Benchmarking International Tunnel Maintenance Practices for Indian Railways

Abstract

Railway tunnels in India are exposed to complex geotechnical and climatic challenges, including lateritic geology, monsoonal rainfall, and high traffic loads, which often result in crown instability, water ingress, and slope erosion. This study benchmarks international tunnel maintenance practices from Germany, Japan, and Switzerland, focusing on predictive diagnostics, sustainable repair technologies, and policy frameworks. Comparative analysis with Indian case studies such as the Karmali and Pernem tunnels along Konkan railways highlights gaps in current methodologies and the need for integration of advanced tools like Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The findings propose a unified framework that combines global best practices with site specific adaptations, enabling Indian Railways to transition from reactive maintenance to predictive, sustainable tunnel management. Ultimately, this research establishes a replicable model for resilient railway infrastructure in geologically sensitive regions.

Introduction

Railway tunnels are critical to transportation networks, particularly in challenging terrains such as India’s Konkan Railway, where lateritic geology, heavy monsoon rainfall, and high traffic loads lead to recurring issues like crown instability, water ingress, erosion, and settlement. These conditions demand effective maintenance strategies to ensure safety and reliability. While countries such as Germany, Japan, and Switzerland have adopted advanced tunnel maintenance frameworks based on predictive diagnostics, automation, and sustainability, Indian practices largely remain reactive and site-specific.

The study compares international tunnel maintenance approaches with Indian case studies of the Karmali and Pernem tunnels. Internationally, Germany emphasizes predictive diagnostics using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and lifecycle assessment, Japan focuses on seismic resilience through IoT-based monitoring and robotic inspections, and Switzerland integrates sustainability via digital twins, advanced drainage, and carbon-neutral policies. In contrast, Indian tunnels rely on corrective measures such as resin injection, drainage reinforcement, and slope stabilization, which are effective but implemented mainly after visible deterioration.

A comparative analysis highlights key gaps in India’s tunnel maintenance system, including limited use of advanced diagnostics, minimal automation, insufficient sustainability integration, and lack of standardized predictive policies. To address these gaps, the study proposes a unified framework for Indian Railways that combines global best practices with local adaptations. The framework is built on three pillars: predictive diagnostics using GPR, SHM, AI/ML, IoT sensors, and digital twins; sustainable repair technologies incorporating proven engineering methods alongside robotic automation and lifecycle assessment; and policy and governance reforms aligned with international standards and carbon-neutral goals.

Overall, the proposed framework provides a pathway for Indian Railways to shift from reactive maintenance to proactive, predictive, and sustainable tunnel management, enhancing safety, reducing lifecycle costs, and improving long-term resilience in geologically sensitive regions.

Conclusion

The benchmarking of international tunnel maintenance practices against Indian case studies demonstrates the urgent need for Indian Railways to adopt a predictive and sustainable framework. While site specific interventions such as crown stabilization at Karmali and drainage reinforcement at Pernem have improved safety, they remain largely reactive in nature. In contrast, countries like Germany, Japan, and Switzerland emphasize predictive diagnostics, automation, and sustainability through tools such as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), digital twins, and carbon neutral policies. This study proposes a unified framework that integrates global best practices with Indian conditions, combining predictive diagnostics, sustainable repair technologies, and policy alignment. Such an approach will enable Indian Railways to transition from reactive maintenance to proactive asset management, ensuring resilience, cost efficiency, and environmental responsibility. Ultimately, the findings establish a replicable model for future ready railway infrastructure in geologically sensitive regions, contributing to safer and more sustainable transport systems.

References

[1] PIARC, Maintenance | Road Tunnels Manual. [Online]. Available: https://tunnelsmanual.piarc.org/en/operation-and-maintenance/maintenance [2] Deutscher Aus schuss für unterirdisches Bauen (DAUB), Recommendations for the Determination of Lifecycle Costs for Tunnels. Cologne, Germany, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.daub-ita.de/fileadmin/documents/daub/gtcrec4/2023-03-24_DAUB_LZK_Empfehlung_EN_fin.pdf [3] Japan Tunnelling Association, Challenges & Changes: Tunnelling Activities in Japan 2024. Tokyo, Japan. [Online]. Available: https://www.japan-tunnel.org/en/sites/www.japan-tunnel.org.en/files/attach_file/2024all.pdf [4] Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Operations and Maintenance of the Project – Tunnel O&M Activities. [Online]. Available: https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12229738_04.pdf [5] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Preventive Maintenance for Road Pavement and Tunnels. [Online]. Available: https://www.mlit.go.jp/road/road_e/s3_maintenance.html [6] F. Sandrone, V. Labiouse, and J. F. Mathier, “Data collection for Swiss road tunnels maintenance,” ResearchGate, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vincent-Labiouse/publication/37442088_Data_collection_for_Swiss_road_tunnels_maintenance/links/5633d4c308ae88cf81ba4fcf/Data-collection-for-Swiss-road-tunnels-maintenance.pdf [7] Research Designs and Standards Organisation (RDSO), Guidelines for Civil Engineering Inspection, Maintenance and Safety in Existing Tunnels. Lucknow, India, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://rdso.indianrailways.gov.in/uploads/files/GE-G-0015.pdf [8] D. Pandey and S. B. Piplewar, “Maintenance and repairs of traffic tunnels – A case study of Darekasa Tunnel, Gondia District, Maharashtra,” International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research (IJSCER), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijscer.com/uploadfile/2015/0427/20150427030345560.pdf [9] J. V. Sundar, “Challenges in fast-track execution of track relaying in 60 year old tunnel at Mangalore,” IRICEN Seminar Paper, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://iricen.gov.in/iricen/ipwe_seminar/2017/PAPER% 202024/5.2%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Challenges% 20in%20Fast%20Track%2 0Execution %20 of%20Track.pdf

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Rajesh Kulkarni, Dr. Smita S. Aldonkar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.