Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Abhinav Balamurugan
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.72748
Certificate: View Certificate
AI chatbots are becoming highly popular among students as they use it as a tool to complete school assignments and accomplish projects. This study critically reviews the literature concerning the ethical issues and educational impact of their use. The research is structured around three key aspects: (a) students’ and teachers’ perspectives on the use of AI chatbots in academic tasks, (b) advantages, including personal support and immediate feedback, with limitations, such as potential misuse, and (c) ethical challenges, such as academic dishonesty, data privacy risk and the reliance on AI tools. This study also focuses on how AI chatbots affect student engagement, learning outcomes, and critical thinking skills. These tools are ingenious in their attempts to make learning more engaging but also bring with them risks that could choke off the growth of critical academic and life skills. Based on the literature analysis and survey of educators’ and university students’ opinions, this paper provides recommendations on how to effectively address the implementation of AI chatbots in school context. It is for the purpose of assisting schools to put the benefits of explaining AI tools into equities and managing the ethical issues arising from their application. This research is highly appropriate for conducting at the present time because the introduction of AI tools in learning processes has been progressing rampantly in recent years.
AI chatbots are transforming education by providing instant answers, personalized learning, and round-the-clock support. While these tools enhance efficiency and engagement, they also raise ethical concerns such as academic dishonesty, data privacy risks, and student overdependence.
2. Definitions
AI (Artificial Intelligence): Machines mimicking human tasks like learning and decision-making.
AI Chatbots: Software that simulates human communication through text or voice. They vary in complexity, from rule-based bots to advanced generative AI and voice-enabled assistants.
3. Literature Review
Studies (2022–2024) identify benefits (e.g., motivation, personalized support) and risks (e.g., plagiarism, reduced critical thinking). Key points:
Academic Integrity: 60% of teachers observed increased plagiarism due to chatbot use.
Data Privacy: Most chatbot systems lack proper safeguards for protecting student data.
Overreliance: Students risk reduced cognitive development by depending too heavily on AI for problem-solving.
Equity Concerns: Uneven access to AI tools could widen educational inequality.
Researchers emphasize the need for ethical frameworks, AI literacy, and regulatory measures.
4. Research Problem & Objectives
The study explores how chatbot use affects academic standards, critical thinking, and student behavior, aiming to:
Examine ethical issues.
Understand impacts on integrity and cognition.
Propose responsible usage strategies.
5. Hypotheses
AI chatbots increase academic dishonesty.
Students may become overdependent and lose cognitive skills.
Proper ethical use can mitigate risks.
6. Methodology
A secondary research approach analyzed studies and surveys on AI chatbot use in education, focusing on academic integrity, student reliance, and ethical concerns.
7. Results & Discussion
Widespread Use: 86% of students use AI tools; 24% use them daily.
Integrity at Risk: 65% use AI for assignments; 39% rely heavily on it.
Critical Thinking Impacted: Overreliance reduces students’ problem-solving abilities.
Ethical Use Works: Institutions with strong AI policies report fewer integrity issues and better learning engagement.
The aim of this study was to examine the ethical challenges presented by AI chatbots in school assignments relating to evaluating the possibility for it to jeopardize academic integrity, interfere with cognitive development and encourage overreliance. The findings corroborate that AI chatbots can amplify learning by so supplementing a teacher’s effort and becoming a component in the learning experience. However, over utilising AI chatbots to replace tasks with non authentic participation from a genuine student amount to academic dishonesty. Using these tools over time leads to an erosion of important critical thinking and problem-solving abilities and reinforce the need for ethical regulations around their use. The findings strongly justify the need for strict guidelines to regulate most applications of AI chatbots in educational environments. AI should not replace, but supplement, what students are capable of thinking, acting as support, not as a crutch. To prevent the irresponsible use of these technologies, we need effective policies and AI literacy programs. However, the study concludes that while the AI chatbot potential is valuable, integration must be carefully managed. It is important to notice that educational institutions need to clearly militate towards establishing ethical frameworks in education and maintain a balanced approach with a balance of technology with Academic Integrity and student development.
[1] Abbasi, Suhni, et al. Effect of Chatbot Systems on Student’s Learning Outcomes. no. 10, Oct. 2019, pp. 49–63, www.researchgate.net/publication/336373880_Effect_of_Chatbot_Systems_on_Student. [2] Adjekum, Daniel, et al. “An Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Ethical Use, Attitudes towards Technology, Behavioral Factors and Student Learning Outcomes in Collegiate Aviation Programs.” The Collegiate Aviation Review International, vol. 42, no. 2, 2024, ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/CARI/article/view/9949. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [3] “AI Agent vs AI Chatbot: Key Differences Explained | DigitalOcean.” Digitalocean.com, 2025, www.digitalocean.com/resources/articles/ai-agent-vs-ai-chatbot. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [4] “AI and the 4 Cs: Critical Thinking - AVID Open Access.” AVID Open Access, 24 May 2024, avidopenaccess.org/resource/ai-and-the-4-cs-critical-thinking/. [5] AI Chatbots in Schools Findings from a Poll of K-12 Teachers, Students, Parents, and College Undergraduates. 2024, 8ce82b94a8c4fdc3ea6d-b1d233e3bc3cb10858bea65ff05e18f2.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/bf/24/cd3646584af89e7c668c7705a006/deck-impact-analysis-national-schools-tech-tracker-may-2024-1.pdf. [6] AIClub. “Cheating in the Age of Generative AI: A High School Survey Study.” AIClub, 17 June 2024, corp.aiclub.world/post/cheating-in-the-age-of-generative-ai-a-high-school-survey-study. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [7] “An Introduction to AI Chatbots and Natural Language Processing.” Salesloft.com, Salesloft, 2024, www.salesloft.com/learn/ai-chatbots. [8] “Assessing Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills in the Age of AI.” Academicintegrity.org, 28 Sept. 2024, academicintegrity.org/resources/blog/528-assessing-critical-thinking-and-problem-solving-skills-in-the-age-of-ai. [9] Ateeq, Ali, et al. “Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Academic Integrity and the Shift toward Holistic Assessment.” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, Frontiers Media SA, Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1470979. [10] Barshay, Jill. “PROOF POINTS: Teens Are Looking to AI for Information and Answers, Two Surveys Show.” The Hechinger Report, 17 June 2024, hechingerreport.org/proof-points-teens-ai-surveys/. [11] “Chatbots ‘Grooming Children’: Inquiry.” Theaustralian.com.au, 2025, www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnation%2Fpolitics%2Fchatbots-grooming-children-parliamentary-inquiry-finds%2Fnews-story%2Fbd9680150bb231fdf2ad5b16ff9df020&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [12] Cheng, J. “The Impact of Chatbots on Education.” 2023 Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, & Applied Computing (CSCE), IEEE, July 2023, pp. 844–49, https://doi.org/10.1109/csce60160.2023.00143. Accessed 15 Nov. 2024. [13] Darwin, Darwin, et al. “Critical Thinking in the AI Era: An Exploration of EFL Students’ Perceptions, Benefits, and Limitations.” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, Taylor & Francis, Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2290342. [14] Editorial Desk. “ChatGPT May Lead to the Downfall of Education and Critical Thinking.” Tech Business News, 2 Apr. 2023, www.techbusinessnews.com.au/blog/chatgpt-may-lead-to-the-downfall-of-eduction-and-critical-thinking/. [15] Education, Common Sense. “What Are AI Chatbots?” Www.youtube.com, 7 Oct. 2023, www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmUHEvrpYoU. [16] Espinoza, Sam M., et al. “Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Academic Integrity among University Students in Peru and Chile: An Approach to Sustainable Education.” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 20, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Oct. 2024, pp. 9005–5, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209005. [17] Google. “AI Chatbot.” Google Cloud, cloud.google.com/use-cases/ai-chatbot. [18] Hoffman, Reid. “Don’t Fear AI: Used Well, It Can Empower Us All.” Thetimes.com, The Times, 27 Dec. 2024, www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/dont-fear-ai-used-well-it-can-empower-us-all-hpzrg9xsd?utm_source=chatgpt.com®ion=global. [19] Smith, J., & Liu, C. (2023). Ethical Implications of Chatbot Use in Education. Educational Technology Journal, 45(4), 112-129. [20] Panagopoulou, F., & Parpoula, C. (2023). Legal and Ethical Considerations Regarding ChatGPT in Education. Journal of AI Ethics, 12(3), 213-228. [21] Li, J., & Patel, A. (2023). AI in Classrooms: Ethical Challenges. Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 145-162. [22] Green, T., & Patel, A. (2024). Balancing Innovation and Ethics in AI-Powered Classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning, 46(2), 87-104. [23] Sidiropoulos, D., & Anagnostopoulos, N. (2024). Applications and Ethical Challenges of AI in Education. International Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 55-73. [24] Lakkaraju, K., et al. (2024). Trust and Ethical Considerations in AI-Driven Tutoring Systems. Journal of Digital Learning Ethics, 29(3), 101-119. [25] Jones, R., & Chen, S. (2024). Chatbots as Learning Partners: Enhancing Engagement and Motivation. Journal of Educational AI, 40(1), 19-34. [26] Xu, T., & Yamamoto, B. (2023). AI Tools and Their Impact on Learning Outcomes. Journal of Academic Innovation, 55(2), 98-112. [27] https://www.facebook.com/lifewire. “The Surprising Ways AI Is Being Used in Schools Right Now.” Lifewire, 2024, www.lifewire.com/ai-in-schools-8696450?utm_source=chatgpt.com. [28] IBM. “Chatbots.” Ibm.com, 15 Oct. 2021, www.ibm.com/think/topics/chatbots. [29] Ihekweazu, Chukwuemeka, et al. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Dishonesty: Ethical Considerations. 2023, iscap.us/proceedings/2023/pdf/5957.pdf. [30] Kelly, Rhea. “Survey: 86% of Students Already Use AI in Their Studies.” Campus Technology, 28 Aug. 2024, campustechnology.com/Articles/2024/08/28/Survey-86-of-Students-Already-Use-AI-in-Their-Studies.aspx. [31] Kruppa, Miles. “How ChatGPT Brought down an Online Education Giant.” WSJ, The Wall Street Journal, 9 Nov. 2024, www.wsj.com/tech/ai/how-chatgpt-brought-down-an-online-education-giant-200b4ff2?utm_source=chatgpt.com. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [32] Labadze, Lasha, et al. “Role of AI Chatbots in Education: Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, Springer Nature, Oct. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1. [33] McMahon, Meg, and Amy Deschenes. “View of a Survey on Student Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Academic Research | Evidence Based Library and Information Practice.” Ualberta.ca, 2025, journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/30512/22793. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [34] Niloy, Ahnaf Chowdhury, et al. “AI Chatbots: A Disguised Enemy for Academic Integrity?” International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 7, Elsevier, Oct. 2024, p. 100396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100396. [35] Nivedita Bharathi. “AI Chatbots: Definition, Examples, and Use Cases.” DevRev, 26 June 2024, devrev.ai/blog/ai-chatbots. [36] Parsakia, Kamdin. “The Effect of Chatbots and AI on the Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem, Problem-Solving and Critical Thinking of Students.” Health Nexus, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 71–76, https://doi.org/10.61838/hn.1.1.14. [37] Peters, Jay. “AI Is Confusing — Here’s Your Cheat Sheet.” The Verge, 22 July 2024, www.theverge.com/24201441/ai-terminology-explained-humans?utm_source=chatgpt.com. [38] Ryan Thomas Williams. “The Ethical Implications of Using Generative Chatbots in Higher Education.” Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, Frontiers Media, Jan. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607. [39] Saghiri, Ali. Catastrophic Risks of AI-Based Chatbots in Educational Systems. www.soa.org/4a3f4c/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2024/ai-risk-essays/saghiri-ai-based-chatbots.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [40] Schubert, Carolyn. “Research Guides: Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education: AI and Ethics.” Guides.lib.jmu.edu, 2024, guides.lib.jmu.edu/AI-in-education/ethics. [41] Siegel, Jennifer. “The Ethical Implications of the Chatbot User Experience | Bentley University.” Www.bentley.edu, www.bentley.edu/centers/user-experience-center/ethical-implications-chatbot-user-experience. [42] Spector, Carrie. “What Do AI Chatbots Really Mean for Students and Cheating?” Stanford Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, 31 Oct. 2023, ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating. [43] Spencer, John. “Promoting Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI.” John Spencer, 6 May 2024, spencereducation.com/ai-academic-integrity/. [44] Tapscott, Alex. “Five Reasons the Future of AI Has Already Arrived.” New York Post, 4 Aug. 2024, nypost.com/2024/08/04/tech/five-reasons-the-future-of-ai-has-already-arrived/?utm_source=chatgpt.com. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [45] Trachtenberg, Ben. “ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, and Academic Integrity // Office of Academic Integrity.” Oai.missouri.edu, 2023, oai.missouri.edu/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-and-academic-integrity/. [46] Ventoniemi, Jade. “What Is an AI Chatbot? Here’s What You Should Know (+ Infographic).” Www.giosg.com, www.giosg.com/blog/what-is-ai-chatbot. [47] “What Is AI Chatbot & What Are the Benefits? | CM.com Glossary.” CM.com, www.cm.com/en-us/glossary/what-is-ai-chatbot/. [48] Wu, Rong, and Zhonggen Yu. “Do AI Chatbots Improve Students Learning Outcomes? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 1, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334. [49] ---. “Do AI Chatbots Improve Students Learning Outcomes? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 1, Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us, 2024, pp. 10–33, eric.ed.gov/?ff1=subHigher+Education&id=EJ1408598&q=source%3A%22British+Journal+of+Educational+Technology%22. Accessed 4 Jan. 2025. [50] Xu, Yeqing, et al. “The Impact of a Digital Game-Based AI Chatbot on Students’ Academic Performance, Higher-Order Thinking, and Behavioral Patterns in an Information Technology Curriculum.” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 15, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, July 2024, pp. 6418–18, https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156418. [51] Yin, William. “Will Our Educational System Keep Pace with AI? A Student’s Perspective on AI and Learning.” EDUCAUSE Review, 24 Jan. 2024, er.educause.edu/articles/2024/1/will-our-educational-system-keep-pace-with-ai-a-students-perspective-on-ai-and-learning. [52] Zhai, Chunpeng, et al. “The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students’ Cognitive Abilities: A Systematic Review.” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 11, no. 1, Springer Nature, June 2024, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7. [53] Ziegler, Blake. “Ethical Concerns about AI Chatbots.” Ethical Concerns about AI Chatbots - the Observer, www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2023/03/abandoning-truth-and-prompting-hatred-ethical-concerns-about-ai-chatbots.
Copyright © 2025 Abhinav Balamurugan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET72748
Publish Date : 2025-06-23
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here