Structural Analysis and Design of Water Treatment Plant Structures - A Review

Abstract

Water treatment plants (WTPs) play a critical role in ensuring the supply of clean and potable water. The structural integrity of WTPs is paramount to their efficiency and longevity. This review paper examines the various structural components of WTPs, the analysis methods employed, and the design considerations that govern their construction. It explores traditional and modern approaches in structural design, emphasizing load considerations, seismic analysis, material selection, and sustainability aspects. The study aims to consolidate knowledge from various research studies and standards to provide a comprehensive understanding of structural analysis and design in water treatment facilities.

Introduction

1. Importance and Purpose of Water Treatment Plants (WTPs):

Water Treatment Plants (WTPs) are essential for ensuring the delivery of clean and safe drinking water. They eliminate contaminants through physical, chemical, and biological processes. WTP structures must be robustly designed to handle hydrostatic, seismic, and environmental loads. Given increasing population, urbanization, and industrialization, WTPs are vital for addressing growing water demands and ensuring water quality, availability, and sustainable management.

2. Water Treatment Process and Standards:

Conventional water treatment involves stages like:

• Coagulation and Flocculation

• Sedimentation

• Filtration

• Disinfection

These processes remove a range of impurities to meet health and safety standards set by bodies like the WHO and BIS. The efficiency of these processes determines the reliability and effectiveness of a WTP.

3. Regulatory Framework in India:

• AMRUT 2.0 (Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation):

  • Aims for universal access to safe drinking water in urban areas.

  • Emphasizes sustainability, water conservation, smart technologies, and energy-efficient systems.

• CPHEEO (Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization):

  • Provides detailed technical guidelines for WTP design, construction, operation, and maintenance.

  • Encourages water conservation, sludge management, and sustainability.

4. Challenges and Innovations:

• Water pollution from industrial discharge, agricultural runoff, and domestic waste necessitates effective treatment.

• Sustainable solutions like renewable energy use and automation can reduce operational costs and environmental impact.

• The study aims to design a cost-effective, efficient WTP that complies with AMRUT 2.0 and CPHEEO standards.

5. Literature Review - Case Studies and Innovations:

a. Indian Case Studies:

• Ponukumadu Village (2021): Emphasizes treatment design based on surface water from the Krishna River, focusing on site-specific water quality.

• Kumarakom Panchayath (2021): Designed a WTP layout based on detailed physico-chemical water analysis and population forecast.

• Belpada Village (2024): A 6.6 MLD WTP design based on CPHEEO hydraulic standards.

• Jalgaon City (2018): Reviewed conventional treatment stages and recommended upgrades like automation and alternative disinfection methods.

b. International Studies and Technologies:

• Malaysia & Selected Countries (2021): Compared conventional and advanced treatment methods globally. Highlighted adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies.

• Reuse of WTP Sludge (2023): Proposed using iron sludge from WTPs in high-rate activated sludge systems, improving treatment efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

• Ceramic Manufacturing with WTP Sludge (2020): Demonstrated how WTP sludge can enhance ceramic brick properties, promoting circular economy practices.

6. Conventional Water Treatment Overview:

Standard stages include:

• Intake

• Aeration

• Coagulation/Flocculation

• Sedimentation

• Filtration

• Disinfection

It’s widely used due to its cost-effectiveness and adaptability to various contamination levels. However, advanced methods may be necessary in cases of severe pollution.

7. Policy Guidelines – AMRUT 2.0 and CPHEEO:

AMRUT 2.0:

• Focuses on smart water systems, water loss reduction, and efficient infrastructure.

• Encourages GIS mapping, SCADA systems, and decentralized wastewater treatment.

CPHEEO Manual:

• Details technical parameters for WTPs.

• Promotes sustainability, rainwater harvesting, and reuse of treated wastewater.

8. Design Considerations:

Key Parameters:

• Population growth and per capita demand

• Raw water quality

• Flow rate and detention time

• Filtration rate and chemical dosing

• Hydraulic gradients

• Energy efficiency and automation

Design Period (CPHEEO Clause 2.2.6):

• WTPs should typically be designed for a 30-year lifespan.

• Early land acquisition for future expansion is recommended.

• Certain components may require duplication or special design based on their vulnerability (e.g., pipelines in hazard zones).

Conclusion

The structural integrity of water treatment plants is crucial for their long-term performance and sustainability. Ensuring the durability and safety of WTP structures requires a comprehensive approach that integrates advanced analytical methods, innovative materials, and robust design principles. The adoption of modern structural analysis techniques, such as finite element modeling and seismic evaluation, allows engineers to predict and mitigate potential structural failures. Additionally, the use of high-performance materials, including fiber-reinforced concrete and corrosion-resistant steel, enhances the lifespan of these structures, reducing maintenance costs and improving efficiency. Sustainability is another key aspect, as the incorporation of green building materials and energy-efficient designs contributes to environmental conservation and resource efficiency. Future research should focus on optimizing structural designs for cost-effectiveness while maintaining high standards of durability and safety. The integration of smart monitoring systems in WTP structures can provide real-time data on structural health, facilitating proactive maintenance and reducing unexpected failures. With ongoing technological advancements, the structural design of WTPs will continue to evolve, ensuring resilient and efficient infrastructure capable of meeting the growing demand for clean and safe water.

References

[1] American Water Works Association (AWWA). (2017). Water Quality & Treatment: A Handbook on Drinking Water. McGraw-Hill Professional. [2] CPCB “General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants Part-A: Effluents”, Environment (Protection) Rules, Schedule – 4, Central Pollution Control Board, India,1986 [3] Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization (CPHEEO). (2024). Manual on Water Supply and Treatment. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. [4] CPHEEO “Manual on Water Supply & Treatment” Third Edition published by Ministry of Urban Development. [5] CPCB “Inventorization of Sewage Treatment Plants”, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India: CUPS/61/2005-06, Central Pollution Control Board, India, 2007. [6] Endah Angreni. “Review on Optimization of Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant”, International Digital Organization for Scientific Information (IDOSI), 2009 Publications. [7] Ghernaout et al 2018 Applying big data in water treatment industry: A new era of advance. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 5 (3) 89–97. [8] G. Patil, B. Sambrekar, G. Dukare, P. Kansagara, and A. Hingmire, “Study of Water Treatment Plant Jalgaon,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 4038, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0704128. [9] Haritha M, Rajalakshmi R S, 2021, Design of Water Treatment Units for Kumarakom Panchayath, Kerala, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) Volume 10, Issue 03 (March 2021). [10] H. Gulhan et al., “Use of water treatment plant sludge in high-rate activated sludge systems: A techno-economic investigation,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 866, p. 166431, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166431. [11] Indian Standard (IS) 10500. (2012). Drinking Water Specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [12] Metcalf & Eddy. (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery. McGraw-Hill Education. [13] Mangaraj, A., Sahoo, S., & Parida, A. P. (2024). Hydraulic design concept of 6.60 MLD water treatment plant. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (IJRASET). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.64395 [14] National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP). (2013). Framework for Implementation of Rural Water Supply Programme in India. Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India. [15] N H Pakharuddin et al 2021 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 880 012017. [16] Orlov A, Belkanova M, Vatin N. Structural Ceramics Modified by Water Treatment Plant Sludge. Materials. 2020; 13(22):5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225293 [17] Pallavi, U., Prasad, K.N.D.V., Manikanta, J.T., Lakshmi, B.V., & Jyothsna, A. (2021). Design of Water Treatment Plant at Ponukumadu Village. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology, and Science, 3(8), 187. [18] Sawyer, C.N., McCarty, P.L., & Parkin, G.F. (2003). Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science. McGraw-Hill Education. [19] United States Environmental Protection Agency “National Recommended Water Quality Criteria”,2002. [20] World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Fourth Edition Incorporating the First Addendum. Geneva: WHO.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Mr. Rikesh S. Bisen , Dr. A. N. Dabhade . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.