A Psychological Analysis of Attachment Styles, Existential Crisis, and Coping Strategies

Abstract

This paper looks at the relationship between coping strategies, existential crises, and attachment styles, highlighting how these psychological components work together to influence how people react to emotional discomfort, meaning-related issues, and identity-based uncertainties. Intense introspection about one\'s direction, purpose, and sense of self are common characteristics of existential crisis experiences, which are also often accompanied by elevated anxiety, emotional instability, and a profound need for clarity. With secure attachment connected to better emotional control and insecure attachment linked to increased existential sensitivity and anguish, attachment theory offers a crucial framework for comprehending why some people are more susceptible to these experiences than others. These processes may either mitigate or exacerbate existential distress depending on whether people use maladaptive coping mechanisms like avoidance and rumination or adaptive ones like meaning-making, introspection, or social support. This study emphasizes the value of consistent relational patterns, cohesive self-structures, and useful coping mechanisms in lowering existential vulnerability by combining current theoretical advancements with empirical data. It also highlights important ramifications for therapeutic treatment and suggests exciting avenues for additional study targeted at boosting psychological resilience and improving general wellbeing.

Introduction

This text explores the growing prevalence of existential crises among young people, driven by rapid social change, identity uncertainty, and rising performance pressures. An existential crisis involves deep distress related to questions of meaning, purpose, identity, freedom, and death, and is most common in early adulthood, though it can occur at any age. Research shows strong links between existential anxiety and mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, and psychological distress.

Attachment theory is presented as a key framework for understanding individual differences in existential suffering. Secure attachment, developed through consistent and supportive caregiving, promotes emotional regulation, meaning-making, and psychological stability. In contrast, insecure attachment styles (anxious, avoidant, fearful) are associated with heightened existential anxiety, emotional dysregulation, isolation, and difficulties in forming coherent self-narratives.

Coping strategies mediate the relationship between attachment and existential outcomes. Adaptive coping methods—such as meaning-making, reflective thinking, proactive coping, and seeking social support—buffer existential distress and enhance resilience, particularly in securely attached individuals. Maladaptive coping strategies—such as avoidance, repression, rumination, and substance use—are more common in insecure attachment styles and intensify existential suffering.

The text also highlights the role of value systems in existential meaning. Clear, coherent values support resilience, emotional stability, and purpose, while value confusion exacerbates existential distress. Attachment patterns influence the development of value systems, which in turn shape coping strategies and existential well-being.

Conclusion

This review shows how coping mechanisms, attachment patterns, and existential crises create a complex psychological framework that influences how people react to emotional stress, ambiguity, and meaninglessness. Secure connection lessens the intensity of existential anxiety by promoting emotional stability, enhancing the ability to create meaning, and promoting adaptive coping. On the other hand, insecure attachment, especially anxious and avoidant types, weakens tolerance for uncertainty and leads to maladaptive coping, which increases vulnerability. Promising avenues to improve psychological resilience include emerging treatments like ACT, meaning-centered methods, and attachment-based therapies. To fully comprehend the effects of cultural, developmental, and digital-age factors on the attachment-existential-coping connection, further study is necessary. All things considered, improving meaning-making processes, encouraging adaptive coping, and fortifying emotional ties continue to be crucial tactics for helping people in modern society who are struggling with existential issues.

References

[1] Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond, S. (2021). Lazarus and Folkman\'s psychological stress and coping theory. The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice, 349-364. [2] Chen, S., Cheung, M. W., & Cheng, C. (2024). Flexibility in coping deployment and psychological adjustment during COVID-19: A three-level meta-analysis across 33 countries. Social Science & Medicine. [3] Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., ... & Thigpen, J. C. (2022). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological bulletin, 143(9), 939. [4] Gillath, O., & Karantzas, G. (2019). Attachment security priming: A systematic review. Current opinion in psychology, 25, 86-95. [5] Greenglass, E. R., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2019). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis. European psychologist, 14(1), 29-39. [6] Hill, C. (2023). Self-compassion and attachment styles: a meta-analysis, and an empirical study of a self-compassion intervention for people living with a skin condition (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University). [7] Karreman, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (2019). Attachment and well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and resilience. Personality and Individual differences, 53(7), 821-826. [8] Lemay Jr, E. P., Kruglanski, A. W., Molinario, E., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gützkow, B., ... & Leander, N. P. (2023). The role of values in coping with health and economic threats of COVID-19. The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(6), 755-772. [9] Martin, A., Helm, P., & Chen, S. (2023). Attachment insecurity and existential isolation. Personality and Individual Differences, 205, 112028. [10] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Publications. [11] Park, C. L., Wilt, J. A., Russell, B. S., & Fendrich, M. (2023). Does perceived post-traumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic reflect actual positive changes? Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 36(6), 661-673. [12] Piispanen, M. (2020). Behavioral and physiological correlates of empathy and empathic accuracy in human-centered design. [13] Schnell, T. (2020). The psychology of meaning in life. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 3–15. [14] Steger, M. F. (2017). Meaning in life and wellbeing. Wellbeing, recovery and mental health, 7, 75-85. [15] van Bruggen, V., Ten Klooster, P., Westerhof, G., Vos, J., de Kleine, E., Bohlmeijer, E., & Glas, G. (2017). The Existential Concerns Questionnaire (ECQ)–development and initial validation of a new existential anxiety scale in a nonclinical and clinical sample. Journal of clinical psychology, 73(12), 1692-1703. [16] Vos, J. (2023). The meaning sextet: A systematic literature review and further validation of a universal typology of meaning in life. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 36(2), 204-231.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Stoyana Natseva. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.