• Home
  • Submit Paper
  • Check Paper Status
  • Download Certificate/Paper
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
Email: ijraset@gmail.com
IJRASET Logo
Journal Statistics & Approval Details
Recent Published Paper
Our Author's Feedback
 •  ISRA Impact Factor 7.894       •  SJIF Impact Factor: 7.538       •  Hard Copy of Certificates to All Authors       •  DOI by Crossref for all Published Papers       •  Soft Copy of Certificates- Within 04 Hours       •  Authors helpline No: +91-8813907089(Whatsapp)       •  No Publication Fee for Paper Submission       •  Hard Copy of Certificates to all Authors       •  UGC Approved Journal: IJRASET- Click here to Check     
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Aim & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Impact Factor
  • Call For Papers
    • Submit Paper Online
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issue
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Paper
    • Download Certificates
    • Check Paper Status
    • Paper Format
    • Copyright Form
    • Membership
    • Peer Review
  • Past Issue
    • Monthly Issue
    • Special Issue
  • Pay Fee
    • Indian Authors
    • International Authors
  • Topics
ISSN: 2321-9653
Estd : 2013
IJRASET - Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Aim & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Impact Factor
  • Call For Papers
    • Submit Paper Online
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issue
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Paper
    • Download Certificates
    • Check Paper Status
    • Paper Format
    • Copyright Form
    • Membership
    • Peer Review
  • Past Issue
    • Monthly Issue
    • Special Issue
  • Pay Fee
    • Indian Authors
    • International Authors
  • Topics

Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology

  • Home / Ijraset
  • On This Page
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Copyright

An Experimental Approach to Strength Assessment of Concrete by Fractional Substitution of the Fine Aggregate with Expanded Polystyrene Beads

Authors: D. V. Shanmukesh, B. V. Ramana Murty, M. Sai Ram, P. Chandra, S. Anand, S. Lokesh Kumar, S. Teja

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.50221

Certificate: View Certificate

Abstract

Constructions are two types RCC and Steel Structures. In our Country most of the constructions are of RCC. Not only in our country but also in the world most constructions are of RCC type in which Concrete is been used. Even though Cost of concrete is comparatively less than steel, but is somewhat costlier. Ingredients of concrete are water, cement, coarse, sand. But Concrete is Heavier in weight. And when considered for precast structures those might fail at lifting due to mismatch of eccentricity by its own weight. So, in this project Sand in concrete is been partially replaced with Expanded polystyrene ( EPS ) beads, of 10 to 50 of intermediate percentages and it’s compressive strength and Split Tensile Strength are been checked. Because, to reduce cost parameter and also to check the increase of strength parameter which might be an hope. EPS Beads is been considered because it is cheap and abandoned.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

A composite material that consists essentially of a binding medium, such as a mixture of portland cement and water, within which are embedded particles or fragments of aggregate, usually a combination of fine and coarse aggregate. Concrete is by far the most versatile and most widely used construction material worldwide. It can be engineered to satisfy a wide range of performance specifications, unlike other building materials, such as natural stone or steel, which generally have to be used as they are. Because the tensile strength of concrete is much lower than its compressive strength, it is typically reinforced with steel bars, in which case it is known as reinforced concrete.

 A. EPS Beads

EPS, or expanded polystyrene, is a rigid cellular plastic originally invented in Germany by BASF in 1950. It has been used in packaging solutions since 1958. It is 98% air but the rest is made from tiny, spherical EPS beads - themselves made only of carbon and hydrogen. EPS structures are produced through a 3 part process called steam moulding that expands these tiny beads to more than 40 times their original size. This expanding process is precisely timed to determine the size the beads will finally reach. It is this final density of the expanded beads that determines the strength of the structure. After the first stage the beads are left to absorb air for between 24 and 48 hours. In the final stage the freshly expanded beads are poured into individually manufactured moulds where steam and pressure are applied to compress and bond the beads into a final structure of the required strength and density.

B. Composition

There are two principal components of EPS: solid styrenic polymer (polystyrene beads) and a blowing agent. The information below will detail the technical information on the components of EPS

II.  APPLICATION

A. Construction

  1. Floor, Ceiling and Wall Insulation
  2. Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs)
  3. Sheathing
  4. Geofoam
  5. Door Cores
  6. Insulating Concrete Forms (ICF's)
  7. Roofing Insulation Systems
  8. Exterior Insulation and Finishing Systems (EIFS)

B. Packaging/Shapes

  1. Picnic Coolers/Buckets
  2. General Purpose Packaging
  3. Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Packaging   
  4. Refrigeration Divider Trays
  5. Air Conditioning Insulation 
  6. Computer Cushioning Thermal Protective Packaging
  7. Pharmaceutical

C. Specialty Foams

  1. Foam Cups and Containers
  2. Coffee Cups
  3. Cold Drink Cups
  4. Noodle Bowls Ice Cream Bowls
  5. Take-out Conta
  6. Iner

III.  EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BEADS

A. Properties of EPS Beads

EPS has been a material of choice for over half a century because of its technical versatility, performance and cost effectiveness. It is widely used in many everyday applications where its light weight, strength, durability, thermal insulation and shock absorption characteristics provide economic, high performance products.

  1. Light Weight: EPS is an extremely lightweight material which is not surprising considering it is comprised of ~98% air. This characteristic makes it ideal for use in packaging as it does not significantly add to the weight of the total product thereby reducing transportation costs. Energy consumption for transport fuel is also reduced and vehicle emissions minimised – all contributing to lower global warming.
  2. Durability: The exceptional durability of EPS makes it an effective and reliable protective packaging for a wide range of goods. The cellular structure of EPS makes it dimensionally stable and therefore does not deteriorate with age. EPS is also odourless and non-toxic.
  3. Moisture Resistance: EPS is a closed cell material and does not readily absorb water. There is no loss of strength in damp conditions, making EPS ideal for cool-chain products. The material is moisture resistant, so the highest hygiene requirements are met. The ability of EPS to resist moisture also lends itself for use in fishing floats and marina buoys. Even when subjected to prolonged.
  4. Thermal Efficiency: The superior thermal efficiency of EPS makes it ideal for packaging any product that is sensitive to temperature change. Products enclosed in EPS containers can be maintained for long periods at temperature above or below ambient conditions and can be protected from sudden temperature changes that can occur in the transport through different climatic zones. Examples include fresh produce and seafood as well as pharmaceutical and medical products.
  5. Shock Absorption: EPS exhibits excellent shock absorbing characteristics making it the first choice for packaging of a wide range of products including appliances, electronic products, computers and chemicals.

IV. MIX PROPORTIONS

V.  RESULTS

A. Tabular values for Compressive Strength

  1. Tabular values for 10% Replacement
 

Load in KN

   

Days

speci1

speci2

Speci3

 

3

264

261

246

 

7

376

374

358

 

14

458

447

442

 

28

541

537

526

 

 

 

Compressive Strength in N/mm2

Days

speci1

speci2

speci3

Avg

3

11.6952

11.5952

10.8952

11.3952

7

16.6806

16.5806

15.8806

16.3806

14

20.3416

19.8416

19.6416

19.9416

28

24.04

23.84

23.34

23.74

         
 

Total Compressive Strength in N/mm2

 

Days

Compressive Strength in N/mm2

   
 

3 Days

11.4

   
 

7 Days

16.39

   
 

14 Days

19.95

   
 

28 Days

23.74

   

2. Tabular values for 20% Replacement

       

Days

speci1

speci2

speci3

 

3

242

240

224

 

7

351

349

333

 

14

426

415

410

 

28

515

510

499

 
         
         
 

Compressive Strength in N/mm2

Days

speci1

speci2

speci3

Avg

3

10.74528

10.64528

9.94528

10.44528

7

15.59568

15.49568

14.79568

15.29568

14

18.92176

18.42176

18.22176

18.52176

28

22.86

22.66

22.16

22.56

         
 

Total Compressive Strength in N/mm2

 

Days

Compressive Strength in N/mm2

   
 

3 Days

10.45

   
 

7 Days

15.3

   
 

14 Days

18.53

   
 

28 Days

22.56

   

Tabular values for Split Tensile Strength

   

Load in kN

 

Percentage

speci1

speci2

speci3

 

0%

248.8141

241.7456

192.2655

 

10%

242.4524

235.3838

185.9037

 

20%

248.8141

241.7456

192.2655

 

30%

242.4524

235.3838

185.9037

 

40%

243.8661

208.5232

194.386

 

50%

231.1427

217.0055

181.6626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results for Compressive Strength of all percentages

EPS Beads

%

CS

0%

21.5

10%

23.74

20%

22.56

30%

20.32

40%

17.09

50%

14.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


VI. FUTURE SCOPE

These replacements can be further increase to some percentage Flexural strength can be tested with these replacements Addition of admixtures can be done and be tested. Addition of adhesive materials and fibers or some particles can be done and be tested. Replacements can be done to coarse aggregates can be done and be tested. Age parameter of concrete can be increased for 53 days, 96 days, etc and be tested. Slump parameter variation with strength can be tested

Conclusion

1) Gives greater strength of Fck for 10% and 20% replacement of cement in concrete with some decrement. 2) Strength decreased for 30%, 40%, 50% replacement in decreasing order up to next low value of fck. 3) We could use in real time construction with replacement up to 20% to reduce cost. 4) If we want to increase much to reduce cost then we have to design for next highest fck design mix and we have to use it. 5) Weight is Reducing by increase in replacement percentage

References

[1] Kohling K (1960), “The manufacture of light weight concrete using pre-expanded styropore particles s aggregates”, betorstein-zeitung. [2] Mandlik Tarun Sarthak Sood, and others (2013), “Lightweight Concrete Using EPS”, ISSN (Online). [3] Maura G (1978), “Light Weight Concrete made with expanded substituted Polystyrene “,IL Cemento (Rome). [4] Momtazi and others (2010), “Durability of Lightweight Concrete Containing EPS in Salty Exposure Conditions”. [5] Parton G M and Shendy-EL-Barbary M E(1982), “Polystyrene-bead concrete Properties and mix design”, Journal of Cement Composite And Light Weight Concrete. [6] Tamut Prabhu and others (2014),”Partial replacement of coarse aggregate by Expanded Polystyrene Beads in Concrete”.

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 D. V. Shanmukesh, B. V. Ramana Murty, M. Sai Ram, P. Chandra, S. Anand, S. Lokesh Kumar, S. Teja. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ijraset50221

Download Paper

Paper Id : IJRASET50221

Publish Date : 2023-04-08

ISSN : 2321-9653

Publisher Name : IJRASET

DOI Link : Click Here