Artificial Intelligence, National Security, and Scientific Governance: A Policy Framework for the United States

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a strategic national capability for the United States, affecting defense readiness, intelligence analysis, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure, scientific discovery, public administration, and geopolitical competition. This paper examines the future role of AI in U.S. national security and develops scientific policy advice that can be adapted by any government seeking to use AI responsibly. The study applies a qualitative policy-review methodology, drawing on recent U.S. federal AI strategies, national security guidance, NIST risk-management standards, Department of Homeland Security critical-infrastructure guidance, and AI-enabled science initiatives. The analysis finds that AI can improve threat detection, decision support, cyber defense, logistics, disaster response, biomedical discovery, and energy-system optimization. However, these benefits are inseparable from risks involving model opacity, adversarial manipulation, data leakage, deepfakes, autonomous decision-making, infrastructure dependency, workforce disruption, and public-trust erosion. The paper argues that future AI governance should move beyond a simple innovation-versus-regulation debate. Instead, governments should adopt a dual-use governance model that protects national security while preserving scientific integrity, civil liberties, democratic accountability, and international stability. The proposed framework recommends five pillars: sovereign AI infrastructure, independent scientific advisory capacity, risk-based deployment controls, secure public-sector data ecosystems, and international cooperation on AI safety and security. The paper concludes that AI should be treated as both a national security asset and a scientific public good. Any government adopting AI must therefore combine technical excellence with legal safeguards, ethical review, human accountability, and continuous empirical validation.

Introduction

This paper examines the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in U.S. government, national security, scientific research, and public administration. AI has evolved from a research technology into a strategic national asset that influences defense, cybersecurity, intelligence, infrastructure management, emergency response, and scientific innovation. While AI offers significant opportunities, it also introduces risks related to reliability, security, privacy, civil liberties, and democratic accountability.

Research Objective and Methodology

The study uses a qualitative policy-analysis approach to review U.S. AI policies, national security strategies, governance frameworks, and science-policy initiatives. It seeks to answer four key questions:

1. How AI is positioned in U.S. national security policy.
2. What opportunities AI creates for security and scientific advancement.
3. What governance risks arise from government AI use.
4. What policies governments should adopt for responsible AI deployment.

U.S. AI Policy Context

Recent U.S. policies increasingly treat AI as a pillar of national power:

• AI is linked to economic competitiveness, national security, and global leadership.
• Federal strategies emphasize innovation, infrastructure development, and international cooperation.
• Government guidance stresses balancing AI adoption with protections for civil rights, privacy, safety, and public trust.
• AI is also viewed as a key driver of scientific progress in fields such as energy, biotechnology, healthcare, climate resilience, and manufacturing.

Opportunities of AI in National Security

1. Intelligence and Decision Support

• AI can analyze vast amounts of intelligence data, imagery, sensor information, and reports.
• It helps identify patterns, support forecasting, and improve crisis planning.
• Human judgment and accountability must remain central to decision-making.

2. Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure

• AI can strengthen cyber defense by detecting threats, prioritizing vulnerabilities, and supporting incident response.
• It can improve the resilience of energy grids, transportation systems, healthcare networks, financial systems, and communications infrastructure.
• However, adversaries can also use AI for cyberattacks, malware creation, and disinformation campaigns.

3. Defense Logistics and Readiness

• AI can optimize supply chains, predict equipment failures, improve maintenance schedules, and enhance military training.
• These applications can provide major strategic advantages without directly involving autonomous weapon systems.

4. Scientific Discovery and Innovation

• AI accelerates research by analyzing large datasets, generating hypotheses, supporting simulations, and improving modeling.
• Advances in energy, health, materials science, climate resilience, and manufacturing can indirectly strengthen national security.

Major Risks and Governance Challenges

1. Reliability and Hallucinations

• AI systems may generate confident but incorrect outputs.
• In security and policy environments, inaccurate information can lead to poor decisions and loss of public trust.
• Strong validation, traceability, and expert oversight are required.

2. Data Security and Information Leakage

• Government AI systems often process sensitive or classified information.
• Risks include data leaks through training data, prompts, APIs, or third-party vendors.
• Robust security controls, encryption, auditing, and data governance are essential.

3. Adversarial Manipulation and Deepfakes

• AI enables large-scale disinformation, synthetic media, voice cloning, and cyberattacks.
• Governments need strong AI security measures, media authentication systems, and rapid response capabilities.

4. Civil Liberties and Democratic Oversight

• AI can affect surveillance, policing, immigration, benefits, and public services.
• Transparency, legal authority, independent auditing, appeal mechanisms, and human review are necessary to protect rights.

5. Institutional Overdependence

• Excessive reliance on AI may weaken human expertise and critical thinking.
• Governments should maintain human skills, conduct manual backup exercises, and encourage scrutiny of AI-generated outputs.

Scientific Advice for Governments

The paper recommends that governments:

1. Treat AI as critical national infrastructure.
2. Establish independent AI advisory councils.
3. Implement risk-based classification systems.
4. Require rigorous pre-deployment testing.
5. Keep humans accountable for high-impact decisions.
6. Protect public-sector data through strong governance.
7. Maintain transparency registers of government AI systems.
8. Invest in AI literacy and workforce training.
9. Protect scientific advice from political interference.
10. Strengthen international cooperation on AI safety and security.

Proposed AI Governance Framework

The paper introduces a five-pillar governance model:

1. Sovereign and Resilient AI Infrastructure
   • Secure computing resources, data centers, energy supply, chips, cloud systems, and technical talent.
2. Independent Scientific Advisory Capacity
   • Establish permanent multidisciplinary advisory bodies to evaluate AI strategies and deployments.
3. Risk-Based Deployment Controls
   • Apply oversight proportional to the risk level of each AI application.
4. Secure Public Data Ecosystems
   • Improve data quality, privacy protections, metadata standards, and secure data-sharing practices.
5. International AI Security Cooperation
   • Promote collaboration on AI safety, cybersecurity, standards, incident reporting, and responsible global governance.

Conclusion

AI will shape the future of national security and scientific governance. In the United States, AI is already being positioned as a strategic capability linked to defense, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure, economic competitiveness, and scientific discovery. This creates major opportunities, but it also creates risks that cannot be solved by technology alone. Future governments must treat AI as a dual-use public capability: powerful enough to strengthen security and science, but risky enough to require oversight, validation, and democratic accountability. The best path forward is a balanced governance model. Governments should invest in AI infrastructure and scientific discovery, but they should also require risk-based controls, independent advisory systems, secure data governance, human accountability, and international cooperation. AI should not replace public judgment. It should strengthen the ability of democratic governments to make evidence-based decisions while protecting rights, safety, and trust.

References

[1] Autio, C., Basu, A., Eppard, P., Hamon, R., Hutter, B., Kumar, H., & Tabassi, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile (NIST AI 600-1). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1 [2] Department of Homeland Security. (2024). Roles and responsibilities framework for artificial intelligence in critical infrastructure. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/roles-and-responsibilities-framework-artificial-intelligence-critical-infrastructure [3] Executive Office of the President. (2025a). Executive Order 14179: Removing barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence. Federal Register, 90(20), 8741-8742. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02172/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence [4] Executive Office of the President. (2025b). Executive Order 14277: Advancing artificial intelligence education for American youth. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/advancing-artificial-intelligence-education-for-american-youth/ [5] Executive Office of the President. (2025c). Launching the Genesis Mission. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/11/launching-the-genesis-mission/ [6] Kabir, M. S., & Oshin, S. S. Artificial Intelligence in Policing: Ethical, Regulatory, and Technological Challenges in the Canadian Context. [7] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework [8] Office of Management and Budget. (2025). Memorandum M-25-21: Accelerating federal use of AI through innovation, governance, and public trust. Executive Office of the President. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/M-25-21-Accelerating-Federal-Use-of-AI-through-Innovation-Governance-and-Public-Trust.pdf [9] Kabir, S., & Mustofa, J. Contemporary Development of International Humanitarian Laws with Special Reference to Refugees, Women and Prisoners. [10] White House. (2024). National Security Memorandum on advancing the United States leadership in artificial intelligence; harnessing artificial intelligence to fulfill national security objectives; and fostering the safety, security, and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/national-security-memorandum-advancing-the-united-states-leadership-artificial [11] Kabir, M. S. (2025). When Business Law Meets FinTech: Contracts in a Digital Age—The US Perspective. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. [12] White House. (2025a). America\'s AI Action Plan. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf [13] White House. (2025b). AI.gov: President Trump\'s AI strategy and action plan. https://www.ai.gov/

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Prof. Md Shahin Kabir, Sabrina Sinthia Oshin , Md Raihan Kabir , Tanvir Rahman Tuhin , Jaharna Rafi Chowdhury , Easmat Jabin Sumi . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.