Lip prints are acquiring popularity in forensic science because they are unique, stable, and capable of providing personal identification. Human identification is on the rise in this new millennium because of rising crime, natural disasters, and terrorist attacks. Lip prints are a unique pattern comprising the sulci labiorum, or wrinkles and grooves on the labial mucus. I?agree that lip prints have uniqueness just like fingerprint and as such study of lip prints known as Cheiloscopy. Cheiloscopy is the study of the exterior portion?of the lip, which includes a multitude of ridges and indentations that can create a distinctive pattern known as a lip print. Each individual is like a fingerprint, with its own unique?features. This study examines the validity?of lip prints in determining their age and gender considering a sample of 300 individuals, divided equally within the jurisdiction of two age groups and both sexes. The analysis?of lip print patterns was performed in quadrants using Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification, and chi-square, Pearson\'s correlation and regression analysis were applied to verify the results. A statistical analysis showed significant gender-related distributions, reporting significantly more Type I lip prints in women and more Type II?and Type IV lip prints in men (p=0.043). Age effects included: patterns of change?among young and old
Introduction
Overview
Cheiloscopy is the forensic study of lip prints, which are formed by grooves and wrinkles (sulci labiorum) on the lips. Like fingerprints, lip prints are unique to each individual and can serve as a reliable tool for human identification, especially in cases of crimes, disasters, or missing persons. Lip prints can be left as trace evidence at crime scenes and are unaffected by age or minor injuries.
Classification
The Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification (1970) categorizes lip prints into five types:
Method: Lipstick application, transfer to cellophane tape, mounted on white paper, then analyzed under magnification.
Data Analysis
Software: IBM SPSS
Tests Used: Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, Pearson correlation, and Independent T-test
Criteria: Participants were healthy and provided consent; those with lip injuries or deformities were excluded.
Results
Group 1 (Ages 15–25)
Most common lip print: Type I (37.3%)
Distribution:
Males: 36.0% Type I
Females: 38.3% Type I
Other types (descending frequency): II, III, IV, V
Group 2 (Ages 26–70)
Most common lip print: Type I (51.3%)
Distribution:
Males: 28.0% Type I
Females: 23.3% Type I
Other types (descending frequency): II, III, IV, V
Statistical Findings
Independent T-test showed no statistically significant difference in lip print types between genders (p > 0.05), indicating lip prints are not gender-specific.
Conclusion
This study has drastically pertained the domain of?forensic cheiloscopy to lineate lip print patterns with age and sex to an extent that is statistically significant. It was statistically verified (regression analysis and chi-square tests) how much lip prints could be used for the identification of someone, especially when other biometric data are?not available. The study also addresses the challenges posed by environmental factors, as well as calls?for standardization in lip print collection and analysis. These findings are instructive and help advance the study,?providing a baseline for future studies and stimulating development of globally applicable, well-established methodologies. The results further indicate that future integration of digital technologies, such as AI and machine learning, may enhance the accuracy and efficiency of lip print analysis. This study supports the continued applicability of conventional biometric instruments, such as lip prints, as forensic science advances, providing an affordable option in environments with limited resources and broadening the range of forensic identification techniques. In a nutshell, the study shows how cheiloscopy can revolutionize the field of forensic science by linking theoretical knowledge with real-world applications.
References
[1] Kyaw Soe Htun, H. A. Win, K. Soe, T. Zaw, and M. Hlaing, \"Aid For Personal Identification: Stereomicroscopic Morphological Patterns Of Lip Print,\" Apr. 07, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332251085_AID_FOR_PERSONAL_IDENTIFICATION_STEREOMICROSCOPIC_MORPHOLOGICAL_PATTERNS_OF_LIP_PRINT.
[2] Y. Verma et al., \"A study of lip prints and its reliability as a forensic tool,\" National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 25, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.168227.
[3] B. Sivapathasundharam, P. A. Prakash, and G. Sivakumar, \"Lip prints (cheiloscopy),\" Indian Journal of Dental Research: Official Publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 234–237, Oct. 2001, Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11987663/.
[4] G. Mishra, K. Ranganathan, and T. Saraswathi, \"Study of lip prints,\" Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 28, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2948.50885.
[5] K. S, M. K, M. S, and S. P, \"Cheiloscopy - A Vital Tool In Crime Investigation,\" International Journal of Forensic Science & Pathology, pp. 89–93, Mar. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.19070/2332-287x-1500022
[6] V. Sharma, P. Yadav, N. Ingle, and N. Kaur, \"Identification of sex using lip prints : A clinical study,\" Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, vol. 4, no. 6, p. 173, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.149030.
[7] Dwivedi, Nidhi, et al. \"Latent Lip Print Development and Its Role in Suspect Identification.\" Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, 2013, p. 22, https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.114554.