The text emphasizes education as a vital driver of sustainable development, national progress, and individual success, highlighting the Philippine government’s constitutional mandate to provide accessible, quality education. Teachers play a key role in making learning engaging, while assessment is identified as a critical component of effective teaching and learning, providing feedback on student achievement and instructional effectiveness.
In the Philippine context, DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015 underscores the importance of formative and summative assessments within the K–12 program, promoting diverse assessment methods such as written work, performance tasks, and quarterly examinations. However, teachers face challenges in assessment practices, especially in modular distance learning, and in the construction of quarterly examinations, including inconsistencies, delays, and varying expertise among test constructors.
To address these issues, the study proposes examining a sub-office-based system for constructing quarterly assessments to ensure standardization, efficiency, collaboration, and alignment with curriculum guidelines. Anchored on Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory and Coombs’ Systems Approach, the study focuses on evaluating the extent of implementation, challenges encountered, and potential improvements of this system in selected public elementary schools in Binangonan District, Rizal.
Using a descriptive survey design with teachers as respondents, the research aims to inform curriculum planners, administrators, teachers, pupils, parents, and future researchers. Ultimately, the study seeks to develop an action plan to enhance assessment practices and improve the overall quality, fairness, and effectiveness of elementary education.
Conclusion
The study concluded that teachers’ age sex, civil status, educational attainment, length of service, position title and in-service trainings attended have nothing to do with their perceptions on the extent of implementation of sub office based quarterly assessment in public elementary schools.
References
[1] Nolledo, Jose N., 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article XII, Section 24.Manila: National Bookstore, 2020.
[2] Zulueta, Francisco M., Methods of Research. Thesis Writing and Applied Statistics, Manila: National Bookstore, 2020.
[3] Amoranto, Bernadette C.”Resources and Equipment in School “ , The Rizalian Researcher, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2022.
[4] Denworth, Gallagher, J, “Educational Assessment “North Central College, Naperville, ., 2022
[5] DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015 known as ”Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program”.
[6] Durante, Louie M., “Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Examine Formative Assessment Practices in the Philippines”, Educational Assessment , 2022.
[7] Federizo, Hernando J., “Monitoring and Evaluation in Assessment” International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal 1(3):253-260, 2023.
[8] Gallardo, Lucena D. “Assessment of Learning “Education Quarterly, 2020
[9] Hidalgo, Novales, T.., “Rubrics as Evaluation Tool”. National Council of Teachers of English, 2021.
[10] Hunter, Gavin L., “Is Assessment for Learning Really Assessment?”, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2022.
[11] Luther, Butz, L., “Entering Research Learning Assessment (ERLA): Validity Evidence for an Instrument to Measure Undergraduate and Graduate Research Trainee Development”, CBE—Life Sciences Education Vol. 19, No. 2, 2022.
[12] Rempton,, Elizabeth C., “The Impact of Departmentalized and Traditional Instructional Settings”, Liberty University Digital Commons, 2022.
[13] Snyder, Rachel Louise., “Educational Assessment in Obtaining Information for Making Decisions for Educational Policy”, International Journal of Instruction 2021
[14] Sosnowski, Jana “Examples of Formal Reading Assessment Tools” Journal of Reading and Literacy, 2020
[15] Vermont, Strohl, A.., “Elementary Teachers’ Experiences and Perceptions of Departmentalized Instruction: A Case Study”, Journal of Case Studies in Education, 2023.
[16] Aracena, Tyler John, “The Potential Relationships Between Utilizing Quarterly Assessments for Assessing Adolescents’ English Skills as a Predictive Indicator of Students English Lanugage Arts Regents Scores”, St. John\'s University, New York, 2024.
[17] Cahapay, Michael B., “Reshaping Assessment Practices in a Philippine Teacher Education Institution during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis”, College of Education, Mindanao State University, General Santos City, 2020.
[18] Clores, Michael A. “Investigating the Assessment Literacy of Teachers in Private Junior High Schools in the Philippines”, Graduate School, Ateneo de Naga University, Naga City, Philippines, 2020.
[19] Gantalao, Eden Joy et al., “An Analysis of Pupils\' Division Unified Testing Program (DUTP) Results in Selected Core Subjects: A Basis for Improved Classroom Instruction”, DepEd-Bayawan City Division, Bayawan City, Philippines, 2020.
[20] Kissi, Prosper et al., “Teachers’ Test Construction Competencies in Examination- Oriented Educational System: Exploring Teachers’ Multiple-Choice Test Construction Competence”, Directorate of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana, 2023.
[21] Oyinloye, Oluwatoyin Mary and Imenda, Sitwala Namwinji, “The Impact of Assessment for Learning on Learner Performance in Life Science”, University of Nigeria , 2021.
[22] Raganit, Ariel A., “A Comparative Analysis of Mean Percentage Scores (MPS) of Senior High School Classes”, Department of Education, Leyte Division, 2021.
[23] Sewagegn, Abatihun, “A Study on the Assessment Methods and Experiences of Teachers” University of Ethiopia, 2021.
[24] Soifah, Utami, Bambang Widi Pratolo, “Teachers’ Belief, Implementation, and Challenges in Portfolio Assessment in Writing”. Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, 2020
[25] Tesorio, Patrick James C. and Canizares, Monell John F., “Philippine K-12 Secondary Science Teachers’ Assessment Conceptions in Promoting Student Learning”, Toledo City Science High School, Toledo, Cebu City, 2021.