An interesting conundrum arises regarding how to transform the value chains and networks of various categories of human activities to cope with climate change effects. Ideally, in terms of sustainable development goal number 2, there is the need to concurrently deal with the effects of climate change whilst shifting agrifood value chains and networks towards nature-positive trajectories. The word ‘green’ and associated terminology ‘greening’ have taken on new significance as evidenced from extant discourse on how to mitigate and/or tackle the increasing adverse effects of climate change with concurrent shift to a nature-positive direction. In this regard, the concept of ‘greening’ embraces contexts such as circularity, decarbonization, vegetation greening, sustainable land use, and the preservation of biodiversity across many sectors of human endeavour. Thus, ‘greening’ is regarded as a principle in green growth economic policies and nature-positive strategies. Discourse on greening tends to be dominated by academic and policy/governance pundits, sometimes vitiating the opinions of ‘not-so-formal’ practitioners. This article discusses what ‘greening’ means to practitioners within a particular agrifood value chain and network. The narratives reiterate that, even within urban settings, greening practices such as sustainable land use and preservation of biodiversity are intrinsic knowledge areas for artisanal, subsistence, and small-scale entrepreneurial farmers.
Introduction
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a framework for humanity’s future survival by promoting sustainability and a nature-positive development path. We are currently in the Anthropocene epoch, marked by significant human-driven changes to Earth’s systems, threatening biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Scientists warn that humanity has crossed critical planetary boundaries, necessitating urgent nature-positive transitions to minimize environmental damage and restore natural capital.
The discourse on climate change and sustainability is widespread across academic, policy, and business sectors, emphasizing the need to operationalize sustainability beyond rhetoric into practical strategies. Early efforts focused on corporate social responsibility have evolved into broader approaches like ESG and triple-bottom line reporting, highlighting the integration of environmental concerns into economic activities.
This article specifically investigates how ‘greening’—defined as adopting environmentally responsible knowledge and practices—can be operationalized by artisanal, subsistence, and small-scale farmers within agricultural value chains. The concept of ‘greening’ spans multiple sectors and is linked to biodiversity, circularity, and sustainable land use, with particular emphasis on the agrifood sector’s role in food security and ecosystem preservation.
Green growth policies aim to efficiently use resources, reduce pollution, and build resilience, but face challenges such as balancing economic development with biodiversity conservation, especially in developing countries where indigenous knowledge and land rights are often marginalized. Urbanization and industrial expansion further threaten arable and natural lands, though urban agriculture and vegetation greening offer promising sustainability pathways.
Finally, the article proposes a conceptual model to understand greening practices across agricultural value chains and networks, considering the multiple stakeholders involved from production to consumption.
Conclusion
This article contributes to discourse regarding ‘greening’ concepts and practice. Although the participants in the exploratory snap study were drawn from an area where coconut tree is autochthonous, nonetheless, the farmers’ narratives reinforce the view that ‘greening’ is better understood in the contexts of efficiency of land use, preservation of biodiversity, carbon capture and circularity in the upstream stages of the agrifood value chain and network. The farmers’ narratives also showed that they were conversant with the chitter-chatter about effects of climate change and food security challenges. The study provides some evidence leaning towards the development of strategies and implementation of green growth policies that promote and include sustainable urban farming practices in the agrifoods value chain and networks. Taking into consideration that the scope of the exploratory study is very limited, it is remarkable that the opinions expressed in the narratives not only point to the broader issue regarding the infusion of existential indigenous knowledge and practices in green growth technological innovations and economic policies, especially for countries of the Global South that are having to deal with high rates of unemployment of younger people, inter alia, the twin challenges of rapid urban densification and sprawling. The authors plan to proceed to the next phase of the exploratory study with the formation of a number of focus groups comprising the initial and other participants so as to address more contexts of ‘greening’, especially carbon capture and decarbonization, over the full scope of the coconut value chain. It is anticipated that future studies will delve into inclusivity issues as they pertain to the reframing of future policies that inherently involve and rely on sustainable ‘greening’ practices