India is highly vulnerable to natural disasters, especially earthquakes, with 85% of the area at risk and 57% in high seismic zones, including Delhi. Earthquake simulation is complex, and building failures often stem from irregularities in shape, mass, stiffness, or strength. Unsymmetrical structures are particularly vulnerable. This study examines how incident angles of seismic forces (0°, 30°, and 60°) impact the seismic behavior of different RC (Reinforced Concrete) building shapes.
2. Objectives
The main goals of the study are:
Analyze seismic performance of RC buildings with different plan geometries (L, Plus, Square).
Evaluate displacement responses using time history analysis.
Study the effect of varying earthquake incident angles on building performance.
3. Methodology
Software: ETABS 2018
Structures: Three G+5 RC buildings (L, Plus, and Square plan shapes)
Time history: El Centro Earthquake (1940, magnitude 7.1)
Parameters: Incident angles considered were 0°, 30°, and 60°
All buildings followed uniform material specs: M20 concrete, Fe415 steel, and same dimensions.
4. Analysis
Each building shape was subjected to seismic forces at the three incident angles.
Time history analysis was performed using ETABS to evaluate roof displacement as a key indicator of structural response.
5. Results
Maximum displacement occurred at 30° incident angle for all building shapes.
Displacement increased by 2%-3% from 0° to 30° and then decreased by 7%-8% from 30° to 60°.
L-shaped buildings showed the highest roof displacement, 14.34% more than other shapes.
Square and Plus shapes showed similar displacement patterns, with smoother performance.
Conclusion
Following conclusion are found.
1) The analysis indicates that displacement reaches its peak at an incident angle of 30° for all building shapes. However, to accurately identify the most critical incident angle, it is recommended to conduct further investigations with smaller increments between 30° and 60°.
2) The findings reveal that L-shaped buildings exhibit higher displacement under seismic forces compared to other configurations, such as plus-shaped and square-shaped buildings. This suggests that asymmetrical structures are less favorable due to their reduced strength and stability against earthquake-induced forces.
3) Square-shaped buildings demonstrate superior resistance to seismic forces and exhibit enhanced structural stability. Therefore, symmetrical building configurations are recommended to ensure optimal seismic performance.
References
[1] Chinndam, C. and Autade, P. “Seismic Time History Analysis of Six Storey Shear Building with Newmark-? Method and ETABS”, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Vol 7, Issue 3, eISSN: 2319-1163, pISSN: 2321-7308, 2018.
[2] Jain, S. K,“Codes, Licencing and Education.”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol.18,No.S1, pp 319-339, 2002.
[3] Bilham, R,“Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: Tectonics, geodesy and history,” Ann. Geophys., vol. 47, no. 2–3, pp. 839–858, 2004.
[4] Iyengar, R. N, Sharma, D. and Siddiqui, J. M“Earthquake history of India in medieval times,” Indian J. Hist. Sci., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 181–237, 1999.
[5] Mittal, Kumar, A. and Ramhmachhuani, R.“Indian National Strong Motion Instrumentation Network and Site Characterization of Its Stations,” Int. J. Geosci., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1151–1167, 2012.
[6] Archuleta, A. Steidl, A. and Squibb, M, “The COSMOS Virtual Data Center,” in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering no. Paper No. 1566, 2004.
[7] BIS,“Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures,” Bureau of Indian Standards, India, IS 1893 Part 1, 2016.
[8] K. Chopra,Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd, 2006.
[9] “ETABS Lateral Loads Manual.”, Computers & Structure, 2016.
[10] P. R. Vaidya,“ETABS- Time History Analysis”,pp.1-4, Available at www.academia.edu, 2017.