Visible Light Communication is an emerging technology that leverages the visible light spectrum for wireless communication. As medical sensing technologies and smart healthcare operations continue to progress, hospitals\' needs for wireless communication are growing. The increasing demand for efficient and reliable healthcare services Due to the large number of wirelessly connected devices and data-rate-hungry applications, the available Radio Frequency spectrum is limited and getting more crowded. As a result, Radio Frequency based wireless networks are unable to support the low-latency and broadband requirements of applications in future hospital. The widely used open-source network simulator ns-3 is used to construct our simulation testbed. We compare two simulated networks in order to assess the suggested protocol. One network uses the conventional Time Division Multiple Access protocol without enabling Quality of service. Regardless of the priority level of their data, all users in this network share the same amount of time slots. To meet user demands for quality of service, we implement the priority-aware Time Division Multiple Access protocol in the second network. The results confirm that VLC, when optimized through the Development of an Improved Smart Healthcare Application through Visible Communication Network Scheme, offers a transformative solution for hospital wireless communication networks. By achieving ultra-low latency less than one millisecond, high throughput (up to 10 Gbps), and superior packet delivery ratios (95%), Development of an Improved Smart Healthcare Application through Visible Communication Network addresses the critical demands of smart healthcare applications.
Introduction
The rapid advancement of medical sensing technologies and smart healthcare systems is driving a growing demand for reliable, high-performance wireless communication in hospitals. Applications such as real-time patient monitoring, robot-assisted medical procedures, telemedicine, and emerging technologies like medical holography depend heavily on fast and dependable wireless networks to maintain high standards of patient care.
However, hospital wireless networking faces significant challenges. One major issue is electromagnetic interference (EMI), as hospitals must comply with electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) regulations to protect sensitive medical equipment such as MRI, ECG, and EEG devices. Another challenge is the high demand for bandwidth and low latency caused by data-intensive applications like real-time video conferencing, wireless medical imaging, telemedicine for rural populations, and the increasing number of connected medical devices and smart healthcare applications.
To evaluate network performance in such environments, three key metrics are used: network latency, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and network throughput. Latency measures the time taken for data packets to travel across the network, PDR represents the percentage of successfully delivered packets, and throughput indicates the volume of data successfully transmitted per unit time. Together, these metrics reflect the efficiency and reliability of the network.
The text also introduces an improved Visible Light Communication (VLC)-based smart healthcare architecture that integrates lighting, ICT providers, healthcare institutions, patients, caregivers, and regulatory bodies. This architecture supports digitally intelligent, sustainable, and innovation-driven healthcare environments while offering architectural firms a strategic opportunity to enter the smart healthcare market.
Finally, two algorithms are discussed: the existing ESHAVCON algorithm and the improved ISHAVCOMN algorithm. Both are TDMA-based scheduling schemes that allocate transmission slots according to user access categories and traffic priorities. The improved algorithm enhances system functionality by modifying the operational area and incorporating a receiver-side VLC data reception mechanism, aiming to improve efficiency, synchronization, and overall network performance in smart healthcare environments.
References
[1] Ahmad, R., Elgala, H., Almajali, S., Salameh, H. B., & Ayyash, M. (2023). Unified physical layer learning framework towards VLC-enabled 6G-indoor-flying-networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.
[2] Aminizadeh, S., Heidari, A., Dehghan, M., Toumaj, S., Rezaei, M., Navimipour, N. J., Stroppa, F., & Unal, M. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and distributed systems to improve the quality of healthcare service. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 149, 102779.
[3] Deng, T., Liu, X., Zhou, H., & Leung, V. C. (2022). Global Resource Allocation for High Throughput and Low Delay in High-Density VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.
[4] Ghosh, S. (2023). Outage analysis of hybrid VLC–RF system for IoT application under energy harvesting. Telecommunication Systems, 84(3), 387-397.
[5] Ibraiwish, H., Eltokhey, M. W., & Alouini, M.-S. (2023). Energy efficient deployment of VLC-enabled UAV using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society.
[6] Jaime, F. J., Muñoz, A., Rodríguez-Gómez, F., & Jerez-Calero, A. (2023). Strengthening privacy and data security in biomedical microelectromechanical systems by IoT communication security and protection in smart healthcare. Sensors, 23(21), 8944.
[7] Kaushal, K. K., Yadav, V., & Jain, D. (2024). Enabling VLC data centers with DCO-OFDM technology. Journal of Optics, 1-9.
[8] Kheradmand, B., Ghaffari, A., Soleimanian Gharehchopogh, F., & Masdari, M. (2022). Clustering?based routing protocol using gray wolf optimization and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution algorithms in the vehicular ad hoc networks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 34(23), e7209.
[9] Kim, D., Park, H. J., Jung, S. H., Pyo, W. J., Hassan, S. Z., Sim, H. R., Lee, J. H., Jee, D. W., & Chung, D. S. (2024). Visible?Light Communication with Lighting: RGB Wavelength Division Multiplexing OLEDs/OPDs Platform. Advanced Materials, 36(4), 2309416.
[10] Krishnamoorthy, S., Dua, A., & Gupta, S. (2023). Role of emerging technologies in future IoT-driven Healthcare 4.0 technologies: A survey, current challenges and future directions. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(1), 361-407.
[11] Kurunathan, H., Indhumathi, R., Gaitán, M. G., Taramasco, C., & Tovar, E. (2023). VLC-enabled monitoring in a healthcare setting: Overview and Challenges. 2023 South American Conference On Visible Light Communications (SACVLC),
[12] Manhardt, J. (2024). Enabling smart healthcare applications through visible light communication networks.
[13] Mbunge, E., Muchemwa, B., & Batani, J. (2021). Sensors and healthcare 5.0: transformative shift in virtual care through emerging digital health technologies. Global Health Journal, 5(4), 169-177.
[14] Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
[15] Shaikh, F. S., Saleem, Y., & Wismüller, R. (2024). An interference-conscious reduced routing overhead protocol for Device-to-Device (D2D) Networks. Computer Communications.
[16] Thulasi, T., & Sivamohan, K. (2023). LSO-CSL: Light spectrum optimizer-based convolutional stacked long short term memory for attack detection in IoT-based healthcare applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 232, 120772.
[17] Tian, S., Yang, W., Le Grange, J. M., Wang, P., Huang, W., & Ye, Z. (2019). Smart healthcare: making medical care more intelligent. Global Health Journal, 3(3), 62-65.
[18] Verma, H., Chauhan, N., & Awasthi, L. K. (2023). A Comprehensive review of ‘Internet of Healthcare Things’: Networking aspects, technologies, services, applications, challenges, and security concerns. Computer Science Review, 50, 100591.
[19] Wang, C., Liang, X., & Adajar, E. P. (2023). A systematic approach for AC electromagnetic interference study between railways and nearby power lines. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 59(5), 5527-5538.