Land administration is a critical function for ensuring ownership rights, resolving disputes, and enabling economic development. Conventional systems for managing land records often suffer from inefficiencies, centralization-related vulnerabilities, and recurring fraudulent practices like multiple property sales, falsified documents, and illegal changes in ownership. These issues are further exacerbated in developing countries, where digital infrastructure is limited, and manual processes dominate. While blockchain technologies like Ethereum have attempted to address these challenges through decentralization and smart contracts, their practical implementation is often hindered by high transaction (gas) fees, limited scalability, and network congestion. This paper presents a novel, decentralized land administration framework built on the Solana blockchain, which offers significant performance advantages due to its Proof of History (PoH) consensus mechanism and Sealevel parallel processing engine. Utilizing Solana’s rapid transaction processing and low- latency architecture, the platform delivers a reliable, efficient, and tamper-resistant solution for land record management. In addition to its blockchain-based core, the system leverages a modern technology stack comprising for an intuitive and responsive user interface, for executing backend logic and managing smart contract interactions, and Supabase for off-chain data storage with real-time database capabilities. This combination ensures efficient integration between components, delivering a seamless user experience while maintaining high system performance and reliability. The proposed system automates critical functions like property register, ownership confirmation, and document validation using smart contracts, thereby greatly decreasing reliance on intermediaries and reducing the risks linked to centralized data storage.. Experimental outcomes and practical validation confirm the platform’s effectiveness in significantly improving transparency, security, and operational efficiency over conventional land systems and previous blockchain-based solutions. This makes the solution highly suitable for integration into contemporary land governance models, particularly in regions that demand scalable and trustworthy digital infrastructure.
Introduction
Background:
Traditional land administration systems are:
Centralized, relying on physical/semi-digital records.
Vulnerable to data tampering, corruption, manual errors, and natural disasters.
Dependent on intermediaries, causing delays, inefficiencies, and opportunities for fraud.
Particularly problematic in developing countries due to lack of digitization.
Blockchain as a Solution:
Blockchain offers:
Decentralized, tamper-proof, and transparent data storage.
Immutable and timestamped records.
Smart contracts to automate processes and eliminate intermediaries.
However, platforms like Ethereum face scalability and cost issues, limiting real-world land administration use.
Proposed System:
A Decentralized Land Registry DApp was developed using the Solana blockchain, chosen for its:
Document hashes matched stored values, ensuring data authenticity.
The architecture supports future integration with IoT, GIS, or AI.
Conclusion
The proposed land administration system built on Solana\'s blockchain effectively tackles the limitations found in both conventional methods and earlier blockchain-based approaches. By leveraging Solana’s Proof of History (PoH) and Tower BFT consensus mechanisms, the system ensures high efficiency, scalability, and low transaction costs.The system delivers high transaction throughput with minimal costs—key advantages for large-scale real estate implementations. Additionally, smart contracts automate property registrations, minimizing the need for intermediaries and significantly reducing the potential for fraud.The hybrid on- chain/off-chain architecture ensures tamper-proof records without overwhelming blockchain storage.Future improvements will focus on incorporating geospatial mapping for real-time monitoring of land assets and enhancing the system to accommodate multi-party approval processes, allowing for more complex and collaborative transaction workflows.The system sets a precedent for applying blockchain beyond cryptocurrency and opens pathways for secure, decentralized digital governance in land administration.
References
[1] Qi Feng, Debiao He, Sherali Zeadally, Muhammad Khurram Khan, and Neeraj Kumar, \"A Survey on Privacy Protection in Blockchain System.\".
[2] Han Song, Yihao Wei, Zhongche Qu, and Weihan Wang, \"Unveiling Decentralization: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, Comparison, Challenges in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana Blockchain.\".
[3] Turki Ali Alghamdi , Rabiya Khalid , and Nadeem Javaid , \"A Survey of Blockchain Based Systems: Scalability Issues and Solutions, Applications and Future Challenges.\".
[4] Sajjad Khan, Muhammad Bilal Amin, Ahmad Taher Azar, and Sheraz Aslam, \"Blockchains: A Survey on the Role of Smart Contracts in Blockchain Interoperability\".
[5] Mubashar Iqbal, and Raimundas Matulevi?ius, \"Exploring Sybil and Double-Spending Risks in Blockchain Systems\".
[6] Md Sadek Ferdous, Member, IEEE, Mohammad Jabed Morshed Chowdhury, Mohammad A. Hoque, Member, IEEE, and Alan Colman, \"Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: A Survey.\".
[7] Tharaka Mawanane Hewa, Tharaka Mawanane Hewa, Madhusanka Liyanage, Salil S. Kanhare, and D Mika Ylianttila , \"Survey on Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts: Technical Aspects and Future Research.\".
[8] Muhammad Nasir Mumtaz Bhutta, Amir A. Khwaja, Adnan Nadeem, Hafiz Farooq Ahmad, Muhammad Khurram Khan, Houbing Song, Majed Alshamar, and D. Nikolic, \"A Survey on Blockchain Technology: Evolution, Architecture and Security.\".
[9] Siwei Cui, Gang Zhao, Yifei Gao, Tien Tavu, Jeff Huang, \"VRust: Automated Vulnerability Detection for Solana Smart Contracts.\".
[10] Fouzia E. Alzhrani ,Kawther A. Saeedi , (member, ieee), and Liping Zhao, \"A Taxonomy for Characterizing Blockchain Systems.\".
[11] M. Stefanovic, D. Przulj, S. Ristic, D. Stefanovic, and D. Nikolic, \"Smart Contract Application for Managing Land Administration System Transactions.\".
[12] A. Yakovenko, \"Solana: A New Architecture for a High-Performance Blockchain.\".
[13] M. Alharby and A. van Moorsel, \"Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts: A Systematic Mapping Study.\".
[14] Y. Lu, L. Li, H. Peng, and Y. Yang, \"From Bitcoin to Solana – Innovating Blockchain towards Enterprise Applications.\".
[15] G. A. Pierro and A. Amoordon, \"A Tool to Check the Ownership of Solana’s Smart Contracts.\".
[16] J. L. Zhao, S. Fan, and J. Yan, \"Overview of Business Innovations and Research Opportunities in Blockchain and Introduction to the Special Issue.\".
[17] F. Ullah and F. Al-Turjman, \"A Conceptual Framework for Blockchain Smart Contract Adoption to Manage Real Estate Deals in Smart Cities.\".
[18] P. Singh, \"Role of Blockchain Technology in Digitization of Land Records in Indian Scenario.\".
[19] C. Kombe, M. Manyilizu, and A. Mvuma, \"Design of Land Administration and Title Registration Model Based on Blockchain Technology.\".
[20] I. T. Imam, Y. Arafat, K. S. Alam, and S. A. Shahriya, \"A Blockchain-Based Authentication System for Digital Documents.\".
[21] M. Stefanovic, D. Przulj, S. Ristic, D. Stefanovic, and M. Vukmanovic, \"Blockchain and Land Administration: Possible Applications and Limitations.\".
[22] S. S. Mahamure and S. J. Wagh, \"Blockchain Technology for Real Estate Documents Protection Using Ethereum.\".
[23] S. Wang, L. Ouyang, Y. Yuan, X. Ni, X. Han, and F.-Y. Wang, \"Blockchain-Enabled Smart Contracts: Architecture, Applications, and Future Trends.\".
[24] S. N. Zain, K. A. R. Artha, A. A. Alkautsar, and M. H. Widianto, \"Implementation of Smart Contracts for E- Certificate as Non-Fungible Token using Solana Network.\".