The Concrete industry across the world is facing a challenge due to the depletion of the natural minerals used in making OPC, and it has become necessary to search for other pozzolanic materials. In research, it is found that various industrial waste materials like Fly ash, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), Copper Slag have pozzolanic and cementitious properties. Fly Ash is one of the best materials to use in cement concrete works. Its usage has many advantages like, Concrete of better rheology, Enhanced strength and durability, Preservation of limestone reserves, and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.
High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete (HVFAC), due to above many advantages, came into existence, in which the use of fly ash has crossed more than 50% replacement of OPC (i.e., Cement: Fly ash is 50:50).
Strength parameters (Compressive strength, Tensile strength, and Flexural strength) of the HVFAC play a very important role during the design, construction of the concrete members, mainly the rigid pavements.
The aim of this project is to formulate Model equations for the strength parameters of the HVFAC for various water/binder ratios at different concrete ages. These models are helpful in finding out the unknown parameter by just substituting the known values in the model equations.
Introduction
A. Need of the Day
With increasing infrastructure demands, natural resources like limestone are depleting. The concrete industry faces challenges in meeting demand sustainably. As a solution, industrial waste materials such as Fly Ash, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and Copper Slag are being explored for their pozzolanic and cementitious properties, reducing pollution and conserving natural resources.
B. Rigid Pavements
Rigid pavements, made from cement concrete (PCC/RCC/PSC), are widely used globally. They require large volumes of cement. Replacing cement with waste materials like Fly Ash is essential to maintain sustainability without compromising on quality. Rigid pavement structure includes:
Surface course (strongest layer)
Base/sub-base layers (less stiff, aid drainage and frost protection)
C. Fly Ash
Fly ash is a by-product of coal combustion, collected via Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP) in thermal power plants.
1. Availability:
Coal-based power plants generate millions of tons of fly ash annually.
Modern ESPs produce low-carbon, high-quality fly ash.
2. Classifications:
ASTM C-618:
Class F: Low Calcium (<10%), pozzolanic.
Class C: High Calcium (>10%), cementitious and pozzolanic.
IS:3812:
Grade-I & Grade-II: For use in cement, mortar, lime pozzolana, etc.
3. Standards for Use:
Permitted by IS:456, IS:3812, IRC:68; ACI-318 has lifted limits on fly ash usage.
4. Applications:
PPC production
Performance enhancer in OPC
Cement replacement in concrete
HVFA concrete
RCC for dams/pavements
Fly ash bricks and building products
D. Fly Ash Concrete
Originated from research by R.E. Davis (1937), fly ash reacts with lime in cement hydration to form additional cementitious compounds.
Benefits:
Improved strength, workability, and durability
Resistance to sulphate, ASR, and thermal cracking
Lower costs and better surface finishes
Eliminates plastering defects
E. High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete (HVFAC)
Fly ash is used at higher volumes (>50%) for sustainable, durable concrete.
Key Characteristics:
≥50% fly ash of total cementitious materials
Low water (≤130 kg/m³) and cement (≤200 kg/m³) content
Superplasticizers used for high strength mixes
Air-entraining admixtures for freeze-thaw durability
Advantages over Normal Concrete:
Enhanced workability, surface finish, and pumpability
Superior strength gain over time (up to 90 days and beyond)
Excellent durability and resistance to chemical attacks
Better cost-efficiency and life-cycle performance
Real-World Applications:
7-story building in Halifax (Canada) with 55% fly ash
Wisconsin (USA) uses 60% Class-F fly ash since 1989
Sydney Olympic facilities, Crown Casino basement, Jonas Salk Institute
Projects in India, including an HVFA nano-concrete slab in AP (2013)
F. Present Work
The research focuses on developing Mathematical Models to predict:
Compressive Strength
Tensile Strength
Flexural Strength
At various concrete ages and Water-Binder (w/b) ratios.
II. Literature Survey
A. Mathematical Modelling
A mathematical model simplifies a real-world process using variables and equations to aid:
Scientific understanding
Decision-making (tactical and strategic)
Predictive analysis
Stages of Modelling:
Building
Studying
Testing
Use
B. Choosing Mathematical Equations
Models can be derived from:
Literature
Physics analogies
Empirical data and curve-fitting
C. Regression Analysis
A statistical tool for modeling the relationship between variables:
Dependent Variable (Response)
Independent Variables (Predictors)
Key Terms:
S (Standard Deviation): Spread of predicted vs. actual values
R² (Coefficient of Determination): Model accuracy
Fit (?): Predicted value
Residual: Error between observed and predicted value
III. Pre-Project Phase
A. Materials Used
Cement: Ordinary Portland Cement (IS: 12269, IS: 4031)
Fly Ash: Class-C (ASTM-C-618), from Vijayawada power plant
Coarse Aggregate: 20 mm crushed granite (IS specifications)
Fine Aggregate: River sand (Zone-II), clean and graded
Tensile Strength: Using split cylinder test (IS: 5816)
Flexural Strength: Modulus of rupture calculated based on crack location (IS: 516)
IV. Experimental Data
Data includes strength values (compressive, tensile, flexural) at varying:
Ages (28 to 360 days)
Water-Binder (w/b) ratios
Used for developing predictive mathematical models.
Conclusion
The formulated Model equations are reliable for use in rigid pavements and the concrete industry using the HVFAC. (as proved in Chapter VII).
References
[1] www.minitab.com
[2] www.barbecuejoe.com/scan.htm
[3] www.hotmath.com
[4] David J Carrejo and Jill Marshall, “What is mathematical modelling?”, Mathematics Education Research Journal, University of Texas, Vol-19, 2007.
[5] www.deadrockings.com
[6] ASTM: C-618, “Specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use as a mineral admixture in concrete”, American Society for Testing & Materials, 2001.
[7] IS:3812, “Specification of fly ash for use as pozzolana & admixture”, Bureau of Indian Standards, 1999.
[8] IS:10262, “Concrete mix design”, Bureau of Indian Standards, 2009.
[9] IS:456, “Specification for plain & RCC concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, 2000.
[10] IS:516, “Methods of tests for strength of concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, 2002.
[11] IS:5816, “Test method for splitting tensile strength of concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, 1999.
[12] BS:1881 Part-117, “Method for determination of tensile Splitting strength of concrete”, British Standards Institution, 1989.
[13] IRC:68, “Guidelines on cement fly ash concrete for rigid pavement construction”, Indian Roads Congress, 1976.
[14] Malhotra V M and Mehta P K, “High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete”, Supplementary cementing materials for sustainable development Inc., Ottawa, Canada, 2002, pp.101.
[15] Mehta P K, “High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete for sustainable development”, International workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology.
[16] Malhotra V M and Ramezanianpour A A, “Fly ash in concrete”, CANMET, Canada, 1994.
[17] Bhanumathidas N and Kalidas N, “Fly ash for sustainable development”, Ark Communications, Chennai, 2002.
[18] Ash utilization division of NTPC, “Fly ash for Cement concrete - Resource for high strength & durability of structures at lower cost”, NTPC, May 2007.