Influence of Media (News and Crime Shows) on Public Knowledge of Crime Scene Protocol

Abstract

This research paper explores the influence of media, news, television, and crime shows on public knowledge and understanding of crime scene protocols. Media representations of forensic investigations often shape the perceptions of people, creating opinions and expectations about how crime scenes are investigated and handled. However, these portrayals are frequently dramatized and may not always reflect real forensic practices. Through a survey-based approach, this study examines how exposure to crime-related media affects the awareness and understanding of individuals regarding crime scene procedures. The study includes participants from both academic and professional backgrounds, including forensic science students, teaching professionals, police personnel, and advocates. By analyzing the perceptions and responses of participants, the research highlights the role of media in influencing public understanding of forensic science and crime scene investigation protocols. This study further emphasizes the growing impact of crime-based media on society and encourages a deeper understanding of the difference between fictional representation and actual forensic practices.

Introduction

This study examines the influence of media, news, and crime shows on public knowledge and perceptions of crime scene protocols, with particular emphasis on the phenomenon known as the CSI Effect. Media has become a major source of information about forensic science, exposing audiences to crime scene investigations through television shows, documentaries, web series, and news reports. While these portrayals increase public interest in forensic science, they often dramatize investigative procedures, leading to unrealistic expectations about the speed, accuracy, and capabilities of real forensic investigations.

Crime scene protocols involve the scientific identification, collection, preservation, and documentation of evidence while adhering to strict legal and procedural standards. However, media representations frequently simplify or exaggerate these processes for entertainment, creating misconceptions among viewers. This can influence public perceptions of forensic evidence, investigators' roles, and courtroom proceedings. The study seeks to determine whether media exposure genuinely enhances forensic knowledge or primarily promotes fictional understandings of crime scene investigation.

The research specifically compares forensic science students and professionals (including teaching professionals, advocates, and police personnel) to evaluate differences in awareness and perceptions shaped by media. By doing so, it aims to understand how educational background and professional experience affect the interpretation of media portrayals and to emphasize the importance of accurate forensic representation.

The study employs a quantitative survey-based research design involving 93 participants, comprising 62 forensic science students and 31 professionals. Participants were selected using convenience sampling through academic and professional networks. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered through Google Forms, consisting of 30 closed-ended statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree."

The questionnaire assessed participants' views on several aspects of media influence, including:

• Public expectations of forensic professionals.
• Accuracy of media portrayals.
• Knowledge of evidence collection and preservation.
• Speed and realism of crime scene investigations.
• Pressure placed on investigators by media and social media.
• Public trust in forensic evidence.
• Ethical issues in crime reporting.
• Use of advanced forensic technology.
• The need for forensic experts to guide media reporting.

To compare the two participant groups, the researchers applied an independent samples Welch's t-test, which is appropriate for unequal sample sizes and unequal variances. Cohen's d was calculated to measure the magnitude of the observed differences.

The results demonstrate a statistically significant difference between students and professionals. Professionals achieved a mean awareness score of 3.48, whereas students scored 2.45, producing a mean difference of 1.03. The p-value (p < 0.001) confirms that this difference is statistically significant and unlikely to have occurred by chance. Furthermore, the effect size (Cohen's d = 1.4) indicates a very large practical difference between the two groups.

These findings suggest that professionals possess substantially greater knowledge and understanding of actual crime scene protocols than students, likely because of their education and practical experience. Although media increases public awareness of forensic science, it also contributes to misconceptions through dramatized and inaccurate portrayals. The results support the hypothesis that media exposure influences public knowledge differently depending on an individual's educational and professional background.

The study was conducted with appropriate ethical safeguards, including voluntary participation, informed consent, anonymity, confidentiality, and the use of data solely for academic purposes. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations, including the relatively small sample size, the use of convenience sampling, and the reliance on self-reported responses, which may introduce response bias and limit the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

This study concludes that media, crime shows, and news reports significantly influence the perception of the public on the crime scene protocols. The level of understanding of crime scene protocols of forensic science students and professionals, including forensic science teachers, advocates, and police personnel, significantly varies. These awareness levels can underscore the impact of experience and knowledge on the understanding of forensic procedures. Media can generate curiosity about forensic science through exaggerated and dramatized portrayals, which often lead to unrealistic expectations of forensic investigation and fair justice. Therefore, it is necessary to promote accurate media representations related to forensic practices and also enhance forensic literacy through educational resources. This can lead to improved perception and trust in forensic science and the criminal investigation process.

References

[1] Ferris, A. L. (2011). *Examining the “CSI effect”: The impact of crime drama viewership on perceptions of forensics and science* (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University). Kent State University. [2] Patzelt, D. (2004). History of forensic serology and molecular genetics in the sphere of activity of the German Society for Forensic Medicine. *Forensic Science International, 144*(2–3),185–191. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.053](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.053) [3] Tobin, A. N. (2016). *A study of the impact of crime shows on contemporary criminal investigations* (Master’s thesis, George Washington University). George Washington University. [4] Weyermann, C., & Roux, C. (2021). A different perspective on the forensic science crisis. *Forensic Science International, 323*, 110779. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110779](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110779) [5] Ahdal, K. A., Manoj Shankar, Sundar, D., & Narula, A. (2025). Crime and cinema: Exploring the influence of on-screen crimes on real-world offenses. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches in Psychology, 3(1), 1–27. [6] Baskin, D. R., & Sommers, I. B. (2010). Crime-show-viewing habits and public attitudes toward forensic evidence: The \"CSI effect\" revisited. Justice System Journal, 31(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2010.10767956 [7] Besselaar, T. T. (2024). The CSI effect: Media influence on juror perceptions of forensic evidence (Senior thesis, Scripps College). Scholarship @ Claremont. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/2472 [8] Feilzer, M. Y. (2007). The \"Crime Scene\" experiment: Improving public knowledge through the provision of factual information on crime and criminal justice (Doctoral thesis, University of Oxford). Oxford University Research Archive. [9] Gomes, S., Sardá, T., & Granja, R. (2022). Crime, justice and media: Debating (mis) representations and renewed challenges. Comunicação e Sociedade, 42, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.17234/comsoc.42.2022.7914 [10] Hughes, T., & Magers, M. (2007). The perceived impact of Crime Scene Investigation shows on the administration of justice. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 14(3), 258–276. [11] McManus, S. E. (2010). Influence of the CSI effect on education and mass media (Master\'s thesis, University of Central Florida). STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/1577 [12] Pickett, J. T., Mancini, C., Mears, D. P., & Gertz, M. (2014). Public (mis) understanding of crime policy: The effects of criminal justice experience and media reliance. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414526228 [13] Rashmi, C. P., & Jain, L. (2023). An empirical study on Indian crime web series and its effects. Journal of Communication and Management, 2(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.58966/JCM2023234 [14] Sharma, B. K., Hachem, M., Bashir, R., & Mishra, V. P. (2019). Exploring the impact of the CSI effect and appropriate media handling during crime investigation. Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 10(5), 184–197. [15] Baskin, D., & Sommers, I. (2010). Crime-show-viewing habits and public attitudes toward forensic evidence: The “CSI Effect” revisited. Justice System Journal, 31(1), 97–113. [16] Call, C., Cook, A. K., Reitzel, J. D., & McDougle, B. M. (2013). The CSI effect: Does it really exist? The Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(1), 93–112. [17] Cole, S. A., & Dioso-Villa, R. (2009). Investigating the “CSI Effect” effect: Media and litigation crisis in criminal law. Stanford Law Review, 61(6), 1335–1374. [18] Hayes-Smith, R., & Levett, L. M. (2011). Juror’s expectations of forensic evidence: Investigating the CSI effect using a sample of university students. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 153–164. [19] Hawkins, N. A., & Scherr, K. C. (2017). Engaging in the CSI effect: The influences of experience-taking, media consumption, and neuroticism in juror decision making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(1), 21–35. [20] Houck, M. M. (2006). CSI: Reality. Scientific American, 295(1), 84–89. [21] Kim, Y. S., Barak, G., & Shelton, D. E. (2009). Examining the “CSI-effect” in the cases of circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony: Multivariate and path analyses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(5), 452–460. [22] Mancini, C. (2013). The CSI effect in an actual juror sample: Why crime show genre may matter. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 31–42. [23] Podlas, K. (2006). The CSI effect: Exposing the media myth. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 16(2), 429–465. [24] Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2007). The CSI effect: Popular fiction about forensic science affects the public’s expectations about real forensic science. Jurimetrics, 47(3), 357–364. [25] Shelton, D. E., Kim, Y. S., & Barak, G. (2006). A study of juror expectations and demands concerning scientific evidence: Does the “CSI Effect” exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 9(2), 331–368. [26] Tyler, T. R. (2006). Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: Managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. Yale Law Journal, 115(5), 1050–1085. [27] Vicary, A. M., & Zaikman, Y. (2017). The CSI effect: An investigation into police chiefs’ perceptions. Police Practice and Research, 18(1), 39–53. [28] Wise, S. (2006). Providing the missing link: Criminal justice and the CSI effect. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97(2), 459–498. [29] Littlefield, J. (2011). The CSI effect and the myths of forensic science. Social Epistemology, 25(3–4), 255–270

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Samruddhi Badiger, Zayana K R, Pandlagundla Vamsi, Monish A, Prathiba M, Joemon Jose. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.