detection reliability, adaptability, and efficiency. The proposed AI-based intrusion detection system effectively identifies both known and unknown cyber threats, making it suitable for practical deployment in dynamic network environments.
Conclusion
This paper presents an AI-powered network intrusion detection system that enhances security through intelligent anomaly detection and real-time traffic monitoring. By integrating SYN flood detection with ensemble autoencoder-based learning and ICMP flood analysis, the proposed system effectively addresses the limitations of traditional intrusion detection methods. The experimental results demonstrate improved detection accuracy, reduced false alerts, and efficient real-time performance. The proposed approach offers a scalable and practical solution for securing modern network infrastructures.
References
[1] Y. Mirsky, T. Doitshman, Y. Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detection,” Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), pp. 1–15, 2018.
[2] M. Roesch, “Snort: Lightweight Intrusion Detection for Networks,” Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on System Administration, pp. 229–238, 1999.
[3] R. Sommer and V. Paxson, “Outside the Closed World: On Using Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 305–316, 2010.
[4] A. Lazarevic, L. Ertoz, V. Kumar, A. Ozgur, and J. Srivastava, “A Comparative Study of Anomaly Detection Schemes in Network Intrusion Detection,” Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 25–36, 2003.
[5] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016.
[6] Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, “Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798–1828, 2013.
[7] F. Chollet, Deep Learning with Python, Manning Publications, New York, USA, 2017.
[8] Scapy Development Team, “Scapy: Interactive Packet Manipulation Tool,” Official Scapy Documentation, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://scapy.net
[9] R. Doshi, N. Apthorpe, and N. Feamster, “Machine Learning DDoS Detection for Consumer Internet of Things Devices,” IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, pp. 29–35, 2018.
[10] H. Hindy, E. Bayne, M. Bures, R. Atkinson, C. Tachtatzis, and X. Bellekens, “A Taxonomy of Network Threats and the Effect of Dataset Characteristics on Intrusion Detection Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 104650–104675, 2020.
[11] A. Buczak and E. Guven, “A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1153–1176, 2016.
[12] L. Dhanabal and S. P. Shantharajah, “A Study on NSL-KDD Dataset for Intrusion Detection System Based on Classification Algorithms,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 446–452, 2015.
[13] Y. Liu, Y. Li, and X. Chen, “Adversarial Machine Learning: Security Threats and Defense Mechanisms,” Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 58, pp. 102–115, 2021.
[14] R. Shokri and V. Shmatikov, “Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning,” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. 1310–1321, 2015.