This project looks at how we can make M20 grade concrete more environmentally friendly by changing some of its basic ingredients without losing strength. In place of using only ordinary cement and natural stone, part of the cement is replaced with fly ash and GGBS, and part of the coarse aggregate is replaced with coconut shells, which are usually treated as waste. The work includes testing all the materials, designing mixes as per IS 10262:2019, preparing both modified and conventional concretes, and then checking slump, density, and compressive, split tensile, and flexural strength at different ages. The results show that the modified concrete can still meet M20 strength requirements, has slightly lower weight, and benefits from the combined effect of the added materials, while a basic cost comparison indicates that higher replacement levels can also reduce overall concrete cost. Overall, the study suggests that using industrial by-products and agricultural waste in concrete is a practical way to support more sustainable and economical construction.
Introduction
Concrete is a widely used construction material valued for strength, durability, and versatility. However, cement production and raw material extraction contribute significantly to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. This study investigates eco-friendly, low-carbon alternatives by partially replacing cement with fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), and substituting part of coarse aggregates with coconut shells, aiming to balance strength, durability, sustainability, and cost.
Materials and Methods:
Cement: OPC 53 Grade with partial replacement using FA and GGBS.
Aggregates: River sand (fine aggregate), crushed stone (coarse aggregate), and coconut shells (partial coarse aggregate replacement).
Specific gravity, fineness, water absorption, impact value, setting times, and grading as per IS codes.
Workability assessed using slump test.
Mechanical properties tested: compressive strength, flexural strength, and split tensile strength using standard cube, cylinder, and prism molds.
Concrete Mixes:
Component
Conventional
Mix 1 (20% FA, 15% GGBS)
Mix 2 (10% FA, 10% GGBS)
OPC (kg/m³)
420
273
336
Fly Ash
0
84
42
GGBS
0
63
42
Water
149
140
145
Fine Aggregate
648.7
685
670
Coarse Aggregate
1175
998.75
998.75
Coconut Shell
0
176.25
176.25
Superplasticizer
0
3
3
Test Results:
Workability (Slump Test)
Conventional: 85 mm
Mix 1: 79.7 mm (slightly lower)
Mix 2: 85 mm
Compressive Strength (28 days)
Conventional: 22.9 MPa
Mix 1: 20.6 MPa
Mix 2: 21.9 MPa
Flexural Strength (28 days)
Conventional: 3.23 MPa
Mix 1: 3.0 MPa
Mix 2: 3.3 MPa
Split Tensile Strength (28 days)
Conventional: 2.17 MPa
Mix 1: 2.0 MPa
Mix 2: 2.2 MPa
Observations:
All mixes achieved acceptable workability for M20 grade concrete.
Partial replacement of cement with fly ash and GGBS slightly reduced strength but remained above the required threshold, showing that eco-friendly mixes can be both sustainable and structurally adequate.
Mix 2 (10% FA + 10% GGBS) offered better balance between workability and strength compared to Mix 1.
Use of coconut shell aggregates reduced density while maintaining mechanical performance.
Conclusion
This study examined the possibility of producing eco-friendly M20 grade concrete by partially replacing ordinary Portland cement with fly ash and GGBS, and coarse aggregate with coconut shell aggregate. Based on the experimental results, it was observed that the modified concrete was able to achieve the required strength for M20 grade at 28 days.
Although the early-age strength was slightly lower compared to conventional concrete, the later-age strength improved due to the pozzolanic reaction of fly ash and GGBS. The use of coconut shell aggregate reduced the overall density of concrete, resulting in a lighter mix while still maintaining acceptable mechanical properties. Workability was slightly reduced but was successfully controlled using superplasticizer.
Overall, the results indicate that industrial by-products and agricultural waste materials can be effectively used in concrete without significantly affecting strength performance. In addition to meeting structural requirements, the modified mix contributes to reduced environmental impact and potential cost savings. Therefore, the use of such eco-friendly materials can be considered a practical and sustainable alternative for future construction practices.
References
[1] Sanjeet Kumar, \"An Experimental Investigation on Sustainable Concrete Made with Refractory Brick as a Substitute of Natural Fine Aggregate”, Nature Environment and Pollution Technology Journal, Volume 24, Issue No 1, June 2024.
[2] Omer Ahmed, \"Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Cementitious Materials: A Review of Techniques, Material Performance, and Environmental Impact\", Journal of CO2 Utilization, Volume 83, May 2024.
[3] Salim Barbhuiya, \"Biochar-concrete: A Comprehensive Review of Properties, Production and Sustainability\", Case Studies in Construction Materials, Volume 20, July 2024.
[4] Chandrabhan Verma, \"Biodegradable Synthetic Polymers in Sustainable Corrosion Protection: Present and Future Scenarios \" Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, Volume 6, Issue No 4, October 2023, pages 407-435.
[5] Zeyad Alshndah, \"Recycling of Wheat Straw Aggregates of End-of-Life Vegetal Concrete: Experimental Investigation to Develop a New Building Insulation Material Construction and Building Materials.
[6] Zainul Abedin Khan, \"A Review on Sustainable Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste Aggregates in Pavement Base and Subbase Layers\" Cleaner Materials, Volume 13, September 2024.
[7] Angelica Cardoza, \" Alkali-activated cement manufactured by the alkaline activation of demolition and construction waste using brick and concrete wastes Open Ceramics, Volume 16, December 2023.
[8] Shriful Islam, \" Partial replacement of sand by fine-grained crushed waste glass along with fly ash stabilization for geotechnical applications in pavement \" Heliyon, Volume 10, Issue No 19, October 2024.
[9] Shriram Marathe, \"Agro-industrial waste utilization in air-cured alkali-activated pavement composites: Properties, micro-structural insights and life cycle impacts\", Open Ceramics, Vol. 14, December 2024, pp. 100438–100448.
[10] Ramy M. Reda, \"Mechanical properties of sustainable concrete comprising various wastes\"Nature Portfolio, 2023, pp. 1–15.
[11] Muhammad Akbar, \"An Experimental and Statistical Investigation into the Optimisation of Eco-Friendly Concrete Incorporating Agricultural and Industrial Wastes\" Polymers, Vol. 17, 2025, pp. 2731–2748.
[12] Vijay G, R. Gobinath, \"Global Perspectives on Sustainable Concrete Development: Trends and Future Directions\", Advancements in Civil Engineering, December 2024.
[13] Md Rafiur Rahman, \"Green Concrete: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects\" Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 5, Issue No 1, March 2025.
[14] Abiraami R., \"Research on high performance green concrete using nano particles and organic materials: An eco-friendly approach\", Golbal Nest Journal, Vol. 26, Issue No 4, 2024.
[15] Haris Hassen Adem, \"Analyzing the Mechanical, Durability, and Microstructural Impact of Partial Cement Replacement with Pumice Powder and Bamboo Leaf Ash in Concrete\", Advancement in Civil Engineering, December 2025.
[16] Ashwini B., \"Effect of Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Nano Titanium Dioxide and Partial Replacement of Fly Ash in Cementitious Material\", International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol. 5, Issue No 4, April 2024.
[17] by Wegdan W. El-Nadoury, \"Eco-friendly concrete using by-products as partial replacement of cement\", Frontiers in Materials, October 2022.
[18] Pouyan Fakharian, \"Compressive Strength Prediction of Green Concrete with Recycled Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Using a Machine Learning Approach\", MDPI Open Access Journal, Vol. 17, Issue No 20, October 2025.
[19] P. Krishna Kumar, \"Strength characteristics of concrete using electronic plastic waste and coconut shell as natural aggregates\", Material Today: Proceedings, Vol. 62, 2022.
[20] Magdalena Bardan, \"Green Recycled Aggregate in Concrete: Feasibility Study\", Materials, Vol. 18, Issue No 3, January 2025.
[21] Jitao Bai, \"Recycled Aggregate: A Solution to Sustainable Concrete\", Materials, Vol. 18, Issue No 12, January 2025.
[22] Philip Boamah, \"Influence of Coconut Shell Aggregate Size Variation on the Durability of Concrete\", Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews, Volume 8, Issue No.2, 2025.
[23] Ahmed Alawais, \"Sustainable Concrete with Zero Carbon Footprint”, Recent Progress in Materials, Vol. 6, Issue No.3, 2024.
[24] Yosra El Maghraby, \"Utilization of untreated sugarcane bagasse ash in the construction industry\", Journal of UMM-Al-Aqura, Volume 16, 2025, Pages 1628-1642.
[25] Shazim Ali Memon, \"Utilization of Hospital Waste Ash in Concrete\", Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, Volumne 32, Issue No.1, January 2013.