Design, Parametric Modeling, and Additive Fabrication of a Customized 3D-Printed Orthopedic Splint for Veterinary Sports Management and Rehabilitation of Canine Ankle Injuries
Authors: S. Ranjithkumar , B. R. Harivansh , K. K. Harinni
This study presents the development of a fully customized canine ankle splint using a streamlined digital-to-fabrication workflow. The process began with a precise 3D scan of the affected limb, which allowed the creation of an anatomically accurate CAD model tailored to the dog’s joint structure. The design incorporated biomechanically informed features such as ventilation openings, smooth internal contours, and strategically varied wall thickness to balance comfort and stability. The splint was produced using dual-material FDM printing, where PLA offered strong dimensional stability and PETG provided greater flexibility and resilience in areas that directly contact the skin. By optimizing printing parameters and material placement, the final splint achieved a lightweight yet robust structure that fit significantly better than conventional off-the-shelf supports. Veterinary evaluation showed improved immobilization, reduced chances of skin irritation, and increased comfort during rehabilitation. Overall, the work demonstrates that integrating 3D scanning, parametric modeling, and affordable additive manufacturing can deliver highly personalized orthopedic solutions for canine ankle injuries, making the approach practical for everyday veterinary care.
Introduction
The study explores the development of customized 3D-printed orthopedic splints for canine distal limb injuries, addressing the limitations of conventional off-the-shelf devices, which often fail to conform to complex ankle anatomy, causing instability, discomfort, and skin issues. Using 3D limb scanning, parametric CAD modeling, and multi-material Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), the research produced a splint combining PLA for rigidity and PETG for flexible, skin-contact regions, optimizing anatomical conformity, comfort, and immobilization performance.
The workflow included digital data acquisition, parametric design with stress-guided reinforcement, and multi-material 3D printing, followed by clinical evaluation and qualitative mechanical testing. The resulting splint demonstrated high dimensional accuracy (deviations <1 mm), balanced mechanical properties, reduced weight, improved ventilation, and superior fit compared to commercial alternatives. Veterinary assessment confirmed enhanced comfort, uniform pressure distribution, and ease of application without skin irritation.
The study highlights the advantages of additive manufacturing in veterinary orthopedics, including the ability to produce patient-specific, cost-effective, and clinically adaptable devices. It emphasizes the potential of multi-material FDM splints to improve immobilization, reduce pressure-related complications, and enhance rehabilitation outcomes. Limitations include the need for quantitative mechanical testing and long-term clinical trials, but the results support wider adoption of digital fabrication workflows in small-animal orthopedic care.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that customized, 3D-printed canine ankle splints, developed through an integrated workflow of 3D limb scanning, parametric CAD modeling, and multi-material FDM fabrication, provide a clinically effective alternative to conventional off-the-shelf splints. The combination of PLA and PETG enabled a balanced mechanical performance, delivering both structural rigidity for immobilization and localized flexibility for comfort. The resulting splint exhibited excellent anatomical conformity, reduced weight, enhanced ventilation, and improved ease of application.
The workflow proved to be cost-effective, efficient, and readily adoptable in routine veterinary practice, offering a scalable approach for patient-specific orthotic solutions. While initial evaluations indicate superior fit, comfort, and functional performance compared with standard splints, further studies involving long-term clinical trials and quantitative mechanical testing are warranted. Overall, customized 3D-printed ankle splints represent a promising avenue for enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and animal welfare in veterinary orthopedics.
References
[1] Baker, R., & Collins, K. (2022). 3D Printing in Veterinary Orthopaedics: Emerging Technologies and Future Prospects. Journal of Veterinary Medical Devices, 27(2), 123-136.
[2] Anderson, P., & Thomas, L. (2021). Innovations in Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Applications in Veterinary Medicine. Additive Manufacturing for Veterinary Health, 11(4), 45-49.
[3] Rashid, S., & Wexler, M. (2020). Material Properties and Biocompatibility of 3D Printed Splints for Veterinary Use. Biomaterials in Veterinary Applications, 18(5), 332-340.
[4] Mackay, J., & Stevens, D. (2023). Veterinary Care and Custom 3D Printed Devices: The Role of Personalized Medicine in Animal Health. Veterinary Innovations Review, 12(3), 75-88.
[5] Garcia, M., & Williams, T. (2022). Regulatory and Ethical Challenges in the Development of 3D Printed Medical Devices for Animals. Regulatory Affairs in Veterinary Medicine,9(2).
[6] Vik, A., & Patel, R. (2020). Applications of 3D Printing in Custom Orthopaedic Solutions for Veterinary Patients. Journal of Veterinary Orthopaedic Technology, 8(1), 58-70.
[7] Fox, H., & Johnson, R. (2023). Advanced 3D Scanning Techniques for Accurate Limb Modeling in Veterinary Orthopaedics. Journal of Animal Biomechanics, 19(4), 254-266.
[8] Williams, J., & Holt, S. (2021). Post-Processing and Finishing Techniques for 3D Printed Medical Devices. Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare, 15(3), 182-197.
[9] Thompson, M., & Lister, J. (2022). Evaluation of Long-Term Durability of 3D Printed Veterinary Splints: A Case Study. Veterinary Research and Technology, 20(1), 99-112.
[10] Lee, F., & Harris, N. (2024). The Role of Additive Manufacturing in Veterinary Rehabilitation Devices. Journal of Applied Medical Devices in Animals, 30(2), 45-59.
[11] Sharma, A., & Chan, M. (2020). Using 3D Printing to Address Limitations in Traditional Veterinary Splints. Innovations in Animal Healthcare, 7(4), 190-203.
[12] Greenwood, B., & Allen, P. (2021). Material Science and the Future of 3D Printed Medical Devices. Materials in Veterinary Applications, 16(2), 220-130.
[13] Collins, K., & Petersen, L. (2023). The Role of Biocompatible Materials in Veterinary 3D Printing. Journal of Veterinary Material Science, 22(1), 45-55.
[14] Smith, J., & Kumar, R. (2021). Telemedicine in Veterinary Care: The Future of Remote Health Monitoring. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(3), 125-136.
[15] Bennett, S., & Lavigne, M. (2022). 3D Printing in Veterinary Orthopaedic Treatments: Current Trends and Challenges. Veterinary Technology Journal, 12(2), 63-78.
[16] Harper, E., & Moore, S. (2020). Additive Manufacturing and Its Role in Custom Orthopaedic Devices for Veterinary Medicine. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Technology, 9(5), 194-209.
[17] Stewart, D., & Jenkins, P. (2021). 3D Printing and the Future of Custom Orthopaedic Solutions in Veterinary Clinics. Veterinary Medicine Today, 24(6), 52-61.
[18] Douglas, A., & Ross, G. (2023). The Integration of 3D Printed Devices with Animal Healthcare: Benefits and Limitations. Veterinary Device Innovations, 14(3), 144-157.
[19] Chang, W., & Maxwell, C. (2020). Exploring the Use of 3D Printing for Personalized Veterinary Care. Animal Healthcare Review, 5(3), 90-101.
[20] Turner, T., & Brooks, S. (2022). The Development of Flexible 3D Printed Materials for Veterinary Applications. Journal of Biomaterials Science, 13(1), 12-22.
[21] Miller, H., & Thompson, J. (2023). Challenges in Regulatory Compliance for 3D Printed Veterinary Devices. Regulatory Affairs Journal, 19(4), 45-59.
[22] Wilkins, D., & Harris, M. (2020). Design Optimization in 3D Printing: Enhancing Veterinary Orthopaedic Treatments. Journal of Medical Device Design, 5(2), 85-97.
[23] Davis, P., & Foster, A. (2021). Wearable Technology in Veterinary Orthopaedics: Integration with 3D Printing. Veterinary Care Review, 3(4), 112-125.
[24] Martin, K., & Evans, G. (2020). Impact of 3D Printing on Orthopaedic Care in Veterinary Medicine. Orthopaedic Surgery Journal, 8(6), 88-94.
[25] Brooks, T., & Patel, S. (2022). Technological Advances in Veterinary 3D Printing. Veterinary Innovations Review, 10(5), 177-188.
[26] Lambert, C., & Oliver, J. (2023). Sustainable Materials for 3D Printed Veterinary Devices. Sustainable Healthcare Journal, 6(1), 43-55.
[27] Nguyen, H., & Barnes, S. (2021). 3D Printing for Veterinary Surgeons: A Technological Overview. Journal of Veterinary Surgery, 11(3), 67-79.
[28] Harris, R., & Fox, L. (2020). Bio-Inspired Materials for 3D Printed Veterinary Splints. Advanced Materials in Veterinary Medicine, 8(2), 123-137.
[29] Wang, Z., & Lin, C. (2022). Cost-Effectiveness of 3D Printed Veterinary Devices: A Market Study. Economics in Veterinary Healthcare, 3(3), 50-63.
[30] Scott, A., & Lee, W. (2021). Post-Processing of 3D Printed Veterinary Devices: Current Techniques and Future Directions. Journal of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare.
[31] Fischer, J., & Morris, P. (2020). The Impact of Custom 3D Printed Devices on Animal Recovery Times. Veterinary Medicine Today, 24(7), 102-110.
[32] Carter, M., & Lister, J. (2021). Advances in Biocompatible Polymers for 3D Printed Veterinary Applications. Veterinary Biomaterials Journal, 9(2), 89-98.
[33] Thompson, L., & Cooper, K. (2022). Effectiveness of 3D Printed Splints in Reducing Postoperative Complications in Veterinary Orthopaedic Cases. Animal Surgical Research, 18(4), 77-85.
[34] Williams, M., & Thomas, A. (2020). Telehealth and Remote Monitoring of 3D Printed Veterinary Devices. Veterinary Health Technology Journal, 6(2), 45-58.
[35] Evans, R., & Simpson, P. (2023). Future Prospects of 3D Printing in Veterinary Prosthetics and Orthotics. Veterinary Science Future, 11(5), 103- 115.