This review explores kinetic energy harvesting via adaptive suspension resonance in vehicles, focusing on the conversion of vibrational energy into usable electrical power. It addresses the inefficiencies in traditional suspension systems and examines various energy harvesting mechanisms including electromagnetic, piezoelectric, and hydraulic transduction methods. The paper highlights the importance of adaptive resonance tuning to match varying road-induced vibration frequencies and discusses control strategies such as classical, modern, and intelligent systems. Challenges in practical implementation, such as mechanical complexity, retrofitting issues, and trade-offs between comfort and energy recovery, are also analysed. A comprehensive review of recent prototypes and their performance metrics is presented, emphasizing the potential of these technologies to contribute to vehicle electrification, fuel efficiency, and intelligent system integration. This review also highlights the comparative advantages and trade-offs among transduction methods across various suspension types. By addressing both theoretical principles and real-world limitations, it bridges the gap between concept and application. Emerging trends in hybrid systems and Al-based control strategies are discussed to guide future research directions.
Introduction
Overview and Motivation
Increasing concerns about energy sustainability and emission standards have driven research into alternative energy sources in vehicles.
Traditional suspension systems dissipate 10–16% of fuel energy as heat, especially in urban or off-road driving.
KEH aims to recover this wasted energy by converting suspension vibrations into usable electrical energy.
?? Advantages of KEH in Suspensions
Consistent energy source: Unlike regenerative braking, KEH operates continuously when the vehicle is moving.
Supports low-power onboard systems (e.g., sensors, lighting), reducing alternator load and improving fuel economy.
Fits with modern automotive trends: electrification, smart sensors, weight reduction, and wireless systems.
???? Challenges
Suspension vibrations vary with vehicle speed, terrain, and load, making frequency matching difficult.
Traditional fixed-frequency harvesters often perform poorly in real-world conditions.
To solve this, researchers are developing adaptive resonance mechanisms using:
Mechanical tuning
Variable stiffness materials
Intelligent control algorithms
???? Transduction Mechanisms in KEH
1. Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting (EMEH)
Principle: Converts motion between magnets and coils into electricity (Faraday’s Law).
Electrostatic: MEMS-scale; low scalability due to priming voltage.
Triboelectric: Promising lab results but issues with durability and material wear.
Hybrid systems: Combine piezoelectric and electromagnetic methods for broader frequency response, but are complex and bulky.
???? Design Considerations
Systems must balance energy harvesting with ride comfort and safety.
Effective KEH requires adaptability to irregular, broadband vibrations found in real driving conditions.
Technologies like adaptive tuning, multi-modal designs, and smart damping are key research areas.
Conclusion
This review has presented a comprehensive evaluation of kinetic energy harvesting (KEH) via adaptive suspension resonance in vehicles. Various transduction mechanisms—including electromagnetic, piezoelectric, hydraulic, and hybrid systems—offer distinct advantages depending on specific power demands, dynamic conditions, cost considerations, and target vehicle platforms. Each mechanism exhibits unique performance trade-offs, and their effectiveness depends not only on intrinsic material and transducer properties but also on suspension topology, excitation profile, and real-world deployment constraints.
The integration of adaptive resonance tuning strategies—mechanical, electromechanical, and intelligent control-based—has demonstrated significant potential in improving energy capture efficiency under dynamic road conditions. Mechanical tuning approaches offer low-power adjustability, while electromechanical and control-based systems provide real-time adaptability, albeit at the cost of higher complexity and power overhead. Hybrid architectures that combine passive and active control loops appear particularly promising for creating robust, scalable, and energy-efficient KEH systems.
Despite substantial advancements in modelling, simulation, and prototype validation, the transition from laboratory-scale experimentation to large-scale vehicular integration remains constrained. Challenges such as system durability, packaging constraints, electromagnetic interference, fluid losses in hydraulic units, and increased unsprung mass continue to hinder practical implementation. Moreover, manufacturing cost, regulatory compliance, and retrofitting compatibility must be addressed before widespread adoption becomes feasible.
Nevertheless, ongoing innovations in lightweight composites, printed piezoelectric materials, ultra-low-power electronics, and AI-driven tuning algorithms present transformative opportunities. With the automotive industry moving rapidly toward electrification, autonomous operation, and intelligent vehicle networks, KEH-enabled suspensions may evolve beyond energy harvesting into multi-functional systems that combine energy recovery, self-powered sensing, and adaptive ride control.
In conclusion, KEH-equipped suspension systems represent a compelling frontier in vehicular energy sustainability. Continued interdisciplinary research—spanning materials science, automotive dynamics, power electronics, and embedded AI—will be instrumental in enabling robust, modular, and self-powered KEH platforms capable of powering the next generation of smart, efficient, and autonomous vehicles.
References
[1] Wang, Y., and Zhu, L. (2019). Energy harvesting suspension: A review. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 438, 245–261.
[2] Li, X., Zhang, Q., and Chen, Y. (2020). Piezoelectric energy harvesting in automotive suspensions. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 82(2), 101–120.
[3] Yan, C., Zhang, X., and Huang, Q. (2021). Optimization of vehicle piezoelectric energy harvesters. Microsystem Technologies, 27(6), 1045–1053.
[4] Zhang, T., Li, S., and Gao, M. (2023). Design of an electro-hydraulic regenerative suspension. Energy Reports, 9, 4723–4735.
[5] Audi AG. (2016). Electromechanical rotary dampers (eROT). Technical Report.
[6] Zhang, Q., and Zhao, S. (2018). Broadband vibration energy harvesting via nonlinear resonance. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 273, 234–242.
[7] Zhao, M., Wang, H., and Lin, J. (2021). A hybrid electromagnetic-piezoelectric energy harvester for vehicle suspensions. Applied Energy, 286, 116505.
[8] Chen, Y., and Yu, Y. (2017). Dynamic modeling and testing of MMR-based vehicle KEH. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(11), 9767–9775.
[9] Zhao, Y., and Liu, J. (2018). Energy harvesting using rack and pinion electromagnetic dampers. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 346–360.
[10] Zhou, L., Zhang, M., and Pan, C. (2019). Efficiency analysis of ball screw-based suspension harvesters. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 133, 142–155.
[11] Huang, L., and Jiang, P. (2020). Design of linear generators for energy harvesting suspensions. Renewable Energy, 145, 1888–1896.
[12] Audi Media Center. (2016). eROT: Electromechanical rotary dampers in vehicle suspension. Audi Press Release.
[13] Zhao, L., and Gao, W. (2021). Mechanical motion rectifier for regenerative vehicle suspension. Smart Materials and Structures, 30(9), 095002.
[14] Zhang, H., and Wang, B. (2017). Challenges in deploying electromagnetic KEH in vehicles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 22(5), 2363–2371.
[15] Rao, S., and Karthik, V. (2022). Review on suspension-based energy harvesting mechanisms. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 23(1), 113–127.
[16] Li, C., and Tan, W. (2019). Magnet array design for improved generator output. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 295, 158–165.
[17] Tang, X., and Yang, Y. (2012). A review on piezoelectric energy harvesting mechanisms and materials. Smart Materials and Structures, 21(11), 113001.
[18] Niu, S., Wang, X., and Lin, Y. (2016). Piezoelectric harvesting in structural applications. Nano Energy, 30, 368–389.
[19] Xu, B., Zhao, C., and Xu, J. (2020). Multilayer PZT configuration for vehicular applications. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 31(4), 573–582.
[20] Yang, Y., and Tang, L. (2009). Impedance matching and energy optimization in PEH. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 323(1–2), 441–456.
[21] Lee, M., and Kim, Y. (2019). Self-powered sensors using piezoelectric modules in suspensions. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(5), 1946–1953.
[22] Gao, Y., and Li, P. (2018). Development of a hydraulic energy harvester for vehicle suspension. Renewable Energy, 125, 162–172.
[23] Lin, F., and Tan, Y. (2019). Electro-hydraulic regenerative suspension systems: Modeling and simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 93, 23–35.
[24] Zhang, D., and He, J. (2022). Field testing of EHERS prototype on buses. Energy Conversion and Management, 256, 115377.
[25] Ma, J., and Zhao, R. (2021). Hydraulic accumulator-based regenerative suspensions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 147, 107088.
[26] Wang, C., and Xu, D. (2020). Thermal and fluid loss analysis in hydraulic KEH. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 142(8), 081201.
[27] Beeby, S., and White, N. (2006). MEMS electrostatic energy harvesting systems. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 16(8), 139–145.
[28] Wang, Z.L. (2017). Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems. Nano Energy, 37, 1–3.
[29] Zhao, Z., and Yuan, Q. (2021). Hybrid piezoelectric-electromagnetic energy harvesters. Energy Reports, 7, 4565–4574.
[30] Tang, Y., and Chen, S. (2018). Road excitation modeling and vehicle response for energy harvesting. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 102, 57–72.
[31] Wu, H., and Chen, Z. (2020). Adaptive resonance control of piezoelectric harvesters for automotive vibration. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 31(6), 891–902.
[32] Liu, T., Zhang, J., and Wang, Y. (2022). Sliding mode control for semi-active KEH suspensions. Control Engineering Practice, 122, 105084.
[33] Singh, V., and Mehta, R. (2021). Model predictive control for vibration energy harvesting in vehicles. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 35(9), 4339–4348.
[34] Lin, J., and Yang, Z. (2020). ANNs for adaptive tuning of vehicle energy harvesters. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 10457–10469.