Genu valgum is a condition where an individual\'s knees bend inward, touching each other and creating a \"knock-kneed\" look, which may lead to discomfort and difficulties with walking. Commonly known as knock knees, genu valgum is a coronal plane deformity of the lower limb that is often seen in pediatric orthopedic settings. This review focuses on distinguishing between physiological and pathological genu valgum, highlighting the significance of a thorough clinical history, physical examination, and radiographic assessment for accurate diagnosis. Although it is usually a normal variation of growth that appears between ages 2 and 5 and typically resolves on its own by age 7, it is essential to differentiate between physiological and pathological genu valgum to ensure proper treatment. Physiological genu valgum is usually symmetrical, associated with typical height, and seldom leads to functional issues. Conversely, pathological genu valgum can arise from injuries, metabolic conditions (like rickets), skeletal abnormalities, tumors, or systemic illnesses, and is marked by asymmetry, progress that exceeds the anticipated age for correction, or notable functional limitations. The evaluation starts with a thorough clinical history that emphasizes growth, development, family patterns, and dietary habits. A comprehensive physical assessment involves measuring the tibiofemoral angle or the intermalleolar distance, analyzing limb alignment and gait, and checking for rotational deformities or ligament laxity. Imaging is generally utilized only for cases with unusual characteristics, such as asymmetry, abnormal height, or suspected underlying conditions. X-rays, especially long-leg standing images, are useful for determining mechanical axis deviations and assist in planning for surgery.
Management typically follows a conservative approach in physiological cases, where observation is the key strategy. Bracing and orthotic devices are generally discouraged due to their limited effectiveness and low adherence rates. For growing children, guided growth techniques like hemi-epiphysiodesis using staples, plates, or screws are preferred, while osteotomy is typically reserved for patients with fully developed skeletons or when rapid correction is essential. In certain cases that necessitate concurrent limb lengthening, external fixators may be used. This review emphasizes the clinical presentation, evaluation, and treatment alternatives for genu valgum in children, with the goal of assisting clinicians in distinguishing benign growth variations from significant underlying problemsand guiding appropriate care to prevent long-term consequences.
Introduction
???? Overview
Genu valgum, or knock knees, is a common lower limb condition in children, typically part of normal development but occasionally indicative of underlying pathology. Most cases are physiologic and self-correct with age, but pathologic forms may cause discomfort, gait issues, and require intervention.
???? Normal vs. Abnormal Development
Physiologic Genu Valgum:
A normal growth phase starting at age 2 and peaking between 3–4 years.
Usually resolves by age 7–8 without treatment.
No pain, asymmetry, or functional limitations.
Obesity may delay resolution due to added joint stress.
Pathologic Genu Valgum:
Persists or worsens beyond expected age.
Linked to metabolic disorders (e.g., rickets), genetic conditions, trauma, infection, or obesity.
Symptoms include pain, postural instability, altered gait, and joint stress.
May lead to long-term complications if untreated.
???? Etiology (Causes)
Unilateral Genu Valgum: Often pathological; caused by localized trauma, infection, or tumor.
Bilateral Genu Valgum: Typically physiological but may indicate skeletal or metabolic disorders if persistent.
Obesity: Adds biomechanical stress, increasing the risk of angular deformities.
Vitamin D Deficiency (Rickets): Weakens bones, a common historical and present-day cause.
Rotational Deformities:
Intoeing: Common, usually resolves naturally.
Tibial Torsion: Developmental; deviations may affect gait and alignment.
Angular Variations: Influenced by genetics, joint structure (e.g., Q-angle), and biomechanical stress.
???? Assessment & Evaluation
History and physical examination are primary tools.
Key assessments:
Tibiofemoral angle
Intermalleolar distance
Rotational profile
Gait analysis
Radiographs:
Only in cases of asymmetry, persistent deformity, or suspicion of pathology.
Used to evaluate mechanical axis and joint angles.
???? Treatment Protocol
Observation:
For physiologic cases in children <6 years with mild deformities.
Conservative Management:
Weight control, physical therapy, orthotics for mild symptomatic cases.
Surgical Intervention:
Hemiepiphysiodesis (growth modulation): Best for growing children with progressive deformity.
Osteotomy: For older children or severe cases; may involve external fixation for gradual correction.
Post-treatment:
Monitoring and rehabilitation are essential to ensure proper limb alignment and prevent recurrence.
???? Key Takeaways
Genu valgum is common and often harmless in young children but warrants further evaluation if asymmetrical, persistent, or associated with pain or dysfunction.
Obesity and vitamin D deficiency are modifiable risk factors.
Early detection and appropriate treatment are crucial for preventing long-term complications like joint degeneration and mobility limitations.
Conclusion
Genu valgum, commonly known as knock knees, is a frequent pediatric issue that often raises concerns among parents, mainly due to its visible deformity in early childhood. However, in many instances, genu valgum is merely a benign, physiological variant of growth and development that usually resolves on its own without any intervention. It tends to be most prominent between the ages of 3 and 5, and typically diminishes as the child matures, particularly by around 7 years old. It is crucial for healthcare providers to reassure parents about this normal developmental trend while also being alert to unusual presentations. Lower limb deformities in children, including genu valgum, can be classified into physiological and pathological types. Physiological genu valgum is symmetrical and non-progressive, generally not affecting functionality. It often appears alongside other normal variations such as flatfoot and ligament laxity. On the other hand, pathological genu valgum is marked by asymmetry, a progressive nature, short stature, or additional systemic symptoms. The causes of these pathological cases can include metabolic bone disorders like rickets, trauma, infections, genetic syndromes, and skeletal dysplasias. These situations often necessitate an in-depth evaluation, which may involve radiographic imaging and, at times, laboratory tests to ascertain the root cause.
Assessing genu valgum involves a thorough clinical evaluation that includes developmental history, family medical history, nutritional status, and analysis of the child\'s gait. Measuring the tibiofemoral angle and intermalleolar distance assists in quantifying the deformity, while evaluations of rotational profile and ligamentous laxity help distinguish between true valgus deformities and those caused by rotational issues. Radiologic imaging is typically reserved for children exhibiting warning signs such as asymmetry, significant deformity, or lack of improvement as they age.
Management approaches greatly depend on the severity and the underlying cause. Physiological genu valgum usually requires just observation and reassurance. The use of braces or orthotic devices has not consistently proven beneficial and is generally not advised. Conversely, pathological or persistent genu valgum, especially when linked to considerable functional impairments, aesthetic issues, or abnormal mechanical alignment, may call for surgical intervention. Growth modulation methods like guided growth through hemi-epiphysiodesis are preferred for skeletally immature children, whereas osteotomy is an option for older children or those with severe or rigid deformities. Care following surgery, which includes physiotherapy and monitoring for complications like overcorrection or recurrence, is vital for ensuring positive outcomes.
References
[1] Vidya Rahmayunissa Swandi Putri, Ni Wayan Tianing, Agung Wiwiek Indrayani, Ari Wibawa, Sayu Aryantari Putri Thanaya. Prevalence of Genu Valgum in Children Aged 10-12 Years with Excessive Body Weight (Overweight/Obesity) in Sanur Kaja Village, Denpasar. Jurnal Epidemiologi Kesehatan Komunitas 5 (2), 2020, 77-81.
[2] Mozafaripour E, Rajabi R, Minoonejad H. Anatomical Alignment of Lower Extremity in Subjects With Genu Valgum and Genu Varum Deformities. Physical Treatments. 2018; 8(1):27-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/ptj.
[3] Dr. Ganavi Ramagopal.Bow legs and knock knees: is it physiological or pathological?.International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2016 May;3(2): 687-691. http://www.ijpediatrics.com.
[4] Gregory R. White, MD, and Gregory A. Mencio, MD. Genu Valgum in Children: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Alternatives. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Vol 3, No 5, September/October 1995 : 275-283
[5] Dirk Zajonz, Eckehard Schumann, Magdalena Wojan, Fabian B. Kübler, Christoph Josten, Ulf Bühligen and Christoph E. Heyde. Treatment of Genu Valgum in Children by Means of Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis Using Eight-Plates: Short-Term Findings. Zajonz et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2017) 18:456. DOI 10.1186/s12891-017-1823-7
[6] Angelin Mersha, Dr. Venkatachalam. K, Dr. Arun Kumar C, Dr. Vibishek Raj .P, Genu Valgum. International Journal of Scientific Research. Vol 9. October 2020. DOI : 10.36106/ijsr https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347560346.
[7] Khrystyne Tschinkel, Rebecca Gowland. Knock-knees: Identifying Genu Valgum and Understanding its Relationship to Vitamin D Deficiency in 18th to 19th Century Northern England. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology • September 2020. 1-12. DOI: 10.1002/oa.2919. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344079946.
[8] DH Sutherland, R Olshen. The development of mature gait. Copyright 1980 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Vol 62-A.(3)1980;62:336-353. www.jbjs.org.
[9] Amrit Goyal, Vikas Gupta, Meenakshi Goyal, Rajesh Chandra, Vinod K. Sharma. Genu valgum Deformity – Correction by a Wedgeless Implantless Femoral “V” Osteotomy. Acta Orthopædica Belgica, Vol.87-2 - 2021
[10] Currarino G, Pinckney LE. Genu Valgum After Proximal Tibial Fractures in Children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981 May;136(5):915-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.136.5.915. PMID: 6784526. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6784526/.
[11] Farid Mohammed, Varun Aggarwal, Yasir Ali Khan, Amit Verma, Sudhir Kushwaha. Management of neglected Genu Valgum by Limb Reconstruction System. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery 2017;3(3):241-244. DOI: 10.18231/2395-1362.2017.0046.
[12] Satyake Bakshi, Sathya A. A Deep Learning-based Approach in Automated Detection of Genu Valgum. The Journal of Medical Sciences, October-December 2018;4(4):91-94.
[13] Caitlyn M. Rerucha, MD; Caleb Dickison, DO; and Drew C. Baird, MD. Lower Extremity Abnormalities in Children. American Family Physician. August 15, 2017. Vol 96(4):226-233 www.aafp.org/afp.
[14] Stephanie Buchan, Simon Bennet, Matthew Barry. Genu Valgum in Children. Orthopaedics and Trauma. Vol 36(6), December 2022 : 311-316.
[15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877132722001051.
[16] David O. Ferguson, James A. Fernandes. Children\'s Orthopaedics - Lower limb alignment. Orthopaedics and Trauma. Vol 30(6) December 2016 : 539-546. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877132716301282.
[17] Madhish Patel; Ryan Nelson. Genu Valgum. StatPearls Publishing 2023. NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Bookshelf ID: NBK559244 PMID:32644670.
[18] Sabharwal, S., & Zhao, C. (2008). Pediatric lower limb deformities: principles of evaluation and management. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 42(4), 387–397.
[19] https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.43375.
[20] Scheid, D. L., & Sager, D. A. (2011). Evaluation and management of genu valgum in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 31(7), 738-743. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31822bd7db.
[21] Eberbach H, Mehl J, Feucht MJ, Bode G, Südkamp NP, Niemeyer P. Geometry of the Valgus Knee: Contradicting the Dogma of a Femoral-Based Deformity. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(4):909–914. PubMed.
[22] Mullaji AB, Sharma AK, Marawar SV, Kohli AF. Tibial torsion in non-arthritic Indian adults: A computer tomography study of 100 limbs. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42(3):309–313. PMC.
[23] Dodgin DA, De Swart RJ, Stefko RM, Wenger DR, Ko JY. Distal tibial-fibular derotation osteotomy for correction of tibial torsion: Review of technique and results in 63 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(1):95–101. PubMed.