Depression and stress are among the most prevalent mental health disorders, posing significant challenges to global healthcare systems. Conventional diagnostic methods often rely on subjective self-reports and clinical evaluations, which may result in delayed or inaccurate assessments. Electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a promising biomarker due to its non-invasive, cost-effective, and real-time monitoring capabilities. Recent advances in machine learning and deep learning have further enhanced EEG-based detection, offering improved accuracy and scalability. Studies demonstrate the effectiveness of spiking neural networks for stress detection [1], cloud-based EEG analysis for depression diagnosis [2], and hybrid frameworks such as EEG Mind-Transformer [5] and TSF-MDD [6], which leverage temporal and spatial EEG features. Graph-based representations [4] and explainable AI models [8] have further advanced interpretability and clinical applicability. Despite these achievements, challenges remain in dataset diversity, generalization, privacy, and real-time deployment. This review systematically analyzes EEG-based depression and stress detection methods, covering preprocessing, feature extraction, machine learning, and deep learning approaches, along with benchmarks, challenges, and future directions. The aim is to provide a comprehensive perspective on how EEG can be leveraged to develop reliable, interpretable, and clinically validated systems for mental health monitoring.
Introduction
Depression and chronic stress are major global health issues that significantly impact both mental and physical well-being. Because traditional diagnostic methods like interviews and questionnaires are often subjective and biased, there is a growing need for more objective and automated detection techniques.
EEG (Electroencephalography) has emerged as a key non-invasive tool for this purpose, as it records brain electrical activity and helps identify patterns in different brainwave frequencies linked to depression and stress. Research shows EEG signals, including brain asymmetry and neural oscillations, can effectively distinguish between healthy individuals and those with mental health disorders.
Recent progress in artificial intelligence has greatly improved EEG analysis. Early methods relied on handcrafted features and traditional machine learning models, but modern approaches now use deep learning techniques such as CNNs, LSTMs, spiking neural networks, graph-based models, and transformer architectures. These advanced methods improve accuracy by better capturing spatial and temporal patterns in brain activity. Explainable AI is also being developed to make these systems more transparent and clinically acceptable.
Despite these advances, challenges remain, including limited datasets, differences between individuals, difficulty in real-time deployment, and privacy concerns. Future research is focusing on multimodal systems, wearable EEG devices, edge computing, and privacy-preserving methods like federated learning.
Conclusion
Electroencephalography (EEG) has established itself as a vital tool for understanding the neurophysiological underpinnings of depression and stress. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning have significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of EEG-based detection systems. Conventional approaches based on handcrafted features have gradually given way to deep architectures, graph-based learning, spiking neural networks, and transformer models, enabling more robust and automated detection of mental health disorders.
Despite these achievements, several challenges persist, including limited and noisy datasets, inter- and intra-subject variability, lack of interpretability in deep models, and barriers to real-world deployment. Ethical issues such as privacy, standardization, and clinical trust also remain unresolved. Addressing these concerns is essential for moving beyond academic research toward clinically viable and socially acceptable solutions.
Looking forward, the future of EEG-based depression and stress detection lies in multimodal data fusion, adaptive personalized AI, lightweight edge deployment, explainable AI, and privacy-preserving decentralized learning frameworks. Standardization and cross-disciplinary collaboration will play a central role in translating these technologies into clinical practice.
This review underscores that while EEG-based detection systems have made remarkable progress, their true impact will be realized only through interdisciplinary integration, real-world validation, and ethical deployment strategies. Such efforts will pave the way for intelligent, reliable, and patient-centered mental health monitoring systems.
References
[1] Joshi, P. S. Matharu, L. Malviya, M. Kumar, et al., “Advancing EEG based stress detection using spiking neural networks and convolutional spiking neural networks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, Art. no. 26267, 2025. Nature
[2] (Author list as in paper) “Automated depression detection via cloud based EEG analysis with …,” Scientific Reports, published 2025. Nature
[3] X. Liu, H. Zhang, Y. Cui, T. Zhao, B. Wang, X. Xie, S. Liang, S. Sha, Y. Yan, X. Zhao and L. Zhang, “EEG-based major depressive disorder recognition by neural oscillation and asymmetry,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 18, Art. 1362111, Feb. 2024. Frontiers
[4] (Author list as in paper) “Graph-based EEG approach for depression prediction,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2024. Frontiers
[5] (Author list as in paper) “Leveraging deep learning for robust EEG analysis in mental health monitoring: EEG Mind-Transformer,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2024. Frontiers
[6] (Author list as in paper) “TSF-MDD: A Deep Learning Approach for Electroencephalography …,” [PMC article], 2025. PMC
[7] (Author list as in paper) “A Novel Optimized Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Mental …,” [PMC article], 2025. PMC
[8] (Author list as in paper) “Identifying EEG Biomarkers of Depression with Novel Explainable Deep Learning Methods,” [PMC article], 2023/2024. PMC
[9] (Author list as in paper) “A systematic review of EEG-based automated mental stress quantification,” (systematic review — ScienceDirect), 2025. ScienceDirect
[10] (Author list as in paper) “Depression detection and diagnosis based on EEG,” Diagnostics (MDPI), vol. 15, no. 2, Art. 210, 2025. MDPI
[11] (Author list as in paper) “Stress detection based EEG under varying cognitive tasks using …,” Neural Computing and Applications (Springer), 2024. SpringerLink
[12] (Author list as in paper) “Characterizing Major Depressive Disorder using alpha-band …,” (ScienceDirect / Journal), 2024. ScienceDirect
[13] (Author list as in paper) “Decoding Depression from Different Brain Regions Using Hybrid …,” PMC article, 2025. PMC
[14] (Author list as in paper) “Decentralized EEG-based detection of major depressive disorder using split learning and ensemble models,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2025. Frontiers
[15] (Author list as in paper) “Beyond the label ‘major depressive disorder’ — systematic review of resting-state EEG biomarkers for MDD,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2025. Frontiers
[16] D. J. Mayhew, T. J. Slaney, M. E. Jones, and M. W. Woolrich, “Comparing resting state and task-based EEG using machine learning to predict vulnerability to depression in a non-clinical population,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Art. no. 20044, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46638-1.
[17] I. Kakkos, E. Tzavellas, E. Feleskoura, S. Mourtakos, E. Kontopodis, I. Vezakis, T. Kalamatianos, E. Synadinakis, G. K. Matsopoulos, I. Kalatzis, E. M. Ventouras, and A. Skouroliakou, “EEG-Based Assessment of Cognitive Resilience via Interpretable Machine Learning Models,” AI (MDPI), vol. 6, no. 6, Art. no. 112, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ai60601112.