Architecting Responsible Development and Deployment of Generative AI

Abstract

Architecting Responsible Development and Deployment of Generative AI\" presents a comprehensive framework for ensuring the responsible development and deployment of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The paper addresses various aspects crucial for the ethical and effective utilization of generative AI, ranging from governance frameworks and accountability measures to technical considerations such as explainability, fairness, and operational resilience. Through an in-depth exploration of topics such as monitoring and reporting systems, data suitability, performance evaluation metrics like ROUGE and METEOR, and transparency measures, the paper provides practical guidance for organizations and practitioners. Additionally, it delves into the importance of diversity metrics, benchmarking techniques, and user feedback mechanisms in promoting ethical AI practices. Furthermore, the paper outlines key architectural principles for ensuring modularity, scalability, fault tolerance, and efficient resource utilization in generative AI systems. By integrating legal compliance, consent management, and user interface design considerations, the framework aims to foster trust, mitigate risks, and promote the responsible advancement of generative AI technologies.

Introduction

The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) serve as a global standard for preventing and addressing business-related human rights impacts, including those arising from Generative AI. Applying UNGPs can promote responsible AI development by focusing on human rights, governance, accountability, and transparency.

Key points include:

• Human Rights Impact: Generative AI development should consider its effects on dignity and equality, using frameworks like B-Tech’s Taxonomy of Human Rights Risks.

• Governance: A multi-layered governance model involving suppliers, developers, and users is crucial, combining regulation, incentives, and transparency.

• Architecture for Responsible AI: Proposed architecture covers accountability (governance, monitoring, reporting), data suitability (quality, diversity, relevance), explainability, fairness (bias mitigation), performance evaluation, transparency (consent and legal compliance), and operational resilience (modularity, scalability, fault tolerance).

• Generative AI Overview: Generative AI creates new content by learning patterns from data, with powerful transformer-based models driving progress.

• Challenges: Risks include misuse, bias, misinformation, and job disruption, requiring balanced, ethical management.

• Accountability Frameworks: Guidelines, Acceptable Use Policies, voluntary codes of conduct, and potential legislation aim to ensure ethical AI use.

• Monitoring: Metrics, prediction embeddings, and user feedback are essential for tracking AI behavior, detecting bias, and guiding improvements.

• Data Suitability: High-quality, relevant, and diverse training data is vital. Methods like perplexity, BLEU scores, and human evaluations assess data quality, while diversity analysis ensures demographic and domain inclusiveness to mitigate bias and promote fairness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper comprehensively proposes the multifaceted landscape of responsible development and deployment of generative AI. By delving into key areas such as evaluation metrics, fairness considerations, transparency measures, and operational resilience, it underscores the importance of ethical and effective use of AI technologies. While the security aspect remains unexplored, the paper offers a robust framework encompassing various techniques and strategies essential for navigating the complexities of generative AI systems. Moving forward, the field can benefit from further research and advancements in security protocols tailored for generative AI, along with continued efforts to embed ethical principles into model development and deployment. By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, enhancing user-centric design, and embracing regulatory compliance, the future of generative AI holds promise for ethical innovation and responsible technological advancement.

References

[1] Review of artificial intelligence-based question-answeringsystems in healthcare, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Volume 13, Issue 2Mar 2023, “Leona Cilar Budler\", \" Lucija Gosak”, “Gregor Stiglic” [2] An Empirical Study of Pre-trained Language Models in Simple Knowledge Graph Question Answering, arXiv:2303.10368v1 [cs.CL] 18 Mar 2023, Nan Hu, Yike Wu1, Guilin Qi, Dehai Min, Jiaoyan Chen, Jeff Z. Pan, and Zafar Ali [3] Knowledge-based Embodied Question Answering, arXiv:2109.07872v1 [cs.RO] 16 Sep 2021, Sinan Tan, Mengmeng Ge, Di Guo, Huaping Liu, and Fuchun Sun [4] Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey, Haiyan Zhao, Hanjie Chen, Fan Yang, Ninghao Liu, Huiqi Deng, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Mengnan Du, https://doi.org/10.1145/3639372, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol, 2024-04-30 [5] From Understanding to Utilization: A Survey on Explainability for Large Language Models, Haoyan Luo, Lucia Specia, arXiv:2401.12874v2 [cs.CL] 22 Feb 2024, [6] Global Concept-Based Interpretability for Graph Neural Networks via Neuron Analysis, Han Xuanyuan1, Pietro Barbiero, Dobrik Georgiev, Lucie Charlotte Magister, Pietro Lio, arXiv:2208.10609v2 [cs.LG] 8 Mar 2023 [7] Concept-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey, Eleonora Poeta, Gabriele Ciravegna, Eliana Pastor, Tania Cerquitelli, And Elena Baralis, arXiv:2312.12936v1 [cs.AI] 20 Dec 2023 [8] Common Pitfalls When Explaining AI and Why Mechanistic Explanation Is a Hard Problem, Daniel C. Elton, Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, 24 September 2021 [9] Review of artificial intelligence-based question-answering systems in healthcare, Leona Cilar Budler, Lucija Gosak, Gregor Stiglic, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge DiscoveryVolume 13, Issue 2Mar 2023 [10] On GNN explainability with activation rules, Luca Veyrin-Forrer, Ataollah Kamal, Stefan Duffner, Marc Plantevit & Céline Robardet, Data Min Knowl Disc (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-022-00870-z, Published 02 October 2022 [11] Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models, Paul Pu Liang, Chiyu Wu, Louis-Philippe Morency, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, arXiv:2106.13219v1 [cs.CL] 24 Jun 2021 [12] The Language of Derogation and Hate: Functions, Consequences, and Reappropriation, Carmen Cervone, Martha Augoustinos, and Anne Maass, https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967394, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2021, Vol. 40(1) 80–101. [13] Fairness And Bias In Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey Of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategies, Emilio Ferrara, Thomas Lord, Sci 2024, 6(1), 3, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07683, 7 Dec 2023 [14] Measuring Fairness in Generative Models, Christopher T.H Teo, Ngai-Man Cheung, ICML 2021 Workshop - Machine Learning for Data: Automated Creation, Privacy, Bias, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.07754, 16 Jul 2021 [15] A Pathway Towards Responsible AI Generated Content, Chen Chen, Jie Fu, Lingjuan Lyu, arXiv:2303.01325v3 [cs.AI] 27 Dec 2023 [16] A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models, Yupeng Chang and Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu2, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Yi Chang, Philip S. Yu, Qiang Yang, Xing Xie, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1145/3641289, 2024-01-23 [17] Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey, Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.00770, 2 Sep 2023 [18] Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI: Attack, Watermarking and Attribution, Haonan Zhong, Jiamin Chang, Ziyue Yang, Tingmin Wu, Pathum Chamikara Mahawaga Arachchige, Chehara Pathmabandu, Minhui Xue, [19] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.09272, 15 Mar 2023 [20] Ensuring Responsible and Transparent Use of Generative AI in Extension, Paul A. Hill, Lendel K. Narine, The Journal of Extension, Volume 61, Number 2, Article 13, 9-20-2023 [21] From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy, Maanak Gupta, Kshitiz Aryal, Lopamudra Praharaj, date of publication 1 August 2023, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, Volume 11, 2023 [22] Generative AI Meets Responsible AI: Practical Challenges and Opportunities, Kenthapadi, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Nazneen Rajani, KDD \'23: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2023, Pages 5805–5806, https://doi.org/10.1145/3580305.3599557, 04 August 2023 [23] Generative AI and Ethical Considerations For Trustworthy AI Implementation, Rudrendu Kumar Paul, Bidyut Sarkar, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning (IJAIML) Volume 2, Issue 01, Jan-Dec 2023, pp. 95-102. Article ID: IJAIML_02_01_010 [24] How Faithful is Your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models, Ahmed M. Alaa, Boris van Breugel, Evgeny Saveliev, Mihaela van der Schaar, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 162:290-306, 2022, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.08921, 13 Jul 2022 [25] Observe, inspect, modify: Three conditions for generative AI governance, Fabian Ferrari, José van Dijck and Antal van den Bosch, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231214811, November 29, 2023, Sage Journals [26] Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models, Philipp Hacker, Andreas Engel, Marco Mauer, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.02337, 12 May 2023 [27] Regulating Generative Ai: A Pathway To Ethical And Responsible Implementation, Jonathan Luckett, International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics (IJCI) Vol. 12, No.5, October 2023 pp. 79-92, 2023. [28] Regulating Generative AI, Andrew Zonneveld, Harvard Model Congress, Boston 2024. [29] Responsible Generative AI: An Examination of Ongoing Efforts to Tame This Powerful Technology, Journal of Innovation, Cheranellore Vasudevan, Michael Linehan, Chuck Byers, Natalie N. Brooks, Luis Freeman, 2024-1-9 [30] Review of artificial intelligence?based question?answering systems in healthcare, Leona Cilar Budler, Lucija Gosak, Gregor Stiglic, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 13(2), January 2023 [31] The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT, Krzysztof Wach, Cong Doanh Duong, Joanna Ejdys, R?ta Kazlauskait?, Pawel Korzynski, Grzegorz Mazurek, Joanna Paliszkiewicz, Ewa Ziemba, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 11(2):7-24, June 2023, DOI:10.15678/EBER.2023.110201 [32] The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Generative AI, Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (2023) 21(4), 42-50, Vassilka D. Kirova, Cyril S. Ku, Joseph R. Laracy, Thomas J. Marlowe, https://doi.org/10.54808/JSCI.21.04.42 [33] The Ethics of Interaction: Mitigating Security Threats in LLMs, Ashutosh Kumar, Sagarika Singh, Shiv Vignesh Murty, Swathy Ragupathy, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.12273, 22 Jan 2024 [34] The Impact of Generative Content on Individuals Privacy and Ethical Concerns, Ajay Sudhir Bale, R. B. Dhumale, Nimisha Beri, Melanie Lourens, Raj A. Varma, Vinod Kumar, Sanjay Sanamdikar and Mamta B. Savadatti, International Journal Of Intelligent Systems And Applications In Engineering, ISSN:2147-6799, 28/08/2023 [35] Knowledge-based Embodied Question Answering, Sinan Tan; Mengmeng Ge; Di Guo; Huaping Liu; Fuchun Sun, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Volume: 45 Issue: 10, Page(s): 11948 – 11960, Date of Publication: 17 May 2023, DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3277206 [36] ChatGPT versus Traditional Question Answering for Knowledge Graphs: Current Status and Future Directions Towards Knowledge Graph Chatbots, Reham Omar, Omij Mangukiya, Panos Kalnis, Essam Mansour, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06466, Published in arXiv.org 8 February 2023 [37] Advancements in Complex Knowledge Graph Question Answering: A Survey, Yiqing Song; Wenfa Li; Guiren Dai; Xinna Shang, Electronics 2023, 12(21), 4395; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12214395, Published: 24 October 2023 [38] Exploration of Question-Answering Systems: Survey, Asmae Briouya; Hasnae Briouya; Ali Choukri; Mohamed Amnai; Youssef Fakhri, 2023 10th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), DOI:10.1109/WINCOM59760.2023.10322930, October 2023 [39] Modeling Performance and Power on Disparate Platforms Using Transfer Learning with Machine Learning Models, Amit Mankodi, Amit Bhatt, Bhaskar Chaudhury, Rajat Kumar & Aditya Amrutiya, Modeling, Simulation and Optimization Proceedings of CoMSO 2020, 18 March 2021 [40] Grammar Accuracy Evaluation (GAE): Quantifiable Qualitative Evaluation of Machine Translation Models, Dojun Park, Youngjin Jang, Harksoo Kim, Journal of KIISE 49.7 (2022), pp. 514-520, https://doi.org/10.5626/jok.2022.49.7.514, 27 May 2022 [41] A Survey on Generative Modeling with Limited Data, Few Shots, and Zero-Shot, Milad Abdollahzadeh, Touba Malekzadeh, Christopher T. H. Teo, Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran, Guimeng Liu, Ngai-Man Cheung, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.14397, 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 26 Jul 2023 [42] Diversity in Deep Generative Models and Generative AI, Gabriel Turinici, Conference paper on Machine Learning, optimization and data Science, Home Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science pp 84–93, 15 February 2024 [43] Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models, Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi, Jaejun Yoo, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.09797, 28 Jun 2020 [44] An Empirical Study of Pre-trained Language Models in Simple Knowledge Graph Question Answering, Nan Hu, Yike Wu, Guilin Qi, Dehai Min, DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2184834/v1, World Wide Web, Volume 26, Issue 5, September 2023, 1444 pages, ISSN: 1386-145X [45] Recent progress in leveraging deep learning methods for question answering, Tianyong Hao, Li Xinxin, Yulan He, Fu Lee Wang, Yingying Qu, Neural Computing and Applications 34(3):1-19, January 2022, DOI:10.1007/s00521-021-06748-3 [46] Deep learning-based question answering: a survey, Hiba Abdel-Nabi, Arafat Awajan, Mostafa Z. Ali, Knowledge and Information Systems 65(4):1-87, December 2022 [47] Techniques, datasets, evaluation metrics and future directions of a question answering system, Faiza Qamar, Seemab Latif, Asad Shah, Knowledge and Information Systems, DOI:10.1007/s10115-023-02019-w, December 2023 [48] An Efficient Matching Algorithm for Question Answering System, Jing Zhang, Xin Yue Zhao, Jianing Huang, Yunsheng Song, In book: Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining IX, DOI:10.3233/FAIA231020, December 2023 [49] Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review, Giovanni Maria Biancofiore, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio Di Sciascio, Fedelucio Narducci, DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2209.01621, Published in arXiv.org 4 September 2022 [50] Question Answering System Approaches: A Review, Mandar Suryavanshi, International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology, 8thFebruary 2023, DOI:10.48175/IJARSCT-8301 [51] GPT4Vis: What Can GPT-4 Do for Zero-shot Visual Recognition?, Wenhao Wu, Huanjin Yao, Mengxi Zhang, Yuxin Song, Wanli Ouyang, Jingdong Wang, Published in arXiv.org 27 November 2023, DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2311.15732, Corpus ID: 265456165 [52] Zero-Shot Generative Model Adaptation via Image-Specific Prompt Learning, Jiayi Guo; Chaofei Wang; You Wu; Eric Zhang; Kai Wang; Xingqian Xu; Shiji Song; Humphrey Shi; Gao Huang, 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 22 August 2023, DOI: 10.109/CVPR52729.2023.01106.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Dr. Bhuvaneswari U, Arun Prasad V. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.