Determinants of Taxpayers’ Attitudes Towards Tax Avoidance: An Empirical Study

Abstract

Tax avoidance continues to pose a considerable challenge for fiscal systems across the globe, highlighting not just legal and financial aspects but also the psychological and institutional contexts in which taxpayers operate. This research explores the various factors that shape taxpayers\' perspectives on tax avoidance, drawing insights from the responses of 300 individuals. The results indicate that a lack of trust in government and feelings of unfairness regarding the tax system are the most significant factors influencing positive attitudes towards tax avoidance. Societal expectations that promote avoidance play a significant role in its widespread acceptance. On the other hand, a high level of tax morale and robust enforcement mechanisms can diminish these attitudes, although the impact of enforcement is less significant when compared to the influence of trust and fairness. Regression analysis reveals that almost fifty percent of the differences in taxpayer attitudes can be attributed to these factors, with trust in government standing out as the most significant influence. The research indicates that enhancing the credibility of institutions, promoting fairness, and bolstering tax morale are more impactful approaches to diminishing tax avoidance attitudes compared to depending exclusively on penalties and audits.

Introduction

• Taxation is essential for funding public services such as infrastructure, healthcare, education, and welfare.

• Insufficient tax revenues hinder development, increase inequality, and damage public trust in government.

2. Tax Avoidance vs. Tax Evasion

• Tax Evasion: Illegal underpayment or non-payment of taxes.

• Tax Avoidance: Legal use of loopholes to reduce tax liability—technically legal but ethically controversial.

• Avoidance undermines the spirit of tax laws and poses risks to government revenue and fairness.

3. Global Concern

• International bodies (OECD, IMF, UN) highlight avoidance as a global issue, especially by multinational corporations through tactics like transfer pricing and tax havens.

• Notorious leaks (e.g. Panama Papers, Paradise Papers) exposed large-scale avoidance practices.

• Individuals also avoid taxes using deductions, income misreporting, and asset restructuring.

4. Role of Taxpayer Attitudes

• Taxpayer beliefs, perceptions, and ethics significantly influence avoidance behavior.

• Key factors shaping attitudes:

  1. Socio-economic status – Wealthier individuals have more resources to avoid taxes.

  2. Fairness perceptions – If the system seems unfair, avoidance is more accepted.

  3. Trust in government – More trust → more compliance.

  4. Tax morale – Civic values and ethics affect willingness to pay taxes.

  5. Enforcement measures – Stronger audits/deterrents influence behavior.

  6. Cultural/social norms – Widespread avoidance practices reduce stigma.

5. The Indian Context

• India has a low tax-to-GDP ratio, due to:

  • Informal economy

  • Structural inefficiencies

  • Low voluntary compliance

• Tax avoidance in India includes:

  • Misuse of exemptions

  • Profit shifting abroad

  • Exploitation of vague tax laws

• Government reforms to address this:

  • GST, GAAR, transfer pricing rules, and digital surveillance

• Public attitudes differ:

  • Some see avoidance as smart financial strategy

  • Others view it as unethical and harmful to collective progress

6. Theoretical Frameworks

To understand taxpayer behavior, the study draws from multiple theories:

• Economic Deterrence Theory – People avoid taxes based on risk/reward calculation.

• Fairness Theory – Inequitable systems drive avoidance.

• Institutional Trust Theory – Belief in government drives voluntary compliance.

• Social Norms Theory – Behavior aligns with community norms.

• Tax Morale Theory – Intrinsic motivation and ethics reduce avoidance.

7. Literature Review Insights

• Research shows compliance is influenced by:

  • Socio-economic conditions (e.g. income, job role)

  • Perceived fairness of the system

  • Trust in tax institutions

  • Moral values and civic responsibility

  • Effectiveness of enforcement

  • Cultural and peer norms

• Key empirical gaps:

  • Limited studies in developing countries like India

  • Lack of comprehensive models combining all key influencing factors

  • Overfocus on tax evasion and corporate avoidance, ignoring individual behavior

8. Objectives of the Study

This study aims to:

1. Examine socio-economic and psychological determinants of tax avoidance attitudes.

2. Analyze the influence of trust, fairness, and enforcement on avoidance.

3. Provide policy recommendations to promote fair and ethical tax compliance.

9. Significance

• Helps policymakers understand the root causes of avoidance.

• Supports evidence-based reforms that go beyond enforcement—focusing on trust-building, civic engagement, and fairness.

• Enhances global understanding of how attitudes, norms, and institutions shape tax behavior.

Conclusion

Tax avoidance continues to pose a considerable challenge for governments around the world. The perspectives of taxpayers regarding avoidance are influenced by a variety of socio-economic, institutional, and cultural elements. To effectively tackle these determinants, it is essential to implement not just legal and administrative reforms, but also initiatives aimed at fostering trust and a sense of moral responsibility among taxpayers. Creating a system that is fairer, more transparent, and accountable is crucial for reducing avoidance and enhancing compliance. This analysis reveals that taxpayers’ perspectives on avoidance are influenced not only by financial considerations but also by factors such as trust, fairness, ethics, and cultural context. A comprehensive approach that fosters institutional trust, promotes fairness, and enhances tax morale proves to be more effective than depending exclusively on enforcement measures.

References

[1] Agusti, R. R. (2023). Determinants of tax attitude in small and medium enterprises. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2160585. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975 .2022.2160585 [2] Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9 [3] Batrancea, L. M. (2022). A self-employed taxpayer experimental study on trust, power and tax compliance. Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00404-y [4] Castañeda, N. (2023). Fairness and tax morale in developing countries. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2189132 [5] Castañeda-Rodríguez, V. M. (2025). Association between tax morale and the perceptions of fairness and trust in the tax system. International Review of Economics & Finance, 87(1), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.01.005 [6] Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax morale and the role of social norms and reciprocity: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 167(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.001 [7] Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2018). Tax morale and the role of social norms and reciprocity: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11714. [8] Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. [9] Kogler, C. (2023). Perceptions of trust and power are associated with tax compliance: Evidence from survey data. Journal of Behavioral Economics and Policy, 7(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbepol.2023.04.006 [10] Korgaonkar, C. N. (2022). The determinants of tax morale in India. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Working Paper Series, 372, 1–27. https://nipfp.org.in [11] Korgaonkar, C. N. (2022). The determinants of tax morale in India. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Working Paper. [12] Koumpias, A. M., Leonardo, G., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2021). Trust in government institutions and tax morale. FinanzArchiv, 77(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1628/fa-2021-0006 [13] Mannan, K. A., Farhana, K. M., & Chowdhury, G. M. O. F. (2020). Socio-economic factors of tax compliance: An empirical study of individual taxpayers in Dhaka Zones. Bangladesh Development Studies, 43(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3769973 [14] Mas’ud, A., Manaf, N. A. A., & Saad, N. (2019). Trust, power, and tax compliance in Asia: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465926 [15] Murphy, K. (2004). Aggressive tax planning: Differentiating those playing the game from those who don’t. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(3), 307–329. [16] Remali, A. M. (2020). Tax compliance: Taxpayers’ view (perception). Global Business and Management Research, 12(4), 191–200. [17] Richardson, G. (2006). Determinants of tax evasion: A cross-country investigation. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 150–169. [18] Robbins, B. G. (2020). State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance. Sociological Perspectives, 63(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420921190 [19] Sjoberg, F. M. (2019). A global survey experiment on tax morale. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 8969, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8969 [20] Tajuddin, T. S., Muhammad, I., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2024). Trust in tax authorities, tax fairness, and tax morale: A conceptual review. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 16(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v16n2p45 [21] Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Ankush Jain, Dr. Sandeep Kumar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.