Floods are one of the most frequent and devastating natural disasters, significantly affecting human life, infrastructure, and the environment. Accurate and timely flood prediction is essential for disaster preparedness and mitigation. This study presents an intelligent flood risk prediction framework using machine learning and deep learning techniques applied to four Indian cities—Pune, Nashik, Kolhapur, and Satara—each associated with major rivers such as the Mula-Mutha, Godavari, Panchganga, and Krishna, respectively. The dataset incorporates a comprehensive set of hydrometeorological and environmental features including rainfall, temperature, humidity, wind speed, water level, discharge, groundwater level, soil moisture, atmospheric pressure, evaporation rate, and historical flood events. Four algorithms—Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XG-Boost, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)—were trained and evaluated to predict the flood_risk level. The model performances were compared using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. The results demonstrate that the integration of multiple data sources and ensemble techniques significantly improves predictive performance. This research contributes to the development of smart, data-driven flood early warning systems tailored for regional hydrological conditions.
Introduction
Context:
Floods cause severe human and economic losses, especially in Maharashtra cities (Pune, Nashik, Kolhapur, Satara) vulnerable due to climate change, erratic monsoons, and rapid urbanization.
Traditional flood forecasting methods lack accuracy, spatial detail, and adaptability.
Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) offer improved predictive accuracy by analyzing large, diverse environmental datasets in real-time.
Problem:
Existing systems fail to provide timely, accurate flood risk predictions for Maharashtra’s flood-prone cities.
The study aims to develop a scalable ML-based flood risk prediction system to classify flood risk levels dynamically using environmental data.
Objectives:
Collect multi-city environmental data: rainfall, temperature, humidity, wind speed, river and groundwater levels, soil moisture, pressure, evaporation, and past floods.
Preprocess data by cleaning, normalizing, and encoding.
Build and train four ML models: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to classify flood risk.
Evaluate models using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics.
Deploy the best model on a Flask-based web interface for real-time predictions and visualization, supporting disaster management and public awareness.
Methodology:
Data collected from four major rivers and cities: Mula-Mutha (Pune), Godavari (Nashik), Panchganga (Kolhapur), Krishna (Satara).
Data preprocessing included missing value imputation, outlier treatment, normalization, and categorical encoding.
Models trained and hyperparameters tuned via grid search and cross-validation.
Model performance assessed on unseen test data.
Web deployment enables users to input live or city-specific data and receive flood risk predictions with dynamic visualizations.
Key Points:
Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, and ANN were compared for flood risk classification.
Emphasis on reducing false negatives to improve early warnings.
Interactive dashboard designed for municipal authorities, disaster teams, and citizens.
Framework is scalable and adaptable for other regions with new data.
This study demonstrates how ML can enhance flood forecasting accuracy and real-time risk communication in flood-prone urban areas of Maharashtra.
Conclusion
The study presents the successful development of an AI-based flood risk prediction system using machine learning and deep learning models. Utilizing a rich dataset of environmental and hydrological parameters—such as rainfall, temperature, humidity, river discharge, and groundwater level—the system effectively classifies flood risk levels across multiple cities. Among the models tested (Random Forest, SVM, XG-Boost, and ANN), the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) achieved the highest accuracy, demonstrating its strength in capturing complex nonlinear patterns. Model performance was validated using metrics like accuracy, classification reports, and confusion matrices. The system also incorporated time series analysis to uncover water level trends, offering deeper insights into flood dynamics. A user-friendly GUI was developed to enable real-time interaction with model outputs, enhancing accessibility and practical application. This intelligent, data-driven approach holds significant promise for improving early warning systems and supporting disaster mitigation efforts in both urban and rural settings.
References
[1] X. Wang, G. Huang, and J. Liu, Projected increases in intensity and frequency of rainfall extremes through a regional climate model ing approach, J. Geophys. Res., vol. 119, no. 23, pp. 13271 13286, Dec. 2014.
[2] Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. Accessed: Jun. 6, 2020. [Online]. Available:https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_ AR5_FINAL_full_zh.pdf
[3] L. Ling, Z. Yusop, and M. F. Chow, Urban ood depth estimate with a new calibrated curve number runoff prediction model, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 1091510923, Jan. 2020.
[4] M. Nayeb Yazdi, M. Ketabchy, D. J. Sample, D. Scott, and H. Liao, An evaluation of HSPF and SWMM for simulating streamow regimes in an urban watershed, Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 118, pp. 211225, Aug. 2019.
[5] H. C. Winsemius, J. C. J. H. Aerts, L. P. H. van Beek, M. F. P. Bierkens, A. Bouwman, B. Jongman, J. C. J. Kwadijk, W. Ligtvoet, P. L. Lucas, D. P. van Vuuren, and P. J. Ward, Global drivers of future river ood risk, Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 381385, Dec. 2015.
[6] L. Al eri, L. Feyen, and G. Di Baldassarre, Increasing ood risk under climate change: A pan-European assessment of the bene ts of four adap tation strategies, Climatic Change, vol. 136, nos. 34, pp. 507521, Mar. 2016.
[7] O. M. Rezende, A. B. R. da Cruz de Franco, A. K. B. de Oliveira, A. C. P. Jacob, and M. G. Miguez, Aframeworkto introduce urban ood resilience into the design of oodcontrolalternatives, J. Hydrol., vol. 576, pp. 478493, Sep. 2019.
[8] H. Wang, C. Mei, J. Liu, and W. Shao, A new strategy for integrated urban water management in China: Sponge city, Sci. China Technol. Sci., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 317329, Jan. 2018.
[9] U. C. Nkwunonwo, M. Whitworth, and B. Baily, A review of the current status of ood modelling for urban ood risk management in the develop ing countries, Sci. Afr., vol. 7, Mar. 2020, Art. no. e00269.
[10] N. Singh and S. R. Mohanty, Short term price forecasting using adaptive generalized neuron model, Int. J. Ambient Comput. Intell., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 419428, Jul. 2018.
[11] S. Gupta, M. Khosravy, N. Gupta, H. Darbari, and N. Patel, Hydraulic system onboard monitoring and fault diagnostic in agricultural machine, Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol., vol. 62, pp. 16784324, Oct. 2019.
[12] A.Sorjamaa,J.Hao,N.Reyhani,Y.Ji,andA.Lendasse, Methodologyfor long-term prediction of time series, Neurocomputing, vol. 70, nos. 1618, pp. 28612869, Oct. 2007.
[13] C. Hu, L. Bi, Z. Piao, C. Wen, and L. Hou, Coordinative optimization control of microgrid based on model predictive control, Int. J. Ambient Comput. Intell., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5775, Jul. 2018.
[14] C.Ding, X.Cao, and C.Liu,Howdoesthestation-area built environment in uence metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds, J. Transp. Geography, vol. 77, pp. 7078, May 2019.
[15] Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, H. Wang, and Z. Jiang, Depth prediction of urban ood under different rainfall return periods based on deep learning and data warehouse, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 716, May 2020, Art. no. 137077.