In an era characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA), Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) face unprecedented challenges in managing their global human capital. This review synthesizes recent literature from 2015 to 2026 to examine the evolving landscape of International Human Resource Management (IHRM). We explore how MNEs navigate the tension between global integration and local responsiveness, particularly in the context of emerging market multinationals (EMNEs), digital transformation, and geopolitical disruptions. Key themes include the strategic role of subsidiary autonomy, the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on global mobility, the influence of CEO narcissism and top management team (TMT) diversity on radical innovation, and the critical importance of sustainability and social responsibility in HR practices. By integrating insights from internalization theory, upper echelons theory, and institutional theory, this paper proposes a holistic framework for understanding how people, culture, and performance are interconnected in the modern global enterprise. We conclude with a forward-looking research agenda that emphasizes the need for inclusive, resilient, and technologically adept IHRM strategies.
Introduction
The paper reviews the evolving field of International Human Resource Management (IHRM) in multinational enterprises (MNEs), highlighting how globalization, digital transformation, artificial intelligence (AI), geopolitical uncertainty, and sustainability challenges are reshaping the management of global workforces. As organizations expand internationally, effective management of people has become a key strategic resource for maintaining competitiveness and organizational performance.
Traditionally, IHRM research focused on multinational enterprises from developed economies, emphasizing the balance between global standardization and local adaptation of HR practices. However, recent studies show that Emerging Market Multinational Enterprises (EMNEs) follow different internationalization strategies, often relying on acquisitions and home-country institutional advantages. These firms also face unique challenges, such as the "liability of Chineseness," where cultural and institutional biases affect the overseas expansion of Chinese multinational companies. Effective HR practices, knowledge transfer, and cross-cultural integration are essential for overcoming these challenges.
The review explains that modern IHRM has moved beyond traditional internalization theory toward more flexible frameworks. One important model is the Convergence–Divergence–Crossvergence (C-D-C) framework, which suggests that multinational companies combine global HR practices with local adaptations while integrating best practices across cultures. This approach recognizes the influence of both external factors (culture, institutions) and internal factors (leadership and managerial decisions).
A major focus of the paper is the impact of digital transformation and Artificial Intelligence (AI) on human resource management. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated remote work, virtual expatriation, and global virtual teams. AI is increasingly used for recruitment, talent management, performance evaluation, and employee development. However, the review cautions that AI should complement rather than replace human judgment, especially in cross-cultural contexts where ethical considerations and cultural sensitivity remain important.
The paper also highlights the importance of gender and diversity in IHRM. Although women contribute significantly to HR research, gender-related issues remain underrepresented in international HR theories. The review argues that integrating gender perspectives into HR policies and research is essential for promoting diversity, inclusion, innovation, and effective global teamwork.
Leadership is identified as another critical factor influencing multinational performance. The study discusses how CEO characteristics, particularly narcissism, can drive innovation while also increasing organizational risk. Diverse international management teams help balance executive overconfidence by providing broader perspectives and improving decision-making.
Another emerging area is the influence of political ideology on multinational enterprises. Organizations increasingly operate across countries with different political systems and social values, creating ideological tensions that affect strategy, employee engagement, and organizational culture. The review recommends adopting a multidimensional approach to understanding political ideology in international business.
The paper also examines global connectivity, emphasizing that technological and human networks improve knowledge sharing and innovation but simultaneously expose organizations to disruptions such as pandemics, cyberattacks, natural disasters, and geopolitical conflicts. Building resilient human and digital networks is therefore essential for multinational success.
Sustainability has become a central responsibility of multinational enterprises. The review identifies three important roles that MNEs play in emerging markets:
Technology Leader.
Responsible Leader.
Efficiency Seeker.
By transferring technology, promoting responsible business practices, and improving operational efficiency, multinational firms contribute to economic, social, and environmental sustainability. The review also notes that organizations face increasing pressure to address climate change, requiring them to develop localized sustainability strategies while maintaining global legitimacy.
An innovative discussion compares legitimate multinational enterprises with Criminal Multinational Enterprises (CMNEs). Although both operate across borders and manage global networks, criminal organizations rely on informal governance, trust, and coercion rather than legal institutional frameworks. This comparison highlights the importance of strong institutions and ethical governance in legitimate multinational business operations.
Based on the reviewed literature, the paper proposes an integrated IHRM framework built around three interconnected pillars:
Strategic Human Resource Management, focusing on talent, staffing, and workforce management.
Cultural and Leadership Dynamics, emphasizing cross-cultural leadership, diversity, and organizational culture.
Performance and Sustainability, integrating innovation, environmental responsibility, and ethical governance.
These pillars interact continuously while responding to external pressures such as technological change, geopolitical uncertainty, and environmental challenges.
Finally, the paper outlines several directions for future research, including:
Understanding how political ideology influences managerial decision-making.
Exploring how AI can enhance rather than replace human capabilities.
Developing gender-inclusive IHRM theories.
Investigating the relationship between HR practices and sustainability.
Building resilient multinational organizations capable of adapting to global disruptions.
Conclusion
Managing people, culture, and performance in a global context is no longer about choosing between standardization and adaptation. It is about building dynamic capabilities that allow MNEs to navigate complexity, leverage diversity, and respond to disruption with agility. As this review demonstrates, the future of IHRM lies in the integration of strategic flexibility, cultural intelligence, and sustainable purpose. By embracing crossvergent HRM strategies, fostering inclusive leadership, and leveraging technology responsibly, MNEs can achieve superior global performance while contributing positively to society.
References
[1] Fan, D., Xia, J., Zhang, M. M., Zhu, C. J., & Li, Z. (2016). The paths of managing international human resources of emerging market multinationals: Reconciling strategic goal and control means. Human Resource Management Review, 26(4), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.04.003
[2] Nayak, S., et al. (2025). Global connectivity and disruption: Balancing technological and human networks. Journal of International Management, 31(3), 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101280
[3] Farndale, E., Horak, S., Piyanontalee, R., Puffer, S. M., & Vidovi?, M. (2025). Looking back to look forward: Disruption, innovation and future trends in international human resource management. International Business Review, 34(1), 102362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102362
[4] Schuler, R. S., Dowling, P. J., & De Cieri, H. (2002). Global talent management and global talent challenges: Strategic opportunities for IHRM. Journal of World Business, 37(6), 335-343.
[5] Cooke, F. L., Wu, G., Zhou, J., Zhong, C., & Wang, J. (2018). Acquiring global footprints: Internationalization strategy of Chinese multinational enterprises and human resource implications. Journal of Business Research, 93, 184-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.012
[6] Liu, Y., & Meyer, K. E. (2020). Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: The case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions. Journal of World Business, 55, 100958.
[7] Caligiuri, P., et al. (2020). International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 697-713.
[8] Budhwar, P., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence – challenges and opportunities for international HRM: a review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
[9] Verbeke, A., & Mudambi, S. M. (2015). The theory and practice of multinational enterprise regionalization. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.014
[10] Liu, Y., & Meyer, K. E. (2020). Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: The case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions. Journal of World Business, 55, 100958.
[11] Malin, C. D., et al. (2024). The application of AI in digital HRM - an experiment on human decision-making in personnel selection. Business Process Management Journal.
[12] Lee, J. Y., et al. (2025). How professionals respond to disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction: The role of interactive governance. Social Science and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.xxx
[13] Cooke, F. L., et al. (2025). The role of gender in authorship and knowledge base in existing IHRM literature. Human Resource Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2025.101087
[14] Lee, J. Y., Wei, Y., Tang, R. W., Choi, B., & Cooke, F. L. (2025). CEO narcissism, subsidiary top management team international diversity, and radical digital innovation in multinational enterprises. Research Policy, 54(6), 105242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105242
[15] Brouthers, L. E., et al. (2026). Political ideology in multinational enterprises: A multi-level and reflexive model. Journal of World Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2026.xxx
[16] Bu, M., Hatani, F., Holtbrügge, D., & Van Assche, A. (2025). Multinational enterprises and sustainable business in emerging markets. Journal of International Management, 31(3), 101254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101254
[17] Cooke, F. L., et al. (2025). Multinational enterprises and climate change: A systematic review and integrated framework. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115631
[18] Enderwick, P., & Buckley, P. J. (2024). Criminal multinational enterprises: Stress-testing internalization theory. Journal of World Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2024.101553
[19] Telenor Case Study. (2025). Replicating digital business models across borders. Journal of International Management.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101294
[20] Yao, F. K., et al. (2025). Not all threats are equal: Symbolic and realistic threats and the deployment of parent-country nationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 56(2), 174-193.