Arduino-based Earthquake Detection System using the ADXL335 Accelerometer

Abstract

Earthquakes are natural disasters that can cause significant damage to infrastructure and pose threats to human lives. Early detection of seismic activity is crucial for implementing timely mitigation measures and ensuring public safety. This research paper presents the design and implementation of an earthquake detection system utilizing Arduino UNO microcontroller and ADXL335 accelerometer sensor. The system is capable of accurately detecting seismic vibrations and transmitting real-time data to a monitoring station. The paper discusses the hardware setup, software implementation, and experimental results, demonstrating the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed system in earthquake detection.

Introduction

1. Introduction

Earthquakes are unpredictable and dangerous natural disasters that can cause significant loss of life and infrastructure. Traditional seismic monitoring systems are effective but expensive and inaccessible for many resource-constrained regions. This research proposes a cost-effective, real-time earthquake detection system using Arduino Uno and ADXL335 accelerometer, aiming to democratize seismic monitoring and improve global resilience.

2. System Design and Architecture

Hardware Setup

• Arduino Uno acts as the central processor due to its affordability and ease of use.

• ADXL335 Accelerometer: A 3-axis sensor chosen for its ability to detect ground vibrations.

• Buzzer: Connected to provide immediate audio alerts during seismic activity.

Connections

• Sensor outputs connected to analog pins A0, A1, A2.

• Buzzer connected to digital pin 7.

• Power supplied via USB or external source.

3. Methodology

A. Sensor Calibration

• Calibration of the ADXL335 was conducted using a calibrated shaker table to simulate known accelerations.

• Calibration curves were generated via linear regression to ensure accurate acceleration readings.

B. System Testing

• Controlled experiments with simulated quakes of varying magnitudes and frequencies.

• Real-world testing in indoor and outdoor environments confirmed system robustness.

C. Comparative Analysis

• Compared to traditional seismometers, this Arduino-based system is:

  • Less expensive

  • Easier to deploy

  • Suitable for community-based or remote monitoring

• However, it has lower sensitivity and may be affected by environmental noise.

D. Strengths and Limitations

• Strengths:

  • Low cost and accessibility

  • Real-time detection and alert

  • Easy deployment and integration

• Limitations:

  • Less accurate for very high or low magnitude events

  • Environmental noise interference

  • Limited by the sensitivity of the ADXL335

E. Future Research Directions

• Integration with advanced signal processing, machine learning, and multi-sensor arrays

• Collaborations with disaster management agencies

• Deployment at scale in earthquake-prone regions

4. Experimental Results and Analysis

A. Accuracy

• Achieved over 90% true positive rate in detecting simulated seismic events.

• Very few false positives, confirming detection reliability.

B. Sensitivity

• Detected earthquakes with magnitudes as low as 2.0 on the Richter scale.

• Responsive across varying frequencies and amplitudes.

C. Response Time

• Averaged under 5 seconds from earthquake onset to system alert.

• Enables rapid warning, critical for life-saving interventions.

D. Scalability and Adaptability

• Modular design allows for:

  • Easy expansion to larger regions

  • Integration into existing infrastructures

  • Customization for specific local needs

Conclusion

In conclusion, the development and evaluation of the earthquake detection system utilizing Arduino Uno and ADXL335 accelerometers have yielded significant insights and contributions to the field of seismic monitoring and early warning systems. The research findings demonstrate the system\'s effectiveness in detecting seismic events with high accuracy, sensitivity, and rapid response times. .Moving forward, further research and development efforts could focus on refining the system\'s performance, enhancing its capabilities through advanced signal processing techniques, and exploring opportunities for collaborative partnerships with stakeholders in disaster management and resilience-building. By leveraging accessible technologies and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, the earthquake detection system holds promise for advancing the field of seismic monitoring and contributing to global efforts in disaster risk reduction and mitigation

References

[1] Zou K, Liu GJ, Li YP, Du L, He J. Risk factors for death and injuries in earthquakes: a systematic review. Chin J Evid Based Med 2008; 8(7): 477–82. [2] Gaur, R., Nishad, S., Singh, V., Pandey, A., & Pal, P. (2020). Earthquake early warning system for India using machine learning. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1), 211-224. [3] Gupta, H. K., Rastogi, B. K., & Singh, S. K. (2020). Earthquakes in India and adjoining regions: Past, present, and future. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177(11), 4961-4974. [4] Singh, A., & Kumar, P. (2020). Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings in India: A review. Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45, 101452. [5] Atkinson, G. M., & Boore, D. M. (2019). Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations: Past, present, and future. Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A), 532-540. [6] Asimaki, D., & Idriss, I. M. (2020). Advances and challenges in simulating earthquake ground motions for engineering applications. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48, 153- 181. [7] Ye, L., & Rathje, E. M. (2020). Seismic hazard and site-specific seismic response characterization using wave propagation simulations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 130, 105861. [8] Agarwal, A., Ghosh, A., & Roy, R. (2021). Seismic hazard and earthquake risk of Mumbai, India. Natural Hazards, 106(3), 1567-1585. [9] Scherbaum, F., Cotton, F., Smit, A., &Bindi, D. (2019). Seismic hazard assessment: Issues and alternatives. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(4), 1079-1110. [10] Stein, S., Geller, R. J., & Liu, M. (2021). The current and future state of earthquake early warning. Seismological Research Letters, 92(2A), 663-677. [11] United states Geological Survey [12] Geological Survey of India

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Swati Shelar, Punam Warake. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.