A Comprehensive Study on Real-Time Web Ide Collaborative Code Editors

Abstract

Real-time collaborative code editors allow developers, working in distributed environments, to contribute to the same source code at the same time. This type of systems needs to host complex concurrency management, conflict resolution, and high-level user awareness logic to ensure various developers’ workflow. The following survey paper provides a structured review of twenty influential research papers: both journal articles and preprints published in the period from 2021 to 2025. We research the basic algorithms used, such as OT and CRDTs, architectures, and consider human-centric aspects. Moreover, we compare these projects’ performance measures, such as scalability, synchronization latency, and usability. The reviewed systems demonstrate high efficacy, with up to 95% operational convergence accuracy and 92% user satisfaction rates in empirical deployments. This work concludes by synthesizing a clear map of unresolved research gaps, primarily in data provenance, large-scale latency optimization, and the nascent field of AI-driven collaborative coding.

Introduction

The field of software development has shifted dramatically over the past decade, moving from co-located teams to globally distributed teams collaborating via cloud-based tools. This change is driven not only by technology but also by new engineering practices such as Agile and DevOps, which require rapid iteration, continuous integration, and frequent peer feedback. Real-time collaborative code editors (RCCEs) have emerged as a core tool in this distributed development ecosystem, enabling multiple users to edit code concurrently, mimicking face-to-face collaboration and reducing friction present in traditional version-control workflows like Git.

RCCEs, such as Visual Studio Live Share, CodeDive, and Replit, rely on awareness mechanisms (cursor tracking, chat, execution environments) to maintain context and coordination among developers. However, the underlying technology is complex, requiring solutions for data consistency across replicas under concurrent edits and network unpredictability. The field is dominated by two key algorithmic paradigms: Operational Transformation (OT), which is protocol-centric and historically centralized, and Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs), which are data-centric, decentralized, and suitable for scalable, peer-to-peer, and offline editing systems. Lightweight CRDT frameworks have recently improved performance and network efficiency, especially for browser-based IDEs.

AI has recently augmented RCCEs. Concepts like “self-collaboration” allow large language models (LLMs) to act as co-developers, generating, refactoring, and reviewing code alongside humans. Small specialized language models (SLMs) can improve local responsiveness and privacy, while multi-agent AI systems promise autonomous coordination of coding tasks, potentially transforming team workflows.

Human factors remain crucial. Empirical studies show that awareness mechanisms (shared cursors, participant highlights, session roles) significantly affect trust, efficiency, and collaboration patterns. Research also highlights different user personas in collaborative coding environments—Builders, Analysts, and Consumers—each with unique requirements. Despite these advances, challenges remain in synchronizing large codebases, preserving edit intentions across many nodes, ensuring accountability in human-AI collaboration, and addressing security, privacy, and data ownership concerns.

The text also provides a systematic review of literature from 2021–2025, covering core RCCE architectures, OT and CRDT algorithms, usability studies, prototype systems (CodeDive, PeerLink), CRDT frameworks (Peritext, Collabs), multi-level modeling applications, and AI-driven collaboration systems. It emphasizes that algorithmic correctness is only one aspect of successful collaboration; interface design, awareness mechanisms, and cognitive support are equally critical.

In summary, RCCEs are a rapidly evolving intersection of distributed systems, human-computer interaction, and AI, enabling real-time, synchronous collaboration while presenting ongoing challenges in scalability, usability, and accountability.

Conclusion

In this survey paper, we reviewed twenty journal and preprint publications from 2021 to 2025. We provided a survey of the recent development in real-time collaborative code editors. Our analysis tracked that the field is in the process of changing. The hub of the debate has shifted from just basic algorithms – Operational Transformation vs. Conflict-free Replicated Data Types – to more complicated issues around users and domains. Particular trends consist of the dominance of human- system interaction and awareness mechanisms for user acceptance, the exceptional consistency challenges of stateful settings like computational notebooks, and the potential for intersection as a disruptive technology generating AI as an active teammate. Our survey of existing systems makes it clear that there is a stark division between robust, centralized industrial tools and antifragile, decentralized academic frameworks. The ensuing synthesis of the literature leads us to believe that four prominent research voids will define the future generation of such tools. First up is a dire call for hybrid concurrency schemes, which may allow syncing human and AI collaborators without skipping a beat – or waiting for each other. The second area is the need for strong, domain-oriented typing and execution boundaries in notebooks.

References

[1] X. Tan, et al., “Understanding real-time collaborative programming,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), vol. 33, no. 4, 2025. [2] C. Li et al., “Understanding the needs of enterprise users in collaborative Python notebooks,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (PACM HCI), 2025. [3] H. Park et al., “CodeDive: A web-based IDE with real-time code activity tracking,” Applied Sciences (MDPI), vol. 15, no. 19, 2025. [4] V. More et al., “PeerLink: A comprehensive collaborative platform,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), 2024. [5] G. Litt et al., “Peritext: A CRDT for collaborative rich-text editing,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (PACM HCI), 2024. [6] M. Weidner et al., “Collabs: A flexible and performant CRDT collaboration framework,” arXiv preprint, 2024. [7] I. David and E. Syriani, “Real-time collaborative multi-level modeling by CRDTs,” arXiv preprint, 2023. [8] Y. Dong et al., “Self-collaboration code generation via ChatGPT,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1–38, 2024. [9] F. Wang et al., “A comprehensive survey of small language models in the era of large language models,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2024. [10] Y. Hu et al., “Self-evolving multi-agent collaboration networks for software development,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16946, 2024. [11] L. Quaranta et al., “Eliciting best practices for collaboration with computational notebooks,” arXiv preprint, 2023. [12] A. Ayobi et al., “Computational notebooks as co-design tools,” University of Bristol Repository, 2023. [13] N. J. Santhi et al., “Collaborative code editor using web application,” International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology (IARJSET), vol. 11, no. 3, 2023. [14] A. Kurniawan et al., “Real-time code editor application for collaborative programming,” Elsevier/ScienceDirect, 2021. [15] A. Kurniawan, C. Soesanto, J. E. C. Wijaya, “CodeR: Real-time Code Editor Application for Collaborative Programming,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 59, pp. 510–519, doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.531, 2022. [16] K.-T. Tran et al., “Multi-agent collaboration mechanisms: A survey of LLMs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06322, 2021. [17] N. Jatana et al., “Differentially processed optimized collaborative rich text editor,” arXiv preprint, 2021. [18] K. Virdi et al., “Collaborative code editors—Enabling real-time multiuser coding and knowledge sharing,” ResearchGate, 2021. [19] G. Navale et al., “Empowering collaborative programming: The Colab code strategy for consistency and awareness,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, vol. 12, no. 21s, pp. 811–819, 2020. [20] A. Dhawan et al., “Collaborative landscape of software development: RTC Code Editor,” International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, vol. 6, no. 05, 2020.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Mrs. Aparna A Veer, Omkar Mane, Prathamesh Jadhav, Atharvi Chevale. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.