Echoes of Absence: Trauma, Familial Disconnection, and Narrative Fragmentation in Klay’s Redeployment and Ackerman’s Waiting for Eden

Abstract

War literature has always been haunted by silence, absence, and the impossibility of returning unchanged. In the post-9/11 context, contemporary American writers like Phil Klay and Elliot Ackerman have brought renewed urgency to the representation of war veterans, exploring not just combat, but also the estrangement of returning home. Klay’s Redeployment (2014) captures the fragmented voices of veterans grappling with memory, alienation, and moral injury, while Ackerman’s Waiting for Eden (2018) intensifies the theme of absence through its narrator—a dead soldier recounting the story of his wounded comrade. Both texts foreground the afterwar as a space where trauma lingers, disrupting familial bonds and dismantling the idea of a seamless homecoming. This paper examines how Klay and Ackerman use narrative fragmentation, silence, and disconnection to articulate trauma. Reading their works through the lens of trauma studies (Cathy Caruth, Dominick LaCapra) and memory studies (Marianne Hirsch), I argue that their narratives destabilise conventional notions of heroism and instead reveal the haunting persistence of war in domestic and familial spaces.

Introduction

Phil Klay’s Redeployment and Elliot Ackerman’s Waiting for Eden—both written by veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan—explore the psychological and relational fallout of war, focusing on the fractured reintegration of soldiers into family life. These works use fragmented narratives, shifting perspectives, and silences to mirror the disjointed and painful experiences of veterans suffering from PTSD and the resulting emotional gaps within families.

Drawing on trauma theory, especially Cathy Caruth’s idea that trauma resists linear storytelling, both authors reject traditional heroic war narratives in favor of intimate portrayals of internal chaos, moral injury, and alienation. Klay’s collection reveals veterans’ struggles to reconcile brutal combat experiences with domestic normalcy, highlighting their failure to reconnect with spouses and children. Ackerman’s novel uniquely uses a dead soldier’s narration and the coma-bound state of another to dramatize family liminality, waiting, and unresolved grief.

While existing scholarship has analyzed individual works, this study emphasizes the shared thematic concern with familial disconnection caused by trauma. It argues that through narrative fragmentation and silence, these texts reframe war literature to focus on absence, emotional rupture, and the complex process of healing, ultimately advocating for empathy as a means to bridge the divide between veterans and their families.

Conclusion

Phil Klay and Elliot Ackerman expose the enduring costs of war not only on soldiers’ psyches but on the fragile fabric of family life. By emphasizing absence, silence, and disconnection, their works dismantle traditional war narratives of triumph and return, instead confronting readers with the fractured realities of trauma. In Redeployment, trauma speaks in fragmented veteran voices, while in Waiting for Eden, trauma resonates in silence and waiting. Both texts demonstrate that the most persistent battlefield is the space between war and home, where veterans and families grapple with irreparable absence. Through their narrative experimentation, Klay and Ackerman remind us that the story of war is not only fought abroad but also lived in the quiet estrangements of family, memory, and identity.

References

[1] P. Deer, “Mapping contemporary American war culture,” College Literature, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 48–90, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1353/lit.2016.0002. [2] M. I. M. Alosman, “GRIEVABLE AND UN GRIEVABLE LIVES: PHIL KLAY’S REDEPLOYMENT,” HUMANITAS - Uluslararas? Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 30–44, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.20304/humanitas.797328. [3] L. Shixian, “Transnational trauma and politics in Phil Klay’s post-9/11 War Novel Redeployment,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 029–038, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.53789/j.1653-0465.2023.0302.005. [4] B. Farina, M. Liotti, and C. Imperatori, “The role of attachment trauma and disintegrative pathogenic processes in the Traumatic-Dissociative dimension,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00933. [5] A. F. Joaquim, G. D. Schroeder, and A. R. Vaccaro, “Traumatic Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation—A comprehensive analysis of all case series found in the spinal trauma literature,” The International Journal of Spine Surgery, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 724–739, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.14444/8095.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Dr. Mehak Bakshi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.