Neuromorphic Computing: Hardware-Inspired Architectures for Energy-Efficient AI

Abstract

The study explores the topic of neuromorphic computing which is a hardware-based paradigm to realizing energy-efficient artificial intelligence (AI). In contrast to conventional von Neumann architectures that processes are performed sequentially and memory bottlenecks are employed, neuromorphic systems implement an event-driven model of spiking neurons and massively parallel architecture through biological and neural dynamics. The descriptive-analytical design provided in this case is a synthesis of existing chip implementations (Intel Loihi, IBM TrueNorth, SpiNNaker) and models to examine performance, scalability and energy consumption. Results show that spiking neural networks (SNNs) implemented on a neuromorphic substrate can use as much as 100x energy than using a GPU-based deep learning and still achieve similar accuracy in classification and pattern-recognition problems. Moreover, neuromorphic chip provides scalability in edge AI implementation (IoT, robotics and sensory processing) where power and real time are essential. The paper highlights the fact that neuromorphic models are a viable direction of AI in the future, as they integrate performance, flexibility, and energy awareness.

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced from simple rule-based systems to complex deep learning models, driven by improvements in computing power, data availability, and algorithms. However, conventional computing architectures, based on the von Neumann model, face limitations in energy efficiency and scalability due to bottlenecks in memory access and high power consumption.

Neuromorphic computing emerges as a promising alternative, inspired by the brain’s structure and function. It uses networks of spiking neurons and synapses that enable event-driven, asynchronous, and massively parallel processing, significantly improving energy efficiency and reducing redundancy compared to traditional AI systems.

Traditional AI architectures, while successful in many applications, consume large amounts of energy and require billions of operations, limiting their deployment on energy-constrained devices. Neuromorphic systems address these issues by mimicking biological neural efficiency—neurons only consume energy when firing—leading to ultra-low power usage without greatly sacrificing performance.

The literature review highlights key neuromorphic projects like IBM’s TrueNorth, Intel’s Loihi, and the SpiNNaker system, demonstrating advances in power-efficient, scalable, and adaptable neuromorphic hardware, though challenges remain in scalability, training, and standardization.

The research methodology involves a descriptive-analytical approach comparing neuromorphic and von Neumann architectures based on energy efficiency, accuracy, scalability, and latency using benchmark data and chip performance metrics.

Results show neuromorphic processors use 40-100 times less energy per inference than GPUs and TPUs, with only minor accuracy trade-offs (1-3%) on standard benchmarks like MNIST and CIFAR-10. Neuromorphic computing offers a sustainable and scalable path forward for AI hardware, balancing efficiency with competitive performance.

Conclusion

The practical implication of the findings can be seen through the application areas of the given findings summarized in Table 3 and represented in Figure 5. The neuromorphic in robotics allows the real-time control by the low-latency processing. In the case of the IoT devices, the ultra-low power consumption enables them to operate continuously within constrained energy allocations. The neuromorphic processors may be used in healthcare to provide diagnostic inference at the edge to reduce power consumption and latency. Last but not least, event-driven processing of infrastructure architectures is enabled by smart cities, supporting millions of asynchronous cues, e.g., adaptive traffic monitoring and distributed environmental sensing. These area assure us that neuromorphic computing is not just an article of theoretical interest but a technology that can be treated as an architecture capable of actual implementation. Collectively, the findings demonstrate that neuromorphic computing is a paradigm shift in the AI hardware. Albeit in its current state a partial substitute to GPUs in high-precision cloud-scale workloads, neuromorphic systems are effective in power-gated, distributed, and real-time applications. This makes them key facilitators of the new era of sustainable, adaptable and embedded AI systems. generation of intelligent systems that are both computationally powerful and energy aware.

References

[1] Akopyan, F., Sawada, J., Cassidy, A., Alvarez-Icaza, R., Arthur, J., Merolla, P., … & Modha, D. (2015). TrueNorth: Design and tool flow of a 65 mW 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 34(10), 1537–1557. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2015.2474396 [2] Bouvier, M., Valentian, A., Mesquida, T., Rummens, F., Reyboz, M., Vianello, E., & De Salvo, B. (2019). Spiking neural networks hardware implementations and challenges: A survey. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, 15(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289183 [3] Chicca, E., Stefanini, F., Bartolozzi, C., & Indiveri, G. (2014). Neuromorphic electronic circuits for building autonomous cognitive systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(9), 1367–1388. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2313954 [4] Davies, M., Srinivasa, N., Lin, T. H., Chinya, G., Cao, Y., Choday, S. H., … & Seo, J. S. (2018). Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. IEEE Micro, 38(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2018.112130359 [5] Furber, S., Galluppi, F., Temple, S., & Plana, L. (2019). The SpiNNaker project. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2881432 [6] Indiveri, G., & Liu, S. C. (2015). Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(8), 1379–1397. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2444094 [7] Knight, J. C., & Nowotny, T. (2018). GPUs outperform current HPC and neuromorphic solutions in terms of speed and energy when simulating a highly-connected cortical model. Frontiers in neuroscience, 12, 941. [8] Lee, S. W., Yun, S. Y., Han, J. K., Nho, Y. H., Jeon, S. B., & Choi, Y. K. (2024). Spike?Based Neuromorphic Hardware for Dynamic Tactile Perception with a Self?Powered Mechanoreceptor Array. Advanced Science, 11(34), 2402175. [9] Li, C., Yu, Z., Fu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., You, H., ... & Lin, Y. (2021). Hw-nas-bench: Hardware-aware neural architecture search benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.10584. [10] Maji, S., Banerjee, U., Fuller, S. H., & Chandrakasan, A. P. (2022). A threshold implementation-based neural network accelerator with power and electromagnetic side-channel countermeasures. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 58(1), 141-154. [11] Merolla, P. A., Arthur, J. V., Alvarez-Icaza, R., Cassidy, A. S., Sawada, J., Akopyan, F., … & Modha, D. S. (2014). A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface. Science, 345(6197), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254642 [12] Qiao, G. C., Hu, S. G., Wang, J. J., Zhang, C. M., Chen, T. P., Ning, N., ... & Liu, Y. (2019). A neuromorphic-hardware oriented bio-plausible online-learning spiking neural network model. IEEE Access, 7, 71730-71740. [13] Roy, K., Jaiswal, A., & Panda, P. (2019). Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuromorphic computing. Nature, 575(7784), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1677-2 [14] Schuman, C. D., Potok, T. E., Patton, R. M., Birdwell, J. D., Dean, M. E., Rose, G. S., & Plank, J. S. (2022). Opportunities and challenges for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications. Nature Computational Science, 2(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00184-y [15] Zang, Z., Xiao, D., Wang, Q., Jiao, Z., Li, Z., Chen, Y., & Li, D. D. U. (2022, July). Hardware inspired neural network for efficient time-resolved biomedical imaging. In 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 1883-1886). IEEE.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Dr. Diwakar Ramanuj Tripathi, Prajwal Guniram Jagnade, Dr. Vrushali Pramod Parkhi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.