Plant Awareness Disparity: Treasuring the Trees Around Us

Abstract

Plant Blindness i.e. the inability to see or notice the plants around us known as Plant Awareness Disparity has serious ecological implications. This article discusses the effect of Plant Awareness Disparity and the classroom strategies which may be employed to address this issue.

Introduction

The text discusses Plant Blindness, also termed Plant Awareness Disparity (PAD), which refers to humans’ tendency to overlook plants and underestimate their importance compared to animals. Although plants are fundamental to life on Earth, people often fail to notice, recognize, or value them due to cognitive biases, zoocentric education systems, and limited everyday engagement with plant life.

PAD is characterized by four components: negative attitudes toward plants, lack of attention to them, insufficient knowledge of their ecological importance, and a greater relative interest in animals. This disparity affects multiple domains, including cognitive (poor identification and recall), emotional and behavioral (low interest and empathy), educational (limited curriculum focus and evaluation), ecological (biodiversity loss and ecosystem imbalance), and social-cultural variables (erosion of indigenous and traditional plant knowledge).

The neglect of plants has serious consequences for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, medicinal and economic plant resources, and environmental policy support. Addressing PAD can improve plant identification, conservation awareness, ecological balance, and sustainable use of plant resources.

The text emphasizes the role of education in reducing PAD through classroom strategies such as nature observation, plant cultivation, experiments, creative activities, storytelling, quizzes, biodiversity tours, and essay writing. Overall, it calls for urgent awareness-building and educational reforms to shift society from plant indifference to plant sensitivity, ensuring long-term ecological sustainability and biodiversity conservation.

Conclusion

Earth, Vasundhara, thriving with life, is a unique planet in terms of its diverse Flora and Fauna. The two forms of life Plants and Animals have been beautifully coexisted since ages. Talk about nature, and you can imagine greenery, mountains, rivers and animals. But wait, can you recognize the animals in this frame of imagination, of course you can. In the contrast, think of the forest and try to name the trees and plants. This testing of our floral knowledge is an eye-opener, bringing forth an alarming issue. Are we neglecting plants and their importance in ecosystem by not recognizing them?

References

[1] Amprazis, A., Papadopoulou, P., & Malandrakis, G. (2021) Plant blindness and children’s recognition of plants as living things: A research in the primary schools context. Journal of Biological Education, 55(2), 139–154. [2] Balding, M., & Williams, K. J. (2016)Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12738 [3] Bebbington, A. (2005) The ability of A-level students to name plants. Journal of Biological Education, 39, 63-67. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655963 [4] Boros, E., E. Boric, and M. Patocski. (2021) “What can be done to increase future Teachers’ Plant Knowledge?” Journal of Biological Education1-11. Doi:10.1080/00219266.2021.1909632 [5] Bozniak E. C. (1994) “Challenges facing plant biology teaching programs.” Plant Science Bulletin, 40, pp.42-46 [6] Cil, E.,& Yanmaz, D. (2017). “Determination of pre-service teachers’ awareness of plants.” International Journal of Environmental Education, 7 (2), 84-93. [7] Darely W. M.(1990) “The Essence of Plantness.” The American Biology Teacher, 52(6), pp. 354-357 [8] Fancovicova, j., and P. Prokop. (2011) “Plants have a chance: Outdoor Educational Programmes alter students’ knowledge towards Plants.” Environmental Education Research, 17 (4): 537-551. Doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.545874. [9] Fernandez- Diaz M (2022) “Pre-service teachers’ ideas and misconceptions about the nutrition, reproduction and importance of plants: A case study in Spain. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences 3(8), pp.930-933. [10] Fernández-Llamazares, Á., & Cabeza, M. (2017) Rediscovering the potential of Indigenous storytelling for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 11(3), e12398. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12398 [11] Flannery M. C. (1991) “Considering Plants.” The American Biology Teacher, 53(5), pp.306-309. [12] Gras, A., Garnatje, T., Bonet, M., Carrio, E., Mayans, M., Parada, M., Rigat, M., & Vallès, J. (2016). Beyond food and medicine, but necessary for life, too. Other folk plant uses in several territories of Catalonia and the Balearic Islands. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0097-8 [13] Hershey D. R. (1996) “A historical perspective on problems in botany teaching.”The American Biology Teacher, 58(6), pp.340-347 [14] Hershey D. R. (2002) “Plant blindness: we have met the enemy and he is us.” Botanical Society of America Plant,48(3), pp.78-85. [15] Herrero, B., & Cardaño, Y. M. (2015). Ethnobotany in the folk songs of Castilla y León (Spain). Botanical Sciences, 93(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.88 [16] Hershey, D. R. (2002). Plant blindness: “I have met the enemy and he is us.” Plant Science Bulletin, 48(3), 78–84. [17] Ivanova, T., Ganeva-Raicheva, V., Bosseva, Y., & Dimitrova, D. (2021). Singing the nature—Ethnobotanical knowledge in Bulgarian folk songs. Botanical Sciences, 99(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2672 [18] Kaasinen A.(2019). Plant Species recognition skills in Finnish students and teachers. Education Sciences. 9 (2), 85. [19] Kletecki, N., Hrusevar, D., Mitic, B., & Sorgo, A. (2023). Plants are not boring, school botany is. Education Sciences, 13,489. [20] Krosnick, S. E., Baker, J. C., & Moore, K. R. (2018). The pet plant project: Treating plant blindness by making plants personal. The American Biology Teacher, 80(5), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2018.80.5.339 [21] Kubiatko M, Faneovieova J and Prokop, J (2021). “Factual Knowledge of students about plants is associated with attitudes and interest in botany. International Journal of Science Education43(9), pp.1426-1440. [22] Lindemann?Matthies, P. 2005. “‘Loveable’ Mammals and ‘Lifeless’ Plants: How Children’s Interest in Common Local Organisms Can Be Enhanced through Observation of Nature.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 655–677. doi:10.1080/09500690500038116. [23] Link-Perez, Dollo, Weber, & Schussler, (2010) “What’s in a Name: Differential labeling of plant and animal photographs in two nationally syndicated elementary science textbook series.” International Journal of Science Education, 32 (9), pp. 1227-1242. [24] Miralles, A., Raymond, M., & Lecointre, G. (2019). Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 19555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56006-9 [25] Nyberg, E., Hipkiss, A., & Sanders,D. (2019). Plants to the fore: Noticing plants in designed environments. Plants, People, Planet, 1, 212-220. [26] Parsley K. M. (2020). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants, People, Planet, 2(6), 598–601.https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10153 [27] Parsley K M (2022) “Initial Development and Validation of the Plant Awareness Disparity Index.” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9727616/ [28] Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students\' name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 630–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9290-7 [29] Pedrera, O., Ortega, U., Ruiz-González, A., Díez, J., & Barrutia, O. (2021). Branches of plant blindness and their relationship with biodiversity conceptualisation among secondary students. Journal of Biological Education, 57, 1-27. [30] Pilgrim, S., Smith, D., & Pretty, J. (2007). A cross-regional assessment of the factors affecting ecoliteracy: Implications for policy and practice. Ecological Applications, 17(6), 1742–1751. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1358.1 [31] Stagg, B. C., & Dillon, J. (2022). Plant awareness is linked to plant relevance: A review of educational and ethnobiological literature (1998–2020). Plants People Planet, 4(6), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10323 [32] Tunnicliffe, SD; Patrick, P; (2011) What Plants and Animals Do Early Childhood and Primary Students’ Name? Where Do They See Them? Journal of Science Education and Technology , 20 (5) pp. 630-642. [33] Wandersee, J. H., Schussler, E. E. (1999). Preventing plant blindness. American Biology Teacher, 61(2), 82–86. University of California Press [34] Wandersee, J.H., & Schussler, E.E. (2001). Towards a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47(1), 2-9. [35] Yorek, N., ?ahin, M., & Ayd?n, H. (2009). Are animals ‘more alive’ than plants? Animistic-anthropocentric construction of life concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(4), 369–378. [36] Zani, G., & Low, J. (2022). Botanical priming helps overcome plant blindness on a memory task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 1–9.

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Dr. Kumud Purohit, Surbhi Sharma. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.