This study investigates the development of stabilized mud composites (SMCs) using melted PET plastic as a binder and bamboo fibers as reinforcement. The research focuses on formulating and optimizing PET-Bamboo SMCs to improve mechanical strength, durability, and thermal properties. The methodology includes soil characterization, bamboo fiber extraction and treatment, and preparation of composite samples with varying proportions. The optimal mix ratio of mud and plastic was determined, with 60% PET plastic (SP60) yielding the highest compressive strength. Further investigation evaluated the impact of bamboo fiber addition, revealing that a 4% fiber content (SP60-4) significantly improves compressive strength and mitigates brittle failure. The SP60-4 composite demonstrates superior compressive strength and water absorption performance compared to conventional stabilized mud composites with alternative stabilizers. This research highlights the potential of PET-Bamboo SMCs as high-performance materials for construction, offering enhanced mechanical properties and water resistance. The findings provide valuable insights for developing scalable applications in the construction industry.
Introduction
Overview:
This research explores innovative ways to strengthen Stabilized Mud Composites (SMCs) for construction by incorporating melted PET plastic as a binder and bamboo fibers as reinforcement. The goal is to overcome traditional limitations of SMCs, such as low tensile strength, cracking, and water sensitivity, while improving durability, strength, and sustainability.
Need & Scope:
Need: SMCs are eco-friendly and low-cost, but they lack strength and durability.
Scope: This study aims to improve these properties using waste PET plastic and bamboo fibers. The mix proportions are optimized and tested for compressive, tensile, and flexural strength, as well as water absorption.
Objectives:
Determine the optimal mix of PET, bamboo fiber, and mud.
Analyze the effect of bamboo fiber on mechanical properties.
Lowest in SP60 (0.67%), increasing with higher bamboo fiber content due to its natural absorbency.
Density & Flexural Strength:
Best performance observed with SP60-3 (60% PET + 3% bamboo fiber), balancing strength and water resistance.
Conclusion
1) The stabilized mix with 60% PET and 4% bamboo fibers (SP60-4) achieved a compressive strength of 25.3 N/mm², demonstrating more than a 700% improvement compared to soil stabilized with 15% cement.
2) The addition of 4% bamboo fibers increased tensile strength by 87.14%, highlighting the role of fibers in improving the mix\'s ductility and tensile performance.
3) The water absorption rate of the mix was 2.6%, meeting the IS standards, ensuring durability and resistance to moisture-related degradation.
4) The optimized mix is affordable and contributes to sustainability by repurposing PET waste and reducing dependence on traditional stabilizers like cement.
5) The results indicate that the SP60-4 mix offers superior strength, reduced brittleness, and moisture resistance, making it suitable for soil stabilization applications.
6) The use of PET binders and bamboo fibers shows significant promise as a sustainable construction material, with potential for broader application as advancements in plastic melting technologies progress.
References
[1] N. P. Vignesh, N. Arunachelam, K. Mahendran, and B. Dinesh Kumar, “A Study on Polymeric Fibre Reinforced Stabilized Mud Blocks,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1026, no. 1, p. 012010, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1026/1/012010.
[2] Y. Xian, D. Ma, C. Wang, G. Wang, L. Smith, and H. Cheng, “Characterization and Research on Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Plastic Composites,” Polymers, vol. 10, no. 8, Art. no. 8, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/polym10080814.
[3] Y. O. Babatunde, R. A. Ibrahim, and D. O. Oguntayo, “Effect of mix proportion on the strength and durability of plastic and sand composite for construction applications,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 7, no. 6, p. 333, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41062-022-00930-9.
[4] S. Panda and D. Behera, “Effect of red mud on mechanical and chemical properties of unsaturated polyester-epoxy-bamboo fiber composites,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 4, no. 2, Part A, pp. 3325–3333, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.219.
[5] Y. Xian, H. Li, C. Wang, G. Wang, W. Ren, and H. Cheng, “Effect of White Mud as a Second Filler on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Bamboo Residue Fiber/Polyethylene Composites,” BioResources, vol. 10, no. 3, Art. no. 3, May 2015.
[6] M. Thiam and M. Fall, “Engineering properties of a building material with melted plastic waste as the only binder,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 44, p. 102684, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102684.
[7] Y. O. Babatunde, J. Mwero, R. Mutuku, Y. Jimoh, and D. Oguntayo, “Effects of filler types on the microstructural and engineering properties of waste plastic binder composite for construction purposes,” Cogent Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2143057, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2022.2143057.
[8] C. K. Subramaniaprasad, B. M. Abraham, and E. K. Kunhanandan Nambiar, “Influence of Embedded Waste-Plastic Fibers on the Improvement of the Tensile Strength of Stabilized Mud Masonry Blocks,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 27, no. 7, p. 04014203, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001165.
[9] Y. Babatunde, J. Mwero, R. Mutuku, Y. Jimoh, and D. Oguntayo, “Influence of material composition on the morphology and engineering properties of waste plastic binder composite for construction purposes,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e11207, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11207.
[10] M. Thiam, M. Fall, and M. S. Diarra, “Mechanical properties of a mortar with melted plastic waste as the only binder: Influence of material composition and curing regime, and application in Bamako,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 15, p. e00634, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00634.
[11] M. Thiam and M. Fall, “Mechanical, physical and microstructural properties of a mortar with melted plastic waste binder,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 302, p. 124190, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124190.
[12] C. Prasad, E. K. K. Nambiar, and B. M. Abraham, “Plastic Fibre Reinforced Soil Blocks as a Sustainable Building Material,” 2012. Accessed: Dec. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available:
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Plastic-Fibre-Reinforced-Soil-Blocks-as-a-Building-Prasad-Nambiar/dc8f84eccd671f1d7fc914f40a3233af30720c4a
[13] V. Prakash and A. Raj, “STUDIES ON STABILIZED MUD BLOCK AS A CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL,” Nter Natl. Jour Nal Nnovative Resear Ch Adv. Eng. Ing, vol. 3, 2016
[14] N. M. Yusof et al., “Effects of Boric Acid Pretreatment on the Properties of Four Selected Malaysian Bamboo Strips,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/f14020196.
[15] IS: 1725:1982 Specification for Soil based blocks used in general building Construction.