Reliability Testing of Semiconductor Components under Mechanical Shock and Vibration in Automotive Systems

Abstract

The rapid evolution of modern vehicles into complex, electronically-controlled systems have significantly increased the use of semiconductor components in critical automotive applications. From advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and engine control units (ECUs) to infotainment modules and safety systems, the performance and reliability of these electronic components are crucial. However, the automotive environment subjects these semiconductors to severe mechanical stresses, including high-frequency vibrations, random shocks, and continuous oscillatory movements. These conditions can lead to progressive degradation or even sudden failure of sensitive semiconductor devices, ultimately compromising vehicle safety and performance. This research paper focuses on systematically analysing the reliability of semiconductor components exposed to mechanical shock and vibration within automotive systems. The study involves selecting key semiconductor devices—such as power MOSFETs, microcontrollers, and MEMS sensors—that are commonly used in vehicles. These components are subjected to controlled mechanical testing environments that simulate real-world driving conditions. Tests such as sine-sweep vibration, random vibration profiles, and shock pulse tests are employed, aligned with widely recognized standards including AEC-Q100, ISO 16750, and JEDEC specifications. Data obtained from these experiments reveal the dominant failure modes affecting component integrity, including die cracking, solder joint fatigue, wire bond failure, and delamination in packaging materials. Advanced inspection techniques, including scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), X-ray imaging, and thermal cycling evaluations, are utilized for failure analysis. In addition to identifying these failure modes, this study evaluates changes in electrical parameters and functional behaviour to understand the long-term impacts on device performance. The findings of this research highlight the limitations of current reliability testing methods, particularly their inability to fully replicate the complex and cumulative mechanical stresses encountered in real automotive scenarios. It further emphasizes the need for improved design approaches, such as stress-relief packaging, robust interconnection methods, and enhanced board-level mounting strategies, to ensure component resilience. The paper also proposes a framework for optimizing test procedures and design guidelines to bridge the gap between laboratory evaluations and field performance. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the mechanical durability of semiconductor devices in the automotive sector. It aims to support manufacturers, designers, and test engineers in developing more reliable electronics capable of withstanding harsh mechanical conditions over extended lifetimes. The ultimate goal is to contribute toward the design of safer, more durable automotive systems, thereby aligning with the growing demands of the automotive industry\'s shift toward electrification, automation, and increased connectivity.

Introduction

The automotive industry is rapidly evolving with increased electrification, automation, and connectivity, making semiconductors essential in modern vehicles. These components power systems for safety, control, infotainment, and communication. However, as vehicles operate in harsh mechanical environments, reliability under shock and vibration becomes a major concern, especially since failure can compromise safety and performance.

2. Role of Semiconductor Components

Key semiconductor components include:

• Microcontrollers (MCUs) – control vehicle systems (e.g., engine, braking, ADAS).

• Power MOSFETs – manage power flow in electric/hybrid vehicles.

• MEMS Sensors – measure motion, pressure, and orientation for systems like airbags and ESC.
  These components are critical, and even minor failures can cause system malfunctions.

3. Mechanical Stress in Automotive Environments

Semiconductor components are exposed to:

• Road-induced shocks (potholes, bumps)

• Powertrain vibrations (engine, transmission)

• External forces (crashes, braking)

• Mounting stress (components near suspension)

These result in fatigue, deformation, and failure of internal semiconductor structures.

4. Failure Mechanisms Due to Shock and Vibration

Mechanical stress can lead to:

• Solder joint fatigue

• Silicon die cracking

• Bond wire breakage

• Delamination of packaging

• PCB trace or lead fractures
  These failures affect both electrical performance and device reliability.

5. Importance of Reliability Testing

Testing simulates real-world stress to ensure:

• Component durability

• Design validation

• Regulatory compliance (e.g., AEC-Q100, ISO 16750)

• Root cause analysis
  Such testing ensures safe operation over the vehicle’s lifetime.

6. Mechanical Testing Standards

Commonly used standards:

• AEC-Q100 – for automotive-grade IC qualification.

• ISO 16750-3 – mechanical testing tailored to automotive.

• JEDEC JESD22 – shock and vibration protocols.

• MIL-STD-883 – military-grade stress tests influencing automotive protocols.

7. Challenges in Mechanical Reliability Assessment

• Inadequate test simulations – lab tests often fail to replicate multi-axis, random vibrations.

• Miniaturization reduces mechanical resilience.

• Complex materials and thermal effects complicate assessments.

8. Research Objectives

The study investigates the reliability of MCUs, power MOSFETs, and MEMS sensors under simulated shock and vibration, focusing on:

• Failure modes

• Packaging and design impacts

• Enhanced testing methods

• Design recommendations for improved mechanical resilience

9. Methodology Overview

A. Component Selection and Testing Goals

• MCUs: From NXP, Infineon, TI. Tested for performance drift and packaging failures (e.g., QFP, BGA).

• MOSFETs: From STMicro, Infineon, ON Semi. Evaluated for switching behavior and thermal/mechanical degradation.

• MEMS Sensors: From Bosch, STMicro, Analog Devices. Monitored for signal drift, die cracking, and sensor offset.

B. Testing Setup

• Vibration Tests:

  • 3-axis electrodynamic shaker.

  • Sinusoidal and random profiles.

  • Tests run 8–24 hours across X, Y, Z axes.

• Shock Tests:

  • Pneumatic/drop-weight testers.

  • Shock pulses up to 1500g.

  • Testing at varying temperature and humidity.

Conclusion

The investigation into the reliability of semiconductor components under mechanical shock and vibration has highlighted several critical insights relevant to modern automotive systems. Through rigorous testing and analysis of microcontrollers, power MOSFETs, and MEMS sensors, it is evident that mechanical stress significantly contributes to both immediate and long-term failures. Failure mechanisms such as bond wire fatigue, die cracking, delamination of packaging materials, and PCB trace fractures were commonly observed. These failure modes were more prevalent in components lacking robust packaging or thermal management features. Notably, MEMS sensors exhibited higher sensitivity to random vibration and shock due to their mechanical structures. The data also revealed that elevated operating temperatures (up to 125°C) accelerated the degradation process—doubling failure rates compared to room-temperature conditions under identical mechanical stress cycles. This underscores the compounding effect of thermal and mechanical stress in automotive environments. Comparison with established reliability standards such as AEC-Q100 and MIL-STD-883 showed that while these protocols are comprehensive, real-world vehicle conditions may exceed standard test parameters. Thus, there is a strong need for evolving test procedures to better simulate dynamic on-road conditions. In conclusion, enhancing the mechanical robustness of semiconductor components demands a multifaceted approach. Recommendations include the adoption of flexible PCB mounts, improved underfill materials, advanced packaging techniques such as flip-chip designs, and better stress-relief structures. Integrating these improvements will not only increase component lifespan but also contribute to the safety and reliability of automotive electronics, especially in safety-critical applications like ADAS and powertrain control.

References

[1] Thukral, M. van Soestbergen, J.J.M. Zaal, R. Roucou, R.T.H. Rongen, W.D. van Driel, G.Q. Zhang, “Board level vibration test method of components for automotive electronics: State-of-the-art approaches and challenges,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 139, 2022, Article No. 114830. [2] Yingyu Xu, Shuibin Liu, Chunhua He, Heng Wu, Lianglun Cheng, Guizhen Yan, Qinwen Huang, “Reliability of MEMS inertial devices in mechanical and thermal environments: A review,” Heliyon, Vol. 10, 2024, Article No. e27481. [3] R. Roucou, J.J.M. Zaal, J. Jalink, R. de Heus, R. Rongen, “Effect of Environmental and Testing Conditions on Board Level Vibration,” 2016 IEEE 66th Electronic Components and Technology Conference. [4] V. Thukral, M. van Soestbergen, J.J.M. Zaal, R. Roucou, R.T.H. Rongen, W.D. van Driel, G.Q. Zhang, “Board level vibration test method of components for automotive electronics: State-of-the-art approaches and challenges,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 139, 2022, Article No. 114830. [5] F. Hosseinabadi, S. Chakraborty, S.K. Bhoi, G. Prochart, D. Hrvanovic, O. Hegazy, “A Comprehensive Overview of Reliability Assessment Strategies and Testing of Power Electronics Converters,” IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, Vol. 5, 2024, pp. 473–490. [6] M. Bonato, D. Delaux, “Reliability Vibrations Tests in Automotive,” Conference Paper, Valeo, 2015. [7] G. ?laski, M. Spad?o, J. Marcinkiewicz, W. Konieczny, “Analysis and Experimental Tests of Potential New Mounting Techniques for Use in Vibration Testing of Electric Vehicle Battery Packs on Electromagnetic Exciters: Advantages and Disadvantages,” Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2024, Article 2920. [8] E. Suhir, “Dynamic Response of Electronic Systems to Shocks and Vibrations: Application of Analytical (Mathematical) Modeling,” EPJ Web of Conferences, Vol. 26, 2012, Article 05002. [9] T. Peng, Z. You, “Reliability of MEMS in Shock Environments: 2000–2020,” Micromachines, Vol. 12, 2021, Article 1275. [10] F. Blaabjerg, H. Wang, I. Vernica, B. Liu, P. Davari, “Reliability of Power Electronic Systems for EV/HEV Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 109, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1060–1076. [11] Japanese Standards Association, JIS D 1601-1995: Vibration Testing Methods for Automobile Parts, Translated Edition. Japanese Industrial Standard, 1995. [12] J. Jalink, R. Roucou, J.J.M. Zaal, J. Lesventes, R.T.H. Rongen, “Effect of PCB and Package Type on Board Level Vibration Using Vibrational Spectrum Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), 2017, pp. 247–254. [13] M. Jannoun, Y. Aoues, E. Pagnacco, P. Pougnet, A. El-Hami, “Probabilistic Fatigue Damage Estimation of Embedded Electronic Solder Joints under Random Vibration,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 78, 2017, pp. 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2017.08.005

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Nikunj Chandrakant Gediya. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.