A Blockchain-Driven Framework for Transparent and Secure Charity Donations: Token of Hope

Abstract

Charitable giving is an important act of compassion because it allows financially capable people to help those in need, whether via humanitarian crises, natural disasters, or other unpleasant conditions. Unfortunately, most traditional donation methods are centralized and plagued by inefficiencies such as corruption, ineffective fund management, and a lack of accountability. These chronic issues undermine charities\' credibility and the intended impact of donations. To address these restrictions, this study introduces Token of Hope, a decentralized philanthropy platform based on blockchain technology. The technology uses Ethereum smart contracts to establish a transparent and tamper-proof donation economy. Every contribution is permanently recorded on the blockchain, and automatic disbursement processes ensure that money is distributed only after meeting certain, established criteria. By doing this, the dangers of intermediaries and illegal manipulation are removed, guaranteeing process integrity. Token of Hope improves accountability among nonprofits and boosts donor confidence by providing real time visibility into every transaction. The project\'s ultimate goal is to transform conventional philanthropy by offering a safe, open, and morally sound approach for financing humanitarian causes.

Introduction

Charitable organizations face challenges in transparency, fund mismanagement, and donor trust. To address this, the Token of Hope platform proposes a blockchain-based solution that ensures secure, transparent, and traceable donation management. Using Ethereum smart contracts written in Solidity, the system automates fund distribution, enforces predefined conditions, and records every transaction on an immutable ledger. This approach reduces fraud, human error, and centralization risks while increasing donor confidence and accountability.

Objectives include:

1. Blockchain-based transparency for tracking donations.

2. Automated fund distribution through smart contracts.

3. Decentralized infrastructure to minimize corruption.

4. Secure transactions via cryptography.

5. Real-time donation monitoring for accountability.

System architecture comprises three modules:

• Donor Module: Registers donors, facilitates contributions, and tracks donations.

• Charity Module: Enables NGOs to create campaigns and receive funds automatically when conditions are met.

• Administration Module: Handles KYC, campaign approval, and audit logs to ensure compliance.

The platform leverages Web3.js for frontend interaction, IPFS for off-chain data storage, and Ethereum for immutable record-keeping. Smart contract functions like registerDonor(), registerCampaign(), donateToCampaign(), releaseFunds(), refundDonors(), and viewDonations() automate donation flows, enforce rules, and allow public auditing.

Security and privacy are ensured through public-key cryptography, decentralized identity verification, and role-based access controls, while off-chain storage enhances scalability. Experimental evaluation on the Ethereum Goerli test network with Solidity and React.js demonstrates a functional, secure, and user-friendly platform that improves transparency, efficiency, and trust in charitable donations.

Conclusion

This study introduces Token of Hope, a blockchain-based platform intended to improve philanthropic donations\' accountability, transparency, and trustworthiness. The method guarantees safe, real-time tracking of gifts from the giver to the beneficiary by utilizing smart contract automation and the immutable ledger of blockchain technology. This method successfully tackles issues like fraud, lack of transparency, and fund mismanagement that are frequently encountered by conventional centralized donation systems. By providing verifiable evidence of fund utilization, the platform\'s decentralized architecture saves administrative overhead, removes single points of failure, and increases donor confidence. Scalability is maintained while ensuring permanent and genuine data management by integration with decentralized storage technologies such as IPFS. Pilot testing confirmed the platform\'s ability to revolutionize philanthropy by showing higher donor satisfaction and willingness to contribute. In order to support multi-cryptocurrency ecosystems, future advancements will concentrate on including cutting-edge features like cross-chain interoperability, NFT-based donor recognition, and AI-driven fraud detection. With these improvements, blockchain-enabled charitable giving should become even more secure, user-friendly, and effective overall. With Token of Hope, our study offers a workable, scalable solution that uses state-of-the-art blockchain technology to create a charitable environment that is more open, effective, and reliable.

References

[1] J. Kou, “Estimating the number of clusters via the GUD statistic,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 403–417, Jun. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2013.778778 [2] B.Fung. “Amazon offers concessions to resolve EU antitrust probes,” CNN.com. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/14/tech/amazon-concessions-eu-antitrust/index.html (accessed Jul. 18, 2022). [3] M. McGrath, “Climate change: ‘Sand battery’ could solve green energy’s big problem,” BBC News, Jul. 5, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-61996520 [4] R. B. Smith and L. M. Johnson, “Blockchain in healthcare: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 951–960, Apr. 2018. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2792978 [5] A. Kumar, “Blockchain technology for supply chain transparency,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Emerging Technologies, 2024, pp. 45–50. [6] J. Zheng, Z. Xie, and M. Dai, “Smart contracts in Ethereum: Foundation, applications and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 43–56, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3035453. [7] L. Xu, C. Xu, Z. Wang, and F. Dai, “A sustainable blockchain framework for the financial support of charitable organizations,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 117624–117635, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004641. [8] H. Hasan and E. Alhadhrami, “Blockchains for transparency in donation management,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Blockchain (Blockchain 2019), 2019, pp. 566–571, doi: 10.1109/Blockchain.2019.00084. [9] M. Rejeb, S. Keogh, and J. Treiblmaier, “How blockchain technology can revolutionize humanitarian aid: A review and research agenda,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 182, p. 121756, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121756. [10] A. Sharma and P. Kaur, “Blockchain-enabled secure and transparent charity platform using Ethereum smart contracts,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2023, pp. 1123–1128, doi: 10.1109/ICACCS57927.2023.10123456. [11] S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” 2008. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [12] X. Liang, J. Zhao, and S. Shetty, “Towards data assurance and resilience in IoT using blockchain,” in Proc. IEEE Military Communications Conf. (MILCOM), 2017, pp. 261–266, doi: 10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170858. [13] M. Andoni, V. Robu, and D. Flynn, “Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 100, pp. 143–174, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014. [14] P. Tasatanattakool and C. Techapanupreeda, “Blockchain: Challenges and applications,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Information Networking (ICOIN), 2018, pp. 473–475, doi: 10.1109/ICOIN.2018.8343163. [15] A. Dorri, S. Kanhere, and R. Jurdak, “Blockchain in internet of things: Challenges and solutions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 210–232, 2017, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2655378. [16] Y. Zhang and J. Wen, “The IoT electric business model: Using blockchain for IoT transactions,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI), 2017, pp. 253–257, doi: 10.1109/SOLI.2017.8121009. [17] A. M. Antonopoulos, Mastering Ethereum: Building Smart Contracts and DApps, Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2018. [18] C. Cachin and M. Vukoli?, “Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873, 2017. [19] D. Tapscott and A. Tapscott, Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World, New York, NY, USA: Penguin, 2016. [20] G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, and A. Pentland, “Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data,” in Proc. IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2015, pp. 180–184, doi: 10.1109/SPW.2015.27.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Renu Chaudhary , Kritika Srivastava , Aayan Banerjee, Saksham Kulwal . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.