This study proposes a safety framework that employs blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the protection of tourists and manage emergencies more effectively.. In these situations the AI module analyzes real-time data on crowds, environment and location to predict possible risks and enable proactive decisions. Additionally blockchain is employed to ensure the security of tourist identities online and to stop fabrication of incident report data allowing data integration for communication, between rescue teams and security forces. By collaborating these technologies can foster coordination, among departments and shorten the response time to offer tourists a safer and more dependable travel experience.
Introduction
The text describes an AI and Blockchain-based Tourist Safety Monitoring and Emergency Response System (AB-TSMERS) designed to improve tourist safety and emergency response efficiency.
Tourism is economically important, but current safety systems are slow and unreliable because they depend on manual reporting and centralized information sharing. To address this, the proposed system integrates:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) to analyze real-time data (crowd density, weather, location, sensor inputs) and predict potential risks or incidents.
Blockchain technology to securely store and verify data, ensuring transparency, trust, and tamper-proof records for emergencies and coordination among agencies.
The literature review shows:
AI techniques (like computer vision and sensor fusion) are effective for detecting abnormal behavior and crowd risks.
Blockchain improves secure data sharing, identity verification, and coordination among emergency agencies.
Combining AI and blockchain creates stronger safety systems, but challenges remain in scalability and integration.
The methodology includes five phases:
Collecting data from sensors, GPS, and weather sources.
Using AI to detect risks and generate alerts.
Storing and sharing verified data through blockchain and smart contracts.
Integrating both systems into a user app and control dashboard.
Testing and deploying the system in real environments.
The results indicate that the proposed system:
Responds to emergencies about 30% faster than traditional systems.
Improves prediction of risky situations.
Ensures secure and transparent data storage.
Enhances communication between emergency response teams.
However, challenges include high implementation cost, scalability issues, and the need for large datasets for accurate AI performance.
Conclusion
The AB-TSMERS system is a way to keep tourists safe in the end. The AB-TSMERS system uses smart technology and blockchain to keep an eye on tourists and guess what might happen to them. The AI part of the AB-TSMERS system is very important because it helps find threats and tells the police about them. The AB-TSMERS system is safe and open because it uses blockchain technology to keep all the data safe.
The AB-TSMERS system also helps groups like the police and health care teams work together. This makes it easier to handle emergencies. It helps people. The AB-TSMERS system works well because it has smart contracts and ways to keep track of who you are. Overall, the AB-TSMERS system makes tourists safer. Helps the tourism industry grow. If the AB-TSMERS system is improved and used in real life, it could help keep tourists safe in the future.
References
Steiner, C. Neuman and J. Schiller, “Kerberos: an authentication service for open network systems,” 1988, Proceedings of the 1988 Winter USENIX Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 191 - 202.
[2] X. Yue, H. Wang, D. Jin, M. Li and W. Jiang, “Healthcare data gateways: found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control,” 2016, Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 40, pp. 218 - 225.
[3] Decentralized identity,” 2018, Microsoft white paper, available on https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2DjfY as of March 21, 2019.
[4] H. Orman, “Blockchain: the emperors new PKI?,” 2018, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 23 - 28.
[5] “Decentralized ID,” 2018, Decentralized ID white paper, available on https://decentralized.id/docs/DID-whitepaper.pdf as of March 23, 2019.
[6] C. Allen, A. Brock, V. Buterin, J. Callas, D. Dorje, C. Lundkvist, P. Kravchenko, J. Nelson, D. Reed, M. Sabadello, G. Slepak, N. Thorp and H. Wood, “Decentralized public key infrastructure,” 2015, Rebooting the web of trust white paper, available on https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot1-sf/blob/master/final-documents/dpki.pdf as of March 25, 2019.
[7] P. Dunphy and F. Petitcolas, “A first look at identity management schemes on the blockchain,” 2018, IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 20 - 29.
[8] G. Zyskind, O. Nathan and A. Pentland, “Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data,” 2015, IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 180 - 184.
[9] J. Lee, “BIDaaS: blockchain based ID as a service,” 2018, IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 2274 - 2278.
[10] M. Sabadello, K. Hartog, C. Lundkvist, C. Franz, A. Elias, A. Hughes, J. Jordan and D. Zagidulin, “Introduction to DID auth,” 2018, Rebooting the web of trust VI white paper, available on https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot6-santabarbara/blob/master/final-documents/did-auth.pdf as of March 26, 2019.
[11] Y. Jian, “An improved scheme of single sign-on protocol,” 2009, 5th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security, Xi\'an, China, vol. 1, pp. 495 - 498.
[12] R. Yu, J. Wang, T. Xu, J. Gao, Y. An, G. Zhang and M. Yu, “Authentication with blockchain algorithm and text encryption protocol in calculation of social network,” 2017, IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 24944 - 24951.
[13] W. Li, A. Sforzin, S. Fedorov and G. Karame, “Towards scalable and private industrial blockchains,” 2017, Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Contracts, New York, NY, USA, pp. 9 - 14.
[14] S. Friebe, I. Sobik and M. Zitterbart, “DecentID: decentralized and privacy-preserving identity storage system using smart contracts,” 2018, 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), New York, NY, USA, pp. 37 - 42.
[15] Z. Hu, Y. Zhu and L. Ma, “An improved kerberos protocol based on Diffie-Hellman-DSA key exchange,” 2012, 18th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON), Singapore, Singapore, pp. 400 - 404.
[16] Johnson, T., & Patel, R. (2021). “An Overview of Solidity Programming for Blockchain-based Applications.” Journal of Blockchain Research, 12(4), 150-160.