Integrating Circular Economy and Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions

Abstract

Amid growing disruption risks and sustainability pressures, there is increasing interest in integrating circular economy (CE) principles with supply chain resilience (SCR) strategies. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of research at the integration of CE and SCR. We analyze conceptual and empirical studies to identify how circularity and resilience interact within supply chain management. The review reveals that circular supply chain practices – such as product redesign for reuse, localized recycling loops, and resource recovery – can simultaneously enhance resilience by reducing dependence on virgin materials and improving adaptive capacity (Gaustad et al., 2018; Paul & Saha, 2025). However, integrating CE and SCR also entails trade-offs; for example, closed-loop supply chains introduce new uncertainties (e.g., variable return flows) that must be managed to avoid eroding resilience (De Arquer et al., 2023). We synthesize the literature into key thematic categories: (1) synergistic practices that advance both circularity and resilience, (2) tensions and challenges in aligning CE and SCR goals, and (3) enabling factors (e.g., collaboration, digital technology) that support their integration. Drawing on these insights, we propose a comprehensive agenda for future research, including the development of integrated performance metrics, exploration of multi-tier collaborative frameworks, longitudinal studies of CE–resilience dynamics, and novel decision-support methodologies. The paper offers theoretical contributions by bridging sustainability and risk-management paradigms, and practical guidance for firms seeking to build supply chains that are both sustainable and shock-resilient.

Introduction

This study explores the integration of circular economy (CE) principles with supply chain resilience (SCR) to create sustainable and disruption-resistant supply chains. It highlights how recent crises such as pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and climate disruptions have emphasized the need for resilient supply systems. While traditional resilience strategies focus on inventory buffers and flexible sourcing, circular economy practices promote reuse, recycling, remanufacturing, and closed-loop systems to reduce waste and dependence on virgin resources.

The study explains that CE practices can strengthen resilience by improving resource security, enabling localized sourcing, reducing supply disruptions, and increasing adaptability. Examples include recycling, repair systems, modular product design, and remanufacturing, which help firms recover faster during crises. Research during COVID-19 showed that companies with circular business models experienced fewer losses compared to traditional firms. Technologies such as IoT and blockchain further support this integration by improving visibility, traceability, and coordination in supply chains.

However, the paper also identifies challenges in combining CE and resilience. Closed-loop supply chains introduce uncertainties related to product returns, recycling processes, reverse logistics, and quality variations. Over-optimizing circular systems for efficiency may reduce resilience by increasing vulnerability to disruptions. Therefore, firms must balance sustainability goals with operational flexibility and risk management.

The study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) using PRISMA methodology, analyzing around 45 studies from 2000–2025. It categorizes findings into themes such as CE as a resilience enabler, trade-offs between efficiency and resilience, integrated circular-resilient practices, and performance outcomes. Representative studies demonstrate that practices like repair systems, localization, collaboration, product redesign, and digital technologies jointly improve sustainability and resilience.

Conclusion

This paper set out to review and analyze the burgeoning area at the crossroads of circular economy and supply chain resilience. Through a systematic literature review encompassing approximately two decades of research, we have provided a comprehensive synthesis of how circularity and resilience concepts interact in supply chain contexts. The evidence is compelling that circular economy principles – designing out waste, keeping materials in circulation, and regenerating natural systems – can be strategically leveraged to enhance supply chain resilience by reducing resource dependencies and increasing adaptive capacities. We documented numerous cases and studies where circular practices (from recycling to remanufacturing to collaborative waste re-utilization) enabled supply chains to better absorb and recover from disruptions, whether those disruptions were demand surges, supply shortages, or global crises. At the same time, our review candidly highlights that achieving the twin goals of circularity and resilience is not automatic; it requires navigating trade-offs and thoughtfully redesigning supply chain operations. Challenges such as managing the uncertainty of reverse logistics, balancing efficiency with buffers, and coordinating across extended supply networks must be addressed. We identified a set of integrated practices – including innovative product design, process improvements, network reconfiguration, strong collaboration, and digital technologies – that serve as enablers to jointly optimize for circularity and resilience. These practices form the basis of a framework (Figure 1) that future enterprises can adopt as a blueprint for Circular Supply Chain Management (CSCM) aligned with resilience objectives. From a theoretical standpoint, this work contributes to a more holistic understanding of sustainable operations by linking two previously siloed research streams. It underscores that sustainability and resilience are complementary aspects of the broader pursuit of supply chain sustainability – resilient supply chains are more likely to be sustainable over the long run, and sustainable (circular) supply chains inherently cultivate forms of resilience. We encourage scholars to further develop this integrated perspective, employing new lenses and methods to deepen knowledge, as outlined in our future research agenda (Table 3). In particular, we stress the need for empirical validation and longitudinal studies to move beyond qualitative rationale to quantitative proof of the circular–resilient value proposition. For practitioners and policymakers, the implications are actionable. Investing in circular economy initiatives can yield resilience dividends, making supply chains not only greener but also more secure and stable. Conversely, approaching resilience planning with an eye to circular opportunities can unlock innovative solutions that also advance sustainability goals. Companies that have been pioneers in this space demonstrate that far from being a trade-off, circularity and resilience can create a virtuous cycle: resilience ensures the continuity needed to achieve sustainability targets, and circularity provides the resources and flexibility needed to be resilient. Policymakers can amplify this by crafting regulations and incentives that jointly promote environmental responsibility and supply chain preparedness – for example, supporting local remanufacturing not just for jobs or waste reduction, but as a matter of economic resilience. In closing, the integration of circular economy and supply chain resilience is not just a theoretical ideal but an increasingly practical imperative. The events of recent years have shown that global supply chains face complex risks that require more creative, regenerative approaches to management. Meanwhile, the urgency of climate change and resource depletion calls for transformative change in how supply chains operate. The circular economy provides a pathway for that transformative change, and when combined with resilience thinking, it offers a route to supply chains that are not only sustainable in good times but also robust in the face of adversity. We hope this review contributes a solid foundation of knowledge and inspiration for both academics and practitioners to accelerate the transition toward circular, resilient supply chain ecosystems that can thrive in the uncertain years ahead.

References

[1] Aming’a, M., Marwanga, R., & Annan, J. (2024). Is it practical to uphold both resilience and sustainability of supply chains using closed-loop supply chain models considering circular economy? An empirical investigation from Kenya. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2315666. doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2315666 [2] Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Foropon, C. (2019). Examining the role of dynamic remanufacturing capability on supply chain resilience in circular economy. Management Decision, 57(4), 863–885. [3] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [4] Cafforio, F., Park, S. W., Giannoccaro, I., & Abdel-Malek, L. (2025). Resilience of circular supply chains: Analyzing the impact of take-back strategies via efficient computation of post-disturbance equilibrium. Sustainable Development, 33(6), 8721–8736. doi:10.1002/sd.70119 [5] Carissimi, M. C., Bin Hameed, H., & Creazza, A. (2024). Circular economy: The future nexus for sustainable and resilient supply chains? Sustainable Futures, 8, 100365. [6] Chari, A., Niedenzu, D., Despeisse, M., Machado, C. G., Azevedo, J. D., & Johansson, B. (2022). Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains—Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(6), 2500–2517. [7] Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A review and future research directions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102271. [8] Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 [9] Cobra, R., Moroni, I. T., Rodrigues, V. P., Fradinho, J. M. S., & Mascarenhas, J. (2023). Repair as a circular strategy for increasing resource availability and health system resilience during a crisis. Health Policy and Technology, 12, 100778. [10] D’Adamo, I., & Lupi, G. (2021). Sustainability and resilience after COVID-19: A circular premium in the fashion industry. Sustainability, 13(4), 1861. [11] De Arquer, M., Ponte, B., Pino, R., & De La Fuente, D. (2023). A Control Engineering Approach to the Ripple Effect Analysis in Closed-Loop Supply Chains. 2023 Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, & Applied Computing (CSCE), 446–450. doi:10.1109/CSCE60160.2023.00080 [12] De Arquer, M., Ponte, B., & Pino, R. (2022). Examining the balance between efficiency and resilience in closed-loop supply chains. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 30, 1307–1336. doi:10.1007/s10100-021-00766-1 [13] Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Wamba, S. F., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110–128. [14] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2022). Building resilience: The impact of the circular economy on global trade and supply chains. Ellen MacArthur Foundation report. Retrieved from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/articles/building-resilience [15] Faisal, M. N., & Talib, F. (2016). Implementing sustainable supply chain risk management: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7), 1658–1680. [16] Fletcher, C. A., St Clair, R., & Sharmina, M. (2021). Seafood businesses’ resilience can benefit from circular economy principles. Nature Food, 2(4), 228–232. [17] Gaustad, G., Krystofik, M., Bustamante, M., & Badami, K. (2018). Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 24–33. [18] Goltsos, T. E., Ponte, B., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Naim, M. M., & Syntetos, A. A. (2019). The boomerang returns? Accounting for the impact of uncertainties on the dynamics of remanufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 57(23), 7361–7394. [19] Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 285–307. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001 [20] Islam, S., Hassan, S., Hossain, S., Ahmed, T., Karmaker, C. L., & Bari, A. B. M. Mainul. (2025). Exploring the influence of circular economy on big data analytics and supply chain resilience nexus: A structural equation modeling approach. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 3(3), 100219. doi:10.1016/j.grets.2025.100219 [21] Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014). The ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172. [22] Ivanov, D. (2020). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 300(1-2), 341–353. [23] Jabbarzadeh, A., Haughton, M. A., & Khosrojerdi, A. (2018). Closed-loop supply chain network design under disruption risks: A robust approach with real world application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 116, 178–191. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.025 [24] Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. [25] Le, H. M., Wood, L. C., & Duong, L. N. K. (2025). The integration of circular economy and resilience principles in modern supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-025-00609-5 [26] Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: a systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2858–2886. [27] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583 [28] Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S. J., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2017). The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1108–1118. [29] Paul, A., & Saha, S. C. (2025). Analysing the usefulness of circular strategies to improve supply chain resilience against demand changes. Sustainability, 17(18), 8248. [30] Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. [31] Rajesh, R. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management and resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research. International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 369–384. [32] Rasi, R. Z., Ismail, H., Shahbaz, M. S., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2023). Interdisciplinary challenges in the circular supply chain: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(4), e15225. [33] Ridley, M. (2019, February 11). Blending efficiency and resilience. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@Mark_Ridley/blending-efficiency-and-resilience-1ff876e7f0c9 [34] Scholten, K., & Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471–484. [35] Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B., Jr. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41–48. [36] Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438. [37] Stone, J., & Rahimifard, S. (2018). Resilience in agri-food supply chains: a critical analysis of the literature and synthesis of a novel framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(3), 207–238. [38] Torshizi, E., Mousapour Mamoudan, M., & Yazdani, M. (2026). Strengthening omnichannel supply chain resilience through circular economy integration: A case-based analysis of disruption preparedness strategies. Omega, 141, 103466. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2025.103466 [39] Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J., & Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5592–5623. [40] Vali-Siar, M. M., Roghanian, E., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2022). Resilient mixed open and closed-loop supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks considering competition: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 172, 108513. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108513 [41] Vimal, K. E. K., Shaikh, M. F., Chouhan, A. P., & Kandasamy, J. (2024). Developing a framework for achieving optimal sustainability and resilience in circular sharing networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 18267–18295. [42] Wang, B., Luo, W., Zhang, A., Tian, Z., & Li, Z. (2020). Blockchain-enabled circular supply chain management: A system architecture for fast fashion. Computers in Industry, 123, 103324. [43] Xu, L., Zhou, L., & Tokar, T. (2020). Bridging sustainability and resilience in supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 35–50. AI Use Declaration [44] ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2026) was used to assist in summarizing background literature to support understanding from published research articles for this review, and it was utilized only for this purpose. The author independently read and verified all cited sources and ensured that summaries accurately reflected the original texts.

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Syed Rashedul Haque, Mominul Islam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.