Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for Stress Measurement in PCC and RCC: A Review

Abstract

Stress evaluation in Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) and Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) is essential for ensuring structural safety, durability, and service performance. Traditional stress measurement methods are often destructive or intrusive, limiting their applicability in existing structures. Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques provide viable alternatives for assessing in-situ stress without compromising structural integrity. This paper presents a concise review of established and emerging non-destructive techniques for stress measurement in PCC and RCC structures. Methods such as ultrasonic pulse velocity, acoustic emission, impact-echo, magnetic techniques for reinforcement stress assessment, digital image correlation, and fiber optic sensing are examined with respect to their working principles, advantages, limitations, and field applicability. Particular emphasis is placed on their reliability, sensitivity to environmental factors, and suitability for real-time structural health monitoring. The review also highlights recent advancements in smart sensing technologies and data-driven approaches that enhance stress prediction accuracy. Key challenges, including material heterogeneity and calibration requirements, are discussed. The paper provides a compact reference for researchers and practitioners seeking effective non-destructive approaches for stress evaluation in concrete infrastructure.

Introduction

Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) are essential materials in modern infrastructure due to their strength, durability, and ability to resist complex stresses from loads, environmental effects, and seismic forces. Traditional stress assessment methods—such as core extraction, sectioning, hole-drilling, and reinforcement exposure—are destructive or semi-destructive, limiting their applicability in in-service structures because they can damage the material, disrupt operations, and provide only localized measurements.

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) methods have emerged as reliable alternatives for evaluating stresses without harming the structure. Key NDT techniques include:

• Ultrasonic Detection: Uses shear wave velocities to correlate stress with wave propagation, exploiting acousto-elastic effects.

• Embedded Sensors: Piezoelectric or fiber-optic sensors provide internal stress data but face practical challenges in maintenance and installation.

• Flat Jack Method: Measures stress by slot-cutting concrete and using hydraulic pressure to restore the original stress state.

• Optical-Interferometric Method: Non-contact, laser-based technique detecting sub-micrometer surface displacements to determine stress.

• Hard Inclusion Method: Uses instrumented metallic inclusions and over-coring to measure in-situ stresses accurately.

• Stress-Relief Techniques: Core drilling or other localized stress relief allows estimation of internal stress without compromising structural integrity.

These methods vary in precision, applicability, and field practicality, and are increasingly integrated into Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) frameworks to provide continuous, real-time, and non-invasive stress assessment. The review emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate NDT methods based on structural type, accessibility, and accuracy requirements while highlighting ongoing research to enhance standardization and reliability in stress measurement for concrete infrastructure.

Conclusion

The Non-destructive techniques (NDTs) provide effective and reliable approaches for stress measurement in PCC and RCC structures without compromising structural integrity. This review highlights the principles, advantages, and limitations of major NDT methods, including ultrasonic, acoustic, magnetic, optical, and fiber optic sensing techniques. While significant progress has been made in improving accuracy and field applicability, challenges related to material heterogeneity, calibration, and environmental influence remain. Integration of advanced sensors digital monitoring, and data-driven models offers promising future directions. Overall, NDT methods play a crucial role in sustainable infrastructure management and real-time structural health assessment.

References

[1] Bingquan Wang, Weijia Shi, Bo Zhao, Jiubin Tan, “Ultrasonics methodology for defect and stress detection of in-serviced T-shaped R-zone components”, Ultrasonics, Volume 124, 2022,106730. [2] Pedro M. Ferreira, Miguel A. Machado, Marta S. Carvalho and Catarina Vidal, “Embedded Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring: Methodologies and Applications Review”, Sensors, 2022, vol.22(21), 8320. [3] Luka Luli?, Mislav Stepinac, Marko Bartolac, Paulo B. Lourenço, “Review of the flat-jack method and lessons from extensive post-earthquake research campaign in Croatia”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 384, 2023, 131407 [4] Vladimir Pisarev , Igor Odintsev , Svyatoslav Eleonsky , Andrey Apalkov, “Residual stress determination by optical interferometric measurements of hole diameter increments” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 110, 2018, pp: 437-456. [5] Jiang, Q., Bertolo, V.M., Popovich, V.A. et al. Relating matrix stress to local stress on a hard microstructural inclusion for understanding cleavage fracture in high strength steel. Int J Fract, Vol. 232, 2021, pp. 1–21 . [6] Ryall, M.J., and Abdul-Rahman, A. “ Assessment of In-Situ Stresses in Pre-stressed Concrete Bridges”, Bridge management 2: inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair, ed(s) J. E. Harding, G. A. R. Parke, M. J. Ryall, London, Emerald Publishing Limited: 193, 484-501. [7] Li, X., Feng, D., Chen, J. (2012). Influence of Residual Stress on PCC Pavement Potential Cracking. In: Scarpas, A., Kringos, N., Al-Qadi, I., A., L. (eds) 7th RILEM International Conference on Cracking in Pavements. RILEM Bookseries, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht.. [8] Dabli A. G., Bambole A. N., Bajoria K. L. Evaluation of In-Place Stress in Concrete by Incremental Hole Drilling. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 117(4), 2020, pp. 27-35.

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Shreyas Sachin Sankpal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.