Low-code/no-code platforms have changed the landscape of mobile and web application development by providing speed and customization without the complexity of coding. Microsoft Power Apps has become a strong choice for businesses and individual users looking for scalable, inexpensive, and usable applications. This study describes the experience of using Microsoft Power Apps to design a personalized food delivery application inspired by Swiggy. This paper presents our screen-wise modular approach to design and develop Home, Restaurant Listing, Item Details, Cart, Payment, and Order Tracking screens. The paper, which provides the algorithmic steps, mathematical equations for cost and time saving, and comparisons with traditional ways to develop software, provides intermediate results indicating 60-65% reductions in cost and development time, while providing the small business the ability to scale and build new modules. In our discussion, we highlight how Power Apps democratizes app development and empowers organizations to build enterprise-level applications with minimal effort.
Introduction
Background and Objective
With the digital transformation of industries, mobile apps are essential for businesses in areas like food delivery, ridesharing, and e-commerce. However, traditional app development is costly, time-consuming, and requires skilled developers, making it inaccessible for many SMEs.
This study explores the use of Microsoft Power Apps, a low-code/no-code platform, to build a Swiggy-inspired food delivery app. It evaluates the technical feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and development speed compared to conventional methods. The study also proposes a screen-wise modular design, development framework, and performance evaluation metrics.
Key Features of Power Apps Platform
Drag-and-drop UI with reusable components
Integrates with SharePoint, Dataverse, Power Automate, and external APIs
Automates workflows and backend processes
Enables non-developers to create functional apps
Scales from small to enterprise-level applications
Literature Insights
Traditional coding is resource-heavy (Sharma et al., 2021)
Power Apps reduces development time by up to 60% (Gupta & Verma, 2022)
Low-code tools promote innovation for non-technical users (Kumar & Sen, 2019)
Integration with external APIs and automation is feasible (Mishra & Rao, Lee et al., 2021)
Performance may trade off slightly vs native apps, but usability remains strong
Gaps in literature:
Few studies on consumer-facing apps (e.g., food delivery)
Lack of algorithmic design frameworks or screen-wise methods in Power Apps
Methodology Overview
The app was developed using a structured approach that included:
1. Requirement Analysis
Features: user login, restaurant list, menu view, cart, order placement, payment gateway, order tracking
Functional and non-functional requirements documented
2. Application Design (Modular Screens)
Login Screen – Credential validation
Home Screen – Restaurant list from backend
Menu Screen – Dynamic menu display
Cart Screen – Add/remove items using collections
Order Screen – Confirm and store orders in SharePoint
3. Algorithm Design
A step-by-step pseudo-code algorithm for order processing ensures consistent and error-free transactions
4. Performance Metrics
Response Time (RT): Measures average time per user action
Success Rate (SR): Percentage of successful operations
User Satisfaction Index (USI): Based on feedback ratings
5. Data Integration
Power Automate for order notifications and email alerts
Dataverse and SharePoint for storing structured/semi-structured data
6. Testing
Functional, performance, and usability testing
Surveys to evaluate satisfaction and navigation ease
Results and Comparison with Traditional Development
Development Time
Approach
Prototype Time
Deployment Time
Total Time
Traditional Coding
60 hrs
120 hrs
180 hrs
Power Apps
15 hrs
40 hrs
55 hrs
~70% reduction in total development time using Power Apps
Cost
Approach
Development Cost
Maintenance/year
Total Cost
Traditional Coding
$10,000
$5,000
$15,000
Power Apps
$4,000
$2,000
$6,000
~60% cost reduction with Power Apps
User Performance Metrics
Metric
Traditional Apps
Power Apps App
Avg. Load Time (sec)
4.2
2.1
Navigation Errors (%)
12
4
Satisfaction Score (/10)
6.5
9.2
Power Apps apps had faster loading, fewer errors, and higher satisfaction
Conclusion
In conclusion, the research indicates that this Microsoft Power Apps is a practical and efficient application development option. Power Apps is a significant advancement in custom application development compared to traditional coding. It saves development time and application cost while increasing user satisfaction and proficiency. An examination of the tables and graphs has validated that Microsoft Power Apps significantly increases prototyping speed, its deployment speed within organizations, and improves user-friendliness using low-code methods (in impact and quick UI deployment). Furthermore, as organizations utilize built-in connectors and other automation, even using less human resources, they provides more business scalability. To sum up, we conclude that Microsoft Power Apps is a viable development option that is financially sound for businesses and education institutions looking to be disruptors in their workflows and offer user-focused digital solutions.
References
[1] Gripsy, J. V., &Prabhu, N. (2022). Enhanced route discovery mechanism using improved CH selection with Q-learning to minimize delay in MANETs. International Journal of Computer Applications, 184(43), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2022922454
[2] Gripsy, J. V., & Raj, S. (2021). AI-based stress detection using machine learning techniques. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, 11(2), 45–53.
[3] Gripsy, J. V., Kumar, A., &Prabhu, N. (2020). Network intrusion detection using hybrid AI models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, 15(3), 112–120.
[4] Microsoft. (2023). Power Apps documentation. Microsoft Learn. Retrieved from https://learn.microsoft.com/powerapps
[5] Gartner. (2022). Low-code application platforms: Market trends and insights. Gartner Research Report, 22(7), 1–15.
[6] Al-Fedaghi, S. (2021). Flow-based modeling of mobile applications. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 14(3), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2021.143007
[7] Kumar, S., & Bansal, A. (2020). Comparative study of low-code development platforms. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 9(6), 45–52.
[8] Swetha, R., & Sharma, V. (2019). Custom mobile app development for e-commerce applications. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(17), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918994
[9] Smith, J., & Patel, R. (2021). User experience in customized mobile applications. Human-Computer Interaction Journal, 37(4), 221–238.
[10] Deloitte. (2023). The future of application development: Low-code and no-code platforms. Deloitte Insights, 18(5), 12–19.
[11] Gripsy, J. V., Kowsalya, R., Thendral, T., Sheeba, L. (2025). Integrating AI and Blockchain for Cybersecurity Insurance in Risk Management for Predictive Analytics in Insurance. In Cybersecurity Insurance Frameworks and Innovations in the AI Era (pp. 349–376). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1977-3.ch012
[12] Gripsy, J. V., Sowmya, M., SharmilaBanu, N., Senthilkumaran, B. (2025). Qualitative Research Methods for Professional Competencies in Educational Leadership. In Leadership in Higher Education: A Global Perspective (pp. 1–20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1882-0.ch013
[13] Gripsy, J. V., Sheeba, L., Kumar, D., Lukose, B. (2025). Eco-Intelligent 6G Deployment: A Data-Driven Multi-Objective Framework for Sustainable Impact Analysis and Optimization. In 6G Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (pp. 1–20). IGI Global DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3373-2220-9.ch008
[14] Gripsy, J. V., Selvakumari, S. N. A., SenthilKumaran, B. (2025). Transforming Student Engagement Through AI, AR, VR, and Chatbots in Education. In Emerging Technologies in Education (pp. 1–20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1882-0.ch015
[15] Gripsy, J. V., Hameed, S. S., Begam, M. J. (2024). Drowsiness Detection in Drivers: A Machine Learning Approach Using Hough Circle Classification Algorithm for Eye Retina Images. In Applied Data Science and Smart Systems (pp. 202–208). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003471059-28
[16] Gripsy, J. V., Mehala, M. (2020). Voice Based Medicine Reminder Alert Application for Elder People. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(6), 2284–2288. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.F7731.038620
[17] Gripsy, J. V., &Kanchana, K. R. (2020). Secure Hybrid Routing To Thwart Sequential Attacks in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(4), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I4/20201458