Digital Criminal Justice: Evaluating the Digital Reforms Introduced under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Abstract

India’s 2023 criminal law overhaul through the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) marks a decisive statutory turn towards a technology enabled criminal process, expressly integrating electronic communication, audio video electronic means and digital records across investigation, trial and appeal. This paper examines the digital criminal justice reforms embedded in these new codes, focusing on provisions relating to e FIRs, electronic service of summons and warrants, audio video recording of evidence, online proceedings under Section 530 BNSS, and the reconfiguration of offences to address cyber enabled harms under BNS. It situates these reforms against earlier, largely ad hoc reliance on video conferencing and electronic evidence, and against Supreme Court jurisprudence in Lalita Kumari, Anvar P.V., Shafhi Mohammad and Justice K.S. Puttaswamy on FIR registration, electronic evidence standards and privacy. Using a qualitative doctrinal methodology, the paper analyses statutory text, leading case law and emerging commentary to evaluate whether digitisation, as envisaged by BNS and BNSS, advances access to justice, efficiency and cyber crime governance without compromising fair trial guarantees and informational privacy. It argues that while the new codes significantly enhance the legal infrastructure for digital complaints, electronic process, virtual hearings and cyber crime prosecution, they defer critical questions of authentication, data protection, standardisation and capacity building to subordinate rules and institutional practice, risking uneven or rights insensitive implementation. The paper concludes with normative recommendations: comprehensive procedural rules on electronic communication and evidence, robust privacy and data protection safeguards tailored to criminal justice data, measures to bridge the digital divide, sustained capacity building for criminal justice actors, and doctrinal clarification on electronic evidence and remote hearings under the new regime. These measures, it contends, are essential if India’s move towards digital criminal justice is to remain consistent with constitutional commitments to equality, dignity and due process.

Introduction

The text examines India’s recent overhaul of its criminal justice system through the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, with a specific focus on how these reforms introduce and regulate digital technologies in criminal law and procedure.

It explains that these new codes replace older colonial-era laws and aim to modernise the system by formally recognising electronic communication, digital evidence, e-FIRs, online summons, audio-video trials, and virtual court proceedings. The BNSS is especially significant for procedural digitisation, enabling electronic filing of complaints, digital service of legal documents, and remote recording of evidence. The BNS, on the other hand, updates substantive criminal law to include cyber-related offences such as cyber-stalking, online obscenity, voyeurism, and digital identity theft.

The paper situates these reforms within the broader evolution of India’s “digital justice system,” which has gradually developed through judicial initiatives, e-Courts projects, and COVID-era video conferencing practices. It highlights that earlier reliance on technology was largely ad hoc, whereas the new codes provide statutory backing for these practices.

Methodologically, the study uses doctrinal legal analysis of statutes, Supreme Court case law, and policy documents, alongside limited secondary literature. It evaluates how the new framework interacts with constitutional principles, especially due process and privacy rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21.

Key benefits of the reforms include improved access to justice through e-FIRs and online processes, faster and more transparent procedures, stronger tools for handling cybercrime, and better integration of digital governance systems. However, the text also identifies serious challenges such as unequal digital access, risks to privacy due to large-scale data collection, lack of uniform implementation across states, and unresolved issues around authentication and reliability of electronic evidence.

Conclusion

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita mark a decisive shift in India’s criminal?justice architecture, embedding digital communication, audio?video technology and electronic evidence into the heart of investigation, trial and appeal. E?FIRs, electronic service of process, audio?video recording and online proceedings promise to make criminal justice more accessible, efficient and responsive to cyber?crime realities.[6][8][^10] Yet digitisation is not inherently rights?enhancing. Without careful attention to privacy, data?protection, fair?trial safeguards, authentication and infrastructural equity, digital reforms can exacerbate existing inequalities and create new vulnerabilities. The trajectory of implementation under BNS and BNSS will therefore depend on how legislatures, courts and criminal?justice agencies interpret and operationalise these provisions, whether they invest in capacity?building and whether they integrate constitutional principles into techno?legal frameworks. For scholars and practitioners, the digital criminal?justice reforms offer rich terrain for ongoing research: empirical study of e?FIR usage, analysis of case?law under Section 530 BNSS, evaluation of Nyaya?Shruti’s impact, and doctrinal exploration of the new evidence code’s treatment of electronic records. This paper has offered an initial doctrinal and normative evaluation, emphasising both transformative potential and areas of concern. Future work must continue to interrogate whether India’s journey towards digital criminal justice ultimately strengthens or compromises the foundational commitments of the Constitution to fairness, dignity and rule of law.

References

[1] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, No. 45 of 2023, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India). [2] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, No. 46 of 2023, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India). [3] Law.asia, Criminal Justice System Enters the Digital Age (May 21, 2025), https://law.asia/bnss-criminal-justice-reforms/.[^6] [4] Bureau of Police Research & Dev., SOP on Zero FIR & e?FIR (2024), https://bprd.nic.in/uploads/pdf/SOP_on_Zero_FIR & eFIR - NCL 2023.pdf.[^26] [5] Medianama, How India’s Criminal Law Amendment Bills Will Affect Digital Sphere (June 2, 2024), https://www.medianama.com/2023/08/223-criminal-law-replacement-bills-digital-ecosystem/.[^2] [6] Anubhav Khandelwal, Electronic Communication under the BNSS and BNS (2025), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5096623.[^9] [7] Neeraj Tiwari, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Indian L. Inst. (2024), http://www.ili.ac.in/pdf/10._Neeraj_Tiwari__F.pdf.[^38] [8] Drishti Judiciary, Section 530 BNSS, https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/to-the-point/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-&-code-of-criminal-procedure/section-530-bnss.[^10] [9] IJFMR, Legal Challenges, Digital Evidence, and New Criminal Laws (2025), https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/2/41627.pdf.[^28] [10] MCO Legals, Cybercrimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Series 2, Issue 3) (2025).[^15] [11] Your Law Article, Offences Against Cybercrime under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Feb. 19, 2026), https://www.yourlawarticle.com/post/offences-against-cybercrime-under-the-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023-bns.[^20] [12] Cyber Crime Punishments under BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita), Scribd (Sept. 10, 2025).[^16] [13] India Code, The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/20062/1/a202345.pdf.[^3] [14] NCERT, The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Schools Module), https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/module/New_Laws_2023/BNS68-2023E.pdf.[^39] [15] JETIR, Bridging Physical & Cyber Crimes in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (2024), https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2408430.pdf.[^23] [16] India Code, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/20099.[^5] [17] Delhi High Court, Electronic Evidence and Video Conferencing Rules, 2025.[^11] [18] Press Information Bureau, New Criminal Laws Press Release (Nov. 19, 2025), https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2237481®=1&lang=1.[^8] [19] Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1.[27][31] [20] Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473.[18][17] [21] Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2018) 2 SCC 801.[^19] [22] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.[29][22] [23] Supreme Court of India, In re: Guidelines for Court Functioning through Video Conferencing during Covid?19 Pandemic, Suo Motu Writ (Civil) No. 5/2020 (Apr. 6, 2020).[14][12] [24] Supreme Court Observer, Switching to Video (Oct. 8, 2023), https://www.scobserver.in/journal/switching-to-video/.[^14] [25] IJFMR, The Evolution of Right to Privacy: From K.S. Puttaswamy to Aadhaar (2025).[^21] [26] Additional policy documents and state?level SOPs on e?FIR, Nyaya?Shruti and video?conferencing, as available.[24][26]

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Mr. Virendra Kumar, Ms. Sakshi , Deepannita Medhi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.