Bamboo\'s strong strength-to-weight ratio, low carbon footprint, and quick renewability make it a sustainable substitute for traditional building materials. However, bamboo\'s structural performance differs greatly between species, therefore a thorough assessment is required to ascertain whether it is suitable for load-bearing applications. With an emphasis on compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural behavior, modulus of elasticity, and dimensional stability, this study examines the mechanical characteristics of important bamboo species, such as Guadua angustifolia, DendrocalamusStrictus, Bambusa Balcooa, and Phyllostachys edulis. To evaluate structural integrity, standardized mechanical tests and microscopic analysis were used.
The findings show that DendrocalamusStrictus has outstanding flexural resistance and Guadua angustifolia has superior compressive and tensile strength, making it ideal for structural applications. Phyllostachys edulis exhibits favorable elasticity but poorer density, while Bambusa Balcooa, despite being commonly available, exhibits diversity in mechanical properties. The results contribute to the creation of uniform technical guidelines and emphasize the significance of species-specific selection in bamboo construction. In addition to supporting the use of bamboo in sustainable construction, this study offers vital information for future material optimization in green building techniques.
Introduction
I. Introduction
Bamboo, often called "green steel," is gaining recognition as a sustainable and renewable construction material due to its high strength-to-weight ratio, fast growth, and low environmental impact. As global demand for eco-friendly building materials increases, it is crucial to evaluate the mechanical and structural properties of different bamboo species for modern engineering. Key properties under study include tensile strength, compressive resistance, flexural behavior, and resistance to environmental deterioration.
The research focuses on comparing bamboo species such as Guadua angustifolia, Dendrocalamus strictus, Bambusa balcooa, and Phyllostachys edulis to identify their suitability for structural applications. Evaluations include modulus of elasticity, ultimate strength, density, and dimensional stability, aiming to inform engineers, architects, and policymakers about optimal bamboo use in construction.
II. Literature Review
1. Bamboo-Concrete Bond Strength (Pankaj R. Mali & Debarati Datta, 2019)
Surface treatments (grooves, coatings, steel wrapping) significantly improve the bond between bamboo and concrete.
Grooved bamboo strips showed the highest bond strength.
Groove size and spacing critically affect performance.
2. Bamboo Bonding Challenges (Nguegang Nkeuwa et al.)
Bonding bamboo is harder than wood due to solid cell walls and low permeability.
Isocyanate adhesives perform better than formaldehyde-based ones.
Surface treatments (steaming, bleaching) alter bonding efficiency.
3. Bamboo for Bio-Oil (Liang Ching et al.)
Studied two bamboo species for bio-oil production at different ages.
Older bamboo produces more water-free bio-oil and has higher ash content.
Ash composition affects char formation during pyrolysis.
4. Engineered Bamboo for Construction (Anu Bala & Supratic Gupta)
Bamboo scrimber outperforms laminated bamboo in strength and fire resistance.
Bamboo-reinforced concrete (BRC) shows promise for low-cost, heat-resistant housing.
Water-repellent coatings and mechanical anchoring improve bonding in concrete.
5. Bamboo Bar Bond Performance (Gaofei Wang et al.)
Compared different surface treatments (epoxy, polyurethane) under pull-out loading.
Epoxy-treated bars had higher peak bond stress.
Developed bond stress–slip models for future application in bamboo-reinforced concrete.
6. Glued-in Joints in Bamboo (Yan Feng et al.)
Pull-out strength in laminated bamboo structures depends on:
Rebar diameter
Anchorage length
Glue thickness
A simplified design formula was developed for glued-in joints with less than 6% error.
III. Physical Properties of Bamboo
High specific gravity (SG) in bamboo affects bond strength, heat/moisture transfer, and composite performance.
Higher SG means better internal bond (IB) strength, but excessive compression can cause swelling with moisture.
Studies show compression ratio and panel density are key to improving composite performance.
Bamboo strands behave differently than wood during pressing, affecting bond strength and moisture stability.
IV. Surface Characteristics and Chemical Composition
Bonding is influenced by surface geometry, roughness, cracks, and heat treatment.
Steam-softened bamboo can be flattened without large cracks, improving resin efficiency.
Excessive cracking (e.g., in early bamboo scrimber) leads to inefficient resin use.
Heat treatments enhance dimensional stability but may reduce bonding performance.
Proper machining techniques are crucial to avoid surface damage that weakens bonding.
Conclusion
With an emphasis on important mechanical characteristics such compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, and durability, this study assessed the structural integrity of several bamboo species. The results show notable species differences, with Guadua angustifolia and Dendrocalamusstictus standing out as the best due to their favorable fiber density and high strength-to-weight ratios. However, despite being widely accessible, species such as Bambusa balcooa showed reduced structural reliability when subjected to high stresses.
The necessity of uniform cultivation and treatment procedures is highlighted by the discovery that environmental factors, including harvesting age and growing circumstances, also affect mechanical performance. Furthermore, endurance was increased by treatment techniques (such as heat or chemical preservation), though occasionally at the expense of decreased flexibility.
References
[1] Pankaj R. Mali and Debarati Dattaa (2019) Experimental study on improving bamboo concrete bond strength
[2] William Nguegang Nkeuwa, Jialin Zhang, Kate E. Semple, Meiling Chen ,YelingXia ,ChunpingDai ,Bamboo-based composites: A review on fundamentals and processes of bamboo bonding
[3] Liang ching, sushiladhikari, zhoughong Wang, yulong ding Characterization of bamboo species at different ages and bio-oil production
[4] Anu Bala, Supratic Gupta Engineered bamboo and bamboo-reinforced concrete elements as sustainable building materials
[5] Gaofei Wang, Yang Wei, Si Chen, Kang Zhao, Zhengyan Zhou Bond performance between surface-modified bamboo bars and concrete under pull-out loading
[6] Yan Feng, Ming Xu, Yao Xu, Liuhui Tu, Sunyue Chen Pull-out strength of the glued-in joint in laminated bamboo structure
[7] C. Dai, C. Yu, C. Xu, G. Heat and mass transfer in wood composite panels during hot pressing: Part 4. Experimental investigation and model validation Holzforschung, 61 (2007), pp. 83-88, 10.1515/HF.2007.013 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[8] C. Dai, C. Yu, J. Jin Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. Part IV. Internal bond strengthWood Fiber Sci, 40 (2008), pp. 146-160 View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[9] F. Febrianto, J.-H. Jang, S.-H. Lee, I.A. Santosa, W. Hidayat, J.-H. Kwon, et al. Effect of bamboo species and resin content on properties of oriented strand board prepared from steamtreated bamboo strands Bioresources, 10 (2015), pp. 2642-2655 View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[10] M. Chen, L. Ye, G. Wang, X. Ma, Q. Chen, C. Fang, et al. In-situ investigation of deformation behaviors of moso bamboo cells pertaining to flexural ductility Cellulose, 27 (2020), pp. 9623-9635 View at publisherCrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[11] M. Chen, L. Ye, G. Wang, C. Fang, C. Dai, B. Fei Fracture modes of bamboo fiber bundles in three-point bending Cellulose, 26 (2019), pp. 8101-8108 View at publisherCrossrefView in Scopus Google Scholar
[12] M. Chen, R. Liu, G. Wang, C. Fang, X. Ma, S. Zhang, et al. Parenchyma cell morphological changes of bamboo under bending Sci Silvae Sin, 2 (2020) Google Scholar
[13] M. Chen, L. Ye, H. Li, G. Wang, Q. Chen, C. Fang, et al. Flexural strength and ductility of moso bamboo Constr Build Mater, 246 (2020), p. 118418 View PDF View articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[14] C.R. Frihart, D.J. Yelle, R.E. Ibach Wood properties influence bond durability 5th Int Sci Conf Hardwood Proceeding, ISCHP15 (2015), p. 70–6 Google Scholar
[15] S. Maulana, W. Hidayat, I. Sumardi, N.J. Wistara, M.I. Maulana, J.H. Kim, et al. Properties of dual-species bamboo-oriented strand boards bonded with phenol formaldehyde adhesive under various compression ratios Bioresources, 16 (2021), pp. 5422-5435, 10.15376/biores.16.3.5422-5435 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[16] C. Dai, C. Yu, C. Zhou Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. Part I. Inter-element contact Wood Fiber Sci, 39 (2007), pp. 48-55 View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[17] C. Zhou, G.D. Smith, C. Dai Characterizing hydro-thermal compression behavior of aspen wood strands Holzforschung, 63 (2009), pp. 609-617, 10.1515/HF.2009.111 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[18] J. Jin, C. Dai, W.E. Hsu, C. Yu Properties of strand boards with uniform and conventional vertical density profiles Wood Sci Technol, 43 (2009), pp. 559-574, 10.1007/s00226-0090248-3 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[19] K.E. Semple, P.K. Zhang, G.D. Smith Hybrid oriented strand boards made from Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens Mazel) and Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.): speciesseparated three-layer boards Eur. J. Wood. Wood. Prod., 73 (2015), pp. 527-536, 10.1007/s00107-015-0914-0 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[20] Y. Yu, R. Zhu, B. Wu, Y. Hu, W. Yu Fabrication, material properties, and application of bamboo scrimber Wood Sci Technol, 49 (2015), pp. 83-98, 10.1007/s00226-014-0683-7 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
[21] X. Zhang, Z. Zhou, Y. Zhu, J. Dai, Y. Yu, P. Song High-pressure steam: a facile strategy for the scalable fabrication of flattened bamboo biomass Ind Crops Prod, 129 (2019), pp. 97104, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.061 View PDF View articleGoogle Scholar
[22] K.E. Semple, P.K. Zhang, G.D. Smith Stranding moso and guadua bamboo. Part II. Strand surface roughness and classification Bioresources, 10 (2015), pp. 4599-4612, 10.15376/biores.10.3.4599-4612 View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar