Optimizing Modern Oxidation Processes for Effective Water and Soil Decontamination

Abstract

The present research is focused on deepening the knowledge and practical application of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for cleaning up polluted water and soil. AOPs are a modern set of treatment techniques that work by generating highly reactive oxidizing agents, mainly hydroxyl radicals (•OH), directly at the site of contamination. These powerful species are effective in breaking down stubborn organic pollutants commonly found in Indian environmental conditions. In this study, the effectiveness of various AOP methods—including Fenton, photo-Fenton, hydrogen peroxide with UV light (H?O?/UV), ozone (O?), ozone with hydrogen peroxide (O?/H?O?), ozone with UV (O?/UV), and a combination of ozone, hydrogen peroxide, and UV (O?/H?O?/UV)—was assessed by determining the reaction rates for the removal of nitro-phenols. The primary aim was to optimise these processes for better pollutant removal, making them suitable for large-scale implementation in Indian scenarios. Experimental results demonstrated that ozonation induced the formation of quinone-based intermediates, while the mineralization of organically bound nitrogen to nitrate ranged from 50% to 100%, contingent upon the applied treatment conditions. The AOPs substantially enhanced the biodegradability of nitrophenol-laden waters and concurrently reduced their toxicity, thereby establishing their efficacy as effective pre-treatment methods preceding conventional biological filtration processes. Moreover, the application of AOPs, particularly ozonation and Fenton-based treatments, achieved effective remediation of recalcitrant contaminants such as nitrophenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), diesel, shale oil, and transformer oil within soil matrices. Treatment outcomes exhibited dependency on soil composition; sandy soils facilitated higher contaminant removal efficiencies relative to peat soils, which exhibited enhanced chemical retention and consequent reduction in treatment efficacy. Notably, Fenton-like reactions were operable at native soil pH levels, wherein endogenous iron content catalyzed hydrogen peroxide decomposition without necessitating exogenous ferrous ion supplementation. Critically, synergistic treatment strategies combining chemical oxidation (via ozonation or Fenton chemistry) with biological remediation—employing low-dose oxidants to stimulate microbial degradation—yielded superior contaminant removal compared to either approach employed independently. Economic analyses identified Fenton treatment as the most cost-effective modality for integrated water purification and soil remediation.

Introduction

Water and soil pollution from persistent and toxic organic compounds—particularly nitrophenols (NPs) and petroleum derivatives—pose significant environmental and public health risks in India. Conventional biological treatment methods are often ineffective due to the recalcitrant nature of these pollutants. Therefore, the study explores Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) as promising alternatives for efficient remediation.

Key Themes and Findings:

1. Water Pollution and Nitrophenols (NPs):

• Nitrophenols, used in pesticides and industrial applications, are toxic and resistant to biodegradation.

• They can accumulate in organisms and cause severe health effects (liver, CNS, kidneys).

• India faces unique challenges in degrading NPs due to limited research under local environmental conditions.

2. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs):

• AOPs generate hydroxyl radicals (•OH) that can mineralize toxic organics.

• Techniques include ozonation, UV/H?O?, Fenton, and photo-Fenton processes.

• AOPs are versatile, effective, and suitable for both water and soil treatment, despite higher costs and safety requirements.

3. Study Objectives:

• To identify effective AOPs for degrading nitrophenols and petroleum-based pollutants in Indian environmental conditions.

• To evaluate the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and toxicity reduction of various AOPs.

• To develop hybrid chemical-biological treatment strategies using native microbes for enhanced remediation.

Experimental Approach:

Water Treatment:

• Selected pollutants: 2-NP, 4-NP, 2,4-DNP, 2,5-DNP, 2,6-DNP, 4,6-DN-o-CR, 2,6-DN-p-CR.

• Experiments were conducted using batch reactors under varied pH and oxidant concentrations.

• Performance metrics included:

  • Degradation kinetics (via HPLC)

  • Mineralization (TOC, UV-Vis, IC)

  • Toxicity reduction (e.g., Daphnia magna bioassays)

  • Economic viability

Soil Treatment:

• Target pollutants: PAHs, diesel, transformer oil, and shale oil.

• AOPs (ozonation, Fenton, photo-Fenton) tested on different soil types (sand vs. organic-rich peat).

• Combined chemical oxidation with native microbial bioremediation.

• Measured:

  • Hydrocarbon removal

  • Aromatic content (254 nm absorbance)

  • Toxicity and biodegradability improvements

Key Insights:

• AOPs effectively enhance biodegradability and reduce toxicity in both water and soil systems.

• Fenton and photo-Fenton systems showed high degradation potential, especially under acidic conditions.

• A hybrid AOP-biological treatment approach proved practical, especially for Indian field conditions with limited infrastructure.

• Cost analysis suggested that low-dose oxidant systems combined with microbial treatment offer economically viable solutions for large-scale use.

Literature Review Highlights:

• AOPs were first conceptualized by Glaze et al. (1987).

• Hydroxyl radicals (•OH) are powerful, non-selective oxidants with high oxidation potential.

• AOP classifications:

  • Photochemical (e.g., UV/H?O?, photo-Fenton)

  • Non-photochemical (e.g., O?/H?O?, Fenton)

• Reactor setup for Fenton systems includes controlled pH, reagent dosing, and neutralization/flocculation steps post-treatment.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that enhanced oxidation offers a diverse array of effective methods for degrading aqueous nitrophenols (NPs). Degradation kinetics differed markedly across treatment methods, with Fenton processes achieving a tenfold reduction in NP concentration within minutes, whereas UV photolysis required several hours to reach the same level of removal. In addition to their effectiveness in degrading nitrophenols (NPs), standalone ozonation and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) also contribute to the detoxification and enhanced biodegradability of NP-containing wastewater. Key mechanisms underlying these improvements include ring hydroxylation, nitrogen mineralization, and ring-opening reactions that transform aromatic compounds into more biodegradable aliphatic forms, alongside a reduction in overall toxicity. These findings support the application of AOPs and ozonation as valuable pretreatment strategies to improve the efficacy of conventional biological treatments in removing hazardous and recalcitrant NPs. Although combining enhances nanoparticle degradation and reduces ozone consumption, this advanced oxidation process (AOP) becomes less economically competitive compared to standalone ozonation when higher treatment costs are considered. Taking capital expenditures into account, the Fenton treatment emerges as the preferable option, even though operational costs for ozonation and Fenton processes may be similar. This is largely because Fenton treatment requires minimal capital investment, whereas ozone equipment installation involves substantial upfront costs. Consequently, among the AOPs evaluated, Fenton’s reagent stands out as the most effective and cost-efficient treatment method. Both chemical treatments (ozonation and Fenton) and combined chemical-biological approaches proved highly effective in remediating soils contaminated with nitrophenols (NPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), matrix significantly influences treatment efficacy. Contaminant removal was more efficient in sand (mineral soil), whereas peat (organic-rich soil) required higher chemical dosages and achieved lower removal rates. The selection of remediation strategies, whether ex situ or in situ, was determined by the nature of the contamination and the appropriateness of two-phase or three-phase ozonation systems. Hydrogen peroxide effectively degrades contaminants through reactions catalyzed by naturally occurring iron in soils, characteristic of Fenton-like processes. In soil remediation applications employing Fenton and Fenton-like treatments, the use of moderate reagent dosages combined with incremental, stepwise hydrogen peroxide additions was shown to enhance treatment efficacy. These methods proved effective across a range of pH conditions, including both acidic environments (pH 3.0) and the native pH of the contaminated soils, underscoring their versatility for practical remediation scenarios. Chemical oxidation methods, such as ozonation and Fenton treatment, achieve a more rapid reduction in contaminant concentrations in polluted soils compared to biodegradation alone. This accelerated contaminant removal is particularly critical when preventing the migration of toxins into deeper soil layers or groundwater. For effective soil rehabilitation, combining chemical oxidation with biological treatment has demonstrated superior performance over either approach used independently. To preserve and enhance the activity of indigenous microorganisms following chemical oxidation, it is advisable to employ moderate concentrations of oxidants—such as hydrogen peroxide or ozone—during Fenton?like or ozonation pretreatments, and subsequently follow with a biodegradation phase. Cost analysis indicates that the Fenton and Fenton-like treatments represent the most economical chemical remediation methods for contaminated soils. Although chemical oxidation alone can effectively degrade contaminants such as nitrophenols, PAHs, diesel, transformer oil, and shale oil, a strategy that combines moderate chemical pre-treatment with subsequent biological degradation offers superior efficiency and cost-effectiveness compared to either approach used in isolation.

References

[1] Adams, C.D., Cozzens, R.A., Kim, B.J. 1997. Effects of ozonation on the biodegradability of substituted phenols. - Water Research, vol 31, no 10, p 2655-2663. Ahn, Y., Jung, H., Tatavarty, R., Choi, H., Yang, J.-W., Kim, In S. 2005. [2] Monitoring of petroleum hydrocarbon degradative potential of indigenous microorganisms in ozonated soil. – Biodegradation, vol 16, p 45-46. [3] ATSDR: Toxicological profile for NPs. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA: U.S., 1992. [4] Baciocchi, R., Boni, M.R., D’Aprile, L. 2003. Hydrogen peroxide lifetime as an indicator of the efficiency of 3-chlorophenol Fenton’s and Fenton-like oxidation in soils. - Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol B96, p 305-329. [5] Barbeni, M., Minero, C., Pelizzetti, E. 1987. Chemical degradation of chlorophenols with Fenton’s reagent (Fe2+ + H2O2). - Chemosphere, vol 16, nos 10-12, p 2225-2237. [6] Beltran, F.J., Garcia-Araya, J.F., Alvarez, P.M., Gimeno, O. 1999a. Effects of single and combined ozonation with hydrogen peroxide or UV radiation on the chemical degradation and biodegradability of debittering table olive industrial wastewaters. – Water Research, vol 33, no 3, p 723-732. [7] Beltran, F.J., Rivas, J., Alvarez, P.M., Alonso, M.A., Acedo, B. 1999b. A kinetic model for advanced oxidation processes of aromatic hydrocarbons in water: application to phenanthrene and nitrobenzene. - Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol 38, p 4189-4199. [8] Beltran, F.J., Gomez-Serrano, V., Duran, A. 1992. Degradation kinetics of pnitrophenol ozonation in water. - Water Research, vol 26, no 1, p 9-17. [9] Benitez, F.J., Beltran-Heredia, J., Acero, J.L., Rubio, F.J. 1999. Chemical decomposition of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol by ozone, Fenton’s reagent, and UV radiation. - Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research, vol 38, no 4, p 1341-1349. [10] Bogan, B.W., Trbovic, V. 2003. Effect of sequestration on PAH degradability with Fenton’s reagent: roles of total organic carbon, humin and soil porosity. – Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol B100, p 285-300. [11] Bowers, A., Netzer, A., Norman, J.D. 1973. Ozonation of wastewater – some technical and economic aspects. – The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol 51, no 3, p 332. [12] Chen, J., Rulkens, W.H., Bruning, H. 1997. Photochemical elimination of phenols and COD in industrial wastewaters. - Water Science and Technology, vol 35, no 4, p 231-238. [13] Chen, R., Pignatello, J.J. 1997. Role of quinone intermediates as electron shuttles in Fenton and photoassisted Fenton oxidations of aromatic compounds. - Environmental Science & Technology, vol 31, p 2399-2406. [14] Choi, H., Lim, H.-N., Kim, J., Cho, J. 2001. Oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by ozone in the presence of sand. – Water Science and Technology, vol 43, no 5, p 349-356. [15] Ciardelli, G., Ranieril, N. 2001. The treatment and reuse of wastewater in the textile industry by means of ozonation and electro-flocculation. – Water Research, vol 35, no 2, p 567-572. [16] Ciardelli, G., Capanneli, G., Bottino, A. 2001. Ozone treatment of textile wastewaters for reuse. - Water Science and Technology, vol 44, no 5, p 61-67. [17] Combs, R., McGuire, P. 1989. Back to basics – the use of ultraviolet light for microbial control – Ultrapure Water Journal, vol 6, no 4, p 62-68. [18] Composition of Petroleum Mixtures/W. Weisman (ed.). Total Petroleum [19] Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group Series/prepared by T.L. Potter and K.E. [20] Simmons. U.S.: Amherst Scientific Publishers, 1998. p 52-63. [21] Cunningham, S.D., Berti, W.R., Huang, J.W. 1995. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. - Trends Biotechnology, vol 13, p 393-397. [22] Dabestani, R., Ivanov, J.N. 1999. A compilation of physical, spectroscopic and photophysical properties of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. - Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol 70, no 1, p 10-34. [23] Danckwerts, P.V. Gas-Liquid Reactions. Mc Graw-Hill Book Co., 1973, p. 266. [24] Dieckmann, M.S., Gray, K.A. 1996. A comparison of the degradation of 2-nitrophenol via direct and sensitized photocatalysis in TiO2 slurries. - Water Research, vol 30, no 5, p 1169-1183. [25] Eisenberg, G.M. 1943. Colorimetric determination of hydrogen peroxide. – Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research, vol 15, no 5, p 327-328. [26] EPA US Chemical Oxidation, Field Applications of In Situ Remediation [27] Technologies, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology Innovation Office, Washington, DC 20460, 1998. p 31. [28] EPA US 1996. Ultraviolet Light Disinfection Technology in Drinking Water Application – An Overview. EPA 811-R96-002, Office Of Ground Water and Drinking Water. [29] EPA US 1993. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) 2,4-DNP. Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH. [30] EPA US 1986. Health and Environmental Effects Profile for Dinitrocresols, EPA/600/x-86/197. Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH. [31] EPA method 9045C. Soil and Waste pH. Available: http://www.epa.gov [32] EPA method 0415.1 Organic Carbon – Total UV Promoted. Available: http://www.epa.gov [33] Finnish Standard SFS 5062: Water quality. Determination of the acute toxicity with water flea, Daphnia magna Straus, 1984. [34] Fox, R.D. 1996. Physical/chemical treatment of organically contaminated soils and sediments. - Journal of Air and Waste Management, vol 46, p 391-413. [35] Furukawa, S., Yasunaga, N., Kawaai, Y., Hirotsuji, J. 1997. Highly efficient ozonehydrogen peroxide reactor with multiple injection port. In: Proceedings of the 13th Ozone World Congress, vol 1, p 499. [36] Gates-Anderson, D.D., Siegrist, R.L., Cline, S.R., 2001. Comparison of potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide as chemical oxidants for organically contaminated soils. – Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol 127, p 337-347. Glaze, W.H. 1987. Drinking water treatment with ozone. - Environmental Science and Technology, vol 21, no 3, p 224-230. [37] Glaze, W.H., Kang, J.W. 1988. Advanced oxidation processes for treating groundwater contaminated with TCE and PCE: laboratory studies. Journal AWWA, vol 80, no 5, p 57-63. [38] Glaze, W.H., Kang, J.W., Chapin, D.H. 1987. The chemistry of water treatment involving ozone, hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet radiation. - Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 9, no 4, p 335-342. [39] Gogate, P.R., Pandit, A.B. 2004. A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. - Advances in Environmental Research, vol 8, p 501-505. [40] Gordon, A.J., Ford, R.A. The Chemist’s Companion. A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques and References. New York: A Wiley-interscience publication, 1976. 541 p. (in Russian). [41] Grimmer, G.G. (ed.) Environmental Carcinogens: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Chemistry, Occurrence, Biochemistry, Carcinogenicity. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL. 1983. [42] Haberl, R., Urban, W., Gehinger, P., Szinovatz, W. 1993. Oxidation of industrial wastewaters containing non-biodegradable constituents by ozone with and without simultaneous irradiation. In: Proceedings of the eleventh ozone world congress, 29 August - 3 September San Francisco, USA, vol 1, p S-10-1 – S-10-12. [43] Heron, G., Christensen, T.H., Tjell, J.Chr. 1994. Oxidation capacity of aquifer sediments. – Environmental Science and Technology, vol 28, p 153-158. [44] Herterich, R. 1991. Gas chromatographic determination of nitrophenols in atmospheric liquid water and airborne particulates. – Journal of Chromatography, vol 549, p 313- [45] 324. [46] Hinchee, R.E., Downey, D.C., Aggarwal, P.K. 1990. Use of hydrogen peroxide as an oxygen source for in situ biodegradation: Part I. Field studies. – Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol 27, p 287-299. [47] Hoigné, J. 1988. The chemistry of ozone in water. In: Process Technologies for Water Treatment, Stucki, S. (ed.), New York: Plenum Press, p 121-143. [48] Hoigné, J., Bader, H., Haag, W.R., Staehelin, J. 1985. Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water: III – Inorganic compounds and radicals. - Water Research, vol 19, no 8, p 993-1004. [49] Hoigné, J., Bader, H. 1983a. Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water: I – Non-dissociating organic compounds. - Water Research, vol 17, p 173-183. [50] Hoigné, J., Bader, H. 1983b. Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water: II – Dissociating organic compounds. - Water Research, vol 17, no 2, p 185-194. [51] Hoigné, J., Bader, H. 1976. The role of hydroxyl radical reactions in ozonation process in aqueous solutions. – Water Research, vol 10, p 377. [52] Hoigné, J., Bader, H. 1975. Ozonation of water: role of hydrogen radicals as oxidizing intermediates. - Science, vol 190, p 782-784. [53] Huang, C.P., Dong, C., Tang, Z. 1993. Advanced chemical oxidation: its present role and potential future in hazardous waste treatment. - Waste Management, vol 13, p 361- [54] 377. [55] IOA (International Ozone Association EAG) Revised Guideline Document. Ozone [56] Concentration Measurement and Monitoring in a Concentrated Process Gas by UVabsorption. Masschelein, W.J., Blaich, L., Langlais, B., Thieben, E., Bell, J., Reading, A. In: Ozone Science and Engineering Special Issue on Quality Assurance in Ozone Practice, 1998, vol 20, p 433-487. [57] In Situ Oxidation 1999. USA: Technology Status Review, performed by ThermoRetec [58] Consulting Corporation with assistance from HydroGeoLogic, Inc. and Coleman [59] Research Corporation – Energy & Environmental Group, Environmental Security [60] Certification Program, November 1999, p. 42. [61] Janknecht, P., Wilderer, P.A., Picard, C., Labort, A. 2001. Ozone water contacting by ceramic membrane. - Separation and Purification Technology, vol 25, p 341-346. Jans, U., Hoigné, J. 1998. Activated carbon and carbon black catalysed transformation of aqueous ozone into OH-radicals. - Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 20, no 1, p 6790. [62] Keith, L.N., Telliard, W.A. 1979. Priority pollutants. 1-a perspective view. - Environmental Science and Technology, vol 13, no 4, p 416-423. [63] Kim, J., Choi, H. 2002. Modelling in situ ozonation for the remediation of non-volatile PAH-contaminated unsaturated soils. – Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol 55, p 261-285. [64] Kiwi, J., Pulgarin, C., Peringer, P. 1994. Effect of Fenton and photo-Fenton reactions on the degradation and biodegradability of 2 and 4-nitrophenols in water treatment. - Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol 3, p 335-350. [65] Kochany, J., Bolton, J.R. 1992. Mechanism of photodegradation of aqueous organic pollutants. 2. Measurement of the primary rate constants for reaction of •OH radicals with benzene and some halobenzenes using an EPR spin-trapping method following the photolysis of H2O2. – Environmental Science and Technology, vol 26, p 262-265. [66] Kong, S.-H., Watts, R.J., Choi, J.-H. 1998. Treatment of petroleum-contaminated soils using iron mineral catalyzed hydrogen peroxide. - Chemosphere, vol 37, no 8, p 1473-1482. [67] Ku, Y., Su, W.-J., Shen, Y.-S. 1996. Decomposition of phenols in aqueous solution by a UV/O3 process. - Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 18, p 443-460. [68] Kwon, B.G., Lee, D.S., Kang, N., Yoon, J. 1999. Characteristics of p-chlorophenol oxidation by Fenton reagent. - Water Research, vol 33, no 9, p 2110-2118. [69] Langlais, B., Reckhow, D.A., Brink, D.R. (eds.). Cooperative Research Report: Ozone in water treatment: Application and Engineering. USA: Lewis publishers, Chelsea, 1991. 569 p. [70] Ledakowicz, S., Maciejewska, R., Perkowski, J., Bin, A. 2001. Ozonation of reactive blue 81 in the bubble column. – Water Science and Technology, vol 44, no 5, p 47-52. Legube, B., Karpel Vel Leitner, N. 1999. Catalytic ozonation: a promising advanced oxidation technology for water treatment. - Catalysis Today, vol 53, p 61-72. [71] Lee, B.-D., Hosomi, M. 2001. A hybrid Fenton oxidation – microbial treatment for soil highly contaminated with benz(a)anthracene. - Chemosphere, vol 43, p 1127-1132. [72] Lee, B.-D., Hosomi, M., Murakami, A. 1998. Fenton oxidation with ethanol to degrade anthracene into biodegradable 9,10-anthraquinone: a pretreatment method for anthracene-contaminated soil. - Water Science and Technology, vol 38, p 91-97. [73] Levin, M.A., Gealt, M.A. Biotreatment of industrial and hazardous waste. New York: [74] McGraw-Hill, p 4. 1993. [75] Lipczynska-Kochany, E. 1992. Degradation of nitrobenzene and nitrophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes in a homogeneous phase: photolysis in the presence of hydrogen peroxide versus the Fenton reaction. - Chemosphere, vol 24, no 9, p 1369-1380. [76] Lipczynska-Kochany, E. 1991. Degradation of aqueous nitrophenols and nitrobenzene by means of the Fenton reaction. - Chemosphere, vol 22, nos 5-6, p 529-536. [77] Ma, Y.-S., Huang, S.-T., Lin, J.-G. 2000. Degradation of 4-nitrophenol using the Fenton process. – Water Science and Technology, vol 42, nos 3-4, p 155-160. [78] Mackay, D., Shui, W.Y., Ma, K.C. Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical [79] Properties and Environmental Fate of Organic Chemicals. FL: Lewis, Boca Raton. 1992. [80] Masschelein, W.J., Goossens, R. 1984. Nitrophenols as model compounds in the design of ozone contacting and reacting systems. - Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 6, p 143-162. [81] Masten, S.J. 1991. Ozonation of VOCs in the presence of humic acid and soils. – Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 2, p 287-312. [82] Masten, S.J., Davies, S.H.R. 1997. Efficacy of in-situ ozonation for the remediation of [83] PAH contaminated soils. - Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol 28, p 327-335. Munter, R., Preis, S., Kamenev, S., Siirde, E. 1993. Methodology of ozone induction into water and wastewater treatment. – Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 15, no 2, p 149-165. [84] Munter, R. 1985. Ozone decomposition in aqueous solutions. – Soviet Journal of Water Chemical Technology, vol 7, p 16-22 (in Russian). [85] Nam, K., Rodriguez, W., Kukor, J.J. 2001. Enhanced degradation of polycyclic hydrocarbons by biodegradation combined with a modified Fenton reaction. – Chemosphere, vol 45, p 11-20. [86] Nam, K., Kukor, J.J. 2000. Combined ozonation and biodegradation for remediation of mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. - Biodegradation, vol 11, p 1-9. Nelson, C.H., Brown, R.A. 1994. Adapting ozonation for soil and groundwater cleanup. - Environmental Engineering, a Supplement to Chemical Engineering, p EE20EE24. [87] Palmroth, M.R.T., Pitchel, J., Puhakka, J.A. 2002. Phytoremediation of subarctic soil contaminated with diesel fuel. - Bioresource Technology, vol 84, p 221-228. [88] Penchuk, Ya.O., Haldna, Yu.L., Kangro, A.V., Margna, L.Yu., Orav, I.P. 1986. [89] Ionchromatographic determination of drinking water ions. In: Proceedings of Tartu State University, vol 743, p 160-167 (in Russian). [90] Petigara, B.R., Blough, N.V., Mignerey, A.C. 2002. Mechanisms of hydrogen peroxide decomposition in soils. - Environmental Science and Technology, vol 36, p 639-645. [91] Pierpoint, A.C., Hapeman, C.J., Torrents, A. 2003. Ozone treatment of soil contaminated with aniline and trifluralin. - Chemosphere, vol 50, p 1025-1034. [92] Richard, J.Y., Vogel, T.M. 1999. Characterization of a soil bacterial consortium capable of degrading diesel fuel. - International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol [93] 44, p 93-100. [94] Ruppert, G., Bauer, R., Heisler, G. 1994. UV-O3, UV-H2O2, UV-TiO2 and the photoFenton – comparison of advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment. - Chemosphere, vol 28, no 8, p 1447-1454. [95] Sax, N.I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Sixth edn., 1984. [96] Shishida, K., Echigo, S., Yamada, H., Matsui, S. 1999. Study of the development of the high performance ozone/hydrogen peroxide water treatment system for TOC removal: effect of operational parameter. – Journal of Japanese Society of Water Environment, vol 22, p 199. [97] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. USA: American [98] Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Pollution Control [99] Federation, 17th ed., 1994. 1268 p. [100] Stehr, J., Müller, T., Svensson, K., Kamnerdpetch, C., Scheper, T. 2001. Basic examinations on chemical pre-oxidation by ozone for enhancing bioremediation of phenanthrene contaminated soils. – Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol 57, p 803-809. [101] Stover, E.L., Wang, L.-W., Medley, D.R. 1982. Ozone assisted biological treatment of industrial wastewaters containing biorefractory compounds. - Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 4, p 177-194. [102] Tang, W.Z., Huang, C.P. 1997. Stochiometry of Fenton’s reagent in the oxidation of chlorinated aliphatic organic pollutants. - Environmental Technology, vol 18, p 13-23. Technical/Regulatory Guidelines. USA: Technical and Regulatory Guidance for In [103] Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater. Prepared by Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation Work Group In Situ Chemical Oxidation Work Team, 2001, 25 p. [104] Teel, A.L., Warberg, C.R., Atkinson, D.A., Watts, R.J. 2001. Comparison of mineral and soluble iron Fenton’s catalysts for the treatment of trichloroethylene. - Water Research, vol 35, p 977-984. [105] Tessier, A., Campbell, P.G.C, Bisson, M. 1979. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. – Analytical Chemistry, vol 51, no 7, p 844851. [106] Trapido, M., Kallas, J. 2000. Advanced oxidation processes for the degradation and detoxification of 4-nitrophenol. - Environmental Technology, vol 21, p 799-808. Trapido, M., Veressinina, Y., Munter, R. 1998. Advanced oxidation processes for degradation of 2,4-dichloro- and 2,4-dimethylphenol. – Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol 124, no 8, p 690-694. [107] Trapido, M., Veressinina, Y., Hentunen, J.K., Hirvonen, A. 1997. Ozonation of chlorophenols: kinetics, by-products and toxicity. - Environmental Technology, vol 18, p 325-332. [108] Trapido, M., Veldre, I. 1996. On polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated levels in the ecosystem of Lake Peipsi in the 1970s-1980s. - Hydrobiologia, vol 338, p 185-190. [109] Ullmann’s. Encyclopaedia of industrial chemistry. Germany: VCH Verladsgesellschaft, 5 ed., 1991. p 415-419. [110] Walling, C. 1975. Fenton’s reagent revisited. - Accounts of Chemical Research, vol 8, p 125. [111] Wang, Y.-T. 1990. Methanogenic degradation of ozonation products of biorefractory or toxic aromatic compounds. - Water Research, vol 24, no 2, p 185-190. [112] Watts, R.J., Stanton, P.C., Howsawkeng, J., Teel, A.L. 2002. Mineralization of a sorbed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in two soils using catalyzed hydrogen peroxide. - Water Research, vol 36, p 4283-4292. [113] Watts, R.J., Haller, D.R., Jones, A.P., Teel, A.L. 2000. A foundation for the riskbased treatment of gasoline-contaminated soils using modified Fenton’s reactions. - Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol 76(B), p 73-89. [114] Watts, R.J., Bottenberg, B.C., Hess, T.F., Jensen, M.D., Teel, A.L. 1999a. Role of reductants in the enhanced desorption and transformation of chloraliphatic compounds by modified Fenton’s reactions. - Environmental Science and Technology, vol 33, p 3432-3437. [115] Watts, R.J., Foget, M.K., Kong, S.-H., Teel, A.L. 1999b. – Hydrogen peroxide decomposition in model subsurface systems. - Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol 69(B), p 229-243. [116] Watts, R.J., Stanton, P.C. 1999. Mineralization of sorbed and napl-phase hexadecane by catalyzed hydrogen peroxide. - Water Research, vol 33, p 1405-1414. [117] Watts, R.J., Dilly, S.E. 1996. Evaluation of iron catalysts for the Fenton-like remediation of diesel-contaminated soils. - Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol 51, p 209-224. [118] Watts, R.J., Udell, M.D., Leung, S.W. 1992. Treatment of contaminated soils using catalysed hydrogen peroxide. In: Chemical Oxidation Technologies for the Nineties, W.W. Eckenfeld, A.R. Bowers, J.A. Roth (eds.), A Technomic Publishing Company, INC, Lancaster, USA, 1992, p 37-50. [119] Yang, M., Hu, J., Ito, K. 1998. Characteristics of Fe2+/H2O2/UV oxidation process. - [120] Environmental Technology, vol 19, p 183-191. [121] Yu, C.-P., Yu, Y.-H. 2001. Mechanisms of the reaction of ozone with p-nitrophenol. - Ozone Science & Engineering, vol 23, p 303-312.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Debaraj Pani, Prof. Sanam Sarita Tripathy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.