Rainwater Harvesting Systems in Urban and Rural India: Performance and Policy Review

Abstract

Contemporary India faces unprecedented water challenges as demographic pressures intensify and climatic variability disrupts established precipitation patterns. This scenario has rekindled interest in rainwater harvesting (RWH) methodologies that historically sustained Indian communities across diverse ecological zones. Our investigation examines the operational effectiveness of RWH implementations spanning metropolitan areas and remote settlements. Through comprehensive analysis of indigenous water conservation practices including Bundelkhand\'s Haveli structures and Rajasthan\'s Chauka networks, alongside contemporary rooftop collection technologies, this study presents a nuanced assessment of current performance metrics. The research synthesizes findings from multiple case studies to evaluate system efficiency, economic feasibility, and policy integration challenges. Results demonstrate significant potential for enhancing regional water security through strategic RWH deployment, while simultaneously revealing persistent obstacles in system maintenance protocols, water quality management, and institutional coordination. The analysis underscores the necessity for refined policy frameworks that bridge traditional ecological knowledge with modern engineering approaches to achieve sustainable water management outcomes.

Introduction

I. Context and Challenges

India faces growing water management challenges due to:

• Population growth

• Climate variability (e.g., simultaneous floods and droughts)

• Unequal water access and over-dependence on groundwater

Current centralized infrastructure often fails to adapt to these diverse challenges. There's renewed interest in decentralized, traditional water systems that once ensured local sustainability.

II. Methodology

The study combines:

• Literature synthesis (2014–2023) of 12 rigorously selected studies

• Thematic analysis across four key dimensions:

  1. Traditional RWH systems

  2. Modern RWH technologies

  3. Policy effectiveness

  4. Socio-economic barriers

Focus was placed on empirical evidence and real-world outcomes over theoretical models.

III. Key Findings

A. Traditional Indigenous Systems

• Historic systems like Havelis (Bundelkhand), Johads, and Chaukas (Rajasthan) were ecologically attuned and highly effective.

• Revived through community efforts (e.g., Tarun Bharat Sangh in Rajasthan), these systems have successfully:

  • Recharged groundwater

  • Revived rivers

  • Improved agriculture and livelihoods

• Modern tools like GIS and MCDA validate the location and efficiency of these traditional systems.

B. Modern RWH Systems

• Roof Harvesting Systems (RHS) are used in urban and peri-urban areas.

  • Provide up to 80–90% of domestic water needs in some cases.

  • Energy-intensive in high-rise buildings.

• Pond Harvesting Systems (PHS) serve agricultural purposes and flood mitigation.

  • Effective in storing large volumes for irrigation (e.g., 73,000 m³/year).

  • Integrated under government programs like MGNREGA.

C. Water Quality and Treatment

• Rainwater can be contaminated by biological (E. coli) or chemical (lead, nitrates) pollutants.

• Common treatment methods:

  • First-flush diverters

  • Sand/membrane filters

  • UV treatment (costly and energy-intensive)

• There is a mismatch between end-use and treatment standards, leading to over-treatment for non-potable use.

D. Policy, Economic, and Social Dimensions

• National programs (e.g., Jal Jeevan Mission, Smart Cities Mission) promote RWH.

• Key issues:

  • Weak regulatory enforcement

  • Single-pipe systems restrict potable vs non-potable reuse

  • Economic disincentives due to low tariffs and high setup costs

  • Lack of awareness and maintenance reluctance

  • Gender disparities in maintenance burden

E. Geographical and Environmental Constraints

• Soil type, terrain, and climate critically influence RWH effectiveness.

• Poorly planned upstream RWH can reduce downstream water availability, requiring Integrated Watershed Management strategies.

Conclusion

Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) remains a vital and scalable strategy for enhancing India’s water security, climate resilience, and sustainable development. This review has revealed the enduring significance of traditional systems like Havelis and Chaukas, which continue to serve as critical sources of irrigation and groundwater recharge. Modern innovations, including Roof and Pond Harvesting Systems (RHS and PHS), also show promising potential in urban stormwater management and decentralized domestic supply. However, significant challenges continue to inhibit the widespread and sustainable adoption of RWH. These include gaps in water quality, energy-intensive treatment methods, lack of economic viability, inconsistent policy enforcement, and low public awareness. The path forward lies in an integrated approach that builds upon India\'s traditional water wisdom, advances modern technologies, and strengthens regulatory support.

References

[1] S. Das. 2023. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 99(6), 743–746. “Watershed management, green environment and rural resurgence.” [2] Z. Huang, E. L. Nya, M. A. Rahman, T. B. Mwamila, V. Cao, W. Gwenzi, and C. Noubactep. 2021. Sustainability. 13(15), 8338. “Integrated water resource management: Rethinking the contribution of rainwater harvesting.” [3] L. Liansangpuii, R. Singh, R. M. Singh, K. N. Singh, and S. K. Kar. 2023. Current Science. 125(1), 43–51. “Hydrological assessment of Haveli-based traditional water harvesting system for the Bundelkhand region, Uttar Pradesh, India.” [4] G. K. Pala, A. P. Pathivada, S. J. H. Velugoti, C. Yerramsetti, and S. Veeranki. 2021. Materials Today: Proceedings. 45, 6567–6571. “Rainwater harvesting – A review on conservation, creation & cost-effectiveness.” [5] A. Rawat, N. Panigrahi, B. Yadav, K. Jadav, M. P. Mohanty, A. Khouakhi, and J. W. Knox. 2023. Water. 15(11), 2042. “Scaling up indigenous rainwater harvesting: A preliminary assessment in Rajasthan, India.” [6] A. M. Rodrigues, K. T. M. Formiga, and J. Milograna. 2023. Water Supply. 23(10), 4112. “Integrated systems for rainwater harvesting and greywater reuse: A systematic review of urban water management strategies.” [7] A. S. Vieira, C. D. Beal, E. Ghisi, and R. A. Stewart. 2014. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 34, 225–242. “Energy intensity of rainwater harvesting systems: A review.” [8] J. Vinoj and D. S. Gavaskar. 2018. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research. 3(9), 1–6. “Smart city rain water harvesting (IoT) techniques.” [9] H. A. Zabidi, H. W. Goh, C. K. Chang, N. W. Chan, and N. A. Zakaria. 2020. Water. 12(11), 3163. “A review of roof and pond rainwater harvesting systems for water security: The design, performance and way forward.”

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Akash Kumar Singh, Prajwal K Gowda, Sagnik Goswami, Somashekar L, Gowtham Prasad M E. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.