The Long-Term Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: Evidence from Emerging Markets

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has gained significant traction in emerging markets, where businesses are increasingly integrating social and environmental considerations into their corporate strategies. This study examines the long-term impact of CSR initiatives on financial performance, focusing on firms operating in emerging economies. Utilizing panel data from 2010 to 2023 across multiple industries, we employ fixed-effects regression models to assess the relationship between CSR expenditure and key financial performance indicators, including return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and market value (Tobin’s Q).Our findings reveal a positive and statistically significant correlation between CSR investment and financial performance in the long run. Firms with sustained CSR engagement experienced an average increase of 8.2% in ROA and 10.5% in ROE over the study period. Additionally, companies that consistently disclosed CSR activities observed a 12.3% rise in Tobin’s Q, suggesting improved investor confidence and long-term value creation. Sectoral analysis indicates that consumer goods and financial services firms benefited the most from CSR initiatives due to heightened stakeholder engagement and regulatory incentives.These results highlight that CSR is not merely a philanthropic endeavor but a strategic tool that enhances firm reputation, operational efficiency, and market competitiveness. Policymakers and business leaders in emerging markets should consider CSR as an integral part of corporate strategy to drive sustainable financial growth. Future research should explore industry-specific CSR practices and their differential impacts on firm performance

Introduction

Evolution and Importance of CSR

• CSR has transitioned from philanthropy to a strategic business practice, driven by stakeholder demands, regulations, and sustainability goals.

• In emerging markets (e.g., India, China, Brazil, South Africa), CSR supports both social responsibility and financial performance, helping firms gain goodwill, manage risks, and secure long-term stability.

2. Theoretical Frameworks Explaining CSR’s Impact

• Stakeholder Theory: CSR builds trust with stakeholders, enhancing loyalty and reputation.

• Resource-Based View (RBV): CSR enhances intangible assets like brand equity and employee morale.

• Legitimacy Theory: CSR helps firms maintain societal legitimacy, especially where institutions are evolving.

• Slack Resources Theory: Profitable firms are more capable of investing in CSR.

• Trade-Off Hypothesis: Overinvestment in CSR may reduce financial efficiency.

3. CSR in Emerging Markets

• Countries like India (mandatory CSR law), China (SOE-driven CSR), and Brazil (sector-specific CSR) use CSR to address environmental, social, and economic issues.

• Unique challenges include regulatory uncertainty, weak institutions, and socio-economic disparities, but firms leverage CSR for market differentiation and stakeholder engagement.

Study Objectives

1. Analyze long-term CSR impact on financial performance in emerging markets.

2. Explore sector-specific differences in CSR effectiveness.

3. Assess how regulation influences CSR adoption and financial outcomes.

Research Methodology

• Approach: Quantitative analysis using panel data (2010–2023) from 500 firms in sectors like manufacturing, finance, and consumer goods.

• Metrics:

  • CSR: ESG scores, CSR spend, sustainability indices

  • Financials: ROA, ROE, Tobin’s Q

• Analysis Tools: Fixed-effects regression, Granger causality tests, propensity score matching (PSM), VIF for multicollinearity.

Key Findings

1. Positive Impact of CSR on Financial Performance

• CSR expenditure is positively associated with:

  • ROA (+8.2%)

  • ROE (+10.5%)

  • Tobin’s Q (+12.3%)

2. Sectoral Differences

Sectors with direct consumer interaction (e.g., finance, consumer goods) show stronger CSR benefits.

3. Bidirectional Causality

• CSR improves financial outcomes and financially successful firms are more likely to engage in CSR.

4. Robustness

• VIF confirms no multicollinearity.

• PSM validates that CSR-active firms outperform non-CSR firms in financial terms.

Interpretation & Implications

• CSR as Strategic Investment: Improves valuation (Tobin’s Q), reputation, and operational efficiency.

• Industry-Specific Insights: Policy should target industry needs to maximize CSR effectiveness.

• Role of Regulation: Strong CSR mandates (e.g., India) boost both adoption and financial outcomes.

• Long-Term View: CSR offers sustained gains, especially when integrated into business strategy.

Conclusion

This study provides empirical evidence that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) positively influences financial performance in emerging markets over the long term. By analyzing panel data from 2010 to 2023, we find that CSR investment leads to higher profitability (ROA and ROE) and enhanced market valuation (Tobin’s Q). These results suggest that CSR is not merely a compliance requirement but a strategic tool for improving financial stability and competitiveness.The findings indicate that firms consistently engaging in CSR experience an 8.2% increase in ROA, a 10.5% rise in ROE, and a 12.3% boost in Tobin’s Q. Sectoral analysis reveals that financial services and consumer goods industries benefit the most, whereas manufacturing and energy firms see modest but positive returns. These insights highlight the importance of industry-specific CSR strategies to maximize impact.Furthermore, the Granger causality test confirms that CSR and financial performance share a bidirectional relationship. This means that while CSR enhances financial outcomes, firms with stronger financial performance are also more likely to invest in CSR. Such findings underscore the need for long-term CSR commitments rather than short-term philanthropic efforts.In conclusion, CSR should be viewed as a sustainable business strategy that fosters stakeholder trust, regulatory compliance, and competitive advantage. Policymakers and business leaders in emerging markets should encourage CSR adoption by designing incentives that align social responsibility with financial growth, ensuring a mutually beneficial relationship between businesses and society

References

[1] Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. [2] Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. [3] Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., Wang, H., &Guedhami, O. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: International Evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101855. [4] Carroll, A. B., &Shabana, K. M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. [5] Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Website Reporting. Business & Society, 44(4), 415–441. [6] Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., &Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23. [7] Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. [8] De Klerk, M., & De Villiers, C. (2012). The Value Relevance of Corporate Responsibility Reporting: South African Evidence. Meditari Accountancy Research, 20(1), 21–38. [9] Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. [10] Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. [11] Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–18. [12] Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., &Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. [13] Fombrun, C., &Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. [14] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman. [15] Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. [16] Gond, J. P., Igalens, J., Swaen, V., &Akremi, A. E. (2011). The Human Resources Contribution to Responsible Leadership: An Exploration of the CSR–HR Interface. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 115–132. [17] Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. [18] Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. [19] Jain, T., &Jamali, D. (2016). Looking Inside the Black Box: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(1), 53–69. [20] Jamali, D., &Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262. [21] Jo, H., &Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. [22] Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223. [23] Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2010). International Business, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. International Business Review, 19(2), 119–125. [24] Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18. [25] Mahoney, L. S., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance and Institutional Ownership in Canadian Firms. Accounting Forum, 31(3), 233–253. [26] Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. [27] Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. [28] Mitra, N., &Schmidpeter, R. (2017). The Why, What and How of the CSR Mandate: The India Story. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2(1), 1–13. [29] Mishra, S., &Suar, D. (2010). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian Companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 571–601. [30] Moon, J., & Shen, X. (2010). CSR in China Research: Salience, Focus and Nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 613–629. [31] Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., &Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. [32] Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value: How to Reinvent Capitalism—and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 62–77. [33] Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. [34] Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., &Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490. [35] Turker, D. (2009). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189–204. [36] Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. [37] Wang, H., Gibson, C. B., & Zander, U. (2016). Editors\' Comments: Is Research on Corporate Social Responsibility Undertheorized? Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 1–8.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Anoop Tripathi, Neeraj Topkhane, Uroos Fatima Rizvi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.