Leadership credibility, influence, and emotional intelligence (EI) remain central constructs in contemporary organizational behavior research, particularly in culturally diverse contexts. This study investigates the interrelationships among these variables by conducting a cross-cultural analysis of workplace leaders in India and Japan. Using a mixed-methods design, the study surveyed 450 employees across IT, manufacturing, and service sectors, supplemented with 20 in-depth interviews. Quantitative analysis employed multiple regression and correlation methods, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Findings reveal that emotional intelligence significantly predicts leadership credibility (? = .47, p < .01) and influence (? = .39, p < .01) across both contexts, with cultural variations in relational emphasis. In India, credibility was strongly linked to transparency and participative decision-making, whereas in Japan, consistency and collective harmony were dominant predictors. Qualitative evidence underscored the role of empathy and adaptive communication as mechanisms of influence. These results align with transformational leadership theory and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, extending cross-cultural leadership frameworks. Practical implications include the integration of EI training into leadership development programs and the adaptation of credibility-building strategies to cultural norms. The study highlights the necessity of emotional competencies in enhancing leader effectiveness globally. Limitations include reliance on self-reported measures and cross-sectional data. Future research should adopt longitudinal designs and expand to additional cultural contexts. This research contributes to leadership studies by advancing understanding of how EI fosters credibility and influence in culturally distinct environments, with relevance for both scholars and practitioners navigating global leadership challenges.
Introduction
Purpose of the Study
This study investigates how emotional intelligence (EI) relates to leadership credibility and influence across two culturally distinct countries: India and Japan. It addresses gaps in understanding how these leadership attributes interact within cross-cultural settings.
Key Concepts
Leadership Credibility: Being perceived as trustworthy, competent, and aligned with organizational values (Kouzes & Posner, 2017).
Influence: A leader’s ability to shape behavior, attitudes, and decisions (French & Raven, 1959).
Emotional Intelligence (EI): Self-awareness, empathy, emotional regulation, and social skills (Goleman, 1998), crucial for managing interpersonal dynamics in leadership.
Research Questions
What is the relationship between EI and leadership credibility in India and Japan?
How does EI contribute to leadership influence across cultures?
How do cultural differences shape the EI–credibility–influence relationship?
Significance
Theoretical: Expands transformational leadership theory by integrating cross-cultural and EI components.
Practical: Offers guidance for multinational companies to develop culturally responsive leadership programs, especially in India and Japan.
Literature Insights
Credibility leads to better engagement and performance.
Influence is increasingly linked to relational and emotional factors rather than authority.
EI is a strong predictor of effective leadership, communication, and conflict resolution.
Cultural Factors shape how leadership is perceived (e.g., collectivism in Japan, participatory culture in India).
Methodology
Design: Mixed-methods (surveys + interviews).
Sample: 162 mid-level employees (India: 89, Japan: 73) from IT, manufacturing, and service sectors.
Instruments: Validated scales measuring leadership credibility, influence tactics, and EI.
Analysis:
Quantitative: Correlations and regressions.
Qualitative: Thematic analysis of interviews.
Findings
Quantitative
EI is positively correlated with both credibility (r = .52) and influence (r = .48).
EI significantly predicts both credibility and influence.
Stronger effects in India compared to Japan.
Qualitative
Three major cultural themes:
Empathy builds credibility – universally valued.
Consistency drives influence – emphasized in Japan.
Participatory leadership enhances trust – valued in India.
Discussion
EI is a critical factor in leadership effectiveness across cultures.
Cultural context modifies how EI translates into credibility and influence.
India: Leaders gain credibility through transparency and inclusivity.
Japan: Credibility stems from consistency and harmony.
Supports the view that leadership traits are both universal and culture-specific.
Limitations & Future Directions
Self-reported data may introduce bias.
Cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions.
Future research should use:
Longitudinal studies.
Multi-source data.
Broader cultural samples (e.g., Europe, Southeast Asia).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that emotional intelligence is a significant predictor of leadership credibility and influence across cultural contexts. However, the mechanisms differ: participatory decision-making enhances credibility in India, while consistency and harmony reinforce it in Japan. These findings contribute to leadership theory by highlighting the interplay between emotional competencies and cultural expectations. For organizations, the results emphasize the need to cultivate emotionally intelligent, culturally adaptable leaders to succeed in a globalized business environment.
References
[1] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[2] Côté, S. (2014). Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091233
[3] French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). University of Michigan Press.
[4] Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam.
[5] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
[6] House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage.
[7] Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Wiley.
[8] Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
[9] Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EI): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross?border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01730.x
[10] Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Oke, A. (2011). Retracted: Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.653
[11] Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
[12] Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.132