This study examines a comparative analysis of the logistics management practices of two leading pharmaceutical companies, Abbott India Ltd. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., with special reference to Madhya Pradesh. Primary data was collected by 50 supply chain personnel through a structured questionnaire by Google Forms. A mixed-methods approach, combining a literature review, a survey, and interviews, was used. The study explores procurement processes, warehousing infrastructure, inventory management, distribution networks, and technology adoption. Statistical tools, including correlation and regression analysis, are employed to examine the efficiency and effectiveness of logistics operations. The preliminary findings underscore critical differences in digitization levels, 3PL partnerships, and cold chain capabilities. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations tailored to both companies for enhancing logistics performance and resilience.
Introduction
The Indian pharmaceutical supply chain is rapidly evolving due to globalization, rising demand, technological innovation, and regulatory pressures. Efficient logistics is vital for product safety, timely delivery, and regulatory compliance. This study compares logistics practices between Abbott India Ltd. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., focusing on their operations in Madhya Pradesh.
Objectives:
Examine and compare logistics practices of Abbott and Glenmark.
Analyze key logistics elements—warehousing, transportation, and inventory control.
Assess the role of technology.
Identify challenges and recommend improvements.
Literature Review Highlights:
Challenges: Regulatory barriers, poor inventory management, and high transportation costs.
Technology: Tools like SAP, RFID, IoT, and WMS improve accuracy, visibility, and efficiency.
Models: Centralized systems (used by Abbott) increase control but risk bottlenecks; decentralized models (partially used by Glenmark) offer flexibility but may reduce efficiency.
Regulations: Compliance is critical for reliability but adds financial and operational burdens.
Company Profiles:
Abbott India Ltd.: Established in 1944, operates in diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, and nutrition. Uses SAP, RFID (partially).
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.: Founded in 1977, focuses on generics and APIs. Uses SAP, RFID, and full WMS.
Methodology:
Design: Descriptive and comparative.
Approach: Quantitative, using questionnaires and interviews.
Sample: 50 logistics professionals (25 from each company).
Tools: SPSS, Excel; data analyzed via correlation and regression.
Key Findings:
Parameter
Abbott India Ltd.
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Conclusion
Inventory Accuracy
97.2%
89.4%
Abbott higher due to tech use
On-Time Delivery
94.1%
88.3%
Abbott’s centralized model more effective
Warehouse Utilization
82.5%
75.7%
Abbott optimized with WMS
Tech Adoption Score (0–10)
8.9
6.4
Abbott leads in digital integration
Logistics Cost (% of sales)
8.3%
9.7%
Glenmark less efficient
Delay Frequency
6.1%
12.4%
Glenmark faces more disruptions
Manager Satisfaction
8.6
7.3
Higher at Abbott
Conclusions:
Abbott outperforms Glenmark in logistics due to greater technological integration, better inventory control, and centralized dispatch systems.
Glenmark faces higher costs and delays due to manual operations and decentralized logistics.
Recommendations:
Glenmark should invest in automation (WMS, RFID) and adopt centralized models where feasible.
Both firms must continually adapt to regulatory and technological shifts to maintain logistics efficiency.
Conclusion
This study compares the logistics operations of Abbott India Ltd. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in Madhya Pradesh, revealing significant differences in technology integration, warehousing, transportation, inventory control, and procurement. Abbott\'s centralized approach improves operational effectiveness and cost control.
In conclusion, the results show that Abbott\'s technology-heavy, centralized logistics model leads to improved delivery schedules, reduced overall costs, and increased inventory accuracy. Despite its agility and regional adaptability, Glenmark must make investments in automation and process standardization to match its rival\'s levels of efficiency. Nonetheless, both businesses demonstrate a dedication to upholding drug safety regulations and compliance in their supply chains.
References
[1] Abbott India Ltd. (2024). Corporate profile and annual report 2023–24. https://www.abbott.co.in
[2] Abbas, K., Afaq, M., Ahmed Khan, T., & Song, W. C. (2020). A blockchain and machine learning-based drug supply chain management and recommendation system for smart pharmaceutical industry. Electronics, 9(5), 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050852
[3] Abideen, A. Z., & Mohamad, F. B. (2020). Supply chain lead time reduction in a pharmaceutical production warehouse–A case study. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 14(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-07-2019-0054
[4] Arji, G., Ahmadi, H., Avazpoor, P., & Hemmat, M. (2023). Identifying resilience strategies for disruption management in the healthcare supply chain during COVID-19 by digital innovations: A systematic literature review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 38, 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101199
[5] Ayer, T., White, C. C., III, & Zhang, C. (2023). Healthcare inventory management. In Research handbook on inventory management (pp. 431–454). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902667.00039
[6] Ding, B. (2018). Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 119, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.07.020
[7] Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2024). Corporate overview and annual report 2023–24. https://www.glenmarkpharma.com
[8] Hasan, A. (2021). Ethical considerations in the use of secondary data for built environment research. In Secondary research methods in the built environment (pp. 26–39). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326963-3
[9] Kambatla, K., Kollias, G., Kumar, V., & Grama, A. (2014). Trends in big data analytics. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 74(7), 2561–2573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.01.003
[10] Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation. (2023). Pharmaceutical industry in MP: Zone-wise investment profiles. https://www.investmp.com
[11] Masengu, R., El Din, M., Ruzive, B., & Al Habsi, J. (2024). Effectiveness of food quality and safety management systems in Oman’s food supply chain. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 75(2), [page range if known].
[12] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2024). Company master data – Abbott India & Glenmark Pharmaceuticals. https://www.mca.gov.in
[13] Narayana, S., Elias, A., & Pati, R. K. (2014). Reverse logistics in the pharmaceuticals industry: A systemic analysis. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2012-0043
[14] Nguyen, A., Lamouri, S., Pellerin, R., Tamayo, S., & Lekens, B. (2022). Data analytics in pharmaceutical supply chains: State of the art, opportunities, and challenges. International Journal of Production Research, 60(22), 6888–6907. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1932140
[15] Prabhakar, A. C. (2024). India’s manufacturing sector performance and job-oriented sustainable economic growth: A comprehensive analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), [page range if known].
[16] Rana, B. K., Yadav, D., & Yadav, S. (2024). Strategic association for quality excellence: Coordination between GMP, GLP, GCP, metrology, QC, and QA. In Handbook of quality system, accreditation and conformity assessment (pp. 1–21). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1110-1_1
[17] Singh, A. (2023). Combating counterfeit and substandard medicines in India: Legal framework and the way ahead. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6, 101. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ss.20230601.12
[18] Singh, S., Kumar, R., Panchal, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 59(7), 1993–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1792000
[19] Vaka, D. K. (2024). Integrating inventory management and distribution: A holistic supply chain strategy. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 15(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2024.15202
[20] Xue, X., Dou, J., & Shang, Y. (2021). Blockchain-driven supply chain decentralized operations–Information sharing perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2020-0026