Review on Comparison of Composite Material Preparation: Traditional vs. Modern Methods and the Future Paradigm Shift

Abstract

Composite materials have emerged as essential solutions across industries due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, enhanced durability, and tailored functionality. This review presents a comprehensive comparison of traditional and modern composite material preparation techniques, highlighting their process mechanisms, advantages, and limitations. Traditional methods such as hand lay-up, vacuum bagging, and filament winding are evaluated alongside advanced techniques like solution mixing, in-situ polymerization, and additive manufacturing. Particular focus is given to the integration of nanotechnology, natural fiber reinforcements, and digital advancements such as 3D printing and digital twins. Furthermore, the paper identifies current challenges in processing, fiber-matrix compatibility, and sustainability. The study concludes by discussing future directions in smart composite systems, emphasizing eco-friendly materials, machine learning integration, and real-time process monitoring. This paradigm shift redefines composite fabrication for next-generation applications in aerospace, automotive, biomedical, and construction sectors.

Introduction

Composite materials are engineered by combining two or more distinct components to produce a new material with enhanced properties such as higher strength, lower weight, and cost-effectiveness. They typically consist of a matrix (metal, polymer, or ceramic) reinforced by fibers or particles. These materials are widely used across industries like biomedical, automotive, aerospace, and naval due to their improved mechanical performance and durability.

Evolution and Benefits:
Composite materials have evolved from traditional to advanced forms, incorporating hybrid fibers and nanotechnologies to improve wear resistance, lifespan, and environmental friendliness. Combining natural and synthetic fibers offers eco-friendly alternatives. Advanced manufacturing techniques such as additive manufacturing (3D printing), neural networks, and finite element analysis contribute to better composite design and production.

Preparation Methods:

• Traditional Methods: Include hand lay-up, open mold casting, vacuum bagging, pultrusion, spray-up, compression molding, and filament winding. These methods range from manual, low-cost approaches with some quality inconsistency to continuous production processes for uniform profiles. Vacuum bagging and infusion improve mechanical properties by reducing voids.

• Modern Methods: Encompass solution mixing, melt mixing, in-situ polymerization, resin transfer molding (RTM), electrospinning, and additive manufacturing. These techniques enhance filler dispersion, interfacial bonding, and enable high precision, customization, and complex structures. RTM is favored for aerospace due to high quality, while electrospinning produces nanofiber composites for biomedical uses. Additive manufacturing offers rapid prototyping and custom designs, although challenges remain in material variety and bonding quality.

Challenges and Advances:
Despite progress, issues like damage-free machining, uniform nanoparticle dispersion, and process control persist. Advanced modeling (digital twins) and machine learning help optimize production. Nanocomposites—polymers enhanced with nanoscale fillers—show significant property improvements.

Conclusion

The comparative review of traditional and modern composite preparation techniques highlights a transformative shift in material engineering. While traditional methods like hand lay-up and pultrusion continue to provide value in large-scale and cost-sensitive applications, modern and digital approaches offer precision, functional enhancement, and customization capabilities. The convergence of nanotechnology, additive manufacturing, machine learning, and digital twins has created a new frontier in smart and sustainable composite manufacturing. However, unresolved issues such as variability in natural fibers, interfacial bonding deficiencies, and lack of industrial-scale validation call for sustained research efforts. Ultimately, the future of composite materials lies in developing eco-compatible, intelligent, and high-performance systems that align with Industry 4.0 principles and circular economy goals. Collaborative research across materials science, data science, and manufacturing domains is key to unlocking the full potential of composites in global industries.

References

[1] Romdhane, L., & El-Sayegh, S. M. (2020). 3D printing in construction: Benefits and challenges. Int. J. Struct. Civ. Eng. Res, 9(4), 314-317. [2] Masaeli, R., Zandsalimi, K., Rasoulianboroujeni, M., & Tayebi, L. (2019). Challenges in three-dimensional printing of bone substitutes. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 25(5), 387-397. [3] Genova, T., Roato, I., Carossa, M., Motta, C., Cavagnetto, D., & Mussano, F. (2020). Advances on bone substitutes through 3D bioprinting. International journal of molecular sciences, 21(19), 7012. [4] Chen, T., & Lin, Y. C. (2017). Feasibility evaluation and optimization of a smart manufacturing system based on 3D printing: a review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(4), 394-413. [5] Kumar, A. (2019). Classification of challenges in 3D printing for combined electrochemical and microfluidic applications: a review. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 25(7), 1328-1346. [6] Wu, H., Chen, X., Xu, S., & Zhao, T. (2023). Evolution of Manufacturing Defects of 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Composites with Processing Parameters: A Micro-CT Analysis. Materials, 16(19), 6521. [7] Ambone, T., Torris, A., & Shanmuganathan, K. (2020). Enhancing the mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid using nanocellulose. Polymer Engineering & Science, 60(8), 1842-1855. [8] Kuentz, L., Salem, A., Singh, M., Halbig, M. C., & Salem, J. A. (2016, January). Additive manufacturing and characterization of polylactic acid (PLA) composites containing metal reinforcements. In International Conference and Expo on Advanced Ceramics and Composites (No. GRC-E-DAA-TN29146). [9] Vardhan, G. H., Charan, G. H., Reddy, P. S., & Kumar, K. S. (2014). 3D printing: The dawn of a new era in manufacturing. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 2(8), 2373-2376. [10] Slaymaker, J., Woolley, J., & Hirani, S. (2023). 3D Printing in Orthodontics: An Introduction. SVOA-Dentistry, 4, 229-241. [11] Paripooranan, C. S., Abishek, R., Vivek, D. C., & Karthik, S. (2020, December). An implementation of AR enabled digital twins for 3-D printing. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Smart Electronic Systems (iSES)(Formerly iNiS) (pp. 155-160). IEEE. [12] Kantaros, A., Piromalis, D., Tsaramirsis, G., Papageorgas, P., & Tamimi, H. (2021). 3D printing and implementation of digital twins: Current trends and limitations. Applied System Innovation, 5(1), 7. [13] Wang, Y., Aslani, F., Dyskin, A., & Pasternak, E. (2023). Digital twin applications in 3D concrete printing. Sustainability, 15(3), 2124. [14] Bhattarai, P. M., Shrestha, P., & Chohan, R. (2022). Digital twin and its implementation in 3D printing: A research review. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 10(07), 49-68. [15] Pozhanka, M., &Zagrai, A. (2024, May). Digital twin in the real-time ultrasonic assessment of additively manufactured PLA parts. In Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems XVIII (Vol. 12951, pp. 97-108). SPIE. [16] Butt, J., &Mohaghegh, V. (2022). Combining digital twin and machine learning for the fused filament fabrication process. Metals, 13(1), 24. [17] Kumar, V., Singh, R., Kumar, R., Ranjan, N., & Hussain, M. (2023). ABS-PLA-Al composite for digital twinning of heritage buildings. Materials Letters, 346, 134536. [18] Hu, C., Hau, W. N. J., Chen, W., & Qin, Q. H. (2021). The fabrication of long carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites via fused deposition modelling: Experimental analysis and machine learning. Journal of Composite Materials, 55(11), 1459-1472. [19] Nugroho, W. T., Dong, Y., & Pramanik, A. (2021). 3D printing composite materials: A comprehensive review. Composite Materials, 65-115. [20] Somireddy, M. (2021). Fabrication of composite structures via 3D printing. Fused deposition modeling Based 3D printing, 255-276. [21] Kalsoom, U., Nesterenko, P. N., & Paull, B. (2016). Recent developments in 3D printable composite materials. RSC advances, 6(65), 60355-60371. [22] Singh, B., Kumar, R., & Chohan, J. S. (2020). Polymer matrix composites in 3D printing: A state of art review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 1562-1567. [23] Al Mahmood, A., Mobin, A., Morshed, R., & Zaman, T. (2017). Characterization of glass fibre reinforced polymer composite prepared by hand layup method. Am. J. Biosci. Bioeng, 5(1), 8-11. [24] Andresen, F. R. (2001). Open molding: Hand lay-up and spray-up. In Composites (pp. 450-456). ASM International. [25] Grabowski, L., Baier, A., & Sobek, M. (2017, August). Molding of strength testing samples using modern PDCPD material for purpose of automotive industry. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 227, No. 1, p. 012051). IOP Publishing. [26] Talapov, V. V., & Melnikov, V. (2020). Investigation of Low Rotational Speeds Effect during Centrifugal Casting on the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Material. Key Engineering Materials, 836, 6-12. [27] Hall, W., Javanbakht, Z., Hall, W., & Javanbakht, Z. (2021). Advanced methods—vacuum bagging and prepreg moulding. Design and Manufacture of Fibre-Reinforced Composites, 55-68. [28] Muralidhara, B., Babu, S. K., & Suresha, B. (2020). Utilizing vacuum bagging process to prepare carbon fiber/epoxy composites with improved mechanical properties. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27, 2022-2028. [29] Abdurohman, K., Satrio, T., Muzayadah, N. L., & Teten. (2018, November). A comparison process between hand lay-up, vacuum infusion and vacuum bagging method toward e-glass EW 185/lycal composites. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1130, p. 012018). IOP Publishing. [30] Ren, L., & Zhang, D. (2025). Effect of Double-Vacuum-Bag Process on the Void Evolution in Composite Laminates. Fibers and Polymers, 1-10. [31] Joshi, S. C. (2012). The pultrusion process for polymer matrix composites. In Manufacturing techniques for polymer matrix composites (PMCs) (pp. 381-413). Woodhead Publishing. [32] Fairuz, A. M., Sapuan, S. M., Zainudin, E. S., & Jaafar, C. N. A. (2014). Polymer composite manufacturing using a pultrusion process: A review. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(10), 1798. [33] Minchenkov, K., Vedernikov, A., Safonov, A., & Akhatov, I. (2021). Thermoplastic pultrusion: A review. Polymers, 13(2), 180. [34] Esfandiari, P., Silva, J. F., Novo, P. J., Nunes, J. P., & Marques, A. T. (2022). Production and processing of pre-impregnated thermoplastic tapes by pultrusion and compression moulding. Journal of Composite Materials, 56(11), 1667-1676. [35] Andrianov, A., Tomita, E. K., Veras, C. A. G., & Telles, B. (2022). A low-cost filament winding technology for university laboratories and startups. Polymers, 14(5), 1066. [36] Zhezhova, S., Srebrenkoska, S., Naseva, S., & Srebrenkoska, V. (2016). DESIGN OF POLYMER COMPOSITE PIPES PRODUCED BY FILAMENT WINDING TECHNOLOGY. Machines. Technologies. Materials., 10(1), 26-28. [37] Misri, S., Ishak, M. R., Sapuan, S. M., & Leman, Z. (2015). Filament winding process for Kenaf fibre reinforced polymer composites. Manufacturing of Natural Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites, 369-383. [38] Özbay, B., Bekem, A., & Ünal, A. (2020). Manufacturing of hybrid yarn thermoplastic composites by the method of filament winding. Gazi University Journal of Science, 33(1), 214-227. [39] Zegeye, A. D., Delele, M. A., Tsegaw, A. A., & Bogale, T. S. (2023). Spray and deposition characteristics of unsaturated polyester resin applied for impregnating long fiber preform composites. Polymer Composites, 44(10), 6646-6660. [40] Kikuchi, T., Fudauchi, A., Koshino, T., Narita, C., Endo, A., Takai, Y., ... & Hamada, H. (2013, November). Mechanical property of CFRP by carbon spray up method. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 56185, p. V02AT02A045). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. [41] Ha, S. K., Jang, J. G., Park, S. H., & Lee, H. K. (2015). Advanced spray multiple layup process for quality control of sprayed FRP composites used to retrofit concrete structures. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141(1), 04014060. [42] Ueng, S. K., Chen, L. G., & Jen, S. Y. (2018). Voxel-based virtual manufacturing simulation for three-dimensional printing. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(6), 1687814018781632. [43] Ueng, S. K., Chen, L. K., & Jen, S. Y. (2017, May). A preview system for 3D printing. In 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) (pp. 1508-1511). IEEE. [44] Cai C, Zhou J, Wu L, Wang K, Xu D, Ouyang H. Design and numerical validation of quasi-zero-stiffness metamaterials for very low-frequency band gaps. Compos Struct 2020;236:111862. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.111862. [45] Tan X, Wang B, Yao Y, Yao K, Kang Y, Zhu S, Chen S, Xu P. Programmable Buckling-based negative stiffness metamaterial. Mater Lett 2020;262:127072. [46] Hamzehei R, Zolfagharian A, Dariushi S, Bodaghi M. 3D-printed bio-inspired zero Poisson’s ratio graded metamaterials with high energy absorption performance. Smart Mater Struct 2022;31:35001. [47] Ye M, Gao L, Li H. A design framework for gradually stiffer mechanical metamaterial induced by negative Poisson’s ratio property. Mater Des 2020;192: 108751. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2020.108751. [48] Montazeri A, Homafar F, Mahnama M. A novel 3D compression-torsion mechanical metamaterial with cubic cells based on askew star mechanism: design, simulation, and experimental validations. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2022. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15376494.2022.2150338. [49] Huang J, Fu M, Zheng B. A novel series of mechanical metamaterials with sign- changing coefficient of thermal expansion and their parameter analysis. Compos Struct 2022;299:116082. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.116082 [50] Sadegh Ebrahimi M, Hashemi R, Etemadi E. In-plane energy absorption characteristics and mechanical properties of 3D printed novel hybrid cellular structures. J Mater Res Technol 2022;20:3616–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JMRT.2022.08.064. [3] [51] Layman CN, Naify CJ, Martin TP, Calvo DC, Orris GJ. Highly anisotropic elements for acoustic pentamode applications. Phys Rev Lett 2013;111:024302. https://doi. org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.111.024302/FIGURES/6/MEDIUM. [52] Tan X, Wang B, Yao K, Zhu S, Chen S, Xu P, Wang L, Sun Y. Novel multi-stable mechanical metamaterials for trapping energy through shear deformation. Int J Mech Sci 2019;164:105168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2019.105168. [53] Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, Shusteff M, DeOtte J, Duoss EB, Kuntz JD, Biener MM, Ge Q, Jackson JA, Kucheyev SO, Fang NX, Spadaccini CM. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 2014;344:1373–7. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/SCIENCE.1252291/SUPPL_FILE/ZHENG.SM.PDF. [54] Filipov ET, Redoutey M. Mechanical characteristics of the bistable origami hypar. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 2018;25:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EML.2018.10.001. [55] Díez-Pascual, A. M. (2022). Inorganic-nanoparticle modified polymers. Polymers, 14(10), 1979. [56] Nagavally, R. R. (2017). Composite materials-history, types, fabrication techniques, advantages, and applications. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng, 5(9), 82-87. [57] Hussain, L., Praveen, P., Ragavu, S., Pahwa, S., Jain, A., RJ, A., & Praveena, K. (2024). The Development of Composites Materials: From Conventional to Innovative Uses. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 529, p. 01050). EDP Sciences. [58] Margarita, V. (2024). MODERN APPROACHES TO THE USE OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS IN CONSTRUCTION. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(07), 57-65. [59] Bosacka, A., & Zienkiewicz-Strza?ka, M. (2020). Actual challenges, opportunities, and perspectives of composite materials. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio AA–Chemia, 74(1), 41-54. [60] Shah, A., Dayo, A. Q., Wagan, R. A., Sajid, A., Shaikh, A., & Mehdi, G. (2019). A short review on the manufacturing problems of natural fiber reinforced composites. Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences, 9(2), pp-68. [61] Rehman, N. U., Ullah, K. S., Sajid, M., Ihsanullah, I., & Waheed, A. (2024). Preparation of Sustainable Composite Materials from Bio?Based Domestic and Industrial Waste: Progress, Problems, and Prospects?A Review. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 8(8), 2300587. [62] Seal, B., Chaudhary, V., & Sadhu, S. D. (2023). Development of natural fiber reinforced nanocomposites: future scope, challenges, and applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 78, 614-619. [63] Warden, G. F. (2018). Development of an Additive Manufacturing Compression Molding Process for Low Cost In-House Prototyping. [64] Sun, Z., Xiao, J., Tao, L., Wei, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, H., ... & Yu, M. (2018). Preparation of high-performance carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites by compression resin transfer molding. Materials, 12(1), 13. [65] Rahaman, M., Aldalbahi, A., & Bhagabati, P. (2019). Preparation/processing of polymer–carbon composites by different techniques. Carbon-containing polymer composites, 99-124. [66] Sui, G., Liu, D., Liu, Y., Ji, W., Zhang, Q., & Fu, Q. (2019). The dispersion of CNT in TPU matrix with different preparation methods: solution mixing vs melt mixing. Polymer, 182, 121838. [67] Kumar, N., Soren, S., Nirala, A., Almakayeel, N., Yunus Khan, T. M., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Distribution of carbon nanotubes in an aluminum matrix by a solution-mixing process. ACS omega, 8(37), 33845-33856. [68] Ledford, W. K., Sabury, S., & Kilbey, S. M. (2021). Enhancing nanomaterial dispersion and performance of parts printed via FFF by a solution casting method. MRS Communications, 11, 122-128. [69] Ahmed, A., & Xu, L. (2020). Numerical analysis of the electrospinning process for fabrication of composite fibers. Thermal Science, 24(4), 2377-2383. [70] Toriello, M., Afsari, M., Shon, H. K., & Tijing, L. D. (2020). Progress on the fabrication and application of electrospun nanofiber composites. Membranes, 10(9), 204. [71] Gupta, R., Staknevicius, R., & Pancholi, K. (2019). Rapid multifunctional composite part manufacturing using controlled in-situ polymerization of PA6 nanocomposite. Procedia CIRP, 85, 61-65. [72] Behm, J. E., Waite, B. R., Hsieh, S. T., & Helmus, M. R. (2018). Benefits and limitations of three-dimensional printing technology for ecological research. BMC ecology, 18, 1-13. [73] Li, R., Ting, Y. H., Youssef, S. H., Song, Y., & Garg, S. (2021). Three-dimensional printing for cancer applications: research landscape and technologies. Pharmaceuticals, 14(8), 787. [74] Pereira, G. R., Gasi, F., & Lourenço, S. R. (2019). Review, analysis, and classification of 3D printing literature: types of research and technology benefits. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci, 6(6), 167-187. [75] Karakurt, I., & Lin, L. (2020). 3D printing technologies: techniques, materials, and post-processing. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 28, 134-143. [76] Shelare, S., Aglawe, K., Giri, S., & Waghmare, S. (2023). Additive manufacturing of polymer composites: applications, challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences (IJEMS), 30(6), 872-872. [77] Gajbhiye, T. S., Waghmare, S., Dhande, M., Gondane, R., Giripunje, M., Shelare, S., &Belkhode, P. (2024). Polymer composite additive manufacturing: Applications, challenges and opportunities. Materials Today: Proceedings. [78] Park, S., Shou, W., Makatura, L., Matusik, W., & Fu, K. K. (2022). 3D printing of polymer composites: Materials, processes, and applications. Matter, 5(1), 43-76. [79] Krawczak, P. (2015). Additive Manufacturing of plastic and polymer composite parts–promises and challenges of 3D printing. eXPRESS Polymer Letters Vol. 9, No. 11 (2015) 959.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Negara Gulti Abetu, Devarakonda Harishkumar, Endalkachew Mosisa, Adugna Fikadu, Lemi Negara, Shimelis Tamene Gobina, Alemu Merga. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.