Carbon Footprint Reduction in CNC Machining Through CAM Optimization

Abstract

The manufacturing industry is a significant producer of energy and greenhouse gas emissions, especially in the processes that are energy consuming like Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machining. CNC machines must be connected to a continuous power supply to cause the rotation of the spindles, feed drives, control system, and other supporting machines, and this results in considerable indirect carbon emission associated with the production of electricity. Enhancement of energy efficiency of machining operations has thus emerged as a key goal in sustainable manufacturing. This paper examines the possibility of cutting down carbon in CNC machining by using Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) toolpath optimization. The traditional CAM toolpaths are usually associated with ineffective linking motions, too much air cutting, and prolonged machining times, which lead to the unnecessary use of energy. In this study, the optimized CAM plans with adaptive clearing, enhanced linking paths and effective selection of parameters were introduced to reduce the number of non-productive tool movements. The tests on experimental machining were performed on a CNC milling machine under controlled condition using both a conventional and optimized toolpaths. Power monitoring system measured energy consumption and the calculation of carbon emissions was done by the use of electricity emission factors. The findings show that optimized CAM toolpaths will generate a substantial decrease in machining time and electrical power usage, which will produce quantifiable carbon emissions. The results prove the fact that the sustainability-based planning of the CAM processes can be part of the environmental awareness-based machining processes.

Introduction

Industrial manufacturing has greatly contributed to economic growth, but it has also led to increased energy consumption and carbon emissions, especially in energy-intensive processes like CNC machining. CNC machines, widely used for producing high-precision components, consume significant electricity not only during cutting but also during idle time and auxiliary operations such as cooling and lubrication. Since machining parameters and toolpath strategies strongly influence energy usage, improving efficiency in process planning has become essential for reducing environmental impact.

The study focuses on reducing the carbon footprint of CNC machining by optimizing Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) toolpaths. Traditional CAM systems prioritize productivity and surface quality but often overlook energy efficiency and emissions. The research highlights that non-productive movements like air cutting and idle tool travel significantly increase energy consumption. Therefore, optimizing toolpaths can reduce machining time, energy use, and CO? emissions.

A theoretical model is developed where total energy consumption is divided into cutting, idle, and auxiliary power. Carbon emissions are then calculated using electricity usage multiplied by an emission factor. The study assumes controlled machining conditions and evaluates key variables such as spindle speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and toolpath strategy while measuring outcomes like energy use, machining time, and emissions.

An experimental setup using a 3-axis CNC milling machine compares conventional toolpaths with optimized CAM-generated toolpaths. Results from multiple machining trials show that optimized toolpaths consistently reduce machining time, energy consumption, and carbon emissions compared to conventional methods. Statistical analysis methods such as ANOVA and regression are used to validate the impact of optimization.

Overall, the research demonstrates that CAM-based toolpath optimization is an effective and practical approach for improving sustainability in CNC machining, offering measurable reductions in energy use and carbon footprint without compromising manufacturing performance.

Conclusion

This paper explored a reduction in carbon footprint in CNC machining by using toolpath optimization via CAM. The study established a detailed model that combines energy use modeling, carbon emission, and experimental justification to assess the benefit of optimized machining approaches to the environment. Experimental evidence has shown that optimized CAM toolpaths have significantly shorter machining time, less energy use, and lower carbon emission than normal toolpaths. The results indicate that the machining time was shortened by 20-25 percent when the toolpaths were optimized, which is mainly because of the reduced air cutting and better tool paths. Consequently, the overall energy consumption dropped by the rate of 24.26 and this was accompanied by a reduction in the level of carbon emission by the margin of 23.91. The above findings affirm the direct connection between increased efficiency in machining and environmental sustainability through reduced electricity consumption and the related greenhouse gas emissions. The ANOVA and regression models statistical analysis supported the importance of machining parameters and toolpath strategies on the energy consumption. The model of regression developed also had good predictive ability to estimate the energy utilization in various machining conditions. Notably, the roughness measurements on the surface revealed that the quality of machining using optimized toolpaths was satisfactory, which meant that the sustainability gains were not at the expense of the product performance. This paper has shown in general that CAM-based process optimization can be a viable approach to minimize the carbon footprint of CNC machining processes and promote sustainable manufacturing processes.

References

[1] Yi, Q., Li, C., Tang, Y., & Chen, X. (2015). Multi-objective parameter optimization of CNC machining for low carbon manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.076 [2] Tian, C., Zhou, G., Lu, F., Chen, Z., & Zou, L. (2020). An integrated multi-objective optimization approach to determine the optimal feature processing sequence and cutting parameters for carbon emissions savings of CNC machining. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 33(6), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1775303 [3] Xiao, Y., Jiang, Z., Gu, Q., Yan, W., & Wang, R. (2021). A novel approach to CNC machining center processing parameters optimization considering energy-saving and low-cost. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 59, 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.023 [4] Rosyidi, C. N., Widhiarso, W., & Pujiyanto, E. (2021). Multi objective optimization model of CNC turning for minimizing processing time and carbon emission with real machining application. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 14(2), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3269 [5] Feng, C., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Huang, Y., & Qu, Z. (2022). Minimizing the energy consumption of hole machining integrating the optimization of tool path and cutting parameters on CNC machines. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 121(1), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09343-5 [6] Xie, Y., Dai, Y., Zhou, H., Liu, J., & Zhang, C. (2023). An optimization method of processing parameters of multi-pass CNC milling towards energy and carbon emission efficiency. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 128(11), 4749-4761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12089-3 [7] Winter, S., Quernheim, N., Arnemann, L., Anderl, R., & Schleich, B. (2022, October). Approach to Reduce the Environmental Impact of a CNC Manufactured Product in the CAD Phase. In Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing (pp. 749-756). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28839-5_84 [8] AREMU, A. A. (2025). AI-POWERED CAM STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING MATERIAL WASTE AND IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN CNC MANUFACTURING. Harvard International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9666-9422 [9] Jamil, M., Zhao, W., He, N., Gupta, M. K., Sarikaya, M., Khan, A. M., ... & Pimenov, D. Y. (2021). Sustainable milling of Ti–6Al–4V: A trade-off between energy efficiency, carbon emissions and machining characteristics under MQL and cryogenic environment. Journal of cleaner production, 281, 125374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125374 [10] Sar????k, G., & Ö?ütlü, A. S. (2024). Optimization of energy consumption in CNC marble processing: statistical and machine learning approaches. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 8(3), 437-450. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1564924 [11] Zhang, L., Jiang, R., Jin, Z. F., Huang, H. H., Li, X. Y., & Zhong, Y. J. (2019). CAD-based identification of product low-carbon design optimization potential: A case study of low-carbon design for automotive in China. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 100(1), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2653-y [12] Peralta Álvarez, M. E., Marcos Bárcena, M., & Aguayo González, F. (2016). A review of sustainable machining engineering: optimization process through triple bottom line. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138(10), 100801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034277 [13] Tapoglou, N., Mehnen, J., & Butans, J. (2021). Energy efficient machining through evolutionary real-time optimization of cutting conditions on CNC-milling controllers. In Experiments and simulations in advanced manufacturing (pp. 1-18). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69472-2_1 [14] Yang, Q., & Ming, W. (2025). Application of green manufacturing processes in precision machining of automotive components. Green Manufacturing Open, 3(1), N-A. https://doi.org/10.20517/gmo.2024.120501 [15] Bilga, P. S., Singh, S., & Kumar, R. (2016). Optimization of energy consumption response parameters for turning operation using Taguchi method. Journal of cleaner production, 137, 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.220 [16] Aramcharoen, A., & Mativenga, P. T. (2014). Critical factors in energy demand modelling for CNC milling and impact of toolpath strategy. Journal of cleaner production, 78, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.065 [17] Campean, E., & Pop, G. (2026). CNC Milling Optimization via Intelligent Algorithms: An AI-Based Methodology. Machines, 14(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14010089 [18] Abdeljabbar, N., & Hammadi, M. (2025, October). A Digital Hybrid Pipeline for Energy-Aware CNC Machining: Surrogate Models Leveraging CAM and G-Code Data. In 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering. https://hal.science/hal-05476184/ [19] Gonzales, J. (2018). Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Product Design for Environmental Impact Reduction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya (Malaysia)). https://www.proquest.com/openview/a9b422970c2b0cbb46815dd9d4b64c0b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y [20] Newman, S. T., Nassehi, A., Imani-Asrai, R., & Dhokia, V. (2012). Energy efficient process planning for CNC machining. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 5(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.03.007 ] [21] Wurm, S., Tschepe, T., Petrovic, O., & Herfs, W. (2025). Developing a Methodology for Accurate Product Carbon Footprint Calculation in Machining Processes. Procedia CIRP, 135, 1308-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.148 [22] Afsharizand, B. (2012). Investigation on quantitative assessment of energy consumption and the associated sustainability performance of CNC milling machines (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University School of Engineering and Design PhD Theses). http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/7414 [23] Lim, J. M., Song, W., Lee, J. S., Park, J. M., Shin, H. M., Oh, I. W., ... & Min, B. K. (2025). Recent Advances in CNC Technology: Toward Autonomous and Sustainable Manufacturing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 26(9), 2311-2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-025-01334-2 [24] Kumar, R., Bilga, P. S., & Singh, S. (2017). Multi objective optimization using different methods of assigning weights to energy consumption responses, surface roughness and material removal rate during rough turning operation. Journal of cleaner production, 164, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.077 [25] Yusuf, L. A., Popoola, K., & Musa, H. (2021). A review of energy consumption and minimisation strategies of machine tools in manufacturing process. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(6), 1826-1842. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1964633 [26] Tao, J., Li, L., & Yu, S. (2018). An innovative eco-design approach based on integration of LCA, CAD? CAE and optimization tools, and its implementation perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.213 [27] Dalpadulo, E., Pini, F., & Leali, F. (2023, October). A CO2 Emissions Life Cycle Assessment of Additive and Conventional Manufacturing Based Lightweight Design in the Automotive. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 87592, p. V002T02A023). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2023-112528 [28] Saravanan, M. (2018). Tool path optimization by genetic algorithm for energy efficient machining. SWANSEA Printing Technology Ltd.: Swansea, UK. [29] Brillinger, M., Wuwer, M., Hadi, M. A., & Haas, F. (2021). Energy prediction for CNC machining with machine learning. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 35, 715-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.07.014 [30] Husom, E. J., Sen, S., & Goknil, A. (2024, April). Engineering carbon emission-aware machine learning pipelines. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 3rd International Conference on AI Engineering-Software Engineering for AI (pp. 118-128). https://doi.org/10.1145/3644815.3644943 [31] Binali, R., Patange, A. D., Kunto?lu, M., Mikolajczyk, T., & Salur, E. (2022). Energy saving by parametric optimization and advanced lubri-cooling techniques in the machining of composites and superalloys: A systematic review. Energies, 15(21), 8313. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218313 [32] Alt?nta?, R. S., Kahya, M., & Ünver, H. Ö. (2016). Modelling and optimization of energy consumption for feature based milling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 86(9), 3345-3363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8441-7 [33] Singh, B. J., & Sehgal, R. (2024). Applications of 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and digital manufacturing for low carbon development. In Sustainability in smart manufacturing (pp. 37-60). CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003467496-3/applications-3d-printing-rapid-prototyping-digital-manufacturing-low-carbon-development-bikram-jit-singh-rippin-sehgal [34] Vinodh, S. J. C. T. (2011). Environmental conscious product design using CAD and CAE. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13(2), 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0310-8 [35] He, B., Tang, W., Huang, S., Hou, S., & Cai, H. (2016). Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(5), 1419-1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7676-z [36] Brillinger, M., Hadi, M. A., Trabesinger, S., Schmid, J., & Lackner, F. (2025). CNC machining data repository: Geometry, NC code & high-frequency energy consumption data for aluminum and plastic machining. Data in Brief, 61, 111814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.111814 [37] Yearwood, A., Manohar, K., Khan, B., Liu, S., Quintyn, C., & Sharief, S. (2024). Part Optimisation using CNC Milling Techniques and Finite Element Analysis. J. Eng. Res. Rep, 26(2), 118-130. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Basheer-Khan-5/publication/377810115_Part_Optimisation_using_CNC_Milling_Techniques_and_Finite_Element_Analysis/links/65deb9e7adf2362b635a8ff0/Part-Optimisation-using-CNC-Milling-Techniques-and-Finite-Element-Analysis.pdf [38] Daniyan, I. A., Tlhabadira, I., Mpofu, K., & Adeodu, A. O. (2021). Process design and optimization for the milling operation of aluminum alloy (AA6063 T6). Materials Today: Proceedings, 38, 536-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.396 [39] Gupta, U., Elgamal, M., Hills, G., Wei, G. Y., Lee, H. H. S., Brooks, D., & Wu, C. J. (2022, June). ACT: designing sustainable computer systems with an architectural carbon modeling tool. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (pp. 784-799). https://doi.org/10.1145/3470496.3527408 [40] Zhang, Z., Yu, H., Zhang, Y., Yang, K., Li, W., Chen, Z., & Zhang, G. (2018). Analysis and optimization of process energy consumption and environmental impact in electrical discharge machining of titanium superalloys. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 833-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.053

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Abhishek Kushwaha, Dr. Narendra Kumar, Mr. Rajneesh Kumar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.